u serious?
So If example
Rooney burst into the box with just the keeper to beat ..no defender in sight and square the ball to Berbatov to tap it in he off?
That is shit
goal..we were robbed
First of all, if you want to compare it should be a similar situation. Besides the fact that you compared an apple with an orange you didn’t even give us an offside situation (refer to FF’s post). Second, Touches has explained the rule where it now becomes clear that Primus was indeed offside. I can understand the argument about if he was level, but clearly part of his body is ahead of the guy.
In 2005 The International Football Association Board agreed a new decision in Law 11 that being "nearer to an opponent's goal line" meant that "any part of his head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second last opponent. The arms are not included in this definition."[1] This is taken to mean that any part of the attacking player named in this Decision 2 has to be past the part of the second last defender closest to his goal line (excluding the arms) and past the part of the ball closest to the defenders' goal line.
More of the same so far in the second half until Gay wasted a chance by hitting the crossbar.