A few points...
1) We cannot compare our preparation to the US because it is a different situation. The US have more talent (well more technically equipped players than us) for Arena to look at..hence the need for more friendlies....TI just want more friendlies so Hardest get a sweat.
2) The MLS is out of season so the players are available to play friendlies outside of the FIFA date. Our first choice players are not available.
3) If we follow USA approach, we can use local players (i.e. PFL and other unattached players) to play friendlies against the likes of St Kitts, Barbados, etc...I doubt that will do Beenie any good because he has seen all the players
he wanted to see...Not the players I want him to see, TI wants him to see, Savannah Boy wants him to see, etc...
4) Although I may disagree with some of Leo's decisions...let me take a good look at 3 things...1) my resume as a successful international coach...hmmn..never coached ah damn team in my life. 2) the success of any forumites as an international caoch....hmmn..no success..however, if i am wrong, please correct me....3) Leo's resume....hmmn..very impressive. My point is Leo Beenhakker has a lot of experience that none of us have, I agree that we don't have to accept his every move as 100% correct but at the end of the day, I believe 100% that he is doing his very best to achieve success at the World Cup.
5) Carlos Alberto Parreira was severely criticised before the 1994 World Cup for 2 reasons..the team's style of play and his player selection (well Brazilian fans are worse than us and they always criticise..if allyuh think TI and his Hardest infatuation is bad...compared to Brazilians..he is nothing). After the winning the WC..he was still criticized. My point is no coach can please everybody even winning is sometimes not enough.
P.S.sorry about the long post..I am becoming like Alberta Trini....