...Something could be said about the allegedly "limited supporting cast ..."
yeah... like is a load ah shit?
90 team (arguably the weakest of the three teams)
Goycochea (after Pumpido broke his leg)
... something could also be said about the imaginary war that was taking place when Argentina played England in Mexico.
Bakes, you is a rel propaganda man tho...FIRST of all, YOU start with this Pele had less of a supporting cast thing, which as far as I am concerned is a bigger load of shit than anybody who said argentina's WC team were weak...
When I pointed out to you that Pele was surrounded by quality players..particularly in 1970, you side step and point out technicalties in my post and ignore the facts that prove THAT you talking rel shit saying those Brazil teams were weaker than any of the Argentina teams Maradona played on...
In 1958, Pele was a bit player who started on the bench at first then became more influential as the tournament went own but he did NOT carry Brazil to the title...FACT.
In 1962..he was injured early, GARRINCHA carried Brazil to the title. FACT.
In 1966..they lost...FACT.
In 1970..the Brazil team was considered one of greatest attacking units ever assembled..
Pele really had a weaker supporting cast than Maradona?
It doh help that a great number of men you listed in the SO-CALLED great Maradona supporting cast are defenders and goalkeepers...
But as i said earlier..THERE IS NO WAY TO TELL WHICH IS THE GREATEST..everything is objective..they are two great players from two different eras...we should leave it at that..
the greatest argument is a waste of time..
and Socafan...i hope is a arrow post you was attempting there..cuz you talk a large level of folly..let me guess Trinidad best product then is Evans Wise?