Soca Warriors Online Discussion Forum

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Disgruntled_Trini on January 30, 2009, 10:19:07 AM

Title: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Disgruntled_Trini on January 30, 2009, 10:19:07 AM
Anybody woking or know somebody woking CLICO downtown?

I hear police outside dey with guns and commotion going on.

Waiting for the news to hear the bacchanal.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: fishs on January 30, 2009, 10:36:17 AM
Anybody woking or know somebody woking CLICO downtown?

I hear police outside dey with guns and commotion going on.

Waiting for the news to hear the bacchanal.

 Mih wife working CIB no guns and thing they just waiting to hear what going on , Montiel start a run on the bank last week and ah think they either going and say that the bank strong or wind up nothing in between.
Ah feel is the former because Monteil in the press conference.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: boss on January 30, 2009, 11:23:12 AM
This man twittering from the press conference:
http://twitter.com/keith_in_tnt

I'm confused...
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Disgruntled_Trini on January 30, 2009, 11:27:38 AM
It on 91.1 now as of 1:25 PM
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: D.H.W on January 30, 2009, 12:33:22 PM
clico need bailout, central bank takes over clico investment bank
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Blue on January 30, 2009, 02:07:13 PM
wow, well daz d end of trinidad
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: truetrini on January 30, 2009, 02:10:31 PM
CLICO have investment in Ft Lauderdale Fl.  Huge Hotels and de economy here cracked. 
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: jimbo on January 30, 2009, 03:45:55 PM
Government to bailout CL Financial
Published: January 30th, 2009

In a press release today it was announced that Government will bailout CL Financial, the parent company of Clico and Angostura.

Key points disclosed

• CL Financial is to divert its 55 per cent stake in Republic Bank and Methanol Holdings

• First Citizens will gain control of company's Republic Bank shares.


• Central Bank Governor assures depositors and policyholders that their money is safe.

• Mr Duprey says this is "not a crisis" it is the early addressing of the situation, a pre-emptive action.

Started out as a holding company for Colonial Life Insurance Company (Trinidad) Limited (Clico) in 1993, CL Financial is now one of the largest local conglomerates in the region, encompassing over 65 companies in 32 countries worldwide.

According to the company's website, its Industry Sectors range from:

•Banking & Financial Services
•Energy & Petrochemicals
•Forestry & Agriculture
•General Insurance
•Life Insurance
•Manufacturing, Retail & Distribution
•Marine Services
•Medical Services
•Real Estate
•Banking & Financial Services
•Energy & Petrochemicals
•Forestry & Agriculture
•General Insurance
•Life Insurance
•Manufacturing, Retail & Distribution
•Marine Services
•Medical Services
•Real Estate

What exactly does this mean...that First Citizen control Republic Bank money ??
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Bitter on January 30, 2009, 04:00:43 PM
GOVT BAILS OUT CLICO
Breaking News   

http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_news?id=161432124

Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams has announced that the Bank and the Ministry of Finance have taken control of the assets and liabilities of Colonial Life Insurance Company, Clico Investment Bank (CIB) and Caribbean Money Market Brokers (CMMB).

Following is the full text of the statement made by Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams at a press conference today:

Some of you may know that CIB has been facing liquidity challenges over the past few weeks. These challenges came to a head in the last few days when the bank began to face an unusually high level of withdrawal requests which put a strain on their available liquid resources. Clico has also been facing liquidity problems, though nowhere near the levels of CIB. Of course, given the close integration of these two financial institutions within the CL Financial Group. It is just a matter of time before Clico also begin to come under severe liquidity pressures. The Inspector of Financial Institutions and the Governor of the Central Bank met with the Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of CL Financial on January 7 2009. In a second meeting on January 13, 2009, Clico’s Chairman formally raised the issue of possible financial assistance from the Central Bank.

There is no doubt that the increase in CIB withdrawals and the nervousness seen at Clico have something to do with the depositors’ concerns about the impact of the sharp decline in methanol and real estate prices on CL Financial’s overall financial situation. In the Bank’s view however, the current financial difficulties being faced by CIB and Clico have more to do with four things:

*Excessive related-party transactions which carry significant contagion risks. I should note that the high level of concentration is not specifically prohibited by the present legislation.

*An aggressive high interest rate resource mobilization strategy to finance an equally high risk investments, much of which are in illiquid assets (including real estate both in Trinidad and Tobago and abroad).

*A very high leveraging of the Group’s assets, which constrains the potential amount of cash that could be raised from the asset sales. In our regular monitoring of CIB and of Clico since 2004 (when insurance supervision was transferred from the Ministry of Finance), the Central bank has consistently focused on these deficiencies but have been stymied by the inevitable challenge of change and by inadequacies in the legislative framework which do not give the Bank the authority to demand these changes. The Central bank is very conscious of the contagion risks that financial difficulties in an institution as vast as the CL Financial Group could have on the entire financial system of Trinidad and Tobago and indeed in the entire Caribbean region. For the record, ladies and gentlemen, the CL Financial Group has an imposing presence with potentially systemic consequences for the financial sector and the economy of Trinidad and Tobago and the entire region. For example:

1 The Group controls over ($100) billion of assets in at least 28 companies located throughout the Region and the world.

2 The Group’s financial interests cover several industry sectors including banking and financial services, energy, real estate and manufacturing and distribution. The four largest financial institutions in the Group manage assets of over $38 billion, over 25 percent of the country’s GDP.

3 In addition to Clico, among the Group’s holdings is the British American Insurance Company Limited, which is one of the main insurance companies in the Eastern Caribbean.

After intense discussions over the past week the Central Bank, the Ministry of Finance and representatives of the CL Financial Group have reached agreement on a strategy to deal with the liquidity challenges of CIB and Clico and to address the underlying problems that have given rise to the current financial stress.

The principal objectives of the strategy are to ensure that resources are available to meet withdrawals of third-party CIB depositors and Clico policy holders; to protect the funds of the depositors and policy holders and in so doing maintain confidence in Clico and reinforce confidence in the financial sector as a whole. The main elements of the strategy are as follows:

*The Central Bank will take control of CIB under section 44D of the Central Bank Act.

*Early next week all the third-party assets and liabilities on the books of CIB and CMMB will be transferred to First Citizens Bank. These liabilities will be matched by resources from the sale of CIB’s holdings of certain high quality assets. The Central Bank will provide short term liquidity as needed to ensure that these liabilities are serviced.

*Following the execution of these transactions, CIB’s banking license will be revoked.

*Clico has a sizeable Statutory Fund deficit. CL Financial has agreed to divest additional assets to help fund this deficit. The Government has committed to provide any additional funding that is needed by Clico.

*Government funding will be provided in exchange for collateral and an equity interest in Clico. It will also act as a catalyst for implementing a change in the current business model and corporate governance structure of Clico. The intention will be to return Clico to its original moorings.

I would like to emphasize that these considerable steps being taken – by the CL Financial Group, the Government and the Central Bank are specifically designed to tell CIB’s depositors that your funds are safe and to maintain confidence in Clico which for decades has been the strength of the insurance sector in Trinidad and Tobago and in the region. Clico’s policy holders can also be assured that the long term future of Clico will be guaranteed by the adoption of a more robust and less risky model. Because any stress in one corner of the financial system tends to raise concerns throughout the sector.

I would also take the opportunity to remind the national community of the tremendous strength of our financial system, which indeed is the envy of the region. Excluding CIB, the banking system now boast of an average capital adequacy level of 18 per cent, compared with a recommended minimum of 8 per cent; in contrast to the illiquidity of CIB, the rest of the banking system is plagued by excess liquidity; the overall level of non-performing loans is an impressively low 2 per cent and the banks have more than adequate level of provisions against bad loans.

Let me support the point raised by Minister Tesheira on the need to accelerate some aspects of the new Insurance Act on which we have been working for some time in collaboration with industry stakeholders. We absolutely need updated insurance legislation to regulate the insurance industry in normal times as well as in times of financial stress.

The ‘fast track’ amendments to the 1980 Insurance Act that are being proposed will provide us with the authority to conduct on-site supervision; will give us the legal basis to share information with other regulators (I should note that CLICO and its affiliate British American have vast regional operations) and will allow the Central Bank to take prompt corrective action to protect depositors, if and when necessary. Before ending I would like to acknowledge the high level of cooperation that we have received from Mr. Duprey in our efforts to address what must be a very difficult period for the CL Financial Group.

I should also recognize the role of First Citizens Bank in doing its part to help stabilize the banking system. Resolving the problems of Clico will call for continued collaboration between CL Financial, Government and the Central Bank, but moreso on the collaboration of the entire financial community led by ATTIC and BATT. While it is currently a CL Financial problem, only the concerted and vigorous action of the entire financial sector would stave off financial contagion. This is not the time for companies to take advantage of CIB/Clico’s problems to expand their balance sheet; this is the time to let competition take a back seat and to support the Government and the Central Bank to keep Clico as a functioning entity and to ensure the continued stability of our financial system.

The actions that we will be taking over the next several weeks and months will only work if they have the support of the community of depositors and policyholders as well as the entire financial sector. We are confident that the proposed strategy will lead to a financial sector that is more resilient to deal with the adverse currents now buffeting the global economy.
   


Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: dervaig on January 30, 2009, 04:11:09 PM
Trini's fear not, the Right Honorable Patrick Obama Manning will take
care of all failing institutions with a Government backstop, ...........
errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, that would be using tax payor funds, of course.

For those folks in Trinidad, yuh ent see nuttin yet.

Restaurants closing down, housing prices on the decline,
bankS in trouble (don't fool yourself and think for one minute
it's only Clico facing pressure). The global recession/depression
(educate yourself, and Google the name Nouriel Roubini) is going
to hit Trinidad very very hard.

Be prepared!
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: D.H.W on January 30, 2009, 04:14:42 PM
it go be hard to find jobs now
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: grimm01 on January 30, 2009, 04:17:47 PM
Hmmm so First Citizens now own Republic?

Watch all dem people who money jump up with HCU cry foul/racism/class-warfare etc etc.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: sammy on January 30, 2009, 04:24:04 PM
 :-\  half of my savings invested with CIB yes.

Well the governor and MOF say we money safe........- i hope is no trouble to get nah.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: jimbo on January 30, 2009, 04:28:21 PM
  half of my savings invested with CIB yes

Believe me yuh not d only one brudder ... alot of we d same boat

Just waiting for d wife to cuss
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on January 30, 2009, 04:40:49 PM
Fishs was it you or somebody else and me that had a nice thread going on like lass year bout CLICO and ANSA McAL ???

ahhhh  money management is ah hellahva ting eh :-\
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Bitter on January 30, 2009, 04:54:11 PM
Hmmm so First Citizens now own Republic?

Watch all dem people who money jump up with HCU cry foul/racism/class-warfare etc etc.

That done start already. Check the comments in the Express
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: lefty on January 30, 2009, 04:56:05 PM
Hmmm so First Citizens now own Republic?

Watch all dem people who money jump up with HCU cry foul/racism/class-warfare etc etc.

dais dem own fault when enill say investigate harry gather up the tribal troops cause he knew d anti-PNMism and other isms woulda overshadow good sense, I personally here a indian woman say "doh leh dem nigga interfere wit we money" around that time. ah not sayin it good that dey loss money but, we does let dis nigga/coolie shit f**k we up to much
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on January 30, 2009, 04:56:48 PM
Trini's fear not, the Right Honorable Patrick Obama Manning will take
care of all failing institutions with a Government backstop, ...........
errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, that would be using tax payor funds, of course.

For those folks in Trinidad, yuh ent see nuttin yet.

Restaurants closing down, housing prices on the decline,
bankS in trouble (don't fool yourself and think for one minute
it's only Clico facing pressure). The global recession/depression
(educate yourself, and Google the name Nouriel Roubini) is going
to hit Trinidad very very hard.

Be prepared!

Be prepared for what? Nothing going and happen to Trinidadians before, during and after Carnival.
Furthermore the government taking over a company assets doesn't put anyone on the bread line, in fact it's a plus. If it was a privately owned company that took over CLICO, eg Citrus Growers Association (Blue Waters take dem over) every man jack was layoff and within 2 years CGA was no more.

I want to hear Duprey's side ah story bad. He might start to blame he 'handyman' Assam for this :-\
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Deeks on January 30, 2009, 04:59:27 PM
Boy oh Boy!!! What go happen to Jabloteh. This is a shock.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on January 30, 2009, 04:59:33 PM
Hmmm so First Citizens now own Republic?

Watch all dem people who money jump up with HCU cry foul/racism/class-warfare etc etc.

dais dem own fault when enill say investigate harry gather up the tribal troops cause he knew d anti-PNMism and other isms woulda overshadow good sense, I personally here a indian woman say "doh leh dem nigga interfere wit we money" around that time. ah not sayin it good that dey loss money but, we does let dis nigga/coolie shit f**k we up to much

so wait nuh
FCB is for black people money and RB was for indian money ??? look doh kill meh here today nuh  :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
So where dey white people money, dey dougla money and chinee people does go den ???

Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: capodetutticapi on January 30, 2009, 05:00:32 PM
mine is scotia.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: lefty on January 30, 2009, 05:04:57 PM
Hmmm so First Citizens now own Republic?

Watch all dem people who money jump up with HCU cry foul/racism/class-warfare etc etc.

dais dem own fault when enill say investigate harry gather up the tribal troops cause he knew d anti-PNMism and other isms woulda overshadow good sense, I personally here a indian woman say "doh leh dem nigga interfere wit we money" around that time. ah not sayin it good that dey loss money but, we does let dis nigga/coolie shit f**k we up to much

so wait nuh
FCB is for black people money and RB was for indian money ??? look doh kill meh here today nuh  :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
So where dey white people money, dey dougla money and chinee people does go den ???


dno dat was not d point, When u money involved tribe must take a back seat check u self, had Enill not been forced to back off HCU might have been contained long before the disaster, u dig
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: fishs on January 30, 2009, 05:18:09 PM
Fishs was it you or somebody else and me that had a nice thread going on like lass year bout CLICO and ANSA McAL ???

ahhhh  money management is ah hellahva ting eh :-\

Yes it was me but the question was which was the biggest company or entity in TT , now yuh know is/was CLICO,
 

Anyhow is ah ste of dramatics in TT.

If they had not gone this way...... say GOTT had simply purchase assets, Meth holdings, Angostura, HCL, etc,
All this hulabaloo would have been moot.

Imagine from those assets you could even at the depressed situation put yuh hands on 30billion , why traumatise the country over what is essentially CIB and CL financial fooking up about 3 billion  and drying the groups liqiuidity,
in other words the group needs about 1billion every month to maintain business and over the past 6 months they start to juggle and then last week they get a serious run because they fire the CIB president and Montiel decide to pull over 50 mill out. Ah drinking lil bit because ah have about 10 thou US tie up.

Anyhow as Naipaul say TT full of alarmists and Duprey using that to' his own ends.

Men to lock up

Duprey
Monteil " remember is CIB funds he use for the HMB share purchase"
Richard Trotman
Calder Hart
Jack Warner
Patric Manning
Boysie Sing
Mano Benjamin
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: D.H.W on January 30, 2009, 05:24:01 PM
mine under meh mattress  :sleepy:
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: mukumsplau on January 30, 2009, 05:50:25 PM
mine under meh mattress  :sleepy:

i glad i brokes..
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on January 30, 2009, 06:32:28 PM
HCL peeps done strt 2 give pink slip.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Dutty on January 30, 2009, 06:35:58 PM

Boysie Sing
Mano Benjamin

dem fellahs was teefin people money too?
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: asylumseeker on January 30, 2009, 07:08:00 PM
Trini's fear not, the Right Honorable Patrick Obama Manning will take
care of all failing institutions with a Government backstop, ...........
errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, that would be using tax payor funds, of course.

For those folks in Trinidad, yuh ent see nuttin yet.

Restaurants closing down, housing prices on the decline,
bankS in trouble (don't fool yourself and think for one minute
it's only Clico facing pressure). The global recession/depression
(educate yourself, and Google the name) is going
to hit Trinidad very very hard.

Be prepared!

You must be Roubini's most ardent promoter ... :)
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Disgruntled_Trini on January 30, 2009, 08:31:57 PM
at the end of the day the safest place to invest your money is

Scotia Bank
Unit Trust
First Citizens

All debt will be underwritten by the GOTT.

Problem is or was, UTC was only offering 7% while others were offering 12%.

Now when inflation is nearly 15% why not take the 12% and hope for the best.

Have no fear though
*singing*
PAAAAAAATRICK, WE STEPPING OUT WITH YOU
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: fishs on January 30, 2009, 11:17:59 PM

Boysie Sing
Mano Benjamin

dem fellahs was teefin people money too?

Context

Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on January 31, 2009, 08:02:28 AM
so uhmm the government now have control over Clico and Methonel and 55% of Republic Bank (dat FCB controlling) with a clause that CL Financial will buy back Republic, CMMB and Methonel. Didn't say nothing bout buying back Clico.

Wha' happening with Clico ???

Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on January 31, 2009, 05:47:32 PM
Well I was in transit most of the day yesterday so while I heard bits and pieces is only when I pick up a Guardian this morning I see Republic Bank getting taken over by FCB....well yes....tell dem FCB reach.....

Now I was sitting comfortably all this time de mess melting down companies all over de world and while I knew the global crisis would have affected us at some point, I really eh envision this direct hit....hear nah all yuh ah have half mih savings with CMMB (part of CL Financial) and de other half wid Republic....in Mutual Funds....
Den it dawn on mih....IF any thing should happen, I goh lose ah good chunk a mih saving cuz dem thing eh covered by DIC funds....

I seriously considering putting mih money now in a good old fashion Fixed Deposit....less interest but ah covered for at least $75K IF anything more dramatic than what happened yesterdy should occur...

Well yes....we are indeed in interesting times....
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on January 31, 2009, 06:51:09 PM
Intresting 4 sure.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: capodetutticapi on January 31, 2009, 07:11:27 PM
from what i hear is de insurance sector that fail.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: lefty on January 31, 2009, 07:20:31 PM
Well I was in transit most of the day yesterday so while I heard bits and pieces is only when I pick up a Guardian this morning I see Republic Bank getting taken over by FCB....well yes....tell dem FCB reach.....

Now I was sitting comfortably all this time de mess melting down companies all over de world and while I knew the global crisis would have affected us at some point, I really eh envision this direct hit....hear nah all yuh ah have half mih savings with CMMB (part of CL Financial) and de other half wid Republic....in Mutual Funds....
Den it dawn on mih....IF any thing should happen, I goh lose ah good chunk a mih saving cuz dem thing eh covered by DIC funds....

I seriously considering putting mih money now in a good old fashion Fixed Deposit....less interest but ah covered for at least $75K IF anything more dramatic than what happened yesterdy should occur...

Well yes....we are indeed in interesting times....

may I Suggest The First Bank of Lensyl and these
(http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb227/SIGERMP9/Military%20FireArms/M1014M401.jpg)

d interest not good dey too but u go be sure it in a safe place
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: kaliman2006 on January 31, 2009, 07:31:12 PM
clico need bailout, central bank takes over clico investment bank

Oh gorsh man! Why mus Trinidadians copy EVERYTING that happens in America?! So because America have bailout, we must have bailout too!

Seriously though, any economists on here? Would a bailout be a prudent fiscal option for CLICO?
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: dinho on January 31, 2009, 07:34:18 PM
the biggest concern now is that people will start to quake about their funds and withdraw money in mass amounts to put it in safer places..

once this panic cycle get started, this will precipitate the fall of the financial sector in T&T as they lose their ability to honor their commitments.. Right now, the government need to work real hard to avert that crisis and prevent just that from happening..

CLICO hands so deeply set in our economy that like it or not, government backing is the best option right now. And its good that it is not a handout and the government is getting something for this.

but this is only the beginning..
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on January 31, 2009, 07:39:54 PM
Browning....hear meh girl.  UNIT TRUST Mutual Funds. Doh touch it, juss leff it "let it grow"....ah know what ah telling ya. Nothing out dere safe. Ever since Royal Bank Canada take over RBTT ah watching dem reel close - cause meh money to plant peas in Tobago in dere.....

Or do like somebody say in here, is to take out every damn cent and put it under dey mattress  >:( Because with today's economy nothing ain't increasing or growing. Interest rates is ah BIG steupse, so you might as well have dey same amount that ya put under ya pillow next week.

Could you imagine your hard earn dollars you ain't even spending, deceasing because of somebody dotishness ???
Datz ting to go postal oui
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on January 31, 2009, 10:37:04 PM
Is d peeps who go loose dey wuk in my church 1 get send home from HCL, 1 sure 2 go from CIB and a girl wukin Radio 97. So nuff peeps will loose dey wuk.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Blue on February 01, 2009, 04:15:04 AM
Browning....hear meh girl.  UNIT TRUST Mutual Funds. Doh touch it, juss leff it "let it grow"....ah know what ah telling ya. Nothing out dere safe. Ever since Royal Bank Canada take over RBTT ah watching dem reel close - cause meh money to plant peas in Tobago in dere.....

Or do like somebody say in here, is to take out every damn cent and put it under dey mattress  >:( Because with today's economy nothing ain't increasing or growing. Interest rates is ah BIG steupse, so you might as well have dey same amount that ya put under ya pillow next week.

Could you imagine your hard earn dollars you ain't even spending, deceasing because of somebody dotishness ???
Datz ting to go postal oui


Dat might work in North America or Europe, but inflation in TnT is still 15% per annum, so yuh money will be worthless in no time at all.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 01, 2009, 06:50:17 AM
Browning....hear meh girl.  UNIT TRUST Mutual Funds. Doh touch it, juss leff it "let it grow"....ah know what ah telling ya. Nothing out dere safe. Ever since Royal Bank Canada take over RBTT ah watching dem reel close - cause meh money to plant peas in Tobago in dere.....

Or do like somebody say in here, is to take out every damn cent and put it under dey mattress  >:( Because with today's economy nothing ain't increasing or growing. Interest rates is ah BIG steupse, so you might as well have dey same amount that ya put under ya pillow next week.

Could you imagine your hard earn dollars you ain't even spending, deceasing because of somebody dotishness ???
Datz ting to go postal oui


Dat might work in North America or Europe, but inflation in TnT is still 15% per annum, so yuh money will be worthless in no time at all.

So what den do you suggest Ryan ?
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: verycute1 on February 01, 2009, 07:41:44 AM
the biggest concern now is that people will start to quake about their funds and withdraw money in mass amounts to put it in safer places..

once this panic cycle get started, this will precipitate the fall of the financial sector in T&T as they lose their ability to honor their commitments.. Right now, the government need to work real hard to avert that crisis and prevent just that from happening..

CLICO hands so deeply set in our economy that like it or not, government backing is the best option right now. And its good that it is not a handout and the government is getting something for this.

but this is only the beginning..

 You already know what happening monday morning. My father already tell my moms take all the money they have left in Republic and put it in scotia monday am bright and early. She kinda on the fence and I tell her hear what, you already know trinis go make a mad rush on the bank to take the money out. And we already know that the bank probably dont have enuff cash, to cover all the deposits at the moment. SO if man rush to take funds out and bank dont have cash to cover it and they say they cant cover withdrawals then at some point it going to get nasty.  And what will happen to those who choose to sit and wait for a few days? Is a gamble you taking, either way. Yes by next friday all may be settled and things will be cool and you money will be safe, but the flip side of the coin could be that enuff pple take so much money out that the bank start to fail too. I tell her listen to the man and take the money out. Is enough money that if they lose it it will sting a bit. ANd they have insurance policies at Clico that they kinda already writing off as lost. We will see.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 01, 2009, 08:27:05 AM
Gosh this morning my mind ran on this former Clico agent Neil Jones. You know the good looking guy with grey hair that always dancing on a desk. He passed away about 6 years ago from Cancer. Actually during his time he was the top insurance agent/premier of the Caribbean. I think he was one of the few agents that took Clico to #1 back in dey day.

Well they ain't start to audit Clico yet, so ya might as well see what you can get out from the policies girl.

3 more to go: The Tatil Group, Guardian Life Aligico ent ? Or it have more insurance companies? I cyah even remember now steupse
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 01, 2009, 02:16:54 PM
Trini u 4get Tesheira d Minister bailin out she late husband company. Is 2 her benefit dat dey stay around.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 01, 2009, 03:14:10 PM
Trini u 4get Tesheira d Minister bailin out she late husband company. Is 2 her benefit dat dey stay around.

How though ???
I was aware Nunez-Tesheira late husband was an Executive at Clico, but he dead and she and kids were the sole beneficiaries or she was the administrator of his estate. End of that phrase of her life ent ?? So I doh understand how bailing out Clico would be to her benefit.

I think if it was Guardian or Tatil, she would have done the same thing.  Not so ??? Uhmm well not she but the Government....
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 01, 2009, 06:05:13 PM
Where u feel she invest d money he leave she? Is just ironic dat she bailin out he company.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Bakes on February 01, 2009, 06:39:58 PM
Where u feel she invest d money he leave she? Is just ironic dat she bailin out he company.
Ahh... so de bailout is really about Karen and not tuh de benefit of the local economy...


Allyuh doh fed up talk shit on dis board?
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on February 01, 2009, 07:14:32 PM
the biggest concern now is that people will start to quake about their funds and withdraw money in mass amounts to put it in safer places..

once this panic cycle get started, this will precipitate the fall of the financial sector in T&T as they lose their ability to honor their commitments.. Right now, the government need to work real hard to avert that crisis and prevent just that from happening..

CLICO hands so deeply set in our economy that like it or not, government backing is the best option right now. And its good that it is not a handout and the government is getting something for this.

but this is only the beginning..

 You already know what happening monday morning. My father already tell my moms take all the money they have left in Republic and put it in scotia monday am bright and early. She kinda on the fence and I tell her hear what, you already know trinis go make a mad rush on the bank to take the money out. And we already know that the bank probably dont have enuff cash, to cover all the deposits at the moment. SO if man rush to take funds out and bank dont have cash to cover it and they say they cant cover withdrawals then at some point it going to get nasty.  And what will happen to those who choose to sit and wait for a few days? Is a gamble you taking, either way. Yes by next friday all may be settled and things will be cool and you money will be safe, but the flip side of the coin could be that enuff pple take so much money out that the bank start to fail too. I tell her listen to the man and take the money out. Is enough money that if they lose it it will sting a bit. ANd they have insurance policies at Clico that they kinda already writing off as lost. We will see.

Well girl I eh goh lie, I going and take mih money out of CMMB bright and early in de morning......ah beginning to feel that if ah continue to listen to these professsionals who keep telling mih every alright, everything OK, when dey damn well know that ent true....I looking out for me right now yes....

So the plan is to move mih money from that Money market fund ah have with CMMB and put it on a fixed deposit....ah eh even considering Unit Trust right now, nutten that says Mutula fund not appealing to me right now.....

Then ah going to do the same thing with mih Republic mutual fund account....but ah wouldn't move it from the bank just to a fixed deposit....so yeah the interest definitely eh the same but ah will feel a bit more comfortable until this whole thing blow over.....

Ah waiting with bated breath to see what the Government will eventually do with Republic's shares.....
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on February 01, 2009, 07:17:18 PM
Gosh this morning my mind ran on this former Clico agent Neil Jones. You know the good looking guy with grey hair that always dancing on a desk. He passed away about 6 years ago from Cancer. Actually during his time he was the top insurance agent/premier of the Caribbean. I think he was one of the few agents that took Clico to #1 back in dey day.

Well they ain't start to audit Clico yet, so ya might as well see what you can get out from the policies girl.

3 more to go: The Tatil Group, Guardian Life Aligico ent ? Or it have more insurance companies? I cyah even remember now steupse


I have a friend who told me on Friday evening while we discussing the unfolding events that she has a policy with CLICO.  Now at the time I didn't have the full picture as to what was happening so we both thought it was only CIB in problems....as the weekend wore on I realised that CLICO had problems with liquidity too.....lord fadder....what next??
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 01, 2009, 07:26:06 PM
UTC and Sagicor is meh option always had a problem wit CLICO as dey were a private company. Need 2 call meh agent monday.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 01, 2009, 08:17:00 PM
Now allyuh ah really out of dey loop with Insurance companies back home. Which is ah damn shame because...uhmm anyway

Meh question is other than The Tatil Group, Guardian Life, Clico and Sagicor who else it have ???

Girl panic or no panic I was pulling out everything cent and policy bright and early Monday morning.
According to Omar, this is just the beginning.  My hard earn money wasn't going to jump up oui

But from inside sources at Clico, apparently some of the employees knew what was happening prior to last week. A dear friend of mine worked at Clico up until November last year. Dry so he email me last year saying he fire dey wuk. Now he only was employed there for 1 year and some months, and all of ah sudden he left. When I asked him why, he said the company was unstable and it's not only he resigning. I replied saying well what job is stable these days, and I left it just so. Now as I think about it, i'm sure there were rumbling in the company late last year.

Look lemme go Cayman Islands eh  ;D
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 01, 2009, 08:21:37 PM
Now allyuh ah really out of dey loop with Insurance companies back home. Which is ah damn shame because...uhmm anyway

Meh question is other than The Tatil Group, Guardian Life, Clico and Sagicor who else it have ???

It have Presidencial but me eh know if dem is a subsidary of 1 of d big 1.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 01, 2009, 08:28:38 PM
Ah now answering meh self

Association of Trinidad and Tobago Insurance Companies
http://www.attic.org.tt/members.htm
20 Insurance Companies.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 01, 2009, 08:50:03 PM
Capital d worse when u get in an accident and d next person with Capital just fix yuh car. 
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on February 02, 2009, 07:21:19 AM
Capital d worse when u get in an accident and d next person with Capital just fix yuh car. 

Girl ah young boy mash up mih car about 2 years ago and when he hit mih the first thing run through mih mind was "lord fadder ah hope dis idiot have good insurance"....turns out he had full comprehensive with Tatil.... :whew: :whew:
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 02, 2009, 04:27:03 PM
Capital d worse when u get in an accident and d next person with Capital just fix yuh car. 

Girl ah young boy mash up mih car about 2 years ago and when he hit mih the first thing run through mih mind was "lord fadder ah hope dis idiot have good insurance"....turns out he had full comprehensive with Tatil.... :whew: :whew:


......where people are people. ya know what ah mean ;D
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: kounty on February 02, 2009, 04:49:00 PM
manning dollars tall.  bail out mr manning!  bail out! no signs of preparing for the low gas price that going and stay for a while to come.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 02, 2009, 05:08:10 PM
Any new news today locals base ??
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Deeks on February 02, 2009, 05:32:39 PM
Bounty killer,
                     What low gas prices. If you feel price of gas going any lower, dream on.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: verycute1 on February 02, 2009, 07:19:40 PM
Any new news today locals base ??

 I not local but the express online said First Citizens telling people next week monday 2/9 Investors with CIB can get their money back
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 02, 2009, 07:44:35 PM
Any new news today locals base ??

Pressure cyah even c d news but next wk tings will ease up so could c d news.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on February 03, 2009, 05:28:36 AM
De latest drama is that they were debating the legislation to allow the for the bailout to take effect (or something so...).  Keith Rowley in he presentation say he NOT supporting the Government because this will allow a man like Calder Hart (Chairman of NIB) to control yet another set a billions (in Republic Bank shares)...I take een all that in the gym yesterday evening and all the time I thinking Rowley could talk till he blue in de face the bill goh pass any way....

Well dis morning ah coworker shock mih when she reveal that the bill need a special majority to pass.... :o :o
well look bachanal here today.....and true to form the opposition eh support it....so more drama folks....sit back and enjoy de ride....get out yuh popcorn and your choice of beverage to wash it down...
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 03, 2009, 12:12:59 PM
Not 2 mention I hear Rowley in d car sayin he cyah support it because Republic Money goin NIPDEC and he pardner Hart in charge.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: ann3boys on February 03, 2009, 02:24:28 PM
right- well the thing is that with the legislation the govt will have access to people's personal Insurance files.....so you could imagine- and to make us more nervous the PM said in parliament yesterday (or was it last night???) that he would look through the records to get info on Panday's apartment- if CLICO is holding Insurance for his apartment in London..
now I don't know about allyou folks, but that makes me very apprehansive about how this gov't will be using personal info ...
and that's why it needs the 3/5 majority - it infringes the population's individual right to privacy.
what you think about that? think that could happen when the US or UK govt takes over their banks?
ha! that's democracy T&T style! ???
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: kounty on February 03, 2009, 04:19:02 PM
Bounty killer,
                     What low gas prices. If you feel price of gas going any lower, dream on.
lol  the price of oil going back up? in the future? thaz the end of oil homeboy, windturbines goin up like crazy.  obama done say dey could keep the oil.  who they goin and sell it to? what going and drive the price up?
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 03, 2009, 04:24:25 PM
right- well the thing is that with the legislation the govt will have access to people's personal Insurance files.....so you could imagine- and to make us more nervous the PM said in parliament yesterday (or was it last night???) that he would look through the records to get info on Panday's apartment- if CLICO is holding Insurance for his apartment in London..
now I don't know about allyou folks, but that makes me very apprehansive about how this gov't will be using personal info ...
and that's why it needs the 3/5 majority - it infringes the population's individual right to privacy.
what you think about that? think that could happen when the US or UK govt takes over their banks?
ha! that's democracy T&T style! ???

So wait, before he get his people together to make sure there's a smooth transition for all the policy holders at CLICO, so nobody get heart failure for losing their monies, he studying to go dig up Panday house insurance ??? Wasn't that London case closed ???

Is it after he had surgery he get more dotish ???
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: capodetutticapi on February 03, 2009, 11:25:50 PM
look at problems now it them people go and start withdrawin all they money now
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 04, 2009, 05:42:59 AM
look at problems now it them people go and start withdrawin all they money now

Over ah million dollars was withdrawn from Republic Bank last Saturday. That now they limited the amount of money they put in dey ATM
Capo ya know dat bank eh? :devil:
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: capodetutticapi on February 04, 2009, 08:29:19 AM
look at problems now it them people go and start withdrawin all they money now

Over ah million dollars was withdrawn from Republic Bank last Saturday. That now they limited the amount of money they put in dey ATM
Capo ya know dat bank eh? :devil:
shhh.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 05, 2009, 05:36:57 AM
Pay severance to CIB employees
Sandra Chouthi | 8:22 pm
Trinidad Guardian
Published: February 4th, 2009
Sandra Chouthi | 8:22 pm

The employees of CL Financial’s Clico Investment Bank (CIB) have been placed on the breadline without severance pay, said unionist Vincent Cabrera. Cabrera is president of the Banking, Insurance and General Workers’ Union (BIGWU). He said billions of dollars are involved in bailing out four companies—Clico Investment Bank (CIB), CMMB, Clico and British American Insurance Company Ltd—but there’s no severance pay for workers. He said the union is demanding that Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams, Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira and First Citizens’ chief executive officer Larry Howai find a way to pay severance to about 100 CIB employees, none of whom are unionised.

“We are making no compromise on that. They must find a way,” said Cabrera. He was speaking at a press conference the union held at its office on 85 Eighth Street, Barataria, yesterday. “The Government, the Central Bank, all the financial institutions, have failed to look after the interest of this important stakeholder that is the workers,” said Cabrera.

“All of the players, the CBTT, the Ministry of Finance and certainly the various finance houses have treated the human factor in quite an inappropriate manner.” He said the union was more concerned about the industrial relations and human resource dimension of the bailout of four subsidiaries of the CL Financial Group than the financial engineering of the embarked on by the Central Bank.

Cabrera said the workers of CIB turned up for work last Monday, but were met with closed doors, with not even a notice posted informing them of the situation. “They had to be guided like ordinary members of the public by what they had seen and heard in the media.

“They enquired from officials of the Central Bank and were told that they would be paid the sum of one month’s notice, that they were not entitled to severance pay and they would be required to effect some final activity associated with the closure of CIB,” Cabrera said.
“This is a cold and callous approach to employees, who are not to blame for the predicament in which the employer has placed them.”
The unionist said the Retrenchment and Severance Benefit Act No 3 of 1985 needs to be repealed as it was “inadequate and useless.”
“That excuse for a law is failing to protect workers who are severed.

“In fact, workers are worse off today than they were before the law was passed in 1985,” Cabrera said.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 05, 2009, 05:37:44 AM
Now hopefully people doh get tie up and blame the economy - instead blame poor management of funds and assets :-\
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on February 05, 2009, 05:57:05 AM
As I now reading that CIB severance story I have a friend who worked at Republic Bank for over 12 years.  Last year when CIB opened in Tobago, the girl leave Republic and moved there.  When I talked to her over the Christmas season she said she was enjoying it.....less than 2 months later she on the bread line...

Lawd fadder....ah eh even know what to call she and say.... :(
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 07, 2009, 06:03:56 PM
So the first 100 from CIB went home yesterday. Heard people needed counseling, because no one was ready or could of imagine this would happen.  Also heard last week WASA sent home some Managers and Executives (dem on vacation for 1 year) for non performance. But told the public they down-sizing.  :-\

Strangely I ain't hear any one mention that costumes sold out in any of the 4 main mas band ie Harts, Revellers, Island People and of course Tribe.

Fete lovers, how dey crowds looking at the all inclusive fetes and dem ??? Or is it that common sense prevailing these days???
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 07, 2009, 06:37:43 PM
Trini I blieve nuff peeps searchin high and low 4 there money 2 buy dey bikini and beads.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: NYtriniwhiteboy.. on February 07, 2009, 07:19:00 PM
yuh know jus among people i know, they have a quite a few who decided to forego playing ina  band this year...but thing is, for every person selling a costume, they have someone willing to buy it...
personally i one of de stupid ones  ;D comin home for carnival for first time in a four years
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 07, 2009, 07:43:03 PM
yuh know jus among people i know, they have a quite a few who decided to forego playing ina  band this year...but thing is, for every person selling a costume, they have someone willing to buy it...
personally i one of de stupid ones  ;D comin home for carnival for first time in a four years

I hear ya. I have some friends who said that they cutting back on feting, because no one knows whats really happening. BUT DEY GOING PAN tomorrow ;D One girlfrien' say she ain't care bout nothing else but she PAN.
Another one who always in somebody fete, say she only hitting 3 good ones (UWI, Moka and Cooler) plus pan dis year and datzz it

Nobody in dey group say nothing bout playing mas. They not even sure if red ants bringing anything for Jouvert.  Anyone heard if they are ???
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: NYtriniwhiteboy.. on February 07, 2009, 08:15:11 PM
cana as far as i know they are..my cousin playing with them, or so she said on wed...i eh hear nuttin different
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on February 10, 2009, 03:04:10 PM
So the first 100 from CIB went home yesterday. Heard people needed counseling, because no one was ready or could of imagine this would happen.  Also heard last week WASA sent home some Managers and Executives (dem on vacation for 1 year) for non performance. But told the public they down-sizing.  :-\

Strangely I ain't hear any one mention that costumes sold out in any of the 4 main mas band ie Harts, Revellers, Island People and of course Tribe.

Fete lovers, how dey crowds looking at the all inclusive fetes and dem ??? Or is it that common sense prevailing these days???

Cana Tribe sell out since August last year....and if eh mistaken ah sure Island People sell out long time too....as for the other 2 you mention, I'm not sure....but I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't sold out too.....the only bands I hear saying that they are not sold out yet are the lesser known ones...

As for the fetes....dem sell out too....
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Dutty on February 10, 2009, 03:14:11 PM


As for the fetes....dem sell out too....

 :o damn!!
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 10, 2009, 04:09:59 PM
Soooooooooo dat means dat Trinidadians ain't too worried bout dey economy during Carnival and hence dey shouldn't worry bout after Carnival too...

arigh' ah go hear bout allyuh
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: dinho on February 10, 2009, 04:15:50 PM
Soooooooooo dat means dat Trinidadians ain't too worried bout dey economy during Carnival and hence dey shouldn't worry bout after Carnival too...

arigh' ah go hear bout allyuh

its actually economically responsible..

yuh go spend less money on ah psychiatrist with less returns..
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Brownsugar on February 10, 2009, 07:22:22 PM
Soooooooooo dat means dat Trinidadians ain't too worried bout dey economy during Carnival and hence dey shouldn't worry bout after Carnival too...

arigh' ah go hear bout allyuh

Nah word on the street is that we goh tighten we belt AFTER Carnival....
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 11, 2009, 05:24:48 PM
Soooooooooo dat means dat Trinidadians ain't too worried bout dey economy during Carnival and hence dey shouldn't worry bout after Carnival too...

arigh' ah go hear bout allyuh

Nah word on the street is that we goh tighten we belt AFTER Carnival....

Definetely dat is d time frame.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 16, 2009, 08:35:44 PM


Dookeran calls for criminal charges to be laid in CLICO fiasco
February 14th 2009
CTNTWORLD.COM


Political Leader of the Congress of the People Winston Dookeran is calling for criminal charges to be brought against those involved in the CLICO fiasco.

Dookeran made the call at a news conference this morning.

The COP Leader is blaming a lack of proper governance and oversight for the difficulties CLICO found itself in.
While Dookeran admitted that the Board and management of CLICO have to take part of the blame, insisting that the regulators, including the Central Bank and the Securities Exchange Commission, are equally liable.

He says there should be an investigation into whether criminal charges ought to brought against those responsible.

Dookeran argues that the Parliament has not been doing its job, with members of the Public Accounts Committee refusing to call anyone before them to answer questions about how CLICO could have fallen so quickly.

Saying he had predicted since 2006 the negative fallout on the financial system from the global financial crisis, Dookeran says Government did not take him seriously.

He was also scathing in his comments about the way the Central Bank and by extension its current Governor, Ewart Williams, has been regulating the financial system.

On Friday the Governor announced that the problem at CLICO was worse than initially anticipated because some of its assets were pledged to other projects.
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: weary1969 on February 16, 2009, 09:11:04 PM
I eh hear he say 2 luck up Harry or did I miss dat?
Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: TriniCana on February 17, 2009, 08:00:13 PM
Casualty #1

Plymouth Jazz Festival called off
Earl Manmohan Scarborough
Trinidad Express

Tuesday, February 17th 2009

   

The 2009 edition of the popular Plymouth Jazz Festival is off.

CL Communications CEO Tony Maharaj, in announcing this yesterday, blamed the cancellation of this year's event on the global economic crisis rather than Clico's financial woes. He was adamant that the event had not been cancelled but postponed until next year.

Clico was one of the main sponsors of the festival for the past four years. However, THA Tourism Secretary, Oswald Williams, told the media the Assembly was planning an alternative event for the same weekend to accommodate those who had already booked accommodation and made travel arrangements.

Two weeks ago, Maharaj had dispelled rumours that the festival, which was scheduled for April 24 to 26 at the Plymouth Recreation Ground, was off because CL Financial had pulled out. In fact, a press conference scheduled for last Wednesday was rescheduled at the last minute to Thursday and then yesterday. The reason given for the Wednesday postponement was that members of the committee were in deep discussions on the event.

Yesterday at the Mount Irvine Bay Hotel, Maharaj said it would have been reckless and not financially prudent to continue with the event when all indicators were showing it would not have been well attended. "What caused it was that when we started getting our information, as we have always done from our travel agents abroad, what we were finding was that people, because of the world economic crisis, were very concerned about the affordability of coming to Tobago," he said.

Maharaj said there was a clear distinction between Clico and CL Financial, and stressed that Clico was an individual sponsor just as Colfire, b-Mobile and others. He added that when Clico pulled out, they were immediately replaced by another sponsor and two other major sponsors showed interest in the event.

He also attributed the poor response to the festival to the exorbitant rates charged by some local hotels during the period, noting that this situation had to be addressed.

"In business, people have to act prudently and it would have been reckless of the Plymouth Jazz Festival Committee and the THA to say that we will still have the festival even if 2,000 people come," Maharaj said.

He said it was not certain if the $50 million event will be held in April next year and the possibility existed that it could be held later in the year.

The Plymouth Jazz festival started in 2005 and has featured foreign acts like Stevie Wonder, Elton John, Sting and Whitney Houston.
Title: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Saywha on February 28, 2009, 09:24:18 AM
Don't u think dey should lock up this man and throw away de key because how he indiscriminately spend we money.  I reading the papers this week and see de man invested in some high profile properties in Florida using we hard earned money.  What de  :cursing: Now people go lose their jobs because he was on a spending spree.  Trinidad really soft yes!  If it was America, he would already be in a cell with Bubba and de soap.



Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Jah Gol on February 28, 2009, 09:31:18 AM
They haven't implicated him in any illegal activity yet. Until they do so he just another greed capitalist exploiting the system.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Brownsugar on February 28, 2009, 10:03:33 AM
Don't u think dey should lock up this man and throw away de key because how he indiscriminately spend we money.  I reading the papers this week and see de man invested in some high profile properties in Florida using we hard earned money.  What de  :cursing: Now people go lose their jobs because he was on a spending spree.  Trinidad really soft yes!  If it was America, he would already be in a cell with Bubba and de soap.



......or at least under house arrest....steups...this is T&T, nobody eh going jail for one blasted thing!!!...taxpayers goh pay thru we teeth to save CL financial cuz money eh no problem...and that will be the end of that.....
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: capodetutticapi on February 28, 2009, 02:12:39 PM
Don't u think dey should lock up this man and throw away de key because how he indiscriminately spend we money.  I reading the papers this week and see de man invested in some high profile properties in Florida using we hard earned money.  What de  :cursing: Now people go lose their jobs because he was on a spending spree.  Trinidad really soft yes!  If it was America, he would already be in a cell with Bubba and de soap.


if he was in usa it would not have made any difference.check bernard madoff.he lose 50 billion.ponzi scheme.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Babalawo on February 28, 2009, 05:03:14 PM
I hear Manning doing the same thing with Calder Hart with some properties in Canada.  And Rodger Boynes with he Sylibia estates.  Every Trini politician is a scyamp yes
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: weary1969 on February 28, 2009, 07:22:36 PM
They haven't implicated him in any illegal activity yet. Until they do so he just another greed capitalist exploiting the system.

Cosign especially d part bout d greddy capitalist.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: capodetutticapi on February 28, 2009, 08:02:58 PM
They haven't implicated him in any illegal activity yet. Until they do so he just another greed capitalist exploiting the system.

Cosign especially d part bout d greddy capitalist.
unless LD tief or commingle,they cyar lock him up,nobody could have foreseen this recession,the man made some business deals that didn't pan out.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: weary1969 on February 28, 2009, 08:34:07 PM
They haven't implicated him in any illegal activity yet. Until they do so he just another greed capitalist exploiting the system.

Cosign especially d part bout d greddy capitalist.
unless LD tief or commingle,they cyar lock him up,nobody could have foreseen this recession,the man made some business deals that didn't pan out.

OK
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: TriniCana on March 01, 2009, 09:17:08 AM
Where the money gone?
...Lawyers, auditors work on Clico’s paper trail
Shaliza Hassanali | 9:05 pm
Guardian



Lawyers and auditors are working feverishly to find out what has happened to more than $5 billion from Clico’s Statutory Fund. And irate Clico employees—who were told by the company’s newly appointed managing director, Claude Musaib-Ali on Wednesday, that they did not know where the money went and were not sure to retrieve it—are calling on their bossman and CL Financial jefe Lawrence Duprey to come clean and answer to them and their clients on where the money has gone.

“We have auditors and lawyers trying to find it... We don’t know where it went to,” Musaib-Ali told workers when he held a meeting with them for the first time last week. He was accompanied to the meeting, held at Clico’s St Vincent Street office, by Clico’s senior vice president Carolyn John. Workers said they were told that some of the funds were invested with “companies that were connected with CL Financial,” which the lawyers and auditors were trying to trace. Musaib-Ali indicated to them that CL may not be able to repay the money. “So that is a loss for us that we have to bear. “We first have to find out where this money went to, and if we could get it back from where it went,” Musaib-Ali told them.

He told workers that “probably in a few months” he would meet with them where he would be able to inform them “where the money went and if they have got some back.” This forced some of the workers to erupt into laughter. “The people who were here before took the money and put it somewhere. We don’t know where. “We are perplexed...” he told workers, “we don’t know where it has gone.” Musaib-Ali informed them the insurance company was facing a rough time and urged them to tighten their belts and put their shoulders to the wheel to come up with an improved service in order to survive. Musaib-Ali said while the company was facing mounting pressures, he was confident Clico could move forward because of the Government and Central Bank’s intervention.

Take out money

Musaib-Ali also informed the workers that customers of Clico’s Executive Flexible Premium Annuity (EFPA) were taking out their money. EFPA is an insurance product specially designed to achieve a balance of financial growth, security and retirement income. “The EFPA was supposed to give you gravy. Now we have no gravy. “You have to let them (customers) know that the company is not closing down. We may offer a lower interest rate and we have become a little slimmer, but we are not going to disappear,” Musaib-Ali insisted.

New board

On February 3, Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira announced in Parliament the names of Clico’s new board of directors. The members include former Central Bank governor Dr Euric Bobb, who was appointed chairman of Clico, Claude Musaib-Ali, Judy Chang, Marlon Holder, Hayden Charles and Anthony Watkins.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: TriniCana on March 01, 2009, 09:20:06 AM
So my question is....isn't there a annually audit done on companies anymore ???
Or just to go further, an internal audit dept ? Ent all insurance companies muss have either an internal audit or actuarial dept ???

ah juss asking, because back in meh day, you either had quarterly and/or annually audits.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: lefty on March 01, 2009, 11:51:46 AM
So my question is....isn't there a annually audit done on companies anymore ???
Or just to go further, an internal audit dept ? Ent all insurance companies muss have either an internal audit or actuarial dept ???

ah juss asking, because back in meh day, you either had quarterly and/or annually audits.


 :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: ..... when u big u large.............apparently............. wont say more than that
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Brownsugar on March 01, 2009, 07:24:25 PM
So my question is....isn't there a annually audit done on companies anymore ???
Or just to go further, an internal audit dept ? Ent all insurance companies muss have either an internal audit or actuarial dept ???

ah juss asking, because back in meh day, you either had quarterly and/or annually audits.


I think it was stated when this whole thing first broke that PWC were/are CL Financial's auditors.....thing to make yuh go hhhhhhhmmmm....yuh see apparently since CLICO was private, they could have done what de hell dey want without having to adhere to the stringent rules required by a publicly listed company....

Girl, I feel it have more story to break out....dis only now start....
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: TriniCana on March 01, 2009, 08:03:04 PM
So my question is....isn't there a annually audit done on companies anymore ???
Or just to go further, an internal audit dept ? Ent all insurance companies muss have either an internal audit or actuarial dept ???

ah juss asking, because back in meh day, you either had quarterly and/or annually audits.


I think it was stated when this whole thing first broke that PWC were/are CL Financial's auditors.....thing to make yuh go hhhhhhhmmmm....yuh see apparently since CLICO was private, they could have done what de hell dey want without having to adhere to the stringent rules required by a publicly listed company....

Girl, I feel it have more story to break out....dis only now start....

No girl...hear nah. Once you a member of ATTIC you have to adhere to the Supervisor of Insurance office rules and regulations, which requires either a quarterly (datz for dem insurance companies who under the microscope eg Capital, Demerara etc) or an annually audit by auditors recognized by the SOI office.

So this is why I had to ask the question. Ah not to familiar with Price Waterhouse. I'm more with Ernst and Young.  So you'll have to full me ein with the 'hhhmmmm' part  ;D

In true....dis only now start.
What I waiting for is the name calling. Avid UNC supporter + money lender = Durpey ent ? And during the UNC rein of Trinidad and Tobago, Durpey and his empire were top noch and untouchable....not so ?

ah cyah wait ;D
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Deeks on March 01, 2009, 08:05:16 PM
The great irony of this whole Clico debacle is the whole notion of laissez faire economics. Limited gov't intervention(least amount of regulations) especially when the markets are hot. That is the mantra of consevatives and free marketeers. The fever did caught on the the Caribbean especially in TT. Now the market bust, it is the gov't who has to bailout everyone. Duprey and Clico shareholders lucky Patrick did not spend all the money as yet.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: daryn on March 01, 2009, 10:03:09 PM
true conservatives are still against bailouts.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: WestCoast on March 01, 2009, 10:24:19 PM
true conservatives are still against bailouts.
only if they are not the ones benefiting from said bailout :devil:
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: TriniCana on March 02, 2009, 05:35:20 AM
The great irony of this whole Clico debacle is the whole notion of laissez faire economics. Limited gov't intervention(least amount of regulations) especially when the markets are hot. That is the mantra of consevatives and free marketeers. The fever did caught on the the Caribbean especially in TT. Now the market bust, it is the gov't who has to bailout everyone. Duprey and Clico shareholders lucky Patrick did not spend all the money as yet.

We have to remember that Clico is Caribbean, so at the moment the PM of Barbados have to bailout also.

The government of Trinidad & Tobago is refusing to say how much money it is giving to bail out the CL Financial Group and CLICO, but the estimated liabilities amount to US$16 Billion dollars.

Yes, BILLION with a “B”.

Prime Minister David Thompson of Barbados has yet to make a statement about CLICO’s narrowly averted bankruptcy, but soon (and probably already secretly done) his longtime friend, client and patron Leroy Parris will come asking for additional concessions from Barbados. That means that CLICO and associated companies will be asking the Prime Minister to give your tax money to a company that has an estimated 100 billion dollars in assets, but has run out of cash.

http://barbadosfreepress.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/clico-on-life-support-will-barbados-prime-minister-thompson-favour-his-patron-leroy-parris-or-the-people-of-barbados/


High Court agrees to liquidate CLICO Bahamas Holdings

Published 02/27/2009 by Caribbean Broadcasting Corporation
The Bahamas Supreme Court has ordered the liquidation of local insurance company, CLICO Holdings Bahamas Limited -- a subsidiary of the Trinidad-based conglomerate CL Financial.The Court on Tuesday issued the winding-up order based on an application made ...
http://www.cbc.bb/index.pl/article?id=3403544
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: dcs on March 02, 2009, 07:54:45 AM

At the end of all this...Duprey still holding real $$ ent?
Think he had enough years to see what coming and try to protect himself from the worse case.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: TriniCana on March 02, 2009, 04:51:27 PM
Guyana hunts for bloggers after false bank report causes panic
Last Updated: Monday, March 2, 2009 | 8:54 AM ET
CBC News


Police in Guyana say they are looking for bloggers who caused alarm with a false report that a commercial bank in the South American country had requested a $6.35-million bailout to avert a collapse.

The Guyana Bank for Trade & Industry said it fielded thousands of calls from worried customers after a website posted a report Thursday that the bank was seeking government aid, which it said was not true. The bank said there was no mass withdrawal of funds and the government's central bank said the institution was sound.

A police statement issued Friday called the blog report "erroneous, wicked and intended to cause public mischief" and it said officers have asked for international and local help "to verify who is hosting this website" and pursue other information.

The website, www.livinguyana.blogspot.com, displayed a message Saturday indicating it had been "eliminated."

The website earlier had removed the original report and published an apology, accepting that the information was "100 per cent incorrect." It said it "relayed information by someone who was duped by a wicked person whose aim was to use this blog to create mischief."

The website, launched in 2005, is run by an anonymous blogger who goes by the name of "Media Critic" and who jokingly refers to himself as "a miserable old disgruntled goat." It says he lives in Guyana.

"The writer has already apologized on the blog, so we have to see what the next step is," said police Cmdr. Paul Slowe.

The false report came just hours after the government took over Guyana's Colonial Life Insurance Company, the local subsidiary of the Trinidad-based CL Financial Group.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Deeks on March 02, 2009, 09:34:11 PM
All yuh know what that means for any Trini going in the caribbean to set a company. Duprey spoil we "reputation"
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: capodetutticapi on March 02, 2009, 10:10:56 PM
Guyana hunts for bloggers after false bank report causes panic
Last Updated: Monday, March 2, 2009 | 8:54 AM ET
CBC News


Police in Guyana say they are looking for bloggers who caused alarm with a false report that a commercial bank in the South American country had requested a $6.35-million bailout to avert a collapse.

The Guyana Bank for Trade & Industry said it fielded thousands of calls from worried customers after a website posted a report Thursday that the bank was seeking government aid, which it said was not true. The bank said there was no mass withdrawal of funds and the government's central bank said the institution was sound.

A police statement issued Friday called the blog report "erroneous, wicked and intended to cause public mischief" and it said officers have asked for international and local help "to verify who is hosting this website" and pursue other information.

The website, www.livinguyana.blogspot.com, displayed a message Saturday indicating it had been "eliminated."

The website earlier had removed the original report and published an apology, accepting that the information was "100 per cent incorrect." It said it "relayed information by someone who was duped by a wicked person whose aim was to use this blog to create mischief."

The website, launched in 2005, is run by an anonymous blogger who goes by the name of "Media Critic" and who jokingly refers to himself as "a miserable old disgruntled goat." It says he lives in Guyana.

"The writer has already apologized on the blog, so we have to see what the next step is," said police Cmdr. Paul Slowe.

The false report came just hours after the government took over Guyana's Colonial Life Insurance Company, the local subsidiary of the Trinidad-based CL Financial Group.


6.35 million guyanese is like $100.00 tnt money.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Blue on March 03, 2009, 02:22:53 AM
Guyana hunts for bloggers after false bank report causes panic
Last Updated: Monday, March 2, 2009 | 8:54 AM ET
CBC News


Police in Guyana say they are looking for bloggers who caused alarm with a false report that a commercial bank in the South American country had requested a $6.35-million bailout to avert a collapse.

The Guyana Bank for Trade & Industry said it fielded thousands of calls from worried customers after a website posted a report Thursday that the bank was seeking government aid, which it said was not true. The bank said there was no mass withdrawal of funds and the government's central bank said the institution was sound.

A police statement issued Friday called the blog report "erroneous, wicked and intended to cause public mischief" and it said officers have asked for international and local help "to verify who is hosting this website" and pursue other information.

The website, www.livinguyana.blogspot.com, displayed a message Saturday indicating it had been "eliminated."

The website earlier had removed the original report and published an apology, accepting that the information was "100 per cent incorrect." It said it "relayed information by someone who was duped by a wicked person whose aim was to use this blog to create mischief."

The website, launched in 2005, is run by an anonymous blogger who goes by the name of "Media Critic" and who jokingly refers to himself as "a miserable old disgruntled goat." It says he lives in Guyana.

"The writer has already apologized on the blog, so we have to see what the next step is," said police Cmdr. Paul Slowe.

The false report came just hours after the government took over Guyana's Colonial Life Insurance Company, the local subsidiary of the Trinidad-based CL Financial Group.


6.35 million guyanese is like $100.00 tnt money.

lol, guyana jus want 2 be in ting, yuh done know dey eh have no money.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Bakes on March 09, 2009, 11:59:47 AM
Don't u think dey should lock up this man and throw away de key because how he indiscriminately spend we money.  I reading the papers this week and see de man invested in some high profile properties in Florida using we hard earned money.  What de  :cursing: Now people go lose their jobs because he was on a spending spree.  Trinidad really soft yes!  If it was America, he would already be in a cell with Bubba and de soap.



Duprey didn't take anybody's money.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Saywha on March 25, 2009, 10:20:48 AM
Don't u think dey should lock up this man and throw away de key because how he indiscriminately spend we money.  I reading the papers this week and see de man invested in some high profile properties in Florida using we hard earned money.  What de  :cursing: Now people go lose their jobs because he was on a spending spree.  Trinidad really soft yes!  If it was America, he would already be in a cell with Bubba and de soap.



Duprey didn't take anybody's money.



you is he family or wha
Title: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: weary1969 on September 30, 2010, 10:18:48 PM
...PM to make statement today
Gail Alexander
Published: 1 Oct 2010
Gail Alexander
The Government yesterday bailed out at the eleventh hour from proposed legislation which would have blocked legal action against its plans regarding the Clico dilemma. Leader of government business in the House of Representatives, Roodal Moonilal, confirmed that the legislation—the Central Bank Amendment (CBA) Bill—has been withdrawn from today’s House debate agenda.
Moonilal added yesterday: “The Prime Minister will make a comprehensive statement on the situation in the House on Friday (today).”

Among provisions pertaining to the Central Bank, the bill sought to empower the Attorney General to act on issues—such as the Clico problem—arising out of circumstances that resulted in a threat to the stability of the local financial system. It would have also empowered the Attorney General to apply to the courts for the appointment of a chief restructuring officer for an institution that is given assistance under this legislation. A three-fifths’ special majority of votes—26 of the 41 MPs—was required for the bill’s passage since it would have affected sections of the Constitution concerning constitutional rights. The bill was expected to have been passed in the House since the ruling People’s Partnership has 29 MPs. The Opposition PNM has 12. Instead, however, Government would now present a bill on procurement practices for today’s House debate.

Government’s decision to pull back on the CBA Bill was confirmed after yesterday’s Cabinet meeting where the bill was expected to have been “finalised” and given “final approval” (sic) according to announcements on Tuesday by Attorney General Anand
Ramlogan. However, yesterday’s weekly Cabinet session chaired by Prime Minister Kamla Persad Bissessar—who returned from overseas Wednesday—withdrew the bill Ramlogan had promoted as the “flesh and bones” of the Government’s Clico plan. Government’s about-face yesterday arose after continuing criticism, and threat of legal action regarding its plans on the Clico issue. The Clico policyholders’ group has called for a meeting with Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar on the situation. Asked about the withdrawal of the CBA Bill, Moonilal said the plans announced in the 2010-2011 budget to deal with the Clico dilemma would be effected via other measures. He said the proposed legislation was just one suggested measure regarding the Clico problem.

“But we have other options to pursue including listening to the concerns of parties,” Moonilal added. Asked about the options, Moonilal repeated: “As I said, the Prime Minister will respond more comprehensively.” Moonilal denied that recent arguments by former attorney general Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj had influenced Government’s decision on—or to pull back from—the CBA Bill. Moonilal declined comment on how the bill might limit the rights of Clico policyholders to take legal action. PNM MP Colm Imbert, who was scheduled to have delivered the Opposition’s reply to the Government on the bill today, said yesterday: “Clearly, they had to pull this bill since it would have been oppressive, draconian and the beginning of a creeping dictatorship.” “Government needed a special majority to pass the bill because it takes away the rights of policyholders to take action against Clico and the Central Bank on the current matter,” he said.

“It provided no alternative remedy and would have left policyholders in pain and in limbo. “It’s very inhumane legislation. It deprives people of their rights to justice. Government does not need this bill to provide funds to pay Clico investors. Its only purpose is to prevent a lawsuit. “They haven’t dealt with the substantive issue—only tried to block complaint—when what they should be doing is holding discussions with policyholders and improving their offer.”
Ramlogan had alluded to strengthening financial regulations in his budget contribution last week. However, first concrete word of the proposed CBA legislation arose this week. The day after Maharaj’s contentions on Clico aired—while the Prime Minister was overseas—a special Cabinet meeting on the Clico issue was convened on Monday under acting Prime Minister Errol McLeod. On Tuesday, McLeod and Finance Minister Winston Dookeran defended the Government’s Clico plan at a media conference, alongside Ramlogan who attacked Maharaj’s arguments. Ramlogan is quoted as saying that the planned bill would have effected and facilitated the Finance Minister’s budget policy announcement.

Ramlogan said the proposed bill would be “the flesh and bones of the formula we have come up with” and would effect and implement assistance for Clico depositors. Short on the legislation’s details, Ramlogan had announced that yesterday’s Cabinet session would have finalised and given final approval to the bill. He said the Clico plan would have been a private arrangement between the Government and depositors who chose to avail themselves of the plan and would not have involved the regulatory aspects of Central Bank’s powers.
Ramlogan said the bill would have been tabled in Parliament today to “give legal authority and proper framework” to effect this solution.
However, the bill is now off the table.

PNM’s Imbert added: “Even if the House passed the bill, I wonder if Independent senators would have supported it, since it was so draconian and oppressive.” Independent senators did not receive a copy of the bill in the usual weekly package of documents sent to them yesterday, they confirmed. Independent bench leader Basharat Ali said he had not seen the bill. “So I can’t formulate a position...All I know is, it is supposed to be going to the House on Friday and House leader Moonilal informed me that we in Senate will be doing it next Tuesday, provided it’s passed in the House,” Ali said.
policyholders welcome decision
Clico Policyholders Group has welcomed the Government’s withdrawal of the Central Bank Amendment Bill, the group’s Peter Permell said yesterday. “While we feel the Prime Minister’s remarks—to take-it or leave-it where the Government’s plan was concerned—were unfortunate, we feel she only said so since she was not in T&T recently and was not fully briefed on the issue,” he said. “But we feel Government should be commended for withdrawing the CBA Bill as it opens the door for dialogue...We stand ready to engage in this with the PM or her technical people.”
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: weary1969 on September 30, 2010, 10:20:15 PM
Did she not already make a statement- Take it or Leave It? I guess she 4got lie down by it.
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: Brownsugar on October 01, 2010, 05:00:53 AM
ooohhh guuudd....Ramesh back in town!!.... :devil:
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: weary1969 on October 01, 2010, 06:13:53 AM
ooohhh guuudd....Ramesh back in town!!.... :devil:

ENTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: sammy on October 01, 2010, 06:14:49 AM
shows that the govt willing to listen and re-think its policies
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: weary1969 on October 01, 2010, 10:21:20 AM
shows that the govt willing to listen and re-think its policies

STEUPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. A policy 2 stop people from suing yuh. What a slippery slope. Next bill is 2 say d warriors wrong 2 sue and not entitle 2 dey money.
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: AirMan on October 01, 2010, 07:12:37 PM
Breaking News
Commission of Inquiry into CLICO, Hindu Credit Union
.
Story Created: Oct 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM ECT


Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar has announced that there will be a Commission of Inquiry into CLICO and the Hindu Credit Union.

Following is the Prime Minister's address in Parliament today:

--Mr. Speaker, my colleague would indeed pilot the Motion that is on the Order Paper in a short while. I thank you for the opportunity to make this statement to the House. 

The CL Financial crisis is, perhaps, one of the largest failures in our country's history; financial failures.  We believe that it is important to reiterate and reemphasize the magnitude and systemic exposures that may arise from this crisis, as well as some of the factors which contributed to this fiasco, based on our understanding to date.  May I say, we continue to gain more and more information as time unfolds daily..Continue..http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Breaking-Event-104183974.html
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: Deeks on October 01, 2010, 07:48:45 PM
Hear we go again. Another in a long list of C o I. Will anything result after it is done?
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: weary1969 on October 01, 2010, 11:01:36 PM
Hear we go again. Another in a long list of C o I. Will anything result after it is done?

Yep another waste of time and money.
Title: Re: Govt withdraws Clico bill
Post by: Brownsugar on October 02, 2010, 04:28:08 AM
shows that the govt willing to listen and re-think its policies

 :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

If they were really listening, we'd have state boards by now, the laptop thing would have been dead in the water, Steve and Ish woulda be on a plane to the US long time, the Min of Public Utilities would have resigned since the expose on his handling of the Desalcott contract and he would have taken his "Acting" CEO with him, they would have kept the policy the PNM had in place to deal wit CLICO, they would have come clean with the pensioners (no scratch that one it was a misprint and the pensioners getting exactly what was promised ::) ::))......

Yuh want more??.....steups!!  Bunch ah frigging headless chickens eh know where they arse from they elbow is.....
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on June 11, 2011, 04:35:41 AM
DUPREY'S $96M BONUS
By Jada Loutoo (Newsday) Saturday, June 11 2011


FORMER CL Financial honcho, billionaire businessman Lawrence Duprey received, over a seven year period, “consultancy fees, salary and bonuses,” as direct payments from Colonial Life Insurance Company Limited (Clico), amounting to over $96.8 million to support his personal needs and lifestyle and that of members of his family.

The shocking claim forms part of the Central Bank and Clico’s civil lawsuit against the businessman who has been in control of the insurance behemoth and its parent company for over 20 decades, until recently.

On Tuesday, attorneys representing the Central Bank and Clico — a subsidiary of CL Financial — initiated legal proceedings against Duprey and Andre Monteil, a former group financial director of CL Financial, seeking what could amount to billions in damages.

The two are being made to answer as to why the conglomerate failed, taking with it millions of dollars of investments of policyholders and investors and threatening the stability of the country’s economy. They have been accused of mismanagement of Clico, misapplication and misappropriation of the insurance giant’s income and assets to the detriment of its policyholders and mutual fund investors.

A statement from the Central Bank said civil proceedings were filed against Duprey, Monteil, CL Financial, Dalco Capital Management and Stone Street Capital Limited – companies both men were affiliated with – rising from the failure of Clico which resulted in the Central Bank having to exercise its emergency powers under Section 44D of the Central Bank Act, in respect of the insurance giant.

According to the statement of case filed by the Central Bank and Clico, there were similar payments to Dalco totalling $468.9 million.

Monteil was said to have received salaries, totalling $16.8 million over a four-year period, as well as receiving consultancy fees, on behalf of Stone Street, to the tune of US$4.5 million (TT$28.8 million) for separate transactions, according to the lawsuit obtained by Newsday.

Stone Street was presented as the CL Financial group’s financial advisers. It was said the monies paid to Duprey and Monteil were procured from Clico coffers.

The lawsuit alleges that Clico’s operation was “grossly deficient,” claiming that interests of policyholders and mutual fund investors were used for funding of Duprey’s personal needs and lifestyle, as well as those of other members of his family and private companies.

Additional information obtained by Newsday indicates that Clico’s monies were used to fund “unsuitable and high risk” projects in pursuit of Duprey’s personal global ambitions, including real estate projects in Florida.

These transactions are said to be the Capri Project, Palazzo Las Olas, the Merrick Park Project and The Wellington preserve Project and Clico was reported to have provided primary financing between 2001 to 2009, involving the provision of eight guarantees of a US$245 million loan to Capri Resorts and Capri Hotel in 2006; the injection of a further $18.5 million to restructure the loan. It was said that Clico has no equity in the project and the issue is still under investigation.

Additionally, it has been alleged that Clico’s monies were used to invest in other unsuccessful Florida property ventures at Palazzo Las Olas, Wellington Preserve and Merrick Park, resulting in losses to the company, exceeding US$55 million.

The bank and Clico’s lawsuit, spoke of the operation of two types of Ponzi schemes by using Clico’s “today’s premiums to pay yesterday’s obligations.”

CL Financial was described as having increasingly become “a behemoth built on debt” while another subsidiary Clico Investment Bank (CIB) was “rumoured to be a basket case, but has been for years.”

The insurance giant — which has over 100,000 individual clients, 450 group health and life clients, 180 group pension plan clients and 14,000 pensioners — was said to be periodically unable to pay its debts, including being unable to meet its obligations to policyholders in full.

The Central Bank and the Government were forced to take control of the conglomerate and its banking and insurance subsidiaries, in January 2009, after Duprey sought a bailout when Clico and CIB’s liquidity problems were made public.

It almost immediately faced a slew of policyholder lawsuits stemming from its inability to pay claims as they fell due.

The prized Clico was said to be weighed down with policyholders’ liabilities of more than $12 billion.

At that time CL Financial controlled over $100 billion of assets in at least 72 companies in 32 countries throughout the region and the world and its financial interests covered several industry sectors including banking and financial services, energy, real estate, manufacturing and distribution.

In the months following its bailout, the financially-stricken Clico reportedly sucked up more than $5 billion in taxpayers’ money. According to the statement of case, in 2008, the Central Bank determined that Clico’s statutory fund (at December 31, 2007) was in deficit by $616,729,110.

Towards the end of 2008, having determined that there was a significant deficit in Clico’s statutory fund in 2007, the Central Bank was said to have become concerned about the state of the fund and made contact with the company’s officials.

The Central Bank’s deputy director of financial institutions was informed that Clico’s statutory fund was deficient by some $2 billion and investigations of the fund’s deterioration points to it being in deficit from as far back as 2001.

Eighty-three percent of Clico’s assets were said to be invested in other companies of the CL Financial group, including over $4.2 billion in fixed deposits with CIB, raising red flags with the Central Bank.

CIB was said, at the time of Central Bank’s intervention, to be suffering from low liquidity ratios and being unable to convert the fixed deposits held by Clico into cash within a reasonable time frame, while the returns on Clico’s investments in other CL Financial group companies had declined in value due to falling market prices for real estate and methanol.

Clico was described as a “cash cow” and the “cash engine” for CL Financial. The lawsuit also alleges that there was no proper governance of Clico, CL Financial or CIB.

The civil proceedings has highlighted that the actual position in relation to the CL Financial group, Clico and CIB was very different from the self-portrayed position and the general public impression.

“Indeed, increasingly over time their actual position became the inverse of the self-portrayed position,” the lawsuit noted.

It was also said that auditors and actuaries expressed concerns that, from as early as 1995, the financial state of Clico was of great concern and the company’s financial state was also of constant and increasing concern to regulators.

“Over the years, Clico’s assets and liabilities were misrepresented, misreported and manipulated, including by related party transactions in order to conceal the deficit and increasing chasm in the statutory fund.”

Investigations into CIB, to date, have also revealed that the bank has failed to perform its duties as trustee of the mutual funds and at January 20, 2009 was estimated to have net liabilities of about $4.7 billion.

An Ernst and Young report — which also forms part of winding-up proceedings filed by CIB and its State appointed manager — noted that CIB “would have probably been deemed insolvent in 2007.”

“Investigations into the affairs of the CL Financial group, Clico and CIB have been and continue to be complex and difficult, especially in relation to earlier years,” the lawsuit notes. On Wednesday, Attorney General Anand Ramlogan said the claim revealed that a large and fast expanding insurance company led people to believe that it was safe for policyholders to invest in it and they will get a very high and attractive rate of return and in the end, there was an artificial layer within the management of the company which led it to implode as it were.

He also said he has directed that all material unearthed from the investigations into CL Financial, Clico and its subsidiaries be sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions for determination as to whether criminal charges can be laid against the principals of the conglomerate.

In a separate interview, DPP Roger Gaspard admitted he had been in receipt of documents from the Central Bank and was in the process of seeking advice from Queen’s Counsel on the issue. There are currently several lawsuits before the courts filed by investors and policyholders seeking to get back their investments from the failed companies (Clico and CIB). A commission of inquiry – led by sole commissioner Sir Anthony Colman – has also been launched to investigate the failure of CL Financial and several of its subsidiaries.

The Central Bank said the legal proceedings were based on the forensic investigations commissioned by the bank into the affairs of Clico. The forensic work is continuing and may result in the expansion of this claim and/or further action. Up to yesterday, attorneys for both men were said to be formulating their defence of the claims stated in the Central Bank and Clico’s lawsuit against them.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: lefty on June 11, 2011, 07:31:59 AM
@ flex Ah it might be ah small oversight eh but which paper.


Clico been stretchin dey self for years and the clico situation had been bubbling for years (over d course of 2 govt administrations) and the d regulators stood idly by an did nothing..........in fact the regulators were being constantly emasculated by people in authority for d sake ah dem Bounce an Loss agencies much less Clico, Ramesh knew it, in fact I suspect everybody in the "higher up" inner circle knew or had an inkling, if people feel dat "wah is she name ??? " and Montiel is d only people dat was able to secure dey money when d ship sink, dey sleepin under ah rock, Clico wasn't no ponsy  scheme perse but dey was over extending deyself and overstating d potential gains to keep d premiums comin in to stay liquid or maintain d illusion of liquidity, then the financial crash went into overdrive(I tink dat was comin looong time) and all fell down  :(............
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: rotatopoti3 on June 11, 2011, 07:43:13 AM
@ flex Ah it might be ah small oversight eh but which paper.

Look lefty righty and lefty again...den look in d 2nd line....tell me wha yuh see
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: lefty on June 11, 2011, 09:26:02 AM
Look lefty righty and lefty again...den look in d 2nd line....tell me wha yuh see

ah not blind d post was edited not to long after I posted
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on June 12, 2011, 05:44:40 AM
Clico, CB suit targets assets
By JADA LOUTOO (TT Newsday).
Sunday, June 12 2011


Former CL Financial chairman, billionaire businessman Lawrence Duprey, and the company’s former financial director, former Clico Investment Bank boss Andre Monteil, could find themselves doling out millions of dollars in restitution if the Central Bank and Colonial Life Insurance Company Limited (Clico) are successful in their civil suit against the two.

With no holds barred, the Central Bank and Clico intend to ask the local courts to order that the two men, and their companies — parent company CL Financial, Dalco Capital Management and Stone Street Capital — pay financial compensation for the roles they may have played in the collapse of the region’s prominent insurance and financial giant.

According to documents filed in the court by Central Bank and Clico, the judge who will hear the case is being asked to make orders for the two men, as well as their companies, to not only pay restitution, but also deliver up whatever assets they have in their possession, now or previously, which may have been acquired from Clico and its statutory fund or mutual funds.

On Tuesday last, the Central Bank and Clico created headline news when a statement was issued by the former, indicating that civil proceedings had been filed in the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago against the men at the helm of what was considered the region’s most successful financial institution.

The civil suit came more than two years after the collapse of the prized insurance giant. In 2009, Duprey was forced to turn to the Central Bank and the then PNM government for help, after he found himself unable to keep his massive conglomerate afloat amidst a turbulent global financial meltdown, and falling methanol and real estate prices. The life-line offered by the Central Bank and the then government angered many around the region, most of whom had invested their life savings in the companies controlled by the two men.

Former Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira and Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams defended the intervention, saying it had to be done to protect the already delicate local economy and ensure that the insurance company could return to financial health after it found itself swirling in a sea of red ink under Duprey’s watch.

That sea has now turned black — a good sign, according to present Finance Minister Winston Dookeran, who noted recently that the company was slowly showing signs of being able to breathe on its own and may soon be taken off the life-support system.

The insurance behemoth’s thousands of policyholders and investors are hopeful that they will not have to wait the 20 years to get back their returns; a plan devised by Dookeran to ensure that they do not end up the biggest losers while protecting the already vulnerable local economy.

With the lawsuit now filed and the provisions that the Central Bank and Clico are asking for: damages and restitution, many are looking on with bated breaths, hopeful that they, too, will get a piece of the pie.

The lawsuit filed last Tuesday asks that Clico be allowed to trace, follow and recover the lost assets or recover whatever substituted assets are available from the men and their companies. The document filed in the court noted that for two decades, the impression portrayed in TT and throughout the Caribbean region of the CL Financial Group of companies, was of a highly successful, fast expanding and diversified international group – the creation of a man with apparently remarkable talent, ambition and vision. It was noted that Duprey promoted and projected that impression in persona, personal wealth, lifestyle, largesse and publicity. His mantra was growth and sales and he rose from being Clico’s IT manager in 1970 to its chairman and also head honcho of the group of companies.

Clico was incorporated as an insurance business in 1936 and was built and founded by Duprey’s uncle Cyril Duprey. The elder Duprey suffered a stroke in 1987 and died a year later.

Both CL Financial and Clico were portrayed as successful, offering attractive products with very high returns and in so far as the group was concerned, was extending its arms to embrace sectors beyond the world of finance in places such as the US, South America, the UK, Europe and Oman, in the Gulf. The reality that was CLF and Clico was very different – in fact it was the very opposite, the lawsuit claimed.

It has been alleged that the man once considered a financial genius operated two Ponzi schemes, channelling investors and policyholders’ monies to fund his wide global ambitions, which included real estate in Florida, acquisitions of European and Caribbean drinks companies, energy companies and the construction of methanol plants in the Caribbean and the Gulf.

It has been noted from a former CL employee that “generally, every risk known to man and then some are in Clico’s’s balance sheet”.

“Clico does not invest assets in support of its liabilities.”

Already, Clico, as part of the bailout plan by the Central Bank and Government, has sucked up more than $5 billion in taxpayers’ money. It was this high and fast wheeling and dealing which led to its equally fast destruction and to the civil suit launched last week.

The lawsuit notes that as Clico expanded, so too did the debt owed to it by CLF and CIB. Over the years, CLF’s debt to Clico was estimated at $2.4 billion by 2008, while CIB’s debt was estimated at $4.23 billion. Clico was unable to recover the amounts owed to it by both CLF and CIB and found itself being unable to pay its own debts, particularly to meet the demands of its policyholders.

Duprey and Monteil have been accused of not seeking to recover the sums of money owed to Clico, but instead accepting fresh certificates of deposits from the company.

The lawsuit filed against Duprey, Monteil and their companies in the courts alleges breach of statutory and common law duties and related accessory liabilities on the part of the defendants, and highlights certain egregious transactions involving the use of Clico’s assets and income to its detriment, such as transactions related to shares in Republic Bank Limited; drinks transactions including Lascelles de Mercado (a Jamaican group); energy transactions including the sale of Clico’s stake in Clico Energy Ltd; Florida property transactions; and the sale of seven million Home Mortgage Bank shares.

The pleadings highlight, “the subordination of the interests of Clico, its policyholders, mutual fund unit investors to the private interests of Duprey and Monteil and their companies; the lack of proper governance and serial mismanagement; and improper dealing with Clico’s assets and the funds of policyholders and mutual fund unit holders.

The Central Bank said last week that the legal proceedings are based on the forensic investigations commissioned by the bank into the affairs of Clico. The forensic work is continuing and may result in the expansion of this claim and/or further action.

It also alleges that there was no proper governance of Clico, CLF and CIB and that the insurance giant’s assets and liabilities were misrepresented, misreported and manipulated in order to conceal the deficit and increasing chasm in the Statutory Fund.

Clico was alleged to be CLF’s cash cow as the group was unable to pay its expenses or obligations. Clico was made to pay these but was not compensated. Clico was also used for Duprey’s personal benefit and to fund his vision, it is alleged. It was also alleged that he received bonuses and salaries totalling TT$96.8 million. Dalco also received commissions totalling $486.9 million from Clico. Monteil has been alleged to have received salaries estimated at $16.8 million, even for the period when he was no longer a director of the company from 2005 to 2008.

Monteil, a former PNM Treasurer, has been accused of receiving commissions on Stone Street’s behalf, contrary to director benefit prohibition, including a US$3.5 million commission payment for the 2004 CIB ten percent shareholding purchase in Republic Bank Limited.

It was also alleged that sometime in 2005, Clico was made to transfer $7.5 million to CLF to fund a dividend payment, as well as, in the following year, made to replenish a bank account in the amount of $22 million. Clico was also made to procure non-performing assets in its statutory fund, including a $500 million CIB bond in 2002, as well as certificates of deposits for fixed deposits for which CIB did not pay interests and neither did CLF nor CIB pay their debts when they fell due.

Duprey was said to be taking money from the company as he wished while the Clico board of directors sat on the sidelines, unable to say or do anything and at times even being unaware of the transactions. Both men have also been accused of failing to report to the Central Bank, Clico’s statutory fund deficit and its serious liquidity and solvency problems.

Also contained in the pleadings is an accusation against Duprey that he sold Clico’s share of Clico Energy in breach of the Memorandum of Understanding signed with the PNM government in January 2009.

The build up of intercompany debt led to contagion risks said to be high and assets and money were allegedly transferred from Clico in return for Certificates of Deposit from CIB, totalling over $4.23 billion, and CLF debentures, totalling over $1.1 billion, as well as a CIB $500 million bond.

It was also alleged that the men kept reinvesting fixed deposits in the same financial institution instead of obtaining a return of its principal to reduce its exposure to risks. In so doing, both men were said to have exposed Clico to contagion risk and excessive credit risk of CLF and CIB. It was said to have been done “all in the family” and with CLF at the centre, the group was as strong as it weakest link and owing just about everybody.

The pleadings filed in court lists in details several other transactions allegedly perpetrated by both men, including the transfer of HMB shares, held by Clico, to Monteil’s Stone Street investment firm. This allegation also forms part of another lawsuit filed by CIB’s state-appointed manager Carl Hiralal, and is expected to be called tomorrow.

Hiralal is seeking the return to CIB of some $110 million as a result of a loan transaction by Monteil in 2007 to his Stone Street Capital investment firm. The monies being sought represent the outstanding $78 million loan balance plus interest payments on the February 14, 2007, CIB borrowing issued to Stone Street.

The lawsuit, filed by Hiralal in April of last year, claims Monteil and Trotman colluded and breached their directors’ fiduciary duties and failed to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company. It is being contended that the $78 million loan paid out in December 2007 to facilitate Stone Street Capital’s acquisition of Clico’s 43.8 percent interest in HMB, breached HMB’s internal control procedures and was nothing short of an act of “self- dealing” by Monteil, who was chairman of HMB and also group financial director of CL Financial.

The lawsuit accuses Monteil and Trotman of a series of wrongful actions and also takes the entire CIB board of directors to task for mishandling the situation and breach of fiduciary duties on several counts, key among them the failure of the directors at a board meeting on June 22, 2007, to ensure that the loan was fully secured.

Monteil, in his defence filed in reply to the lawsuit, confirmed that Stone Street Capital did not repay the $78 million transferred to it under a loan from CIB to buy the HMB shares, after its transfer to a company later bought by Dalco — another company owned by Duprey. He also said the transfer of the $78 million to Stone Street Capital was done on the strength of an oral agreement and the CIB board accepted that the shares were being bought by the loan as security for the same loan. He also deposed that at times, the Central Bank conducted detailed inspections of the CIB books.

The Central Bank’s lawsuit against Duprey and Monteil alleges that because of their breaches of fiduciary duties, Clico has suffered loss and damage and has been prejudiced in so far as its entitlements of property, money, shares, deposits and real estate were misappropriated and wrongfully diverted from the company; and has been exposed to and continued to be exposed to multiple liabilities and claims, including claims by policyholders and mutual fund investors, most of whom have filed lawsuits seeking to get back their investments.

Clico has also been alleged to have been caused to pay $349 million to CLF, without benefit and has suffered and continues to suffer loss and damage. Clico’s true position being concealed from CBTT led to the bank not being able to intervene earlier and prevent loss and prejudiced, the lawsuit states.

The bank and Clico are claiming that because of Monteil’s and Duprey’s actions and alleged breach of their duties, Clico is entitled to recover money or other property purportedly paid or transferred and compensation for loss sustained by the company.

The bank and Clico are also seeking to have the court rescind, if found to be void or voidable, any agreements made as it relates to the way the insurance giant was used as a cash cow and a lending agency.

In a recent statement, Attorney General Anand Ramlogan said the legal action taken by the Central Bank against Duprey and Monteil was just one of several to come. He said the bank’s claims for damages, equitable compensation and declarations related to certain agreements and property of Clico were very wide and, if successful, will lead to a significant award that can be properly utilised in the interest of the company and its policyholders.

He said of the lawsuit, “What the claim really revealed is that a large and fast expanding insurance company led people to believe that it was safe for policyholders to invest in it and they will get a very high and attractive rate of return and in the end, there was an artificial layer within the management of the company which led it to implode as it were.

“The divergence of funds into several subsidiaries, the acquisition of substantial real estate holdings utilising funds from the depositors, we have the interest in Fort Lauderdale and elsewhere, the divergence of dividends which were owed to Clico, we have certain transactions within the energy sector which need to be looked at. Of course we have the sale by Clico to Stone Street of seven million HMB shares which was not in the interest of Clico, and at a price which was not authorised by Clico.”

On Tuesday, hours before the lawsuit was filed, Ramlogan met with the Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams and a high-powered team of attorneys from London as well as local counsel.

Leading the team is John Powell, QC, of 4 New Square Chambers in Lincoln’s Inn, a leading expert in financial services and complex fraud cases, as well as professional negligence. Also part of the team is Leigh-Ann Mulcahy, supported by Nicholas Fletcher, a senior partner with Berwin Leighton Paisner in London. Also forming a part of the team are local attorneys Ian Benjamin and Elena Araujo, who filed the lawsuit at the Port-of-Spain High Court Registry at about 2.30 pm on Tuesday.

Ramlogan said he has also ordered that all the information obtained from the investigations and inquiries into the failure of CL Financial and its subsidiaries, be forwarded to the DPP to see whether they can be of assistance to him in deciding whether criminal charges should be laid. The AG was adamant that the Government could neither influence nor pressure the Commissioner of Police or the DPP to initiate criminal prosecution. But he added that the latest lawsuit was the first in a series of claims that will be filed in the Clico scandal.

“Others are in the pipeline and are nearing completion,” he said.

Gaspard also disclosed that he was in receipt of documents from the Central Bank and was in the process of having Queen’s Counsel give advice on whether there are grounds for criminal charges to be laid.

Sunday Newsday understands that forensic accountant Bob Lindquist, whose forensic report formed the bedrock for the civil suit against Duprey and Monteil, is expected in the country this week. He is expected to hold talks with officials in connection with investigations surrounding Udecott and its former boss, Calder Hart.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on June 12, 2011, 05:45:39 AM
Look lefty righty and lefty again...den look in d 2nd line....tell me wha yuh see

ah not blind d post was edited not to long after I posted

Yes, it was edited... it only had the writer, I added Newsday in after when I saw lefty message.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on June 24, 2011, 05:53:30 AM
Stop the probe
Duprey claims double jeopardy:
By Renuka Singh (Express).


BUSINESS MOGUL Lawrence Duprey yesterday made moves to stall the Commission of Enquiry into collapse of financial conglomerate CL Financial, scheduled to kick off on Monday.

He claims that a lawsuit filed by the Central Bank, earlier this month, against him and other former company officials, will strain his legal resources as both proceedings will overlap.

A five-page document issued by the legal team representing the former CL Financial chairman was delivered to Commissioner Sir Anthony Coleman and all other interested parties to the proceedings yesterday, requesting that the Enquiry be put off until the civil lawsuit between the Central Bank and Duprey was resolved.

The lawsuit alleges that Duprey and several other former company officials misapplied and misappropriated billions of dollars to the detriment of its policyholders and mutual fund investors.

Duprey's legal team is expected to file its response to the Central Bank lawsuit by July 6.

In January 2009, under the former People's National Movement administration, the Central Bank entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with CL Financial, the parent company of insurance giant CLICO, British American, and several other subsidiaries, to bailout the then insolvent company.

The debt has since accumulated to $7 billion and counting, with only investments of $75,000 and under being refunded. Other investors have taken court action to recover their funds.

Just three days before the official start of the Enquiry, Dupery's legal team, attorneys Lionel Luckhoo, Andrew Mitchell QC and Rajiv Persad, said there would be a major overlap between the Enquiry and the civil lawsuit against Duprey.

Legal sources said that if the Enquiry is not voluntarily rescheduled Duprey's legal team are prepared to head to High Court to seek an injunction blocking the proceedings.

The Enquiry, which had a procedural hearing in April, is scheduled to begin receiving evidence between Monday and July 8, at Winsure Building, Richmond Street, Port of Spain. The Enquiry was also appointed to investigate the collapse of the Hindu Credit Union.

Among the reasons for application of the stay was the duplication and overlap of the presentations in both cases.

"There are major issues of regulatory oversight that will need to be aired during the civil claim and that is likely that you (Commissioner) will have to look at these issues as well the possible high cost of the civil claim by the Central Bank," the letter stated.

"Such duplication will prejudice the civil action," the legal team noted.

Luckhoo noted that the Enquiry had no power to award financial compensation but could only make recommendations for future action.

He said the lawsuit initiated by the Central Bank "might have as a consequence a significant financial order against one or more of the parties".

"It is essential that their resources are properly applied to the action where the risk is paramount," he said.

The team also cited the wide coverage of the Enquiry as well as it being fodder for political mileage among their reasons for the application of stay to be accepted.

"The Commission of Enquiry concomitantly with the civil claim would be an abuse of the process of the judicial process in that there will be a substantial overlap of witnesses, information and the subject matter involved," Luckhoo noted.

The letter went on to detail ten points and 23 sub-points all outlining reasons for staying the Enquiry.

"Given the wide publicity, any findings of the Commission of Enquiry are likely to be prejudicial to the fair trial of the civil claim and the appearance of the administration of justice," he said.

Luckhoo noted the Attorney General Anand Ramlogan and "several other Government Ministers" have already called for "certain matters" be dealt with in this Enquiry and already publicly stated that those issues would be referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

"As such this will impact on any fair criminal trial that might be in contemplation, requiring someone in the position of Mr Duprey to fight on three fronts," he said.

"There has been several reports by a certain Government official that demonstrate the Government's intention to use that Commission of Enquiry as part of the Government's political campaign," he said, adding that the Enquiry should avoid being "dragged" into that campaign.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on June 30, 2011, 09:17:55 AM
Duprey blanked
ANDRE BAGOO (Newsday).
Thursday, June 30 2011


CHAIRMAN of the Clico Commission of Inquiry Sir Anthony Coleman yesterday refused an application by lawyers acting on behalf of former CL Financial chairman Lawrence Duprey to remain silent at the proceedings. The ruling effectively means Duprey will face penalties if he refuses to comply with orders to give oral evidence.

Lead attorney for Duprey, Andrew Mitchell QC, on Monday orally applied for Coleman to allow Duprey to remain a party to the proceedings without being called on to give evidence, given simultaneous civil court proceedings revolving around Clico. The application and resulting legal submissions in response absorbed almost three days of the inquiry’s proceedings.

Coleman yesterday afternoon blanked Duprey’s request after hearing hours of legal submissions.

“I have considered the matter very carefully and have come to the conclusion that I should not accede to the application now before the commission for a number of reasons,” Coleman said.

“I shall not give those reasons now. It seems to me that because of the public interest and the unusual nature of the application…I should give a reasoned judgment which I will give in writing as soon as it can be pulled together.”

“There are certain complexities in this which I wish to express in written form. Accordingly the application…as refined…is refused,” he ruled.

Earlier, attorneys representing the Clico Policyholders’s Group (CPG), the Central Bank, the Ministry of Finance and PricewaterhouseCoopers, all objected to Duprey’s request, leading to Mitchell’s remark that his client’s application faced a “tsunami of opposition.”

Mitchell argued that Duprey’s rights were possibly infringed by the prospect of simultaneous civil and criminal proceedings. Attorney for CPG, Terrence Bharath, argued that the application was premature.

“Mr Duprey ought to present himself here and give evidence,” Bharath said. “The policyholders deserve to hear what happened and Mr Duprey, more than any other person, is the man to explain that.”

Noting that Duprey has been the one who approached the State for its intervention in Clico, Bharath asked, “Why is it that he would approach the Government for help and then not come to the COI and say ‘I am not going to help this inquiry’?” Duprey’s silence, he said, “would be a travesty of justice.”

“At the end of the day it would be wrong. He cannot just stay outside in Miami and remain silent. He must present himself for cross-examination,” Bharath said.

Counsel for the inquiry, Peter Carter QC, argued that Duprey’s application was premature criticised Mitchell for reportedly remarking (not at yesterday’s open hearing) that Duprey faced a mere “flea bite” of a $2,000 fine if he refused to attend the hearings.

“The prospect of criminal proceedings is speculative and when it is speculative one has to wonder whether it comes near to the real risk of prejudice,” Carter said. He noted that the inquiry has clear terms of reference which compel it to unravel what happened in the Clico collapse.

“How could you do that without Mr Duprey playing a central role in this inquiry? It is simply impractical to assume that the inquiry could proceed if Mr Duprey is not a central part or a central figure in the process,” Carter said. He queried how the Central Bank, regulators and auditors would explain their roles if they could not refer to the actions of Duprey.

“How are they to explain their own roles if they are embargoed from referring to the context of Mr Duprey’s statements and actions? How do we do the public and policyholders justice explaining to them what happened?”

Central Bank attorney Bankim Tanki QC noted that civil cases have in the past proceeding alongside inquiries. “The reason for that is that there is no risk of injustice,” he said.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on July 01, 2011, 05:46:52 AM
Duprey paid himself $10.7M
ANDRE BAGOO (Newsday).
Friday, July 1 2011


TEN DAYS after he wrote to the Central Bank warning that the CL Financial (CLF) group needed funds to face-off liquidity problems, former CL Financial chairman Lawrence Duprey and the CLF board oversaw payment of $22.5 million in shareholder dividends — $10.7 million of which was paid to two companies of Duprey.

While Duprey had quietly written Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams on January 13, 2009, saying, “We may need urgent liquidity support to be made available to the group” and warning that the group’s assets could not immediately meet projected calls on cash reserves of the company, at a CLF shareholders meeting, ten days later, he presented a “bold and optimistic” report on the company. Dividends were approved for payment, mere days before the Central Bank’s intervention into CLF companies was announced.

“Such was the apparent affluence of CLF that a $3 dividend was declared for the year ending December 31, 2007,” said Peter Carter, QC, counsel to the Commission of Enquiry into Clico which continued hearings yesterday at the Winsure Building, Richmond Street, Port-of-Spain.

“As there were 7.5 million fully paid shares, that meant dividend payments of $22.5 million. Meanwhile, CIB, Clico and British American Insurance could not pay their depositors and policyholders. A total of $22.5 million dollars was paid out at a time when CLF was illiquid.

“Of this $22.5 million, $10.7 million was paid into two private companies of Mr Duprey,” Carter said, citing Duprey’s 42 percent shareholding in CLF.

Carter’s confirmation of reports of the payment of dividends came as he also disclosed that:

* the CLF group disposed of a lucrative asset, Eurotecnica Melamine SA to a private company of Duprey’s a month before he wrote the Central Bank Governor;

* that Duprey told former Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira at a closed-door emergency meeting days before the Government entered with an Memorandum of Understanding with CLF that “no one knows” the status of the asset hole at the group;

* the CLF group was “a house of cards” and its “labyrinth” of inter-group transactions and entities may have been designed to conceal its true state of affairs.

Carter noted that on December 12, 2008, CE Ltd (a wholly owned subsidiary of Clico Energy Ltd, in which CLF had a 51 percent share) agreed to sell its 60 percent holding (337,800 shares) in Eurotecnica Melamine SA to Swiss Clico.Swiss Clico, he said, was not a part of CL Financial, but a company of Lawrence Duprey’s.

Despite his central role in CLF, Duprey did not attend key meetings with the Ministry of Finance leading up to the State’s intervention, provoking the ire of then Minister of Finance Karen Nunez-Tesheira.

Duprey was not present at a meeting on January 24, 2009 with Nunez-Tesheira, Williams, public servants and CLF officials. Nunez-Tesheira told then CLF secretary Gita Sakal that the assets of Clico may not be adequate to deal with the statutory shortfall and demanded an up-front position with regard to CLF assets. (At the time Nunez-Tesheira, whose late husband was a senior Clico executive, held shares in Clico).

According to Carter, the former PNM finance minister told Sakal, “We need an upfront position now and that means Mr Duprey must come and speak to us now. Mr Duprey holds the key here.” Sakal rebutted that Duprey was not the largest shareholder. But Nunez-Tesheira remained firm, pointing out Duprey’s overwhelming influence and control of the CLF group. The next day Duprey (who appears to have flown into the country from Florida) met the finance minister.

To all queries over assets, he defers to his henchman L Andre Monteil, by this point retained as a “consultant” to “negotiate”. A clearly unimpressed Nunez-Tesheira bluntly cut to the chase:

“It’s very simple, what assets are there to meet the gaps? I need the facts today,” she reportedly said. “I need to know what the status is.” Duprey reportedly replied, “No one knows. By Friday I will have a plan.”

“A company which is in breach of its statutory duties and fiduciary responsibilities is saying we got ourselves into this mess, please help us,” Carter said. But that same company was not willing to disclose key information. “Their position was ‘we have a liquidity problem. We are in meltdown and we are not going to tell you what the position is’.” Of CIB and British American, Carter noted that Ernst & Young prepared reports which “identified substantial failures of management.” BA was in default of statutory requirements by $890 million.

(http://www.newsday.co.tt/galeria/2011-07-01-4-1a_duprey_4.jpg)
HIMSELF TO HIMSELF: Former CL Financial chairman Lawrence Duprey.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Brownsugar on July 01, 2011, 07:06:03 AM
Geez and ages!!!.....Greed boy, greed....

People on the brink of financial collapse (e.g. pensioners who put dey whole life savings in CLICO) and these nasty, greedy, stinking people was hoarding off millions.....

And de hard part is Duprey would never make a jail in this 2 x 4 banana republic....steups!!
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: 100% Barataria on July 02, 2011, 11:37:46 AM
Geez and ages!!!.....Greed boy, greed....

People on the brink of financial collapse (e.g. pensioners who put dey whole life savings in CLICO) and these nasty, greedy, stinking people was hoarding off millions.....

And de hard part is Duprey would never make a jail in this 2 x 4 banana republic....steups!!

World over girl, irrespective of ethnicity, culture, gender or nationality..
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on September 22, 2011, 05:11:00 AM
$90 million A YEAR
Lawyer tells enquiry Duprey raked in big bucks from 'cash cow' CLICO
By by Joel Julien
Sep 21, 2011


LAWRENCE DUPREY was paid $90 million a year from the deposits of policyholders in collapsed insurance company CLICO, attorney Neal Bisnath said yesterday.

Duprey, the former executive chairman of CL Financial, was paid a monthly income of $5 million by subsidiary CLICO.

In addition his yearly income, Duprey was also paid multi-million-dollar consultancy fees throughout the year, Bisnath, CLICO's attorney, said. This totalled $90 million a year, he added.

The payments to Duprey were made to his consultancy firm Dalco Capital Management.

The funds paid to Duprey were withdrawn from the "cash cow" of the CL Financial conglomerate, CLICO, Bisnath said.

"Basically CLF billed CLICO on a monthly basis for consultancy services which CLICO then paid to CLF and that was then paid to Dalco $5 million a month, which was Mr Duprey's pay from CLICO," Bisnath said.

Bisnath made the statements as he cross-examined Michael Carballo, the former group financial director of CL Financial, during the commission of enquiry into the collapse of CL Financial and the Hindu Credit Union (HCU) at the Winsure Building, Richmond Street, Port of Spain, yesterday.

Bisnath said CLICO's cash stream was also used to fund investments made by CL Financial.

"Is it true to say that from what we have seen CLICO was really used as a cash cow in the group?" Bisnath asked Carballo.

"Yes, because CLICO was really the one that had the cash flowing in it," Carballo said.

"And that cash that was flowing happened to be policyholders' money and Mr Duprey and CL were using CLICO policyholders' monies without regard to the risk that it was putting those policyholders under," Bisnath said.

Bisnath described Duprey as a "great investor of other people's money".

He said CLICO invested US$445 million of policyholders' money in a Florida real estate project called Capri, while the investment was worth only US$200 million.

"We know in taking on risks he (Duprey) used policyholders' money, not his personal money; and when you use OPM, other people's money, you can have all kind of fancy dreams and you can make all kind of fancy investments because if you lose it, it is not your money you are losing," Bisnath said.

"He (Duprey) could therefore have a bold and aggressive attitude toward business, and an insatiable risk appetite because it was not his money he was using," Bisnath said.

Bisnath said Duprey's downfall was the lack of proper advisers around him.

"He was a great investor of other people's money, but his downfall was the quality of the advisers around him," Bisnath said.

Bisnath said Duprey had no regard for policyholders.

"Lawrence Duprey ran this entire group like his personal kingdom, that is what was happening in effect," Bisnath said. "Basically, it was a one-man show and Mr Duprey did it all," he said.

"My concern from the CLICO perspective is that all these investments were funded by policyholders' money without fiduciary duty, without regard for risk and without regard for the fact that policyholders could suffer tremendously," Bisnath said.

Earlier in the proceedings, Terrence Bharath, an attorney for the CLICO Policyholders Group, questioned who was reining in Duprey's spending after a series of billion-dollar losses in investments on foreign shores.

"Who was controlling Mr Duprey?" Bharath asked Carballo.

Carballo chuckled.

"It may sound comical, but he was losing billions of dollars in investments around the world and yet still he was accountable to no one?" Bharath asked.

"Presumably his family in terms of the trust would give him certain approvals and latitude to make certain decisions, and I would say a lot of the other shareholders, my observation is, placed a lot of faith in Lawrence (Duprey).

"Some of them saw that he had made good decisions in the past and some of them were just hoping that Lawrence would have the Midas touch," Carballo said.

The commission of enquiry is scheduled to continue today, with Carballo being cross-examined by Fyard Hosein, the attorney representing the Ministry of Finance.

GITA PAID HERSELF $30m
Former CL director tells of strange commissions, huge bonuses
By by Joel Julien


STRANGE commissions, exorbitant bonuses and significant weaknesses in internal controls were the order of the day at CL Financial, former group financial director, Michael Carballo, said yesterday.

Carballo made the statement as he gave evidence for the second day at the Commission of Enquiry into the collapse of CL Financial and the Hindu Credit Union (HCU) at the Winsure Building, Richmond Street, Port of Spain, yesterday.

"There were some weaknesses in internal controls, significant weaknesses in internal controls at CL Financial," Carballo said .

"There were significant problems in terms of what we call proper segregation of duties, whereby the payee and the person approving the payment voucher under proper standards are supposed to be separate so you are supposed to have a segregation of duties so you do not have one paying themselves and this was highlighted when CL Financial had what it called a corporate oversight team," he said.

"People were preparing vouchers and paying themselves, it is hard to control situations like this whereby we have Gita Sakal controlling all banking arrangements and paying herself," Carballo said.

Sakal was the corporate secretary of CL Financial.

Carballo said a debit of US$5 million was made from CL Financial's US dollar account at Royal Bank to pay Sakal's consultancy firm, Corporate Consultants Ltd.

Sakal signed both the invoice and the bank instructions to have the funds debited, Carballo said.

CL chairman Lawrence Duprey was unaware of the US$5 million (TT$32.5m) payment to Sakal and ordered that the money be "immediately returned", Carballo said.

Sakal was paid a US$35,000 monthly salary and was entitled to a US$ 2 million annual bonus, Carballo said.

Carballo said his immediate predecessor, Andre Monteil, also sought a US$2 million consultancy fee and $194 million in commissions to help CL Financial out of its financial troubles.

CL Financial's board of directors was "outraged" that Monteil would seek such "exorbitant fee on the heels of the CL Financial seeking liquidity", Carballo said.

Carballo also told the Commission of "strange" commissions being paid during the investment in real estate projects in Florida.

Carballo said a broker named Charles Pratt told him that he was paid US$85 million on the US$300 Green Island Project.

Carballo also questioned the project management of some of the real estate projects in Florida.

"It was only after I moved to CL Financial I realised how these projects were managed, it was via an entity called DYL," Carballo said.

Carballo said DYL is an acronym for the surnames of Lawrence Duprey, John Yanopoulos and Geoffrey Leid.

"And again I wonder what is Geoffrey Leid's involvement in this especially at a time when Geoffrey Leid is a director and company secretary of an insurance company called CLICO," Carballo said.

"To my knowledge you cannot be a director and company secretary at CLICO and sneak in behind the scenes and generate significant fees on projects whereby the exact funding is coming from the same organisation that you are a director of. DYL is being funded by CLICO," he said.

Carballo is scheduled to take the witness stand today where he will be cross-examined by attorney Terrence Bharath who is representing the CLICO Policyholders Group.

(http://media.trinidadexpress.com/images/1316576954828n38.jpg)
SIGNED INVOICE: Gita Sakal, former corporate secretary of CL Financial

(http://media.trinidadexpress.com/images/1316662932747n24.jpg)
RISK TAKER: Lawrence Duprey
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Brownsugar on September 22, 2011, 05:14:52 AM
Mouth open, story jumping out!!!!
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: zuluwarrior on September 22, 2011, 07:39:08 AM
I was Listening to Morgan Job this morning  he was saying when he was in Parliament, Ramesh Lawrence Maraj told him about this scheme that was taking place in Clico .

He also said UNC and PNM Ministers are involve ,Ministers from the present Government is in this ripoff also , you know what is bad about it noting will happen to the guilty GANG of thieves in high places .

WE KNOW WE LIKE IT SO WE FREE
     
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Football supporter on September 22, 2011, 10:09:54 AM
I've been watching this every night. I cannot believe this was allowed to happen. Nothing was covered up. It seems when Carballo raised objections to some of Dupreys projects, Duprey just sourced funding from other CLICO funds.

Where were the checks and balances from Govt? These deals were possibly illegal as allegedly policyholders funds were being misappropriated. This enquiry is costing a fortune and I hope that at the end, criminal charges will be laid at the feet of those responsible and assets seized to repay policyholders.

One particular deal saw the group acquire Belvedere, the worlds largest vodka producer at a  cost of 300 million euros to purchase 68% of the company. However, the deal gave CLICO no control as the existing shareholders and directors retained control. CLICO had to sell the company at a loss within months.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Dutty on September 22, 2011, 10:29:14 AM

Where were the checks and balances from Govt? These deals were possibly illegal as allegedly policyholders funds were being misappropriated. This enquiry is costing a fortune and I hope that at the end, criminal charges will be laid at the feet of those responsible and assets seized to repay policyholders.


doh hol yuh breath breds...every tin pot 'leader' in power day does be padna with 'businessmen'...is 2 degrees of separation in T&T the higher up the ladder yuh go

Unfortunately T&T need a political leader with so much of his own money that he cant be swayed one way or the other...kinda like bloomberg in NY

even when we had a drug dealer for a police commissioner, crime was around but violent crime was minimal
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: diamondtrim on September 23, 2011, 03:09:50 PM
So Duprey, Sakal, Monteil & Co take money and like deyself................it wrong, it bad, shameful, sad, greedy, call it whatever is d best/worst adjective yuh could find.

Dey all operated within the parameters they were allowed. If d Central Bank guided by d big goat Ewart Williams and d Supervisor of Insurance refuse to check Clico, CLF and whoever else, den Duprey and he team shoulda take ALL d damn money!

If I wukkin in a company dat allowin me to approve payments to myself without secondary questionin...i takin more dan 30m. I takin all. It could have commission of inquiry from here to Timbuktu....we all know nutttin comin out of it. D only 'crime' dese ppl could be charged wit is greed and wickedness.....and d kinda money den gone wit makin it easy to live wit dem tags.

CL aint collapse overnight....when folks was reading how Duplrey makin all kinda fancy deal dey wasnt concerned with how he acquirin d funds to do it...nah...dey greedy too....so dey invest more and more in CL hopin to get piece of d pie. Dey wanna put in 1m to get back 1.5 and so on. Investors was greedy too....jus dat Duprey was smarter dan all ah dem

Dais y ah like Jack Warner and dem.....in trinidad d name of d game is greediest win. And jack and Duprey and dem is d greediest bitches in d world...dat is no exaggeration. So congrats to dem and all d greedy investors hull allyuh tail....allyuh loss d game.....yuh cyah be a greedy fish and wanna jump in a pond wit greedier shark
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Deeks on September 23, 2011, 07:04:31 PM
Allyuh see why Jabloteh and JP "sufferring" now.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Brownsugar on September 23, 2011, 09:36:52 PM
Dey all operated within the parameters they were allowed. If d Central Bank guided by d big goat Ewart Williams and d Supervisor of Insurance refuse to check Clico, CLF and whoever else, den Duprey and he team shoulda take ALL d damn money!


CL aint collapse overnight...

Another "big goat" before Ewart Williams was..........*drum roll*

Winston Dookeran.......
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: weary1969 on September 23, 2011, 09:53:53 PM
Dey all operated within the parameters they were allowed. If d Central Bank guided by d big goat Ewart Williams and d Supervisor of Insurance refuse to check Clico, CLF and whoever else, den Duprey and he team shoulda take ALL d damn money!


CL aint collapse overnight...

Another "big goat" before Ewart Williams was..........*drum roll*

Winston Dookeran.......

 :-X
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Football supporter on September 24, 2011, 07:37:25 AM
So Duprey, Sakal, Monteil & Co take money and like deyself................it wrong, it bad, shameful, sad, greedy, call it whatever is d best/worst adjective yuh could find.

Dey all operated within the parameters they were allowed. If d Central Bank guided by d big goat Ewart Williams and d Supervisor of Insurance refuse to check Clico, CLF and whoever else, den Duprey and he team shoulda take ALL d damn money!

If I wukkin in a company dat allowin me to approve payments to myself without secondary questionin...i takin more dan 30m. I takin all. It could have commission of inquiry from here to Timbuktu....we all know nutttin comin out of it. D only 'crime' dese ppl could be charged wit is greed and wickedness.....and d kinda money den gone wit makin it easy to live wit dem tags.

CL aint collapse overnight....when folks was reading how Duplrey makin all kinda fancy deal dey wasnt concerned with how he acquirin d funds to do it...nah...dey greedy too....so dey invest more and more in CL hopin to get piece of d pie. Dey wanna put in 1m to get back 1.5 and so on. Investors was greedy too....jus dat Duprey was smarter dan all ah dem

Dais y ah like Jack Warner and dem.....in trinidad d name of d game is greediest win. And jack and Duprey and dem is d greediest bitches in d world...dat is no exaggeration. So congrats to dem and all d greedy investors hull allyuh tail....allyuh loss d game.....yuh cyah be a greedy fish and wanna jump in a pond wit greedier shark

1. It is the role of a company's directors to protect the interests of the policyholders. The board is there to ensure this is done. If, as in this case, bad decisions were being made, without due diligence and increasing the risk to policyholders without any protection in place, then the entire board may be sued by policyholders.
2. If a company's board has been deemed to put the interests of directors before the interests of policyholders, those directors can be investigated and prosecuted. The directors have a legal responsibility to put the interests of shareholders and policyholders before their personal interests.
3. Directors who knowingly withold information that could effect decisions from board members and policyholders are infringing several company and financial laws.
4. Directors, company secretary's and financial officers who issue payments to themselves without authority or good reason are not necessarily acting outside a companys rules. However, shareholders and policyholders have the right to question these payments and make redress via civil courts.
5. Although many of the incidents may not have broken specific laws, the failure of senior executives to install efficient checks and balances, to prevent via board voting certain rash decisions, to fail to advise authorities, shareholders and policyholders of their concerns can mean they can be guilty of negligence, particularly with regards to financial transactions.
6. I'm not sure of the laws here, but I'm damn sure that the outcome of this enquiry will be recommendations from Sir Anthony Coleman to the DPP inviting criminal charges to be made.
7. Once the Central Bank put in place an investment committee, things should have steadied, but it appears that directors either lied, misled or ignored its recommendations.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: rotatopoti3 on September 24, 2011, 07:53:09 AM
i cant believe this iz d same Martin Daly dat does try tuh preach "Little House and d Prairie Gospel"....

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Brownsugar on September 24, 2011, 07:53:28 AM
Legislation was passed in the House last week or the week before that has something to do with this matter.  Something about not being able to sue a financial institution etc. etc.  Ah keep forgetting to dig up more on it.  I remember the policyholders group being upset about it when it was first proposed late last year and the government shelved it saying they wouldn' t bring back to the table but apparently they changed their minds.....

When ah have the time I'll check it out....
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Football supporter on September 24, 2011, 07:53:43 AM
DiamondTrim, I'm interested in this comment you made "Dais y ah like Jack Warner and dem.....in trinidad d name of d game is greediest win. And jack and Duprey and dem is d greediest bitches in d world...dat is no exaggeration. So congrats to dem and all d greedy investors hull allyuh tail....allyuh loss d game.....yuh cyah be a greedy fish and wanna jump in a pond wit greedier shark"

I don't know if you don't understand mutual funds, group policies, endowments etc or if you're just ignorant and talking shit. If you're referring to individual investors who were acquaintances of Duprey et al, then I would agree. When you invest, you take a risk, but if that risk is based upon incorrect information, that is still not right. If a company is predicting profits of a certain level, that company should have solid research to show why it is predicting that growth. A company can't just say "we think we're gonna make 20% on this deal", it has to show how it arrived at that figure, i.e. past performance, future growth potential, market analysis etc. Then, it is the investors decision whether to take the risk.

With people investing in mutual funds, such as savings plans and endowments, these are not greedy people. They may only be investing $100 p.m. to build a little nestegg for retirement. If you, DiamondTrim, are not saving for retirement, you are uniquly stupid. If you, DiamondTrim, do not possess a bank account, you are a neandethal. If you are not part of a group pension or health plan, you should take out personal plans for your protection. But if you are doing any of these things, you are then, according to your statement, also "a greedy fish and wanna jump in a pond wit greedier shark"

As for your pride in the ability of Trinis to financially rape and plunder innocent people, government and financial institutions, the sooner you pass away, the better. This saga needs to be the turning point where these powerful dictators are no longer allowed to act without oversight. Many laws need to be tightened and power devolved. It was said that CL Financial directors didn't agree with Duprey, but would not vote against him as he controlled their bonuses. That cannot be allowed to continue. Those directors are just as culpable as Duprey, as they put their interests before the people they swore to protect...the policyholders.

As for Mr Warner....lets see how you feel about him after Weds 28th September.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: diamondtrim on September 24, 2011, 09:29:07 AM
Football Supporter.....your response betrays that which you so quickly attempted to impose upon me.....a complete and utter lack of comprehension. Further to that, you seem to possess an innate tendency to misconstrue the context of postings. Nevertheless, I will attempt to elude your obvious ignorance and seek to populate your mind with the explanation that so obviously sailed over a shallow mind.

Mutual funds, savings plans, endowments etc are all symptomatic of greed. Perhaps it is here that I lost you. Greed is good, for it is this greed which allows us to provide for our families and futures. If you Football Supporter, do not understand this, then not only are you below the intellectual poverty line, but you also suffer from an ailment that knows no cure - indefatigable idiocy. The problem arises when individuals become so greedy that mutual funds et al no longer satisfy them and they actively seek increased revenues by whatever means they see fit.

My feelings for JW are well known and I hide behind them not. We live in a capitalist society where greed is the name of the game and those who are better equipped to handle,and manipulate it are the victors. Like it or not, immorality is not a crime. Seedy business deals is not a crime. Corporate advantage is not a crime. Paying oneself, as long as one is empowered to do so is not a crime. What it is, however, is a shame. A blatant lack of respect and consideration for investors. How will you suggest one be punished for such indiscretions? Only morals can guide or lead to retribution. Clearly, the heads of CL do not have morals. As does JW. And I applaud them wholeheartedly.

I myself had funds invested in CLICO...not a significant amount by any means mind you, but enough to prompt a withdrawal of same funds upon hearing of the numerous acquistions by the CL Financial Group. Acquistions that due diligence on the part of any investor would have led to the more than credible hypothesis that so many ventures in such a short space of time would have been a strain on the liquid resources of CLF and as such would have made payments to investors upon maturity dates a bit difficult.


Your assertion that "A company can't just say "we think we're gonna make 20% on this deal", it has to show how it arrived at that figure  etc" is not entirely accurate and again reveals your limited understanding of such endeavours. For that I fault you not. A prospectus  shows past performance and future projected performance. It by no means guarantees any of the figures that are illustrated. Investore rarely, if at all, ask to see how and where funds were invested in years prior. If you Football Supporter, are a shreholder at a bank or credit union, do you question the validity of the published annual reports of the banks? Do you, Football Supporter question the accuracy of your credit union dividend cheque? Of course if an institution has been accurate in its projections over a specific period, it is easy to buy into the notion that they would perform similarly in the future.

I take pride in not only Trinis, but anyone's ability to ride the proverbial jackass until its dead.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: elan on September 24, 2011, 09:48:49 AM
Football Supporter.....your response betrays that which you so quickly attempted to impose upon me.....a complete and utter lack of comprehension. Further to that, you seem to possess an innate tendency to misconstrue the context of postings. Nevertheless, I will attempt to elude your obvious ignorance and seek to populate your mind with the explanation that so obviously sailed over a shallow mind.

Mutual funds, savings plans, endowments etc are all symptomatic of greed. Perhaps it is here that I lost you. Greed is good, for it is this greed which allows us to provide for our families and futures. If you Football Supporter, do not understand this, then not only are you below the intellectual poverty line, but you also suffer from an ailment that knows no cure - indefatigable idiocy. The problem arises when individuals become so greedy that mutual funds et al no longer satisfy them and they actively seek increased revenues by whatever means they see fit.

My feelings for JW are well known and I hide behind them not. We live in a capitalist society where greed is the name of the game and those who are better equipped to handle,and manipulate it are the victors. Like it or not, immorality is not a crime. Seedy business deals is not a crime. Corporate advantage is not a crime. Paying oneself, as long as one is empowered to do so is not a crime. What it is, however, is a shame. A blatant lack of respect and consideration for investors. How will you suggest one be punished for such indiscretions? Only morals can guide or lead to retribution. Clearly, the heads of CL do not have morals. As does JW. And I applaud them wholeheartedly.

I myself had funds invested in CLICO...not a significant amount by any means mind you, but enough to prompt a withdrawal of same funds upon hearing of the numerous acquistions by the CL Financial Group. Acquistions that due diligence on the part of any investor would have led to the more than credible hypothesis that so many ventures in such a short space of time would have been a strain on the liquid resources of CLF and as such would have made payments to investors upon maturity dates a bit difficult.


Your assertion that "A company can't just say "we think we're gonna make 20% on this deal", it has to show how it arrived at that figure  etc" is not entirely accurate and again reveals your limited understanding of such endeavours. For that I fault you not. A prospectus  shows past performance and future projected performance. It by no means guarantees any of the figures that are illustrated. Investore rarely, if at all, ask to see how and where funds were invested in years prior. If you Football Supporter, are a shreholder at a bank or credit union, do you question the validity of the published annual reports of the banks? Do you, Football Supporter question the accuracy of your credit union dividend cheque? Of course if an institution has been accurate in its projections over a specific period, it is easy to buy into the notion that they would perform similarly in the future.

I take pride in not only Trinis, but anyone's ability to ride the proverbial jackass until its dead.

Hope I am not misconstrued, but that is ah pack ah f@#king :bs:     

Whatever community, teaching, or upbringing you get that from is totally and unequivocally :bs: 
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: diamondtrim on September 24, 2011, 09:53:18 AM

[/quote]

Hope I am not misconstrued, but that is ah pack ah f@#king :bs:     

Whatever community, teaching, or upbringing you get that from is totally and unequivocally :bs: 
[/quote]

Hiding from that which is fact does not remove it from its permanent virtue.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Football supporter on September 24, 2011, 10:15:11 AM
DiamondTrim, my son, you are a complete moron.
You spout quotes from 80's movies like its supposed to be fact not an indictment on the corporate attitudes that nearly caused a global financial collapse. Greed is never good, not even for the individual acting on that greed. It is a self destroying attitude. Maybe one or two people of the Duprey ilk get away with it, most do not because their greed demands that they always go for one more deal. Lets look at some examples...Calder Hart, Jack Warner, bin Hamaan. All got a bloody nose, and of course theres many more.

This sentence exposes your spectacularly uniformed knowledge of financial products. "Mutual funds, savings plans, endowments etc are all symptomatic of greed"  Mutual funds, savings plans, endowments are pooled investments designed to offer low risk access to investment products. They are managed to produce low level growth over long periods without exposing investors to adverse risk. Generally they are invested in Fortune 500 companies or FTSE 100 companies.

Investing in BRIC funds (Brazil, Russia, India & China) may be more risky, but growth potentials are higher, yet there are still fund managers who manage these funds according to the risk profile laid out in advance.

Futures trading is the highest risk as you are literally gambling on an outcome.

Greed may be achieved by investing in individual shares via stockbrokers in start up companies or depositing in venture capital opportunities.

This statement demonstrates your total lack of understanding in the CLICO crisis. "Acquisitions that due diligence on the part of any investor would have led to the more than credible hypothesis that so many ventures in such a short space of time would have been a strain on the liquid resources of CLF and as such would have made payments to investors upon maturity dates a bit difficult."

Basically, CLICO money was not supposed to be used to prop up CLF etc. The directors have a direct mandate to protect the interests of policyholders. Mutual funds are, by nature, low risk and should not have been used to repay debts of failing companies. If you have a pension with CLICO through your employer, you cannot just withdraw your funds. You can raise concerns with the company pension manager. If he is fed bullshit by CLICO, he will pass that on to you. If he feels he should move the fund from CLICO, this process could take 12 months or more.

Your assertion that "A company can't just say "we think we're gonna make 20% on this deal", it has to show how it arrived at that figure  etc" is not entirely accurate and again reveals your limited understanding of such endeavours.

Actually, this statement is accurate. A company does have to show how it reached those figures. What it can't show is that once the investment is funded, is that it doesn't adhere to its pre announced investment strategy. I can see you are struggling with this DT, so heres an example.

I say to you I am going to invest in banks in the FTSE 100. Over 10 years you may receive growth of 4% per annum compound based on past performance. Our fund manager will move funds from banks with an asset ratio below 30%. This is fairly specific, yes? However, I take your money and invest in start up banks, sub prime lenders, banks in unstable countries. I lose your money. You see your yearly statement and its too late. Most people do not look at financial press so aren't aware...remember, they have a written contract stating their risk exposure.

DiamondTrim, you are a very dangerous poster as you clearly have little or no understanding of financial legislation or products and paint an entirely false and immature appraisal of the situation, mixed with abuse and vitriol. I, on the other hand, am a qualified financial adviser who has dealt in multi million pound investments. You cannot just make rash observations based on Michael Douglas films.
The failure with CLICO is a failure of the financial services legislation, governance and procedure here in Trinidad. There was undoubtedly greed at play and a despicable lack of respect of policyholders. I like Michael Carballo, but he didn't have the balls to go against Duprey. He should have written a report to the financial regulators and resigned. Unfortunately, his testimony reeks of the old Nazi attitude: "I wasn't in charge and they made me do it" He was supposed to protect the uninformed investors and work for their benefit, but he didn't.

The best outcome from this is a thorough reworking of financial checks and balances together with strong sentencing for those who act illegally or immorally.

"Paying oneself, as long as one is empowered to do so is not a crime" Actually, it kinda is. No director or executive should legally be empowered to pay themselves. All payments, including expenses, have to be signed off by a line manager or company secretary. In the Case of a company secretary, payments to themselves have to be approved by a director or chairman. These payments should then be justified at either a board meeting or a shareholders meeting and included in audited accounts. Without the above, these payments are classed as misappropriated funds, larceny or even theft.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: ribbit on September 24, 2011, 10:51:00 AM
FS, how you could write all that given what is known today about de financial crisis over the last few years, the ponzi scheme known as "securitization" and de incentive structures for CEOs of financial corporations? you are out of date hoss.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Bakes on September 24, 2011, 10:54:28 AM
Where were the checks and balances from Govt?

Are we just tossing around terms here... what 'checks and balances'?  Outside of the corporate laws of TnT government cannot get involved in the corporate affairs of private entities.


1. It is the role of a company's directors to protect the interests of the policyholders. The board is there to ensure this is done. If, as in this case, bad decisions were being made, without due diligence and increasing the risk to policyholders without any protection in place, then the entire board may be sued by policyholders.
2. If a company's board has been deemed to put the interests of directors before the interests of policyholders, those directors can be investigated and prosecuted. The directors have a legal responsibility to put the interests of shareholders and policyholders before their personal interests.
3. Directors who knowingly withold information that could effect decisions from board members and policyholders are infringing several company and financial laws.
4. Directors, company secretary's and financial officers who issue payments to themselves without authority or good reason are not necessarily acting outside a companys rules. However, shareholders and policyholders have the right to question these payments and make redress via civil courts.
5. Although many of the incidents may not have broken specific laws, the failure of senior executives to install efficient checks and balances, to prevent via board voting certain rash decisions, to fail to advise authorities, shareholders and policyholders of their concerns can mean they can be guilty of negligence, particularly with regards to financial transactions.
6. I'm not sure of the laws here, but I'm damn sure that the outcome of this enquiry will be recommendations from Sir Anthony Coleman to the DPP inviting criminal charges to be made.
7. Once the Central Bank put in place an investment committee, things should have steadied, but it appears that directors either lied, misled or ignored its recommendations.

4. This sort of action (self-dealing, conflict of interest) should be prohibited by the company's bylaws... which are subject to and typically reflective of the corporate laws.

5. It is the board's responsibility to craft such protections, not 'senior executives'.  Their responsibility is management, not governance... = board function.  'Negligence' has a specific meaning in law, and is limited to tort actions, not corporate activity.  What you're referring to is likely a breach of fiduciary responsibility more than anything.  Other than that... I think you're on the right track with everything else.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: diamondtrim on September 24, 2011, 10:55:54 AM
My word FS, espousing the vagaries of your profession, be it perceived or not, was not imagined to be a necessary inhabitor of this space. Nevertheless if you so desire then kudos to you.

It seems that we are both mired in professions of linear nature, For I, too, am a qualified financial adviser who has brokered many a deal that will very well supercede the Nigerian multi million pound transfers you seem to so skilled in.

I made my post in an effort to illustrate, in as basic a manner possible, the advantages and significant disadvantages of being greedy. to counter my post you seek to define what mutual funds etc are. Perhaps this was to increase the character count in your post.

Your assertion that "A company can't just say "we think we're gonna make 20% on this deal", it has to show how it arrived at that figure  etc" is not entirely accurate and again reveals your limited understanding of such endeavours.

Actually, this statement is accurate. A company does have to show how it reached those figures. What it can't show is that once the investment is funded, is that it doesn't adhere to its pre announced investment strategy


This very statement confirms my initial one that you werent entirely accurate. That you confirm my statement while simultaneously attempting to discredit it shows the bovine nature of your person.

Your finely qualified self, so experienced in multi million pound deals, should have garnered that greed being good is used in context. Perhaps you sought qualification in numbers and not letters, which allowed for your miniscule grasp and understanding of english.

"Paying oneself, as long as one is empowered to do so is not a crime" Actually, it kinda is. No director or executive should legally be empowered to pay themselves. All payments, including expenses, have to be signed off by a line manager or company secretary. In the Case of a company secretary, payments to themselves have to be approved by a director or chairman. These payments should then be justified at either a board meeting or a shareholders meeting and included in audited accounts. Without the above, these payments are classed as misappropriated funds, larceny or even theft.

Yet another example of your stupidity. There is no 'kinda' crime. Perhaps you kinda brokered multi million pound kinda deals. I agree with you that no director or executive should be empowered to pay themselves etc. have you stopped to consider, then realise, if not only by the testimony of Carballo himself, that this was indeed the case at Clico. Unfortunate it is, but true.

You riddle your responses with semantics and judgements loosely based on your supremely qualified self. Yet you consistently show that you know little more than what is made available for you to interpret.

I said at the very first post that CL were not properly supervised whether by the Central Bank or the Supervisor of Insurance (I paraphrase). Perhaps you missed that as well. Maybe it would have been better understood had I included it in a multi million pound prospectus.

The heads at CL did not steal. They TOOK. Took what they were allowed to. It is not fair to the policy holders, but they did what the wer allowed to do. Crime? No....or maybe, to those of us so finely qualified....a kinda crime.

Greed is good did indeed present itself as a line in the movie Wall Street. However it is a credo that transcends film. Like it or not, it remains true. I'd like to think that the vast majority of us do not consciously allow greed to guide us, but the fact is that it does. It may not drive us to do the immoral or illegal, but it definitely drives us.

Why did you, FS, 'qualify' yourself....to move from a $100 salary to a $1000 salary? Or merely to share this obviously unique achievement on the forum. Why do we invest? For our capital to remain the same? Why do we buy houses, cars, etc? Your tendency to look at things at surface value despite your multi million pound qualification is disturbing, yet understood. Greed is good....take it literally idiot..........smh
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: congo on September 24, 2011, 10:59:02 AM
Clico's failure rests on the weakness of the government and legislation of this country. The politicians fail the shareholders of this country. On one side Duprey paying for Panday's children education and giving gifts. On the other hand Monteil is Pnm treasurer. Everybody high up knew something was up with Cl financial but to afraid to go against Duprey and them. All of them culpable in this. No if's about it. :pissedoff: :pissedoff: :pissedoff: :pissedoff:
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Football supporter on September 24, 2011, 11:01:11 AM
FS, how you could write all that given what is known today about de financial crisis over the last few years, the ponzi scheme known as "securitization" and de incentive structures for CEOs of financial corporations? you are out of date hoss.

These schemes are illegal, or at least immoral and there are supposedly implements in place to expose and prevent them. There will always be slick operators who present schemes to get rich quick and circumvent regulations. as they say, a fool and his money are easily parted. However, small investors should usually find they are protected when invested in pension funds, pooled investments, banks etc.

The incentives are another issue. Bonuses awarded by boards are completely legal. However, it is the duty of the shareholders of those companies to oppose these bonuses and, if need be, table a motion of no confidence in directors and elect new ones in their place. The problem with CLICO was that the Duprey family and their associates were the major shareholders and couldn't be removed. This should have raised concerns with investment houses, regulators etc.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Football supporter on September 24, 2011, 11:01:37 AM
Clico's failure rests on the weakness of the government and legislation of this country. The politicians fail the shareholders of this country. On one side Duprey paying for Panday's children education and giving gifts. On the other hand Monteil is Pnm treasurer. Everybody high up knew something was up with Cl financial but to afraid to go against Duprey and them. All of them culpable in this. No if's about it. :pissedoff: :pissedoff: :pissedoff: :pissedoff:

 :beermug: :beermug:
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Bakes on September 24, 2011, 11:04:24 AM
Football Supporter.....your response betrays that which you so quickly attempted to impose upon me.....a complete and utter lack of comprehension. Further to that, you seem to possess an innate tendency to misconstrue the context of postings. Nevertheless, I will attempt to elude your obvious ignorance and seek to populate your mind with the explanation that so obviously sailed over a shallow mind.

Mutual funds, savings plans, endowments etc are all symptomatic of greed. Perhaps it is here that I lost you. Greed is good, for it is this greed which allows us to provide for our families and futures. If you Football Supporter, do not understand this, then not only are you below the intellectual poverty line, but you also suffer from an ailment that knows no cure - indefatigable idiocy. The problem arises when individuals become so greedy that mutual funds et al no longer satisfy them and they actively seek increased revenues by whatever means they see fit.

My feelings for JW are well known and I hide behind them not. We live in a capitalist society where greed is the name of the game and those who are better equipped to handle,and manipulate it are the victors. Like it or not, immorality is not a crime. Seedy business deals is not a crime. Corporate advantage is not a crime. Paying oneself, as long as one is empowered to do so is not a crime. What it is, however, is a shame. A blatant lack of respect and consideration for investors. How will you suggest one be punished for such indiscretions? Only morals can guide or lead to retribution. Clearly, the heads of CL do not have morals. As does JW. And I applaud them wholeheartedly.

I myself had funds invested in CLICO...not a significant amount by any means mind you, but enough to prompt a withdrawal of same funds upon hearing of the numerous acquistions by the CL Financial Group. Acquistions that due diligence on the part of any investor would have led to the more than credible hypothesis that so many ventures in such a short space of time would have been a strain on the liquid resources of CLF and as such would have made payments to investors upon maturity dates a bit difficult.


Your assertion that "A company can't just say "we think we're gonna make 20% on this deal", it has to show how it arrived at that figure  etc" is not entirely accurate and again reveals your limited understanding of such endeavours. For that I fault you not. A prospectus  shows past performance and future projected performance. It by no means guarantees any of the figures that are illustrated. Investore rarely, if at all, ask to see how and where funds were invested in years prior. If you Football Supporter, are a shreholder at a bank or credit union, do you question the validity of the published annual reports of the banks? Do you, Football Supporter question the accuracy of your credit union dividend cheque? Of course if an institution has been accurate in its projections over a specific period, it is easy to buy into the notion that they would perform similarly in the future.

I take pride in not only Trinis, but anyone's ability to ride the proverbial jackass until its dead.

Never in the course of human history has so little been said by so much.

FS, how you could write all that given what is known today about de financial crisis over the last few years, the ponzi scheme known as "securitization" and de incentive structures for CEOs of financial corporations? you are out of date hoss.

Shouldn't you be preparing your kindergarten lesson plans for Monday... or maybe arranging the toys in the romper room?
Title: Coverage of CLICO/HCU COE
Post by: Brownsugar on November 16, 2011, 10:40:56 AM
Ah trying to find links or radio stations covering this thing but with no luck.  I can't leave mih desk to watch de TV in de kitchen and Gita Sakal supposed to start testifying today.  I curious as to what she have to say.....

I eh know what kinda search engine dey have here in work, but de thing giving me all kinda results when I search for this topic but not taking me to the website (I think one was set up for the COE).  Help a sistah out please.....and thanks..... :)
Title: Re: Coverage of CLICO/HCU COE
Post by: Michael-j on November 16, 2011, 10:49:43 AM
http://www.clfhcuenquiry.org/ (http://www.clfhcuenquiry.org/)
Title: Re: Coverage of CLICO/HCU COE
Post by: Brownsugar on November 16, 2011, 11:40:30 AM
http://www.clfhcuenquiry.org/ (http://www.clfhcuenquiry.org/)

Grazie, grazie.......all yuh better than bing, google et al..... ;D

Title: Clico Boys
Post by: dtool on November 24, 2011, 02:56:16 AM
Just got this and with  the Clico enquiry thought you might find it of interest.
    Skip the first story and pictures....scroll down to the second set


http://monacorevue.com/events/sd1070528.html




Title: Re: Clico Boys
Post by: rotatopoti3 on November 24, 2011, 08:07:09 AM
Been there but not in that capacity.... :thinking:
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on May 03, 2013, 04:19:41 AM
MAD AT DUPREY
Policyholders: No-show by former CL chairman at enquiry a ‘travesty of justice’
By Joel Julien


CLICO policyholders are “mad vex”.

They yesterday described as a “travesty of justice” the decision of former CL Financial executive chairman Lawrence Duprey and group financial director Andre Monteil to not testify at the commission of enquiry into the failure of CL Financial and the Hindu Credit Union (HCU), and lack of sanctions against Duprey and the slap on the wrist for Monteil.

The enquiry’s evidence hearings officially ended yesterday, according to lone commissioner Sir Anthony Colman.

But Attorney General Anand Ram­logan yesterday said the Policyholders Group can rest assured that the commission is an “important step­ping stone in the pursuit of justice. Sir Anthony’s report would provide an important guidance to the State on the way forward. The journey has only just begun,” Ramlogan said.

In a news release issued yesterday, the Policyholders Group (CPG) stated: “CLICO policyholders are not only disappointed, they (are) “mad vex” since they feel as though they have now been cheated twice.

“The first time was when they were told by the Government that they could not get back their life savings, and now that they were being told by the pre­sident-appointed commission of enquiry that Mes­srs Duprey and Monteil, the two central figures who according to the commission would be key to assisting them in understanding what really happened to their (policyholders) money, have essentially thumbed their noses at policyholders and the citizens of Tri­ni­dad and Tobago by not only blatantly refusing to appear before the commission but have also bold-facedly and shamelessly refused to answer any questions sent to them by the commission’s attorneys,” the release stated.

The CPG said the non-appearance by Duprey and Monteil was not only a travesty of justice but added further insult to injury.

“This is indeed unforgivable and not just a travesty of justice but adds further insult to injury, some may even say amounts to a colossal waste of time, resources and taxpayers’ money. Accordingly, it also brings in to question the efficacy of the Commissions of Enquiry Act, in so far as the statute appears to be impotent to treat with persons who may wish to escape scrutiny and accountability,” the release stated.

 Asked whether the commission of enquiry was a waste of time, resources and money, Ramlogan said it was a “resounding success”.

He said the HCU matter was completely dealt with because Harry Harnarine gave testimony. He said he was waiting “with bated breath” on the report because he had “on his radar” the possibility of civil proceedings against many individuals and entities that may have committed civil wrong.

“I am in the process of preparing proceedings against the former HCU board. And on CLICO, I am examining what has emerged thus far and awaiting Sir Anthony’s recommendations to see whether there is action­able wrong-doing by the external auditors, the executive management and board of CL Financial, Clico and CIB”, he said. He added the fact that some persons had concerns and fears about giving evidence underscored the probing nature of the commission.

“It is my estimation that the criminal investigation would benefit in no small measure from Sir Anthony Colman’s report,” he said.

The CPG called for an amendment to the Commission of Enquiry Act “to address this unfortunate and unjust state of affairs”.

Criminal proceedings have been taken against those who failed to respond to subpoenas issued by the enquiry, excluding Duprey, who lives out of the jurisdiction.

Five more persons related to the Hindu Credit Union (HCU) aspect of the enquiry who failed to respond to subpoenas were added to the list of those who criminal proceedings have been taken against.

The five are former HCU financial consultant Jameel Ali, attorney Ashvani Mahabir, chief financial officer Gawtam Ramnanan and treasurer Yadwanath Lalchan and Dave Jagpat.

In the commission of enquiry into the attempted coup, the main protagonist, Yasin Abu Bakr, also did not testify. Ramlogan said Bakr’s appearance or non-appearance was for the historical record. Noting that no prosecution could have arisen from this commission, he said those who came before it gave “life and meaning to the untold events of July 1990”.

“I have no doubt that Sir David Simmons would prepare an insightful, analytical and useful report that would guide the Government”, he said.

—with reporting by Ria Taitt
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Jah Gol on May 03, 2013, 12:57:45 PM
That's the way persons accused of white collar crimes in T&T behave.  They ignore, deny or simply subvert the law altogether. 
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: asylumseeker on May 03, 2013, 01:57:54 PM
That's the way persons accused of white collar crimes in T&T behave.  They ignore, deny or simply subvert the law altogether.

The same man who invented the term 'white lie' invented 'white-collar crime' ... ergo ...
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Bakes on May 03, 2013, 05:16:09 PM
That's the way persons accused of white collar crimes in T&T behave.  They ignore, deny or simply subvert the law altogether. 

Except Duprey did none of those in reference to this particular incident.  The key word here is "accused"... followed closely by "law".  Until he has a legal obligation to show up, why should he?
Title: Re: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Jah Gol on May 03, 2013, 05:46:33 PM
That's the way persons accused of white collar crimes in T&T behave.  They ignore, deny or simply subvert the law altogether. 

Except Duprey did none of those in reference to this particular incident.  The key word here is "accused"... followed closely by "law".  Until he has a legal obligation to show up, why should he?
I never disputed that he wasn't  obligated to attend I was pointing to a general culture of disregard for legal  proceedings of this type. I could add Panday, Monteil , Ish, Steve and Jack to the list of 'offenders' .

Even if he isn't legally obligated to attend considering all of the fallout caused by the demise of the conglomerate he appears to have no interest in even entertaining any examination of his stewardship of an organization that received a massive public bailout.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Bakes on May 03, 2013, 06:36:45 PM
I never disputed that he wasn't  obligated to attend I was pointing to a general culture of disregard for legal  proceedings of this type. I could add Panday, Monteil , Ish, Steve and Jack to the list of 'offenders' .

Even if he isn't legally obligated to attend considering all of the fallout caused by the demise of the conglomerate he appears to have no interest in even entertaining any examination of his stewardship of an organization that received a massive public bailout.

This is not a legal proceeding.  What penalties attach to the findings of this "inquiry"?  And again, why should Duprey leave his home and comforts in South Florida to fly to Trinidad to take part in this pappyshow?  If they have evidence on him let them subpoena/extradict him.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on May 04, 2013, 04:11:45 AM
AG claim upsets Duprey’s lawyer - ‘Back off’
Anand: See you in court
By Raphael John-Lall (Guardian).


Attorney General Anand Ramlogan’s use of the term “wanted man” to describe former CL Financial chairman Lawrence Duprey is “illogical and inexplicable,” said Duprey’s attorney Lionel Luckhoo in a letter to the AG yesterday. Describing Ramlogan’s comments as “outrageous,” he warned that Duprey might have to consider seeking an injunction to stop the AG making “public statements with the weight of your office behind you that give the impression that you have already determined the outcome.”

However, in an immediate response Ramlogan said he was prepared to defend his claim and through his lawyer, Donna Prowell, told Luckhoo that he was ready to do to court if necessary. Luckhoo yesterday found it necessary to remind the AG several times of his constitutional role, summing up: “I am sure that you need no reminding that the role of the Attorney General does not stretch to being prosecutor, judge and jury.”

He also admonished Ramlogan: “You are to be reminded, Attorney General, that you are a leader in the legal profession and should be setting examples of integrity and rectitude. Your interference is contrary to those tenets of your role.” On Thursday, in a post-Cabinet news conference at the Diplomatic Centre, St Ann’s, Ramlogan had said Duprey’s failure to appear at the commission of enquiry, where he is the “central protagonist,” made him a “wanted man.”

Luckhoo complained: “The use by you of the pejorative phrase ‘wanted man’ is frankly both illogical and inexplicable. The phrase has of course been seized by many newspaper reports.”

Luckhoo, therefore, told Ramlogan he was issuing his letter to the media in view of the prominent coverage Ramlogan’s comments had received. He noted that no criminal proceedings had been instituted against Duprey. “There is at this stage an enquiry which should continue without any political interference and without seeking to pre-judge its results or compromise the constitutional fair-trial rights that are possessed by all in this country.”

He also accused the Attorney General of breaking the promise he made to the people of T&T when he took office, and of usurping the role of the commissioner of the enquiry. “You have arrogated unto yourself the role of the commissioner, who, it is hoped, would consider all the evidence and the submissions that he has yet to receive before making any public pronouncements, which is further hoped and indeed expected to be within his terms of office.”

Luckhoo also pointed out that it is the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) who exercises powers with regard to the institution and undertaking of criminal proceedings. “You will of course fully appreciate that...your office and function is separate and distinct from that of the DPP,” he said. He suggested that Ramlogan should follow the example of the DPP.

“You might consider taking a lesson from another office-holder—the DPP—who apart from perfectly properly confirming that he has asked for an investigation, has sought to do all he can to protect the fair-trial rights of those under investigation.” Luckhoo also said his client Duprey had co-operated fully with the enquiry and it was untrue to state otherwise.

“It is incumbent on me to correct this view by stating unequivocally that my client co-operated with the enquiry process, save where same seemed to conflict with his fair-trial rights,” he added. He said Duprey was “astounded” by what seemed to be the Attorney General’s criticism of the police for failing to arrest Duprey. “So far as I am aware, the Police Service were not asked to effect service of a witness summons/subpoena,” Luckhoo said.

“Indeed they could not as Mr Duprey has been ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction for a number of years and has not been to Trinidad since the middle of 2009. “It would not then have been possible therefore to serve him with legal process within the jurisdiction and service abroad of a witness summons would never be an acceptable process for a commission of enquiry, as you will know!”

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: asylumseeker on May 04, 2013, 05:22:00 AM
What's the last thing upon which Anand has correctly pronounced?
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: TdotTrini on May 04, 2013, 05:51:08 AM
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2013-05-04/ag-responds-luckoo%E2%80%99s-letter

AG responds to Luckoo’s letter
Published:
Saturday, May 4, 2013
 
 
Dear Sir:
We act herein for the Honourable Attorney General, Senator Anand Ramlogan SC. Your letter of even date addressed our client has been passed to us with instructions to reply thereto.
 
 
Our instructions are as follows:-
1. Our client did in fact state that had Mr Duprey been served with the sub-poena to attend and give evidence at the Coleman Commission of Enquiry (COI) and failed to show, he would have been liable to the criminal process. In such circumstances, your client risked prosecution for a criminal offence in accordance with the Commissions of Enquiry Act, Chapter 19:01, Section 12 and would have most certainly been a wanted man.
 
2. Furthermore, it is common knowledge that your client was a material witness who was required to attend this COI. He was wanted by the Commission for this purpose. That you would take objection to the description of your client as the ‘central protagonist’ who was a wanted man in this regard is strange and illogical.
 
3. Our client rejects the assertion that his description of Mr Duprey as the ‘central protagonist’ amounts to an unlawful arrogation or usurpation of the role of the Commissioner. Mr Duprey was in fact the head of the CLICO empire. He was the executive Chairman of CL Financial and Chairman of CLICO. This description is therefore justified and fairly obvious to the average man-in-the-street.
 
4. Our client is well aware of the fact that the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP)  is constitutionally responsible for criminal prosecutions but wishes to draw your attention to the fact that the DPP has indicated that the COI has the status of a court of law and hence possesses the power to initiate criminal prosecution for non-attendance under section 12.
 
 
Whilst it is noteworthy that you remember our client’s enviable track record in defending the constitutional rights of hundreds of citizens from all walks of life, it is precisely this experience with the less fortunate in our society that has led to his personal and official concern about the failure and/or refusal of Mr Duprey to attend the COI.
 
5. With respect to your query about what Mr Ramlogan’s response would have been had he been Mr Duprey’s lawyer, we are instructed that he would have advised his client to return home to the country where he amassed his billion-dollar fortune and accept service of the Witness Summons.
 
 
He would have further advised him that he should appear and give evidence before the COI and allow himself to be cross-examined where appropriate. He would have also advised him that to do otherwise, would have created the impression that he was being evasive and un-cooperative and led ordinary people to wonder if he had something to hide. In short, he would have advised to face the music and clear his good name.
 
6. Our client is happy that you took time to visit his Ministry’s website. His commitment to ‘justice for all’ however, is buttressed by his duty to protect and act in the public interest.
 
7. As one of the Attorney’s representing Mr Duprey, you would have no doubt advised him that Sir Anthony Coleman QC had issued a Witness Summons to secure his attendance. We are instructed that this summons was also served on your client’s brother, Mr Peter Duprey by Constable Jason Marine #18444 on the 28th February, 2012 in an attempt to ensure that he is aware that his attendance was required.
 
 
It would be unfortunate if both your good self and Mr Duprey’s brother failed to bring the fact of this Witness Summons to his attention. You did not state clearly whether your client was in fact made aware that the COI had issued a Witness Summons to secure his attendance.
 
8. In light of your decision to release your letter to the media, perhaps you can clarify this important issue as there are many who would want to know if Mr Duprey was in fact aware of the Witness Summons and deliberately avoided or refused to come to Trinidad and Tobago to facilitate service.
 
9. That the fact that you are ‘astounded’ that the police was directed to serve the Witness Summons on Mr Duprey is perhaps a reflection on your lack of knowledge of the basic procedures utilised by all Commissions. We notice that you were careful to state that your client has “NOT been to Trinidad since the middle of 2009”.
 
 
We would be grateful if you could clarify whether this means that he has been visiting Tobago as we are instructed that there are rumours that he has been visiting Tobago in the company of some friends aboard a yacht.  Service of the Witness Summons upon him in Tobago, we are sure you would agree, would have been quite lawful as we are a twin island republic and the jurisdiction of the COI extends to Tobago.
 
In closing, we note that your letter does not purport to be a pre-action letter in accordance with the Pre-action Protocol Direction of the Civil Proceeding Rules (1998 as amended). Indeed, you do not allege defamation of any kind. Rest assured that our client stands ready, poised, willing and able to defend his statements. Mr Ramlogan has instructed us to accept service on his behalf of any court proceedings you may wish to initiate. Be guided accordingly.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: asylumseeker on May 04, 2013, 06:28:09 AM
Quote
5. With respect to your query about what Mr Ramlogan’s response would have been had he been Mr Duprey’s lawyer, we are instructed that he would have advised his client to return home to the country where he amassed his billion-dollar fortune and accept service of the Witness Summons.

No need to reload ... gunshot. heheheh
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on May 05, 2013, 06:00:28 AM
$25b and counting
Cost to taxpayers of CLICO bailout and enquiry
By Asha Javeed (Express).


Sir Anthony Colman’s multi-company Commission of Enquiry (CoE), which principally focused on the illiquid insurance company CLICO and the Hindu Credit Union (HCU), has cost taxpayers $36.2 million.

However, Government’s intervention into the CLICO fiasco has cost taxpayers more than $25 billion.

The 24-month long CoE exercise, which came to an end last Thursday at Winsure Building in Port of Spain, had 85 sitting days, 23 parties, 77 lawyers, 57 witnesses, 50 subpoenas and five million pages of documents.

The Sunday Express obtained a break-down of the $36.2 million cost which comes from the budget of the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM):

Sir Anthony Colman’s fees—$6,852,937.44
Legal Fees—$22,240,363.77
Salaries—$1,804,149.11
Administrative Cost and
Incidentals—$5,370,854.67

The legal fees were divided among lead counsels—Peter Carter QC and Edwin Glasgow QC; Junior counsels—Marion Mac Gregor Mason, Gerald Ian Ramdeen, Shankar Bidaisee; Instructing attorneys—Celeste Jules and Varun Debideen; and special adviser Ian Marshall.

All parties to the CoE, who were mostly represented by senior counsel, would have been paid separate legal bills.

“While the CoE has been costly, it is significantly less than expected because I am a tough negotiator on consultancy fees,” said Attorney General Anand Ramlogan, in response to questions from the Sunday Express yesterday.

Ramlogan pointed out to the Sunday Express that the sum was inclusive of two major companies and was significantly less than the Uff Commission of Enquiry of 2009, which cost the State about $60 million.

The cost of the commission is exclusive of the Government’s bailout of Lawrence Duprey’s cash-strapped empire.

The Sunday Express obtained figures for the bailout which state:

Funds Disbursed:

1. CLICO bailout—$5.6 billion
2. Short Term Investment Products (STIPS)—EFPA, BAT and Mutual Funds—$11.365 billion
3. British American—$0.1 billion
4. CLICO Investment Bank—$1.87 billion
5. CMMB—$0.666 billion
Total—$19.6 billion

Contingencies:

1. CIB’s INCs—$2.16 billion
2. EFPA judgment dated March 2013—$1.3 billion
3. CMMB—$0.835 billion
Total—$4.296 billion

The Sunday Express understands that $2 billion has been re-allocated for the capitalisation of Atrius, the company which CLICO will be re-branded into in the coming months.

In addition, the Government has made provisions of US$55 million for a judicial matter in the Bahamas and has spent US$24 million from the Caricom Petroleum Fund to assist the islands following the collapse of CLICO.

Those sums are also exclusive of legal fees in the CLICO matter.

Last October, Ramlogan revealed in Parliament that the Central Bank had paid some $82.8 million to US forensic investigator Bob Lindquist for investigations.

Ramlogan said Lindquist, between April 2009 to November 2010, received $46 million; February 2011 to August 20, 2011—$10 million; February to September 2011—$17 million; November 2010 to September 2011—$9.8 million; for the grand total of $82.8 million.

Now that the CoE has been concluded, Colman has three months in which to submit his final report to the Government.

Colman’s terms of reference include: “whether there are any grounds for criminal and civil proceedings against any person or entity; whether criminal proceedings should therefore be recommended to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for his consideration; and whether civil proceedings should be recommended to the Attorney General for his consideration.”

Last November, Colman’s Enquiry was almost derailed after DPP Roger Gaspard announced that a criminal investigation against former CLICO executives and several corporate entities aligned to the collapsed insurance giant had begun, almost three years after the Government had stepped in to bail out the company to protect the country’s financial system from systemic risk.

Gaspard had written to Colman expressing concern about how the public enquiry, which had been 19 months old at the time, could impact on the criminal investigation by the police.

“I am particularly concerned that an otherwise credible prosecution might be stopped by the court on the grounds that a defendant’s right to a fair trial had been fatally compromised by the publicity attendant upon your enquiry. As such, I shall be issuing a press release warning the media against the publication of any material which may jeopardise the police investigation and any potential criminal proceedings,” Gaspard had said.

Gaspard had also made a request to Ramlogan to have the CoE discontinued.

Despite Gaspard’s request, the enquiry continued, but witnesses attached to CLICO failed to turn up concerned that they would incriminate themselves.

Last week, former CL Financial chairman Lawrence Duprey and its former financial director Andre Monteil were among the list of no-shows at the CoE.

Questioned yesterday on whether Gaspard’s action had impacted on the integrity of the CoE, Ramlogan said: “The announcement by the DPP of a criminal investigation when the CoE was 90 per cent complete was significant. The Government thought it best to leave these concerns to the discretion of the commissioner. While the criminal investigation could have hijacked the work of the commission, it was too far advanced to be any detriment.”

As the Anti-Corruption Investigation Bureau and the Fraud Squad of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service pursue its criminal investigation, the Central Bank has already mounted and instituted civil proceedings against three former CL Financial executives—Duprey, Monteil and former corporate secretary Gita Sakal.

Asked whether the CoE still had value given the public’s dissatisfaction that key players have not yet been brought to justice, Ramlogan responded: “As AG, depending on the findings and the recommendations, it is my intention to pursue all options.”

He explained that when the Government purchased the rights of the depositors, the State stepped into their shoes and the State will pursue all avenues at its disposal to seek justice.

“While I have no control over the criminal process, I do have constitutional jurisdiction in civil law which I can invoke for social justice,” he said.

“Once I have the report, in the coming months I expect an avalanche of activity in the pursuit of justice.

“The collapse of CLICO has burned a hole in the Treasury the size of a national budget. When the Government assumed office there was a stony wall of silence and inaction with regard to the CLICO fiasco,” explained Ramlogan.

He observed that the DPP was never presented with any police investigation report and, in the circumstances, the Government appointed a CoE.

Apart from lack of witnesses, the CoE has had its fair share of challenges—attorneys objected to the releasing of certain documents forcing the commission to adhere to a confidentiality protocol, and the Ministry of Finance’s lawyers were changed mid-commission.

But the commission has produced startling revelations about a company which was funded principally by policyholders’ money—million-dollar salaries paid to executives; companies created by executives and hiving off millions in contracts; and blatant breaches in governance.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Conquering Lion on May 05, 2013, 07:22:42 AM
So Duprey, Sakal, Monteil & Co take money and like deyself................it wrong, it bad, shameful, sad, greedy, call it whatever is d best/worst adjective yuh could find.

Dey all operated within the parameters they were allowed. If d Central Bank guided by d big goat Ewart Williams and d Supervisor of Insurance refuse to check Clico, CLF and whoever else, den Duprey and he team shoulda take ALL d damn money!

If I wukkin in a company dat allowin me to approve payments to myself without secondary questionin...i takin more dan 30m. I takin all. It could have commission of inquiry from here to Timbuktu....we all know nutttin comin out of it. D only 'crime' dese ppl could be charged wit is greed and wickedness.....and d kinda money den gone wit makin it easy to live wit dem tags.

CL aint collapse overnight....when folks was reading how Duplrey makin all kinda fancy deal dey wasnt concerned with how he acquirin d funds to do it...nah...dey greedy too....so dey invest more and more in CL hopin to get piece of d pie. Dey wanna put in 1m to get back 1.5 and so on. Investors was greedy too....jus dat Duprey was smarter dan all ah dem

Dais y ah like Jack Warner and dem.....in trinidad d name of d game is greediest win. And jack and Duprey and dem is d greediest bitches in d world...dat is no exaggeration. So congrats to dem and all d greedy investors hull allyuh tail....allyuh loss d game.....yuh cyah be a greedy fish and wanna jump in a pond wit greedier shark

Herein lies the dilemma.....no one really wants to accept the plain truth for what it is. As 3Canal say.."If iz licks yuh like....den take licks!"  Nobody was complaining when they were sitting on a presumably nice (but false) portfolio and now complaining when the mark buss.....it's the same as in Madoff, but the only difference is in the USA there are laws, oversight and enforcement...especially when it comes to messing with other people's money. When mark buss THEY GOING AFTER THE MONEY!...plain and simple

In Trinidad a setta men pose up in dey suit and we asking ah setta questions, but nobody really going after the money. We talking vision 2020 but basic things like law enforcement, taxation and revenue collection lacking. That is why Duprey and company could do what dey like.

I hear people talking about govenment should protect the population and ensure things in place (which is somewhat true).......but was that not one of the reasons that Unit Trust Corp was set up in the first place? People get ketch in  their greed!

Duprey and dem know their people well..... (all talk, no action and easy prey to the next flashiest thing) so doh blame dem.....and if unreally want your money start protesting or using yuh voting finger
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: Flex on May 16, 2013, 02:41:21 AM
Duprey: I’ve not seen T&T in 3 years.
By DENYSE RENNE (Guardian).


Former CL Financial chairman Lawrence Duprey maintains he hasn’t been to T&T since June 2009. Duprey is also demanding an apology from Attorney General Anand Ramlogan for what he says is the misinformation Ramlogan is disseminating about his whereabouts. “I left T&T in June 2009 and I have never returned…June 2009, that's when I left,” he said.

Duprey, 79, was speaking exclusively with the T&T Guardian in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA. He reiterated the call he made through his attorney recently for an apology from Ramlogan over the suggestion he had been back in T&T during the period of the commission of enquiry into the collapse of Clico and its subsidiaries.

Duprey said he is now involved in consultancy, which sees him working in different countries worldwide. His consultancy involves restructuring societies. He said: “There’s a lot of work outside here, I don’t have to come back home, or what used to be home, and I don’t live in Trinidad…Don’t let anyone fool you. I have never lived in Trinidad.” He explained that life as an international consultant does not confine him to one location and he has always lived overseas.

Duprey was responding to questions posed by the T&T Guardian after statements by Ramlogan that Duprey was a “wanted man,” but had entered the country and slipped back out without being detected. Ramlogan’s statements came during a post-Cabinet press briefing on May 2. He told the media that Duprey had entered T&T and left without a summons being served on him to appear before the recently-concluded commission of enquiry into the collapse of Clico.

Duprey, through his attorneys Andrew Mitchell, QC, and Lionel Luckhoo, has also denied being on board a yacht in Tobago, or Trinidad, or in T&T waters. His lawyers say the rumours being perpetuated by Ramlogan detract from “the constitutional rights, justice, fairness and equality to all to which my client, in common with all persons, is entitled.” In an immediate response to Ramlogan’s claims, through Luckhoo, Duprey had denied being in T&T.

The AG’s attorney, Donna Prowell, then asked whether that meant Duprey had been in Tobago. Prowell, in her letter to Luckhoo, dated May 3, said there had been rumours that Duprey had been visiting Tobago with friends aboard a yacht. In that case, she said, a summons could have been served on him there.

In his second letter to the AG, Luckhoo explained: “When I stated that Mr Duprey has been ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction for a number of years and has not been to Trinidad since the middle of 2009, it should be taken to mean not been to T&T or within the maritime jurisdiction of same since 2009.”

During the interview with the T&T Guardian, Duprey said he has been working in the Middle East and other countries since 2009. Documentation the T&T Guardian obtained corroborated his claim that he had not been in T&T since 2009. Ramlogan, through Prowell, also said a witness summons was served on Duprey’s brother Peter Duprey by PC Jason Marine on February 28, 2012. But Duprey’s lawyer says his client doesn’t have a brother named Peter.
 
Luckhoo, in a second letter to Ramlogan on May 7, and obtained by the T&T Guardian, said Ramlogan’s utterances and his labelling of Duprey as a “wanted man” remained “opaque and misconceived.”

Demanding an apology, Luckhoo wrote: “I am fortified in the expectation that your client shall ensure that investigations (concerning among other things ‘Mr Peter Duprey’) are concluded with the appropriate urgency—and that he intends to disclose the results of same to the public. When it becomes apparent that my client has not entered the twin-island republic clandestinely, I trust that yours will issue the appropriate apology to the police, the immigration authorities, and of course to my client.”

At the press briefing, Ramlogan chastised the police, saying that the Government would want answers “as to whether or not the Police Service acted quickly when they knew the commission had issued a summons (for Duprey).” The AG said immigration authorities ought to have been alerted so that Duprey’s name was red-flagged in the system.

Duprey, through Luckhoo, wrote to the AG on May 3, calling Ramlogan’s statements “illogical and outrageous,” and saying although there was an ongoing criminal investigation into the affairs of Clico, Duprey had not been charged and there were no criminal proceedings against him. Duprey also responded to the Clico Policyholders Group, which has suggested he return the Chaconia gold medal bestowed on him in 1999.

He was awarded the nation’s second highest honour by then President ANR Robinson for service in the field of business. “If they want it, take it...I don’t need it,” Duprey said. The policyholders, in a media release and letters to the editors of newspapers, called on Duprey to give up the medal because of his involvement in the collapse of the CL Financial group and his failure to attend the commission of enquiry into the collapse of Clico.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey
Post by: asylumseeker on May 16, 2013, 07:13:42 AM
Quote
He was awarded the nation’s second highest honour by then President ANR Robinson for service in the field of business. “If they want it, take it...I don’t need it,” Duprey said. The policyholders, in a media release and letters to the editors of newspapers, called on Duprey to give up the medal because of his involvement in the collapse of the CL Financial group and his failure to attend the commission of enquiry into the collapse of Clico.

He shouldn't have commented on the national honour ... at least, not in this manner.
Title: Clico pays government $7 billion
Post by: Flex on March 28, 2015, 01:57:02 AM
Clico pays government $7 billion
By Suzanne Sheppard (Guardian)


Central Bank Governor Jwala Rambarran has announced a five-point plan to settle outstanding debts owed by the Colonial Life Insurance Company (CLICO) to policyholders and the government.

Speaking at a press conference yesterday, Rambarran said the resolution plan "will bring closure to this deep financial wound inflicted on thousands of CLICO policy holders and Central Bank is doing all in its power and more to ensure that such a financial trauma will never again be inflicted on you."

He said the company is now in a position to make its first payment of just over $7 billion to the T&T Government. This amounts to more than 40 per cent of CLICO’s debt to government.

This development comes almost six years after the collapse of the insurance empire in 2009 which prompted government to embark on a rescue plan involving billions of dollars.

Rambarran said government, which is CLICO's biggest creditor, received $4 billion in cash today, with settlement of the remaining $3 billion in lieu of cash through the transfer of three CLICO assets—Angostura Holdings Limited, CL World Brands Limited and Home Construction Limited.

In addition, CLICO's 1,500 short-term institutional products (STIP) policyholders will receive 85 per cent of their claims totaling $950 million in three months and will receive the remainider after the sale of Methanol Holdings International Limited (MHTL).

“These two payments are being made according to the terms of the CLICO Resolution Plan developed by Central Bank and finalised last week Monday after consultation with the Minister of Finance and the Economy, as required under Section 44F of the Central Bank Act.

“Central Bank’s CLICO Resolution Plan was developed to repay all creditors and policyholders and to ultimately facilitate the transfer of CLICO’s traditional insurance portfolio to a suitable buyer by ensuring that enough appropriate assets are put aside,” Rambarran said.

He said CLICO’s December 2014 management accounts show that there are now sufficient assets to pay the company’s liabilities in its statutory fund. This is mainly due to the sale of its shareholding in MHTL last October ,which added just over $7 billion in cash to the statutory fund.

Rambarran said in the first phase of the payment plan, Government has been paid $4 billion in cash. STIP policy holders, who did not take up Government’s offer to be paid through bonds and shares in the CLICO Investment Fund, will be paid $950 million of the just over $1 billion owed to them.

“Government and these 1,500 policyholders will receive first priority for payment as their policy obligations are accorded legal protection through assets held in CLICO’s Statutory Fund. Of course, CLICO’s 100,000 odd traditional policyholders have equal protection through the Statutory Fund and our process has ensured that sufficient assets are available to meet their obligations,” he said.

The second phase will cover the remaining 15 per cent of claims from Government and the balance of non-assenting STIPs policyholders and will be funded from the proceeds of the sale of CLICO’s 57 per cent shareholding in Methanol Holdings (International) Limited (MHIL) for an estimated $2 billion.

In the third phase, will cover the company’s liabilities to non-Government mutual fund holders and non-residential STIPs policyholders.

Rambarran said CLICO’s obligations to the group that did not accept the Government’s voluntary offer amount to about $410 million. This payout will be funded by the sale of CLICO’s 7 per cent shareholding in Republic Bank Limited and the sale of other assets.

The Central Bank Governor assured that CLICO’s 18,000 assenting policyholders “will not be made worse off” for accepting Government’s offer and Finance and the Economy Minister Larry Howai will announcement arrangements for that group shortly.

He said in the case of British American Insurance Company Trinidad Limited (BAT), there is a broadly similar payment plan but because of financial constraints within the company, some assistance is required.

“As a result, Government will provide funding assistance to BAT to meet statutory fund and other creditor liabilities and to provide the necessary assets to enable the potential transfer of BAT’s traditional insurance portfolio to a suitable buyer,” Rambarran said.

Central Bank’s Resolution Plan for CLICO (full text)

Following is the full statement made by Central Bank Governor Jwala Rambarran on March 27, at a press conference at which he announced the three-phase plan for CLICO to repay ts debt to policyholders and to the T&T government.

Today is a significant day in the painful story that was the CLICO financial crisis.

For CLICO creditors and policyholders the end of this traumatic experience is finally drawing near.

Today, six years after CLICO collapsed, the company is in a position to make its first payment of just over 7 billion dollars to its single largest creditor: the Government of Trinidad and Tobago. This represents more than 40 per cent of CLICO’s debt to Government.

Today is also a turning point for the thousands of policyholders, who’ve endured unimaginable hurt and pain as a result of the CLICO crisis. CLICO is also in a position to pay out about 950 million dollars to policyholders. These two creditors are receiving an equal 85 per cent payout at this stage.

These two payments are being made according to the terms of the CLICO Resolution Plan developed by Central Bank and finalized last week Monday after consultation with the Minister of Finance and the Economy as required under Section 44F of the Central Bank Act. Central Bank’s CLICO Resolution Plan was developed to repay all creditors and policyholders and to ultimately facilitate the transfer of CLICO’s traditional insurance portfolio to a suitable buyer by ensuring that enough appropriate assets are put aside.

They say timing is everything...and the question for many is why start these payments now? The answer is: CLICO is now in a position to make payments to its creditors in order to advance the resolution of the company. CLICO’s ability to meet its obligations to creditors and policyholders is based on its most recent Management Accounts as at December 2014 and our up to date understanding of CLICO’s Statutory Fund position.

These numbers indicate CLICO now has sufficient assets to pay its liabilities in its Statutory Fund. The improvement in CLICO’s Statutory Fund position resulted mainly from the sale of CLICO’s shareholding in Methanol Holdings Trinidad Limited (MHTL) in October 2014. This sale added just over 7 billion dollars of cash to CLICO’s Statutory Fund. The bottom line is, the sale of the MHTL asset injected the funds needed to move CLICO’s resolution forward and to help define our resolution plan.

Central Bank’s Resolution Plan for CLICO has 3 phases.

We are sharing the details of this Plan with the country so you fully understand how the Plan will work... if you are a policyholder or creditor... how our plan will impact you.

There are at least five principles, heavily based in law we used to determine how we would proceed with the Resolution. The most important guiding principle of our Resolution Plan was to take action for the benefit of CLICO policyholders and creditors without reference to shareholder value. This is consistent with Central Bank’s duties upon assuming control of CLICO under Section 44D of the Central Bank Act. On this basis, Central Bank determined the categories of creditors to whom CLICO owes money and this dictates the order of priority in which payment will be made in these three phases.

The first phase I’ve just spoken about is payment today to Government and a payment to a specific group of policyholders. In this first stage, the first creditors to be paid as established by the Resolution Plan are Government and the group of policy holders who held Short Term Investment Products (STIPs) but opted, not to take up Government’s offer to be paid their money through Government bonds and shares in the CLICO Investment Fund.

Government and these 1500 policyholders will receive first priority for payment as their policy obligations are accorded legal protection through assets held in CLICO’s Statutory Fund. Of course, CLICO’s 100 hundred thousand odd traditional policyholders have equal protection through the Statutory Fund and our process has ensured that sufficient assets are available to meet their obligations.

Government will initially receive an 85 per cent payout of its claims on CLICO’s Statutory Fund. This will comprise a payment of 4 billion dollars in cash today and potentially around 3 billion dollars in lieu of cash through the transfer of CLICO’s shareholdings in Angostura Holdings Limited, CL World Brands Limited and Home Construction Limited. This transfer of these 3 CLICO assets to Government will be subject to an independent valuation pursuant to section 44D of the Central Bank Act.

The 1500 non-assenting STIPs policyholders are also first in line to equally receive an 85 per cent payout of their claims on CLICO’s Statutory Fund. This payment will amount to about 950 million dollars of just over the 1 billion dollars owed to them. CLICO will communicate its processing schedule for the payout to these policyholders next week. The first payout to the non-assenting STIPs policyholders is expected to take no more than three months.

The second phase of Central Bank’s CLICO Resolution Plan will meet the remaining 15 per cent of the claims of Government and the balance of non-assenting STIPs policyholders on CLICO’s Statutory Fund. This payout will be funded from the proceeds of the sale of CLICO’s 57 percent shareholding in Methanol Holdings (International) Limited (MHIL). This sale which is expected to realize proceeds in the region of at least 2 billion dollars will be subject to an independent valuation and done in accordance with the MHIL Shareholders Agreement. This second payout will clear CLICO’s debt to all its Statutory Fund creditors and leave sufficient assets to fully and appropriately cover the needs of CLICO’s traditional policyholders. The timing of this second payout will of course be dependent on the sale of MHIL.

The third phase of Central Bank’s CLICO Resolution Plan is the realization of other assets to meet all liabilities (outside of the Statutory Fund) to non-Government mutual fund holders and non-residential STIPs policyholders. These are persons who either had STIPs policies but were resident outside of Trinidad and Tobago and, therefore, not eligible for Statutory Fund protection, or persons who had invested in the CLICO mutual funds which, not being insurance policies, were also not eligible for Statutory Fund protection. In both cases, Government had made a voluntary offer to each group and as a result, outside of the Statutory Fund, the Government has a 2.1 billion dollar claim on CLICO from those that accepted the offer. CLICO’s obligations to the group that did not accept the Government’s voluntary offer amount to about 410 million dollars. The third phase payout is expected to be funded by the sale of CLICO’s 7 per cent shareholding in Republic Bank Limited and the sale of other assets. The timing of the payout will be dependent on the sale of these assets.

At this stage we would have accounted for all of CLICO’s Statutory Fund and Non- Statutory Fund creditors. Government would then be left with 5 billion dollars of Preference Shares along with approximately 1 billion dollars of accrued but unpaid dividends on these Preference Shares. The projections suggest the residual assets of CLICO would, when ultimately realized, likely be sufficient to fully repay this 6 billion dollar liability to Government.

As we’ve started the first phase of the CLICO Resolution Plan, we will also be moving ahead with the process to sell CLICO’s traditional insurance portfolio which comprises its life, group health and pension policies. CLICO’s traditional portfolio was independently valued and we are in the process of appointing an Investment Advisor to lead the portfolio sale. Appropriate assets have also been identified to enable the ultimate transfer to a suitable buyer.

Now that I’ve explained the three phases of Central Bank’s CLICO Resolution Plan, there are two matters I’d like to address. The first matter relates to CLICO’s 18,000 assenting policyholders. These are the majority of CLICO’s policyholders who accepted Government’s offer. Government is committed, in principle, to making these policyholders whole, that is, they will not be made worse off under this Resolution Plan for accepting Government’s offer. The Minister of Finance and the Economy will provide details on this issue shortly.

The second matter relates to British American Insurance Company Trinidad Limited, commonly known as BAT. The Resolution Plan for BAT entails a broadly similar payment plan for the creditors of BAT, but owing to financial constraints within BAT, requires some assistance in order to achieve a more comprehensive outcome. As a result, Government will provide funding assistance to BAT to meet Statutory Fund and other creditor liabilities and to provide the necessary assets to enable the potential transfer of BAT’s traditional insurance portfolio to a suitable buyer.

I started off by saying today is an important day, a turning point in the story that was the CLICO crisis...Looking ahead Central Bank’s CLICO Resolution Plan has now given it an end, it is an end subject to disposal of certain CLICO assets but we would like to assure the country, this plan will be executed in the manner outlined and this grueling six year journey will come to an end.

As I indicated before the most important guiding principle of our CLICO Resolution Plan was to take action for the benefit of CLICO policyholders and creditors and we wholeheartedly believe this will be accomplished.

It’s all a bit technical and complex, indeed the entire matter was unprecedented not only in Trinidad and Tobago but in the Caribbean. Let me then recap the broad elements of our CLICO Resolution Plan that you need to remember:

1.Government, as the single largest creditor of CLICO, will receive 4 billion dollars in cash today, and the balance of around 3 billion in lieu of cash upon the transfer of three CLICO assets, Angostura Holdings Limited, CL World Brands Limited and Home Construction Limited.

2.The 1500 non-assenting STIPs policyholders will receive 85 per cent of their claim or about 950 million dollars in 3 months, and the remaining balance after the sale of Methanol Holdings International Limited.

3.Creditors outside of the Statutory Fund such as non-Government mutual fund holders and non-residential Short Term Investment Products policyholders will be paid following the sale of CLICO’s RBL shares and other assets.

4.The policyholders who accepted Government’s offer of bonds and shares in the CLICO Investment Fund will be no worse off. The Minister of Finance and the Economy will provide details shortly on how these policyholders will be treated.

5.The claims of BAT policyholders will also be settled.

As I wrap up I want to repeat Central Bank’s CLICO Resolution Plan will bring closure to this deep financial wound inflicted on thousands of CLICO policyholders and Central Bank is doing all in its power and more to ensure such a financial trauma will never again be inflicted on you.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on June 04, 2015, 01:55:31 AM
Central Bank: No Clico money for Duprey
T&T Guardian Reports.


Former CL Financial chairman Lawrence Duprey, former group financial director Andre Monteil and Gita Sakal, former corporate secretary, will not be paid under the terms of the 2015 Clico Resolution Plan until civil matters filed against them by the Central Bank are completed.

This was confirmed yesterday in a statement from the Central Bank in response to reports that $48.5 million is to be paid to former directors of the company.

The Central Bank said in June 2011, following a forensic investigation into the affairs of the collapsed insurance giant, a breach of fiduciary duty civil case was filed against the Duprey and Monteil and their companies “as they were considered to be the principal decision makers for the affairs of Clico.” Sakal was added as a defendant in March 2013.

“This is an ongoing matter and based on the advice of Queen’s Counsel, defendants in this civil claim, where they or their companies are policyholders/creditors of Clico, will not be paid under the terms of the 2015 Clico Resolution Plan, until the determination of the matter by the Court,” the Central Bank said.

“In respect of the other former directors and officers of Clico, where Central Bank and Clico have not, based on forensic findings and legal advice, contemplated or initiated any litigation against such persons, to date, there would be no legal basis on which Clico may now withhold payment to them as policyholders/creditors at the point of liquidating its debts to creditors from its own assets.”

The bank said under the terms of Government’s bailout of Clico in 2009 and 2011, related parties, including directors and officers of the company were not to be paid with public funds, on the principle that they may have contributed to the financial collapse of the institution.

The statement continued: “The decision to withhold payment from these former directors and officers of Clico, who are policyholders, resulted in them remaining creditors on the books of Clico. Clico, by law, has to treat with all classes of creditors as part of its resolution strategy.”

The bank said under the 2015 Clico Resolution Plan, the company is making payments to its policyholders and creditors entirely from the proceeds of the sale of its assets. This follows monetisation of the company’s Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd (MHTL) shares and the eventual sale of other Clico assets.

The Central Bank said: “Unlike Government’s bailout, the 2015 Clico Resolution Plan is not funded by Government. No Government funds are being used to make payments to creditors and policyholders of Clico including related parties, under the Clico Resolution Plan.

After Central Bank assumed control of Clico in 2009, an investigation was conducted into the affairs of the company by forensic accountant Robert Lindquist. The Central Bank said it has forwarded reports of all forensic findings since 2010 to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions and the police who have commenced criminal investigations.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on June 05, 2015, 02:00:55 AM
$36 million payout to 4 former CLICO directors.
By Asha Javeed (Express).


Four former directors and their companies, who were classed as “related parties” when Colonial Life Insurance Company (CLICO) went bust in 2009, have already been paid $36,188,690.90.

They are Ian Garcia and his company Events Unlimited; Clinton Ramberansingh and his connected parties (Bianca Ramberansingh and Martina De Silva); Vishnu Ramlogan; and Nigel Salina and his company Nigel Salina and Associates.

The directors were among ten identified to be paid $48.5 million.

However, their connected parties will take the final sum that CLICO has to pay to $63,207,849.78.

All their policies will be paid with interest.

The directors include people who were summoned to the Sir Anthony Colman-chaired commission of enquiry into CLICO to be cross-examined on how the company had found itself in an illiquid position but opted to pay the $2,000 fine instead of giving evidence.

On May 1, Salina, who had long lobbied the Government for the money he invested in the company but had made himself available to the Colman Commission, received his money, which amounted to about $2 million.

Salina had four policies—two in US dollars and two in TT dollars.

On May 4, former financial controller and chief marketing officer Garcia and his company Events Unlimited received close to $16 million.

Garcia, who never appeared before the Commission, had five policies—three in TT dollars and two in US dollars.

One of his policies, worth $6.4 million, was in his company's name, Events Unlimited.

Garcia and Events Unlimited were publicly named in the commission of enquiry by CLICO's attorney Neal Bisnath.

Bisnath had said Garcia was one person who benefited financially from his job at CLICO by creating a company (Events Unlimited) and awarding it work from CLICO.

Bisnath had explained how CLICO had made a US$3 million draft to Events Unlimited which was authorised by former CEO Karen Gardier (who is also identified to be paid) and Garcia.

Bisnath had said the US$3m payment was wire transferred to a US account of Events Unlimited and then US$1 million was returned to open an EFPA (executive flexible premium annuity) policy.

The Express verified that the documents on that transaction remain available on the commission's website, but that policy has now been cashed out.

On Tuesday, Ramlogan collected his $3.5 million from CLICO.

On Wednesday, the Central Bank issued a statement which said that the directors are being paid as creditors, and not directors who may have helped the company to collapse.

“In respect of the other former directors and officers of CLICO, where the Central Bank and CLICO have not, based on forensic findings and legal advice, contemplated or initiated any litigation against such persons to date, the Central Bank said there would be no legal basis on which CLICO may now withhold payment to them as policyholders/creditors at the point of liquidating its debts to creditors from its own assets,” the Central Bank has said.

The Central Bank only initiated civil proceedings against former CL Financial (CLF) chairman Lawrence Duprey and former CFO Andre Monteil, but joined former CLF corporate secretary Gita Sakal months after.

Permell: Govt must tell all

So why has the Central Bank, which was managing CLICO under Section 44D of the Central Bank Act, not taken civil action against the directors for breach of their fiduciary duty when all the documents were publicly available after the commission of enquiry?

That's what Clico Policyholders Group (CPG) chairman Peter Permell wants to know.

He said the Central Bank's statement on the former directors “suggests that there is some trepidation as it relates to potential litigation that could be taken against CLICO by these former directors if the Central Bank were to withhold or delay payment”.

Permell said he remained perplexed about public statements made by Finance Minister Larry Howai and Central Bank Governor Jwala Rambarran, a former employee of CLF subsidiary, CMMB.

“We are even more concerned that the PP Government has now apparently amended the well-established 2009 Government policy that the 'CLICO bail-out' is a guarantee to pay strictly third-party policyholders and creditors of CLICO. And as such by definition excludes former directors and senior managers of CLICO, their immediate family members and private companies. In fact, it appears that the floodgates have now been opened to include all former directors with only one minor exception i.e. persons who are subject to civil proceedings initiated by the State. It therefore begs the question who, when and, most importantly, why.

“As indicated previously, we take some comfort in the honourable Finance Minister's statement that an investigation into the matter is currently taking place. Since it's our considered opinion that former directors should not be paid at this time and if any of them were paid they have no right of confidentiality by virtue of their related party status,” Permell said.

“We therefore call on the Government upon completion of their investigation to not just tell the country who is not being paid, but to disclose all former directors who may have already been paid or are about to be paid and the quantum of such payments.”

The related parties payout is included in the $950 million which was allocated to pay 1,500 policyholders who were entitled to it now that the company has turned around.

CLICO was bailed out by the Government after it collapsed in January 2009. It is estimated that CLICO has cost the State about $25 billion inclusive of the commission. While CLICO has yet to fully repay the State, it had started making payments to its policyholders.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on June 07, 2015, 05:29:23 AM
Central Bank fires Yetming
By COREY CONNELLY
T&T newsday
Sunday, June 7 2015


The Clico Policyholders Group yesterday called for a forensic audit into an alleged payout of millions of dollars to former Colonial Life Insurance Company (Clico) directors and their respective companies following the sudden firing of the insurance giant’s chairman Gerald Yetming and managing director Carolyn John on Friday.

In a move late Friday, which is likely to send ripples throughout the financial sector, the Central Bank gave the pink slip to Yetming and John and appointed Wendy Ho Sing as executive chairman “with immediate effect.”

Ho Sing is the senior specialist adviser to Central Bank Governor Jwala Rambarran. She previously served as Deputy Inspector, Policy and Market Conduct and Deputy Inspector of Financial Institutions at the Central Bank.

In an unsigned e-mail sent to media houses on Friday, the Central Bank said it had terminated the appointments of Yetming and John “after Clico failed to follow direct instructions issued by the Bank on March 26, 2015 setting out the protocols for all disbursements to policyholders and creditors under the Clico Resolution Plan.”

“These instructions included obtaining approval from the Bank for all payments prior to disbursement,” the Central Bank said in the e-mail.

The Bank said further that the two executives were fired pursuant to its powers under Section 44 (D) of the Central Bank Act.

The section states, in part, that “where the Bank is of the opinion that an institution is not maintaining high standards of financial probity or sound business practices, that the Bank “investigate the affairs of the institution concerned and any of its affiliated institutions and to appoint a person or persons for that purpose.”

It also states that the Bank should “take all steps it considers necessary to protect the interests and to preserve the rights of depositors and creditors of the institution.”

Yesterday, the Clico Policyholders Group was guarded in its response to the firing of Yetming, a former Finance Minister, and John.

“If what is being alleged is true, that Clico failed to follow direct instructions issued by the Central Bank on March 26, 2015 with regard to obtaining approval from the Bank for all payments prior to disbursement, which obviously would include former directors of Clico and their connected parties, it would appear that the actions of the Central Bank to terminate the appointments of Clico’s Chairman Gerard Yetming and the company’s managing director Carolyn John would be more than appropriate in the circumstances. Since clearly, these are very serious allegations that warrant firm and decisive action,” the group’s chairman Peter Permell said yesterday in an email to media houses.

Permell said there appeared to be more to the issue than what was being presented by the Central Bank.

“We hasten to add that based on additional information reaching us, there appears to be much more to this story. And as such, not only would we prefer to wait until we have heard from all the parties involved before making a definitive statement on the matter, we are calling for an immediate forensic investigation to determine if these payments were above board,” he said.

Permell said the onus would be on Ho Sing to initiate the forensic audit.

“Ho Sing would have to bring in a firm ...somebody who has the necessary skills to do such an investigation,” he said.

The Central Bank’s decision to fire Yetming and John came days after Finance Minister Larry Howai told journalists he was unaware that million of dollars had been allocated to pay several former directors at the financially-strapped Clico and their respective companies as was alleged in financial circles within the past week.

In the same breath, he had acknowledged last week that all of the Clico payments would be made above board.

Over the past days, reports have indicated that four former directors and their companies were paid TT$36.18 million. The Bank, according to media reports, had said that the directors were being paid as creditors and not directors who may have helped the company to collapse.

Rambarran subsequently said in an interview that the former directors and officers of Clico who were not facing any legal action could have been paid.

“When I came into office in 2012, around December of 2012 the Commission of Inquiry was unfolding. Based on what was coming out from the Commission of Inquiry and looking back at some of the evidence we had from the forensic investigation, we again went back to the Queen’s Counsel and said ‘Are there any other persons who we should contemplate litigation against and the Queen’s Counsel came back and said, ‘Yes, we have grounds to contemplate litigation against Ms Gita Sakal (CL Financial corporate secretary),” Rambarran had said on a television programme.

Yesterday, Permell was adamant that the issue needed to be fully ventilated. “We want to hear from everybody,” he told Sunday Newsday.

“We want to hear from the chairman, we want to hear from Carolyn John, the managing director. What you are talking about here is the payment of millions of dollars to former directors who, based on the Central Bank’s statement, did not get authorisation for.

“It means that Clico would have gone ahead in the absence of clear guidelines as to how these payments should be made and paid those. It begs the question, why? What is the motivation for paying these people?

“Why would you disregard the Central Bank’s instructions — assuming that is what transpired, at this stage we are only hearing one side of the story. So I am saying, I want to hear from all of the parties involved and only then can I make a determination of what transpired here.”

He added, “There seems to be some cognitive dissonance on my part to what he (Rambarran) was saying prior to this release that we saw and what is being said in the release.”

Permell, in the email, also took issue with the fact Ho Sing will essentially hold two portfolios. “Additionally, it has not escaped our attention that the Central Bank appears to have taken a decision to merge the positions of Chairman and Managing Director into one, that of Executive Chairman,” he said.

“On the face of it, this appears to be somewhat retrograde and not consistent with tenets of good corporate governance as witnessed when Mr (Lawrence) Duprey previously held the position of Executive Chairman at Clico. In the circumstances, we shall be grateful if the Central Bank could kindly explain this move.”

Yetming could not be reached for comment yesterday as he was said to be out of the country.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on June 09, 2015, 01:53:24 AM
Ex-clico ceo GETs $17.3m
By Asha Javeed (Express)


Two days before the chairman and managing director of CLICO were fired for not following instructions with regard to payouts, its former chief executive, Eugene Dziadyk, was paid $17.3 million for his policies.

Dziadyk, a Canadian actuary who had three US currency polices, was paid on June 3.

Unlike other policyholders, like former director Nigel Salina who had a two per cent interest on his policies, Dziadyk had 12 per cent interest on the three policies.

For his three investments valued at of $499,919.15, $1,083,051.82 and $1,086,935.36 in 2007, he was paid $3,239,842.96, $7,018,970.63 and $7,044,138.85 respectively.

The $17.3 million represents 85 per cent of the money owed to him with the interest.

The payment was made even after Finance Minister Larry Howai called for a report on the matter.

At the Sir Anthony Colman's Commission of Enquiry, it was revealed that Dziadyk had benefited from an interest credit of $63 million on an account.

As a CLICO director, he penned a letter which is available on the Commission's website, retroactively increasing the interest rate of his Executive Flexible Premium Annuity (EFPA) — which he opened in 2004 at CLICO — from 12 per cent to a whopping 75.48 per cent.

“In accordance with the amendment to the above policy dated March 17, 2004 and approved by Mr Duprey, an interest rate of 75.48% shall be credited to this policy covering the period March 17,2004 to April 24, 2007. This policy may be surrendered without penalty,” the letter stated.

The letter which was dated April 24, 2007 was also the day Dziadyk had a meeting at the Central Bank to discuss liquidity issues and the inadequate response of the Central Bank among others.

Special arrangement for Dziadyk
 
Henry Hamlet, a Clico department manager who gave evidence at the Commission, testified on the special arrangement.

As a result, Dziadyk's account grew from US$2.3 million to US$12.5 million.

Hamlet had said Dziadyk took out about US$10 million (TT$63 million) from the account which was left with a balance of US$2.1 million.

That balance left in the account with the interest is what Dziadyk was paid on June 3.

Dziadyk's payment takes the sum paid to former directors of the company to $53.3 million.

Four former directors and their companies who were classed as “related parties” when CLICO went bust in 2009, have already been paid $36,188,690.90 million.

They are Ian Garcia and his company Events Unlimited; Clinton Ramberansingh and his connected parties (Bianca Ramberansingh and Martina De Silva); Vishnu Ramlogan and Salina and his company Nigel Salina and Associates.

The directors and their connected parties are among ten identified to be paid $63,207,849.78 million on their policies with interest added.

On May 1, Salina received his money which amounted to about $2 million. Salina had four policies-two in US dollars and two in TT dollars.

On May 4, Former financial controller and chief marketing officer Ian Garcia and his company Events Unlimited also received close to $16 million.

Garcia, who never appeared before the Commission, had five policies—three in TT dollars and two in US dollars.

One of his policies, worth $6.4 million was in his company's name Events Unlimited.

Financial benefits for Garcia

Garcia and Events Unlimited were publicly named in the CLICO Commission by CLICO's attorney Neal Bisnath.

Bisnath had said at the CLICO enquiry Garcia was one person who benefited financially from his job at CLICO by creating a company (Events Unlimited) and awarding it work from CLICO.

Bisnath had explained how CLICO had made a US$3 million draft to Events Unlimited which was authorised by former CEO Karen Gardier (who is also identified to be paid) and Garcia.

Bisnath had said the US$3 payment was wire transferred to a US account of Events Unlimited and then US$1 million was returned to open an EFPA policy.

On June 2, Ramlogan collected his $3.5 million from CLICO.

The directors include people who were summoned to the Commission to be cross examined but opted to pay the $2,000 fine instead of giving evidence.

Rambarran, Yetming Faceoff

The payment issue had led to a face-off between Central Bank Governor Jwala Rambarran and former CLICO chairman Gerald Yetming.

Rambarran, a former employee of CL Financial's CMMB, is being advised by Ram Ramesh, his former boss and former adviser to Duprey when the company sought a bailout from the Government.

Last Friday, hours after he defended the directors' entitlement to be paid, Rambarran fired Yetming and managing director Carolyn John.

Yetming said the reason he was fired is “a blatant lie”.

Rambarran had written to Yetming on Friday evening stating: “The bank has re-evaluated its strategy for the future conduct of the affairs of CLICO and in this regard the bank is constrained to discontinue your appointment as chairman of the board. We wish to record our gratitude to you for your contribution to the management and affairs of CLICO.”

However, the Central Bank had said in a release on Friday night: “The Central Bank took this action after CLICO failed to follow direct instructions issued by the bank on March 26th, 2015 setting out the protocols for all disbursements to policyholders and creditors under the CLICO Resolution Plan. These instructions included obtaining approval from the Bank for all payments prior to disbursement.”

Wendy Ho Sing, the former inspector of financial institutions, has been named as executive chairman with immediate effect.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Bourbon on June 09, 2015, 04:56:30 AM
https://www.youtube.com/v/8ps20yaVyro
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Deeks on June 09, 2015, 01:25:41 PM
Ian Garcia, former Belmont and Essex goal keeper. Was not a bad keeper.
Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on June 16, 2015, 02:04:07 AM
TWO QUIT
By Ria Taitt


The CLICO board has collapsed.

In a major slap to Central Bank Governor Jwala Rambarran, and in a most unwelcome development for the Government, two directors of the CLICO board, Jagdeesh Siewrattan and Denyse Mehta, have resigned on principle, citing the Central Bank Governor's “unfair, unjust and insensitive” dismissal of ex-chairman Gerald Yetming and managing director Carolyn John.

The board, which is supposed to consist of five directors, now has only Krishna Bodhai and Wendy Ho Sing, the new executive chairman. But with this fragmentation of the CLICO Board, created by the resignations, there is now no quorum.

Siewrattan's letter of resignation, dated June 12, 2015, and Mehta's letter, dated June 14, 2015, both copied to Minister of Finance Larry Howai, have come in the wake of the June 5 dismissal of Yetming and John, following the controversy over payments to former CLICO directors.

Both Siewrattan and Mehta were critical of the Central Bank's handling of the situation and corroborated Yetming's claim that the Central Bank knew and supported the decision of CLICO to pay the former directors and at no time indicated its opposition until after public controversy developed.

Mehta suggested the Central Bank's behaviour was “unethical” because of its failure to acknowledge joint accountability in the matter. In standing in solidarity with Yetming and John, Siewrattan said if they were dismissed, then so should he.

In her letter, addressed to the Governor, Mehta, who was appointed on September 31, 2010, stated that it had become untenable to continue on the board in view of the “unfair, unjust and unprofessional treatment meted out to my fellow directors, Gerald Yetming and Carolyn John...by you, with great disrespect”.

In complaining about the manner in which Yetming, a former minister of finance, and John were treated, Mehta said: “In addition to them not being given the chance to defend themselves, they were falsely charged with 'trumped-up' allegations that they did not follow instructions regarding approval of payments by the Central Bank to residual STIP holders”.

Mehta stated that at the board meeting of April 29, 2015, an update on the payment plan for non-assenting STIP holders was provided. Given the “Clico Resolution” by the Central Bank, it was the duty of the managing director to execute this plan with the Central Bank officials.

“There was a clearly established protocol for operating as this was not the first payment plan to be executed. There was no objection by any director or from the Central Bank representative, Mr Neil Dingwall, at the board meeting about the plan. Neither was there any objection from Mr Dingwall when it was mentioned that related parties would not be treated differently, an opinion shared by you, Governor, on public television, where you stated that all creditors must be paid.”

Mehta said notwithstanding these statements, there was a clearly-defined and well-established payout process with the Central Bank, which involved senior officials such as Carl Hiralal, Nicole Chapman, Neil Dingwall and Denise Daniel.

“It is my understanding that all of these members participated with Ms John and Ms Hoyte from CLICO. I also know that payments were fully under way by May 13, 2015 and by the last meeting of June 3, 2015, the board was informed that 219 applications were already processed with no expressed concern raised by Neil Dingwall or the Central Bank,” the letter continued.

Mehta stated further that at a special board meeting of May 12, 2015, a letter from the Central Bank was presented where CLICO was directed not to pay Ms Gita Sakal, or any other defendants of the fraud on the public proceedings.

“Given this expressed statement, it is my knowledge that this direction is what was acted upon by Ms John and by extension members of the Central Bank. No other variation in the payment plan was presented to the Board to change our direction,” Mehta stated.

She added: “It is therefore against the principles of natural justice to suggest that the chairman or the MD acted unilaterally, especially as this was a joint process. I therefore plead that only after it emerged in the press that the former directors were paid, and there was a public uproar, that procedural infringement was claimed, leading to the dismissals nearly one month after the payouts commenced. I contend that it was highly unethical of all the Central Bank officials to take no joint accountability for the plan that was already in process.

“I therefore feel that the values espoused by the Central Bank in the handling of this matter are not in sync with my own personal beliefs and I stand with my dismissed colleagues and recognise our sterling contribution made in the recovery of CLICO.”

Mehta said she fully endorsed the work involved in the turnaround of CLICO spearheaded by chairman Yetming, who led a decisive and honourable team, supported by the exemplary work of John, “the front, middle and back of the rebuilding of CLICO”, leading to increased confidence by the Government, policy-holders and the staff at the institution.
 
Siewrattan says:

Siewrattan said the reason for his resignation was the “insensitive dismissal of the two players who played the dominant role in the recovery of CLICO (Yetming and John)”.

Siewrattan also stated that throughout the deliberations of the board, its members, led by Yetming and John, “paid meticulous attention to directions from the Central Bank”.

“Messrs Yetming and John were in constant contact with Central Bank staff. Decisions taken were always based on collegial consensus basis. On these grounds, I plead that the basis for dismissing them ought to apply to me as well. Hence the submission of my resignation,” he stated.

Like Mehta's letter, that of Siewrattan referred to the fact that John, a former CLICO employee who was in retirement when CLICO collapsed, made the sacrifice of returning to rebuild the institution.

“In a situation of declining staff who sought greener pastures, she stuck steadfastly to the task at hand, working long hours not only to maintain the administrative workload, but was the institutional memory bank for lawyers, accountants and management consultants who populated CLICO during this trying period,” Siewrattan stated.

Noting that she was the chief witness at the arbitration proceedings of MHTL (Methanol Holdings), Siewrattan said John was the intellectual database for a diverse set of information required for charting CLICO to safety.

Like Mehta, Siewrattan resigned from MHTL as well. He said as a result of his CLICO directorship, he was also on the board of MHTL and Oman Methanol Company and that those companies should be advised of his resignation of their respective boards.


Title: Duprey wants back CLICO!
Post by: rotatopoti3 on June 27, 2015, 08:44:12 PM
Former CL Financial chairman: Return my shares and I will fix company
By Asha Javeed (Express).


DUPREY WANTS BACK CLICO

LAWRENCE DUPREY feels he was duped into disposing of his company, CL Financial (CLF), to the Government in January 2009.

Six years after the Government took over management of Duprey's CLF to stem money problems in two subsidiaries—Colonial Life Insurance Company of Trinidad and Tobago (CLICO) and the CLICO Investment Bank (CIB)—Duprey wants the State to return it.

And he's prepared to challenge the Government legally for it if the State does not submit a proposal plan to exit CLF to its shareholders by month's end.

Duprey, 81, remains the main shareholder of CLF.

In March, Central Bank Governor Jwala Rambarran announced that CLICO had turned a profit and was able to satisfy its main creditor—the Government—with a $7 billion payment.

That $7 billion (which comprised $4 billion in cash and three CLICO assets—Angostura Holdings Ltd, CL World Brands Ltd and Home Construction Ltd), Rambarran had said, represented 40 per cent of the debt owed to Government, which works out to $17.5 billion.

But former attorney general Anand Ramlogan had pegged the bailout figure at $25 billion, while the country's former and current finance ministers, Winston Dookeran and Larry Howai, had estimated it at about $22 billion.

“The company is easy to fix. The economy and the country need that company. I have unfinished business to take care of,” Duprey told the Sunday Express in a phone interview from his Florida, USA, home last week.

In a message to the Government, he said: “Hand me back my shares and I will come in and fix it.”

The Government has been managing the CLF conglomerate through a shareholders agreement originally signed in June 2009 and which has had multiple extensions as the Government seeks to exit the company.

Fired CLICO chairman Gerald Yetming remains the chairman of CLF, Angostura and HCL.

The Government will not exit CLF until its debt has been satisfied.

But Duprey said he was coerced into agreeing into the situation in the first place.

He provided the Sunday Express with a letter which he sent to then Central Bank Governor Ewart Williams to alert him of the liquidity situation.

The letter, he said, was drafted by his then adviser Ram Ramesh (the former chief executive of what used to be CLF subsidiary Caribbean Money Market Brokers).

The January 13 letter, said Duprey, did not call for a bailout, but liquidity support.

“CL Financial being a significant part of the financial sector has been disproportionately impacted by these adverse conditions. Many of our customers are also affected and are consequently calling on their reserve cash positions. Thus far, all our member companies have been able to deal with their commitments.

“However, we need to develop a comprehensive contingency plan to meet any further developments, if this were to follow a similar pattern to other countries. As a result, CL Financial is taking urgent and decisive action,” the letter said.

The letter outlined CLF's assets for re-structuring—real estate, $2.5 billion; manufacturing, $6.3 billion; energy, $7 billion; and financial services at $8 billion, for a total of $23.9 billion.

A complex action plan

“We are in the process of realigning the asset-liability structure of the group to better meet the current liquidity situation. This is a complex action plan that we are embarking on immediately, including initiatives such as merger of certain entities within the group with strategic partners and/or sale of certain assets in order to raise liquidity.

“As you would appreciate, these initiatives would need some time before they yield the desired results. In the event that the financial crisis deepened in the local market, we may need urgent liquidity support to be made available to the group. In this regard, we would like to discuss the approach of the Central Bank toward supporting the financial sector and, by extension, the CL Financial Group, if conditions were to deteriorate,” the letter said.

This letter was submitted by the Central Bank to the commission of enquiry conducted by Sir Anthony Colman into the collapse of CLICO and related CLF subsidiaries.

But Duprey used it to illustrate that the assets of CLF and CLICO had value, which the Government is now reaping, and that had the Government provided “liquidity support”, as requested, then he would still control his company.

“The whole essence of the letter was misguided by the powers that be. The CIB matter should have been handled by the Deposit Insurance Corporation (DIC). It was the Central Bank's actions which caused a further run on the company and in Barbados,” he recalled.

He blames politics for how he eventually lost control of it.

“The Government came in and they wanted certain assets to satisfy the Statutory Fund. It was clear manipulation by the Government,” he said.

If Duprey's words sound like those of a jilted chairman, at least they have been consistent.

In his witness statement provided to the commission of enquiry in October 2012, he said: “The global collapse coinciding with an ever impossible revamp of the regulatory framework and a refusal of Government-owned entities to back the group after all the years of benefit that they had received from the interest income that the group had generated led to the need for some ultimate Government support.

“I would have preferred, as I deal with further on in this statement of the intervention had not been so politically motivated and had been directed at protection for I believe had that been the position we would have fared great deal better.

“Losing all the intellectual capital as a condition of intervention was a bad decision and was not one replicated in the USA or the UK. It is of note in this regard that I was firmly of the view in January 2009 that the run on CIB and the resultant liquidity or cash flow issues was much inspired by the decision of State-owned or run entities making decisions at or about the same time to withdraw rolling deposits which had been previously rolled from maturity to maturity without question. The decision to seek funds back came in reality out of the blue and caused severe problems.”

Duprey told the Sunday Express he feels he was victimised because he was a friend of former United National Congress prime minister Basdeo Panday, so he left Trinidad immediately after the memorandum of understanding was signed.

“I thought they were about to put a pair of handcuffs on me and put me in jail. I thought that is the action John Jeremie (former attorney general) would have taken so I never came back,” he said.

Asked why he never commented before, he said: “I didn't think it was a public matter. It was a private company.”

Duprey: I can fix CLICO

The disclosures at the CLICO commission were startling—million-dollar salaries paid to executives, companies created by executives and hiving off millions in contracts, and breaches in governance—all at the expense of policyholders.

CLICO was an insurance company formed by Cyril Duprey in 1936.

The reins were passed on in 1988 to his nephew, Lawrence, who grew the company into the conglomerate CLF.

When former Central Bank governor Williams announced the bailout of the company, he said it was to reduce the “systemic risks” to the country's financial sector.

But Duprey countered the Central Bank never explained its strategy to him.

And now, CLF and CLICO are doing well, and in his mind, what the Government has basically done is nationalise its prime assets.

Duprey now has a team negotiating with stakeholders on his behalf—former Hindu Credit Union (HCU) president Harry Harnarine, former CEO Claudius Dacon and Carlton Reis.

To this end, he has also retained former attorney general Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj to file a constitutional motion against the Government for breach of contract and an oppression claim.

“I am in touch with what is happening globally. I know what to do and I can fix it,” he said.

However, Duprey's CLF would be a shell of what it once was—several assets were sold for a cumulative $5.5 billion. They are Primera Energy, Lascelles De Mercado, Burn Stewart Distillers, Valpark mall and Atlantic Plaza, its Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd shareholding and its W Fort Lauderdale Hotel.

Howai: Legal action could be long

When the Sunday Express questioned Howai about Duprey's request, he responded: “Mr Duprey has not contacted the Government on this matter. The CLICO Shareholders Agreement is an agreement between the Government and the CLICO shareholders. The Government cannot unilaterally conclude the agreement. This has to be done in consultation with the shareholders. The Government is still negotiating with the legally appointed negotiators of the shareholders.”

When asked about civil action against the State, he answered: “If, as you say, it is Mr Duprey's intention to 'initiate civil action against the State', I expect that it would be a long, drawn-out affair with little immediate impact. While the Government remains mindful of the constitutional rights of all persons, it will not be intimidated into arriving at any conclusion it does not think is in the best interests of the country.”

The majority of the Government's bailout was spent on paying back policyholders of CLICO and British American's Executive Flexible Premium Annuity (EFPA), which was a facility created by CLICO to raise money and bore an above-market annual interest rate of ten per cent.

Those attractive interest rates had drawn over 25,000 people to invest billions, and CLICO's reach had stretched from credit unions to prime State enterprises to owing millions to local banks.

Duprey had described his empire, which at one time comprised some 65 companies in 32 countries, as being caught up in a ­perfect storm of economic collapse.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on October 04, 2015, 02:45:48 AM
Clico has over $22bn in fund
By Rhonda Krystal Rambally (Guardian).


An actuarial certificate signed by Paul Ngai of Prescience Insurance Consultants and Actuaries, dated April 20, says he was advised by the management of Clico that the assets pledged to the Statutory Fund total more than $22 billion.

Ngai found there were sufficient assets in the fund to make a partial payment in the settlement of certain policyholder liabilities.

This information was received by the Clico Policyholders Group (CPG) over the weekend and mere days before the 2016 budget presentation.

Ngai stated he examined the financial position and valued the policy benefit liabilities of the company for its Statutory Fund as at December 31, 2014.

The total in the fund is $22,428,457,543.00

In the document, headlined Actuarial Certification pursuant to the Insurance Act of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Ngai wrote, “I meet the appropriate qualification standards and am familiar with the valuation and capital adequacy requirements applicable to life insurance companies in Trinidad and Tobago.”

In Ngai’s opinion and based on unaudited financial and source data information provided to him by the management of Clico, he found that:

•The valuation of the policy liabilities has been in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles with such changes as determined and directions made by the Draft Insurance (Caribbean Policy Premium Method) Regulations;

•The methods and assumptions used to calculate the policy liabilities are appropriate to the circumstances of the Statutory Fund and of the said policies and claims;

•The amount of policy liabilities that makes proper provision for the future payments under the Company’s policies is less than the total amount of the Statutory Fund; and

•As a result, there are adequate assets in Clico’s Statutory Fund to fund a partial payment in the settlement of certain policyholder liabilities, backed by said Statutory Fund, to be made in accordance with the Directions of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.”

John: I cannot go on record

Contacted yesterday, Clico’s terminated managing director Carolyn John said she could not comment since it would be a breach of confidentiality.

“I cannot go on record.”

Permell: When will $$ be paid?

CPG chairman, Peter Permell, yesterday said the group was not at all surprised by this revelation as it was consistent with what sources had been saying. However, he said, the big question was when would the payment be made.

Permell said, “The only thing we were not quite clear on was the actual size of the fund in terms of dollar value or the specific assets pledged. In short, these numbers clearly indicate that Clico now has sufficient assets to pay its contractual liabilities in full, relative to its Statutory Fund.”

He explained that from the $22.4 billion, $8 billion had to be deducted, which was previously paid to the Government and the “non-assenting” policyholders representing 85 per cent of contractual liabilities.

“This leaves a balance of $14.4 billion to cover $9 billion of traditional policyholders’ liabilities, $1.4 billion to pay the Government and non-assenting the remaining 15 per cent; and the ‘assenting’ policyholders the balance contractually due to them,” he added.

He believed the information would be helpful to new Finance Minister Colm Imbert in getting a better appreciation of the “true facts” relative to the Clico Resolution Plan, particularly in light of his predecessor Larry Howai’s apparent challenges in obtaining information from Clico and the Central Bank. The CPG is now calling for an urgent meeting with the new Finance Minister.

Permell referred to Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley’s statement in the run up to the general election that, “We of the PNM, have no record of turning our backs on a government commitment made by the Government of Trinidad and Tobago and when this Government has made that commitment we will pay you the money.”

The CPG chairman said this was equally applicable to Clico policyholders and as Prime Minister, so far, Rowley had not done anything to suggest that he was not a man of his word.

Permell said, “It is now a matter of history that the PNM lost the 2010 general election and was unable to make good on its promise.

“Accordingly, Dr Rowley must be aware that it would be a travesty and a betrayal of the worst kind, having returned to government, almost as if by divine intervention; and the PNM either reneges or fails to complete their task for a second time, in circumstances where the Statutory Fund is now fully funded with over $22.4 billion.”

Flashback—Clico collapse

Government was forced to bail out Clico after it collapsed in January 2009.

A January 30, 2009, release from the Central Bank headlined ‘The Government of Trinidad and Tobago and the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Moves to Protect Investors’ stated that in a move to protect the interests of depositors and policyholders, the minister of Finance Karen Nunez-Tesheira and the Governor of the Central Bank had reached an agreement with the CL Financial Limited Group for the provision of a package of financial support for the group’s financial services companies.

Some of the key elements of that agreement were as follows:

*CL Financial will sell, liquidate or collateralise its assets and allocate the proceeds to meeting in full all the requirements of the Statutory Fund for both Clico and the British American Insurance Company (Baico), thereby protecting, in full, all its insurance and pension fund clients;

*The Government will provide funding support to fully back Clico and Baico to meet any Statutory Fund deficits that might emerge after the company has made all possible arrangements to place satisfactory levels of cash and other assets in the Statutory Fund in order to ensure the short as well as medium and long-term liquidity and stability of Clico.

*The Central Bank will assume control of Clico Investment Bank under the provisions of Section 44D of the Central Bank Act.

Earlier this year, four former Clico directors received close to $36 million in payout.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on April 09, 2016, 02:30:22 AM
Govt bids to get back $20B from Clico bailout
By Clint Chan Tack (Newsday).


DECLARING that the former People’s Partnership (PP) failed to resolve the Clico issue, Finance Minister Colm Imbert yesterday said Government is moving to get back the $20 billion bailout of the collapsed insurance giant.

“I have restored order and business common sense to this process.

We are now back on track in terms of recovering the $20 billion of the public funds that have been pumped into Clico,” Imbert said in delivering the Mid-Year Review of the 2016 Budget in Parliament.

Imbert evoked howls of protest from Opposition MPs when he said, “I have requested the Central Bank, with whom I now meet regularly, to dispose, strictly in accordance with the shareholders’ agreement, of the remaining MIHL (Methanol International Holdings Limited) shares owned by Clico, at the valuation price, which is in the vicinity of $2 billion, as well as Clico’s traditional portfolio of insurance policies and other associated assets, valued at approximately $1 billion.”

He also said the Central Bank has been requested to transfer to Government, “Clico’s shares in Angostura, HCL and CL World Brands valued at $3 billion.”

Imbert explained once this transfer takes place, Government will take appropriate decisions, “to dispose of these assets in a sensible and productive manner.” He said Government will acquire lands owned by Angostura and HCL for public purposes such as housing, tourism and infrastructure.”

Imbert also said the Central Bank will begin the process of disposing of Clico’s shares in Republic Bank by 2017. Condemning the PP for underselling Clico’s shares in MHIL for $2 billion less than what they were worth and leaving the Clico resolution plan, “consumed by internal power plays, inertia , dithering, apathy and stagnation,” Imbert said all legitimate creditors and policyholders on the books will be repaid this year, now that Clico’s statutory fund has recovered.

Indicating he will inform the public of Government’s plans to monetise other CL Financial assets in due course, Imbert explained this was “all in the interest of recovering as much of taxpayers funds as is possible, setting liabilities to policyholders and depositors, getting revenue for the Government so deal with items of expenditure that we seeking.” Quoting the late Max Senhouse, Imbert quipped, “We need the money.”

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on April 28, 2016, 04:24:22 AM
Duprey angry at CLF mishandling: ‘I’m not to blame for this fiasco’.
By Gail Alexander (Guardian).


CL Financial’s (CLF) majority shareholder Lawrence Duprey, as well as a new group called the Clico Stakeholders’ Alliance (CSA), are formulating legal action to block Government’s proposed sale of CLF assets.

This was confirmed by Duprey’s spokesman, Claudius Dacon, on Tuesday, following failed bids by Duprey to meet with Government to discuss Duprey’s plan to recover his former companies and repay the outstanding debt owed to Government from the 2009 bailout following CLF’s collapse.
This week’s development marks the culmination of efforts by Duprey, 82, over the past year to regain his former company.

Action has been brewing in the last few weeks since Duprey wrote Finance Minister Colm Imbert on March 23 offering an outline proposal to settle the Clico/CL Financial debt. The proposal had already been sent on March 22 to Central Bank Governor Dr Alvin St Hilaire.

In February, Hillaire had also received a request from Duprey for a meeting on Clico and CLF matters. Duprey had indicated that Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, SC, and attorney Ronnie Bissessar had been retained to represent his interests.

In the March 23 letter, Duprey told Imbert: “I have assembled a knowledgeable team of legal and financial advisers and we stand ready to work with you to bring the best possible resolution of this matter in the interest of all stakeholders.”

But since nothing has been heard from Government, Dacon, former CEO of Colonial Life and Clico Bahamas, said Duprey was now in the process of formulating a pre-action protocol letter to send to Government soon.

Dacon said the CSA, an independent group headed by Tobago activist David Walker, comprises about 50 people “who don’t always agree with us but feel assets shouldn’t be sold off in a ‘fire sale’.”

The CSA includes former Clico employees and policyholders. Walker headed a Charlotteville group which successfully challenged the Tobago House of Assembly on a Charlotteville mall issue.

The parties are particularly concerned since Imbert, in his recent mid-year review, said Government was moving to recoup the $20 billion used for CLF’s bailout.

He said the Central Bank had been asked to dispose of the remaining Methanol International Holdings Limited shares owned by Clico, as well as Clico’s traditional portfolio of insurance policies and other associated assets.

Imbert said the Central Bank was also asked to transfer to Government, Clico’s shares in Angostura, Home Construction Limited and CL World Brands. He said once that was completed, Government “will take appropriate decisions to dispose of these assets” and would also acquire lands owned by Angostura and HCL.

The Central Bank, Imbert added, would begin disposing of Clico’s shares in Republic Bank by 2017. These proposals only relate to Clico and in “due course” Imbert said he would report on plans to monetise other assets held directly by CL Financial.

The T&T Guardian contacted Duprey early last week on his views of Government’s plan. He made it clear he was unhappy with that, saying the sale was a bad idea and that he could manage the assets so the companies could earn hard currency to assist T&T in its current economic constraints. He was bitter about measures taken by the last People’s Partnership (PP) government also and indicated action was ahead on the matter.

In a statement on Tuesday, Duprey stated: “I have chosen to speak now because the country needs a powerful, vibrant CLF.

“For seven long years I’ve been vilified in the media. One government minister after the other has lined up to claim the company that my uncle and I built was a Ponzi scheme.

“They and others claimed I am responsible for all the money that was taken from the taxpayer to rescue CL Financial.

“To support their claim it seems they have hidden all accounts from the public. Every administration has gone to great lengths to keep information from us. They are fighting all the way to the Privy Council to block disclosure of how the money was spent.“

He claimed: “They passed legislation making people like Gerald Yetming, Marlon Holder and all their other senior appointees immune from prosecution, apparently so that they can hide their actions.”

Duprey said the CLF rescue could not have cost TT$20 billion.

“This rescue was less complex and less costly than many in the international arena.

“Unlike many of the other rescues, our assets suffered a temporary diminution in value directly as a result of a global economic crisis. The other rescues were largely the result of bad investments in unrecoverable sub prime mortgages.

“CLF wasn’t in that position and just needed time for asset values to recover, as they did,” he added.

Saying CLF, which included forex generators, Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd (MHTL) and Methanol Holdings (International) Ltd (MHIL), were created for T&T, Duprey accused Government of selling the MHTL and MHIL companies “on the cheap, losing us a constant stream of foreign exchange.”

Duprey said CLF had “broken the effective monopoly of a small cartel of financial service providers in T&T” but the moves of subsequent governments had now eradicated that.

“The other financial services companies are once again free to exploit the market by giving negligible rates of return to savers.

“The Government’s actions allowed them to poach the CLF client base, reducing our value drastically. We created the largest and most valuable insurance infrastructure in the Caribbean.

“That included sales and support staff as well as a valuable portfolio of real estate. This has been destroyed for no good reason,” he said.

Duprey added: “I’m not to blame for this costly fiasco. My management and staff are not to blame. We created a fantastic company that should be helping T&T through this trying time in our history.

“Taxpayers could and should have been repaid within three years. We should now be generating masses of foreign exchange, offering savers sensible returns and leading T&T’s diversification efforts, as we have done successfully.

“Instead, CLF has been reduced to a bit part player that’s being stripped bare even now. CLF has so much to offer, access to accounting and other information will show that clearly.

“That is why each administration has gone to such lengths to hide the information. It is information that will set me free. They cannot stop ongoing disclosures like recent information about kickbacks ...”

He added: “We also need to return CLF to the control of professional businessmen with proud track records, away from politicians and political appointees. I have played my part in building this national treasure. I will now play my part as best possible in restoring the company to its much needed leading role.”

Legal action looms
Lawrence Duprey’s spokesman Claudius Dacon said Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, who both Duprey and the CSA have engaged for the matter, is also a CSA member and is preparing the legal action against the Government. Dacon said Maharaj wrote to Imbert recently, informing him he was retained by Duprey concerning negotiation of CLF but received no reply.

Dacon said Duprey began talks with the past PP government in 2015 and was ready to negotiate for the return of CL Financial. He had spoken to then acting finance minister Vasant Bharath. Dacon claimed Bharath was positive but said solutions were required to say how Duprey would settle the debt and deal with negative public sentiment.

He said it was proposed that a reputable investment firm be hired to do due diligence on CLF and give a proper accounting of the debt owed. Once established and audited, he said it was proposed a firm of investment bankers would be contacted to use CLF’s assets to raise a loan to repay government.

“The problem is we don’t know how much we owe government and if they sell those assets they will never be able to recover sufficient money to repay the taxpayers and policyholders,” Dacon said.

“Lawrence left in 2009 with the assurance policyholders would get full benefits. That’s why he signed the agreement giving the previous government opportunity to seize CLF assets;  he was forcefully evicted. The company always had sufficient funds to deal with its liabilities, it wasn’t insolvent. It was illiquid,” he added.

It is understood another Duprey family branch is also exploring the matter. The T&T Guardian sent emailed queries to Imbert yesterday on whether Government is considering Duprey’s proposal, if it’s feasible and whether there are any talks with Duprey or Maharaj. Imbert replied that he had no comment at that time.

Also contacted, the Central Bank stated “these matters are confidential” and that it could not comment.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on May 16, 2017, 01:44:20 AM
OLIVE BRANCH FOR DUPREY
By KWAME WEEKES (NEWSDAY).


FORMER CLICO jefe Lawrence Duprey and his policyholders will meet face-to-face today for the first time since the collapse of the insurance giant. An item on the agenda is whether Duprey will be prepared to take over the payment of money owed to stakeholders by the one-time flourishing financial conglomerate,

Plans for the olive branch meeting were afoot yesterday, with Policyholder Group chairman Peter Permell remaining tight-lipped over the venue – only that it is in north Trinidad and will be after lunch. But he confirmed Duprey himself will be there. “This is the first time that this policyholders’ group headed by yours truly has ever met with Mr Duprey or will ever be meeting with Mr Duprey,” Permell told Newsday yesterday,

“We have never met with him before, never met with him outside of this meeting that is going to come off tomorrow (today). I have never met with him before the crash or since the crash up to today.” Permell did not want to reveal the full agenda for the meeting, however he said that at the top is Finance Minister Colm Imbert’s statements on the CLICO/CLF Resolution Plan during his mid-year review in Parliament last week and “the way forward”, for his (Permell) group of policyholders to be paid their, “just due.” In Imbert’s mid-year review, he revealed that CL Financial now owes approximately $27.7 billion to taxpayers, $20.3 billion of which was directly injected into the company’s bailout since 2009. The difference, according to Imbert, was accrued via “advisory fees and other costs”, and other liabilities,

Imbert further estimated after “legitimate non-conflicted third party creditors” are paid, CLICO would be left with $2.8 billion in government bonds, cash and equity in several other companies,

Permell believes Imbert was “speaking in parables”, but truly repeating the government’s previously stated unwillingness to pay his group of policy holders,

Imbert said in the Senate in July 7, 2016, that Permell’s group of “assenting policyholders” assigned their rights to their policies to the government, when they accepted the former PP government’s offer of zero coupon bonds and CLICO Investment Fund shares,

“This group gave up their right to accrued interest and these individuals no longer have a contractual arrangement with CLICO, and do not form part of the Resolution Plan,” Imbert said,

Permell said the agreement referred to by Imbert was made between Government and the Central Bank-appointed Directors of CL Financial, who were placed in charge of the company when the Central Bank took control,

“We have not seen any such agreement and there is no way a government could agree not to pay policy holders money that is due to them from the company,” Permell said. Permell said policy holders have a contractual agreement with CLICO,

Their assigning rights to government was only as security for government. However, Permell said as CLICO has returned to some degree of stability as seen in its $2.8 billion in assets, “those policies must now be released back to the policyholders and if there is money, then CLICO has to pay the policyholders the difference.” Permell’s group has already been paid $75,000 and the balance in zero interest bonds,

The sum amounted to “a very rough estimate” of 85 percent of the total amount owed, said Permell. They are now seeking to be paid, “all their contractual entitlements.” Permell said he has been a loud critic of former group chairman Duprey in the past, but that, “Mr Duprey has indicated he is sorry. He apologised to policy holders and wants to pay policyholders the balance of money due to them. But he can only do that of course, if he gets back his money...so everything is linked in that sense,” Permell said,

After disappearing from the public eye since the bailout of 2009, Duprey returned in 2015, asking for his majority shares in the regional conglomerate to be returned to him for his “fixing.” “So, if he is telling us that if he gets back his company that he is prepared to make good on the people’s policies, we have an obligation to sit down and hear what he has to say,” Permell said.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on July 23, 2017, 02:49:06 AM
PAY BACK $2B
Creditors seek to recover debt from CL Financial:
By Asha Javeed (Express).


THE creditors of CL Financial (CLF) are calling in their debt.

First Citizens Investment Services (FCIS) and CLICO Investment Bank (CIB), which is in liquidation, have both written to CLF demanding that their debt which totals about $2 billion be repaid by this week.

The demand letters come after the Government lost its petition to appoint joint provisional liquidators to CLF, claiming it was insolvent and could not repay its debt.

First Citizens Investment Services (FCIS), formerly Caribbean Money Market Brokers (CMMB) which was acquired from CLF for $1, is a subsidiary of banking group First Citizens which is majority owned by the State.

CIB is currently in liquidation by the Deposit Insurance Corporation (DIC).

The Minister of Finance appoints the board of management of the DIC.

Title: Re: CLICO
Post by: Flex on September 18, 2020, 04:04:24 PM
Government now puts CL Financial bailout at $30 Billion
By Kyron Regis (Guardian).


Finance Minister Colm Imbert has revealed that after a decade and multiple assessments, that the government’s bailout of CL Financial and CLICO has cost taxpayers $30 billion.

Speaking at a post Cabinet Media Briefing, Imbert said: “Remember as well that the government, taxpayers by extension, bailed out the CL Financial Group and CLICO, in the tune of billions of dollars - in fact I can tell you now that the final account in terms of indebtedness of CL Financial and CLICO to the state is $30 billion.”

Imbert indicated that it was originally thought that the debt would be approximately $15 billion. He added that when the Ministry went to court with the liquidation “it was $23 billion+ and having done, the final account it is $30 billion.

Imbert said there are many different approaches in the the way in which the debt to taxpayers is being settled .

According to the Finance Minister, one of these approaches is a “set-off”, “in other words you get value for debt”. He gave the example of the golden grove estate in Tobago which was acquired for the Sandals hotel project. Imbert said it was valued, the estate was transferred to the government and then the debt was reduced by the valued amount.

The Finance Minister said that a similar process occurred with CL Marine. While he did not have the exact figure, Imbert disclosed that with regard to CL Marine, the company and it’s assets were valued at ‘a bit over $100 million’.

He said that this acquisition has now reduced the liability of CL Financial/ CLICO Group to the government as result of acquiring that property.

The disclosure of the valuation comes after the Ministry of Finance issued a press release, asserting the fact that CL Marine and its subsidiaries have been acquired by the government, which was part of a court supervised liquidation process.

Based on the liquidation, Imbert said that the government was going through the process of “acquiring strategic assets and netting off/setting off the value of CL Financial Group assets against the debt owed,” thus reducing the debt accordingly.

The Minister insisted that these details were included the recently published press release, but they were not. Hence the reason former Minister in the Ministry of Finance and newly appointed CEO of the Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School Mariano Browne asked: “Where is the report from the Court?”

The Ministry of Finance, in the release, noted that the government has created the National Marine and Maintenance Services Company Limited, a new wholly owned State enterprise for the aforementioned purpose.

Having completed the acquisition, the Finance ministry disclosed that the Government “recently appointed an interim Board of Directors, pending a permanent board, comprised of senior public officials, with an immediate mandate to implement a proper governance structure according to the Companies Act and the State Enterprise Performance Monitoring Manual.”

The Minister of Finance went on to say that the government is quite enthused about this particular acquisition “because we have to diversify away from oil and gas and ship repair, ship building and so on, is a major area of government policy, has been for may many years.”

Imbert emphasized that ship building and ship is also a major area of diversification. He remarked that the government is in the process of acquiring brand new vessels - two fast ferries and two military vessels coming from Australia.

The Finance Minister also reminded the public about the Galleons passage, noting that the facilities of CL Marine and its assets which are housed in Chaguaramas, is intended to repair the aforementioned vessels.

“So it serves a multiple of purposes, it’s part of our diversification effort and it is also a very efficient means of repairing the government vessels,” said Imbert.

As a result of this, the finance minster said he was expecting the government to receive salutations and congratulations for starting the first major diversification project of the government, “rather than being subjected to all sorts of questions about, Why we do that? How you do that? How much you pay for it et cetera?”

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: Flex on May 01, 2021, 12:49:26 AM
Montei and Trotman ordered to pay CLICO almost $100M
By Derek Achong (T&T Guardian).


Former Clico Investment Bank (CIB) chairman Andre Monteil and former CIB President Richard Trotman have been ordered to pay almost $100 million in restitution to their former employer over a controversial unsecured loan to Monteil before the bank’s collapse.

Delivering a 129-page judgement, last week, High Court Judge Avason Quinlan-Williams said that both Monteil and Trotman were responsible for the unpaid $78 million loan as they breached their fiduciary duties to the bank in facilitating it, well over a decade ago.

Quinlan-Williams said: “I have found that the first and second defendants (Monteil and Trotman) to lack credibility and in many respects to be untruthful witnesses.”

“I make this statement because those findings were critical in the court’s fact-finding exercise and in coming to the conclusion that the claimant (CIB) has successfully met their burden in proving the case against the defendants,” she added.

In the lawsuit, CIB was claiming that Trotman and Monteil breached their fiduciary duties through the deal which left the bank unpaid and without sufficient security to cover the loan.

The deal consisted of a series of complex financial transactions done between 2007 and 2008.

According to the evidence in the case, Monteil sought and obtained the loan through his company Stone Street Capital in February 2007 to help purchase shares in Home Mortgage Bank (HMB) held by CIB’s parent company CL Financial (CLF).

Shortly after, the debt was transferred to Monteil’s other company First Capital (St Lucia) Limited, which then held his over 300,000 CLF shares, which at the time, were valued at almost $444 million.

CIB was initially to hold Monteil’s new shareholding in HMB as security but when the debt was transferred to First Capital, it was substituted to that company’s CLF shares.

Monteil struck a deal with former CLF executive chairman Lawrence Duprey for him (Duprey) to take control of First Capital’s debt and assets in exchange for the option to purchase CLF’s 43 per cent shareholding in HMB.

Monteil purchased the HMB shares using the loan and other finances for $110 million and then sold them to the National Insurance Board (NIB) for almost the exact purchase price.

CIB filed the lawsuit against the parties after the Central Bank took over control of it and CLF following the Government’s bailout of both organizations in 2009.

Testifying in the trial of the case in 2009, Trotman admitted that CIB officials fabricated documents to make it appear that it was, in fact, Duprey who had initially taken the loan in February 2007.

“It may be faulty legally but this is the way we approached it,” Trotman said, as he admitted that the questionable manoeuvre was a failed attempt by him and his colleagues to ensure that Duprey would guarantee the loan.

In disposing of the case, Quinlan-Williams ruled that CIB was entitled to restitution for the $78 million loan less the a little over $1 million in HMB dividends it received before its hold over it was substituted to First Capital’s CLF shares.

She also stated that CIB was entitled to two and a half percent interest on the money between when the lawsuit was filed in 2011 and her judgement was delivered.

She declared that the transfer of the debt and security substitution was void as they were not done with proper authority and in breach of the duo’s fiduciary duties.

She also ruled that the duo and Stone Street had to account for the assets they hold or held in their possession, which was acquired directly or indirectly from the proceeds of the loan. CIB was also allowed to trace their assets for such information.

With regard to Monteil, Quinlan-Williams noted that he knew that the loan was unauthorised, in oral terms, did not have adequate security and was granted without due diligence from Trotman.

“He knew that this was highly irregular and not in CIB’s best interests yet as Chairman and a Director of CIB, he allowed it to happen, leaving CIB exposed and unsecured,” she said.

She also said he acted dishonestly by not disclosing the true purpose of the transfer and substitution.

“He deliberately misled Mr Trotman and the CIB Board that the transfer of the loan obligations was to another of his companies that would be a Stone Street subsidiary, namely FCL St Kitts,” she said.

Dealing with Trotman, Quinlan-Williams said he breached his fiduciary duty to act with care diligence and skill as a prudent executive would have done in comparable circumstances.

She also noted that he failed in his fiduciary duties of loyalty, honesty and good faith and did not act with the highest standard of professional and ethical competence.

As part of the judgement, Quinlan-Williams ordered Monteil, Trotman and Stone Street to pay CIB’s legal costs for bringing the lawsuit.

She also granted a 60 stay of execution of the judgement.

CIB was represented by Michael Green, QC, Nadine Ratiram, and Keilah Granger.

Jason Mootoo, Christopher Sieuchand, and Shivangelie Ramoutar represented Monteil and his company.

Matthew Gayle represented Trotman.

Title: Re: Lawrence Duprey/Clico Thread.
Post by: maxg on December 07, 2022, 11:48:17 AM
So they pay yet ?
1]; } ?>