Boy when people jes jump on shit and claim it as fact it real painful yes.
There are photos of this Black John Hanson!
If he was indeed President of the Continental Congress when was photography invented?
Next point, the USA did not exist so how could John Hanson (a white man from Maryland) be the President of the United States. He served 364 days as president of the Confederation.
Anyway you people have the Hansons mixed up due to pranksters.
There are 2 Hansons, the white one was from Maryland and President of the Continental Congress (There was NO United States then) The Black John Hanson was born MUCH later and was a Senator in Liberia!
Simple deduction... how de ass he can have a photo when all dey had was portraits back in the days of the Continental Congress, the only people rewriting history is allyuh with allyuh comicbook history lessons
Breds, yuh think iz ah monkey yuh talking too or what??!! remember i iz the one who post the picture (not a portrait), and below the picture have a comment section where the ppl was debating and arguing bout the validity of the claim.
there was a fella "called steve T" who posted and talked about the same thing you referred too that there were two john hansons, the liberian and the real j hanson, plus i never believed that hanson was black anyway, so yuh not telling me nothing i didn't already know.
TBH, i don't know shyte about john hanson except for the fact that he was the first "ruler" of the confederation states, before washington, and if he ruled the states before washington, then wasn't he the first president?
i got excited when i read the title of the thread and thought freeman was going to shed some more light on the issue, but then disappointment set in tuh hear him talk soooo much sh!t!
i should have known better that when these fat face over pampered black yanks bored, they tend to spew sh!t all over the place, especially from their mouths, just like that david manning fella.