Forgive me for being presumptuous knowing this is very sad time on the forum, but it sound to me that this braod might have been stepping out on dude, and when he found out it look like he send for she tuh tell she he know what de fack she's been up too and might have pulled out his ting tuh scare she maybe tellin she tuh stop and the biatch got pissed that she was busted and pelt corn behind dude, and then went on about she was being abused.
i came to this conclusion bc she shot dude in his head back, that means he was going away from her. she wasn't no fearful for no damn life! she got caught in fackry and hated the fact that homie wont let her ride out tuh play she self so she retaliated.
no woman doh love ah man and buss corn on him while he was walking away from her, it's either shes ah black widow (pure killer) or she mad no arse! the only time ah woman does become so resentful is when she have another dude lined up, and she doh want no one get in the way of that.
i sure she must have told him "if i had ah gun right now i would shoot you", and he probably called her bluff and went for his ting loaded it and put it on the table and said "now yuh have a gun, shoot meh nah".
why else would you pull out ah gun on ah bitch yuh does normally man handle, guns are for formidable opponents. JMT.
Best yuh din say nutten.
Eh wehs your scene boy??!!
wehs the infatuation wid me all of ah sudden fella, how every time i post you come riding on meh dick like i eat yuh white fowl??
if is war yuh want wid me then declare it punk!! lets get it on if is war yuh want then lets gooooo bring it biatch!! or stop fackin riding me like ah mdfkn crack whore! you've been warned !!!
Iron sharpeneth iron. Somebody had tuh tell yuh.
What you wrote was inappropriate. Based on the facts presented, many of us have opinions and could engage in presumption and speculation, but frankly that would only inflame the thread, and what you wrote opened the door for just that. Let's not dishonor the man's passing by descending into baseless nonsense.
In other words, ah not riding for yuh. I just stated what others were thinking.
The other thing I want to say ... and this thread seems as appropriate as any ... is the following:
The forum has been riled up this week with a back and forth on race. While I think there's a space on this forum for discussion on race, I also think such discussion has to be constructive rather than destructive - even where asserted "truths" are "uncomfortable".
Daft was a man, a soldier, a husband, a football fan, an outdoorsman who fished and hunted, a law student, a political activist ... many, many things ... including being Indo-Trini. At the end of the day, I gleaned all those things about him without meeting him in person. The only one of those things that is a revelation to me subsequent to his death is his ethnicity ... and it matters not one ras to me. (If he posted under a different name before, I might even have known it before ... thinking of a poster who lived in the DC area). My point is ... now would be a good time to take stock of what the rules of engagement involving matters of race and ethnicity on the board are ... De bredda's passing is a collective loss, and just like his ethnicity is the last thing I learned about him ... It is the last thing we should remember given this week's exchanges.
I ponged Daft's political perspective openly and without regret. It needed ponging. But I did so respectfully. I can take that to my grave.
Like me, Daft was a sinologist. RIP soldier! It also caught my attention when he mentioned being in law school in the midst of all his "adventures". I will recall the photo of him fishing with his back to the camera (maybe taken by his wife) as emblematic of a man doing what he loved.
So ... JC, you iz ah man I would be open to siddung with and drink a cold one and reason. No doubt ... buh if yuh look in de mirror, yuh would see yuh was outta timing ... And in yuh heart yuh know it because of the words you used to start yuh comments.
Guidance.