Touches can you rate the players including the subs?
I heard Andrews looked a good deal?
Andrews brought energy and did his chances no harm. He play little greedy on some occasions but he was playing for a spot so I could understand that.
Ceasar on the other hand was trying too hard and had a bad night, poor passes, losing ball, running into cul de sacs. He did pull off the beat of the night that Touches mention though. Both he and Joevin were playing as midfielders rather than outside forwards so that affected their ability to create or get involved in the attack as much as we would have wanted as Hart tried the 2 fwds again in this game.
Joevin did better when Hart changed the system and moved Hyland forward to support the striker with Boucaud and Kevan George behind him.
Boucaud changed the game. He brought leadership, distribution, composure and drive when he came on. He was real quarelling with all the players for any sloppiness.
I think Bakr and Bateau is first choice CB pairing, not that Marshall do anything wrong but those two have a calm, commanding presence...and a definite threat at set pieces, moreso than Andrews and Lawrence did based on stats already.
Williams seems to be first choice LB. David looked solid back up but not the same going forward.
Cyrus was solid but didn't have much in front of him
Kenwyne did his job. Glenn looked like we not losing much when Kenwyne not there.
Cummings had his worst game in national colours as the coach tried him as a forward for Jones to knock the ball onto. Does not seem like his type of role. Hart should have tried Plaza alongside Jones if he wanted to test the 4-4-2 sometime in the two games, I think.
Jan Michael looked miles better than Marvin Phillips in terms of how the defence looked and distribution as he didn't have much to do. Also, if we counting clean-sheets...Jan Michael has been in the goal for all of the recent ones.
I eh no Touches but I hope you doh mind mih little insights