Soca Warriors Online Discussion Forum
Sports => Football => Topic started by: truthseeker on October 26, 2005, 03:33:50 PM
-
The London Rusian crew were defeated on penalties by Charlton who matched their effort all ovr the pitch. A Man utd youth team beat Barnet 4-1... The fun begins... Carling Cup
-
This has been the worst 4 days for Chelsea since in the pass year and a 1/2.
Jose will be pissed. Pressure some men going and be sold in January
-
MAN U FOR LIFEEEEE
dis was chelsea side 2day
---cudicini--
---ferreria-- ---huth--- ---- terry --- ---bridge---
--- wright phillips-- --- gerimi--- ---- essien ---- ---- robben---
--- gudjonsen---
--- crespo----
full effing side
lampard for gudjonsen (60')
joe cole for SWP(60')
drogba for crespo(83')
buncha jokersss
-
Troy, they tie one game and loss one on penalties in carling cup and u talkin bout men leavin?
-
small magician, the back 4 only have one starter tho
-
but is not to say those defenders not good
chelsea had the best depth in the world
but money cant save you :devil:
-
Mourinho said he doesn't consider himself as unbeaten record broken, because it was on penalties and not in regular play. In the league, it would have registered as a draw.
Sounds to me like someone's in denial...... ::)
-
Troy, they tie one game and loss one on penalties in carling cup and u talkin bout men leavin?
A Two points to tell you why:
Mourinho don't like to lose at all wether it be in regular play or penalties.
They won that trophy last year now the cannot
Watch soon we will be hearing about some shake ups at Stanford Bridge
-
Wank mourinho... Dat f**ker hates to lose and I am glad that Charlton defeated them today because it may well give impetus to other teams that they have to face.
I am tired of hearing that they are invincible. They are a very good teams... consistent in how they play and their work ethic is second to none. But its easily noted that when they play a team that matches them tackle for tackle, they always look a bit lost because the over reliance on Robben or Duff to pull a rabbit out the arse is so predictable. Everton last week, now Charlton, who next... United!!!
Fire Bun Chelski... and Assnal..
-
wayyyyyz mourinho mus be well cussing....wat i like about him is he is a true competitor...sour loser jus becuz he likes to win and cant stand to lose...not good media wise and in the PR department but must make for one hell of a coach
-
sorry post respectfully deleted
-
small magician, the back 4 only have one starter tho
Fereira is their starting RB. Carvalho lost his place to Gallas.
-
i thought chelsea won ???
-
but is not to say those defenders not good
chelsea had the best depth in the world
but money cant save you :devil:
small you like manu ent but why nobody aint saying nothing about manu big money american owners wtf manu spending big money too so doh make it sound like is only chelsea that does buy in the whole of club football at least the owner know bout football that why he know who good himself and willing to buy them with your owner they boss man glazer, might buy michael vick and warren saap for manu just now cus he aint know the difference in the football :flamethrower:
-
small you like manu ent but why nobody aint saying nothing about manu big money american owners wtf manu spending big money too so doh make it sound like is only chelsea that does buy in the whole of club football at least the owner know bout football that why he know who good himself and willing to buy them with your owner they boss man glazer, might buy michael vick and warren saap for manu just now cus he aint know the difference in the football :flamethrower:
You obviously don't know what you are talking about.
United's owners have spent less than 10 Million this summer, the lowest expenditure by United for a long time. Also their aim is not to bankroll the club but to keep it profitable and make money.
United is very different to Chelsea because although they were the big money club for a long time their money is generated by football activities and they used success to buy more success.
With Chelsea it is the reverse. A big money man buys the club to put money into it in the hope that eventually it will be self-sufficient. As a club Chelsea is not making a profit and will not make a profit for several years.
-
small you like manu ent but why nobody aint saying nothing about manu big money american owners wtf manu spending big money too so doh make it sound like is only chelsea that does buy in the whole of club football at least the owner know bout football that why he know who good himself and willing to buy them with your owner they boss man glazer, might buy michael vick and warren saap for manu just now cus he aint know the difference in the football :flamethrower:
You obviously don't know what you are talking about.
United's owners have spent less than 10 Million this summer, the lowest expenditure by United for a long time. Also their aim is not to bankroll the club but to keep it profitable and make money.
United is very different to Chelsea because although they were the big money club for a long time their money is generated by football activities and they used success to buy more success.
With Chelsea it is the reverse. A big money man buys the club to put money into it in the hope that eventually it will be self-sufficient. As a club Chelsea is not making a profit and will not make a profit for several years.
they pay 7 for park 4 for van der sar and 1.5 for ben foster and that it less than 10 million you miss the maths class and them or wah and they pay nuff to renew shitty ferdinand contract alone as i plainly said yes chelsea does spend but doh talk like manu doh spend too and they only buy park not cus he good to make money in football crazy asia chelsea about buying good players you think people in ghana can afford a essien shirt
-
ohh and by the way i dont know if they are making a profit or not but that is not the bosses concern anyway....read:
Chelsea owner seeks 'fun and trophies'
By Jeff Randall
BBC Business Editor
Roman Abramovich
Roman Abramovich: "It's not about making money"
Sitting in one of Chelsea's luxurious millennium suites, Roman Abramovich has the perfect view of the club that he has just bought for £140m.
He appears to like what he sees and chats confidently about his plans.
In an exclusive interview with the BBC, the Russian oil tycoon explains to me why he's pumping a fortune into the west London side and what he's hoping for in return.
We communicate through an interpreter, Eugene Tenenbaum, who is also one of Abramovich's associates. His English is flawless; I hope his Russian is too.
"Money?" I ask Abramovich. "Is this deal about making a profit?"
He laughs. "No, it's not about making money. I have many much less risky ways of making money than this. I don't want to throw my money away, but it's really about having fun and that means success and trophies."