(http://thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/SUAREZ-BITE.gif)
(http://stateofthegame.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/suarez.jpg)
Brilliant footballer, but so dumb.I think is more than dumb. I think that man have actual mental issues.
Don't think he had a chance to actually bite him... but the intent was definitely there. That would factor into any penalty that he gets. Very foolish either way, brilliant footballer... immature fella.I think his intent was to evoke the response he got from Ivanovic..... to win a penalty
I think his intent was to evoke the response he got from Ivanovic..... to win a penalty
Nah. You could see he was vex with himself after giving away the penalty. That bite was him childishly taking out his frustration on somebody else.Don't think he had a chance to actually bite him... but the intent was definitely there. That would factor into any penalty that he gets. Very foolish either way, brilliant footballer... immature fella.I think his intent was to evoke the response he got from Ivanovic..... to win a penalty
did he bite ivanovic or try to bite him?
did he bite ivanovic or try to bite him?
look at Ivanovic's reaction...he bit him.
Daz d end of his season for sure, and probably missing the first few games of next season too
did he bite ivanovic or try to bite him?
look at Ivanovic's reaction...he bit him.
Daz d end of his season for sure, and probably missing the first few games of next season too
Please. Ivanovic's reaction after pushing his head away from his arm was to sit there on the pitch and stare at the ref for a call. He wasn't paying any attention to his arm whatsoever, at least not the way you'd expect someone who just get bite to do. Not only that... when he eventually tried to show Friend his arm it wasn't even with any conviction. If there was any mark or evidence you'd think he'd put up more of a protest so that the ref take note.
Be serious. We are not debating whether Suarez bit him hard enough to leave a mark. That is irrelevant.
Ivanovic was looking at the ball, not Suarez, until Suarez chomped on him. At which point he spun around and pushed Suarez's head away. It was a clear bite, I eh have time for dis convo, you could argue wid yuhself on dis one.
Be serious. We are not debating whether Suarez bit him hard enough to leave a mark. That is irrelevant.
Ivanovic was looking at the ball, not Suarez, until Suarez chomped on him. At which point he spun around and pushed Suarez's head away. It was a clear bite, I eh have time for dis convo, you could argue wid yuhself on dis one.
Lol... "irrelevant"? Okay... except that would be the only objective proof of there being a bite, with video being inconclusive. As for you not having "time for dis convo"... den ride tuh f**k out. You eh doing nobody favors by commenting dred :beermug:
If we get any offer over 40 mil in the summer, i feel Suarez gone. Brilliant player, but a bit of a mental case.
They made you a forkin moderator? No wonder this forum goin tru and more and more people stop posting. It just goes to show they value people like you more and more on this forum, than people who actually know how to communicate in a respectful and tasteful way.
If we get any offer over 40 mil in the summer, i feel Suarez gone. Brilliant player, but a bit of a mental case.
If we get any offer over 40 mil in the summer, i feel Suarez gone. Brilliant player, but a bit of a mental case.
The funny thing is nobody talking about the fact that once again he deliberately handled the ball. He shared most of his repertoire on the field today. Only thing missing was him racially abusing someone.Giggsy11 no doubt he mad no ass. The man could not wait for the after game buffet ;D
Brilliant footballer, but so dumb.I think is more than dumb. I think that man have actual mental issues.
did he bite ivanovic or try to bite him?
look at Ivanovic's reaction...he bit him.
Daz d end of his season for sure, and probably missing the first few games of next season too
Please. Ivanovic's reaction after pushing his head away from his arm was to sit there on the pitch and stare at the ref for a call. He wasn't paying any attention to his arm whatsoever, at least not the way you'd expect someone who just get bite to do. Not only that... when he eventually tried to show Friend his arm it wasn't even with any conviction. If there was any mark or evidence you'd think he'd put up more of a protest so that the ref take note.
Be serious. We are not debating whether Suarez bit him hard enough to leave a mark. That is irrelevant.
Ivanovic was looking at the ball, not Suarez, until Suarez chomped on him. At which point he spun around and pushed Suarez's head away. It was a clear bite, I eh have time for dis convo, you could argue wid yuhself on dis one.
Lol... "irrelevant"? Okay... except that would be the only objective proof of there being a bite, with video being inconclusive. As for you not having "time for dis convo"... den ride tuh f**k out. You eh doing nobody favors by commenting dred :beermug:
Be serious. We are not debating whether Suarez bit him hard enough to leave a mark. That is irrelevant.
Ivanovic was looking at the ball, not Suarez, until Suarez chomped on him. At which point he spun around and pushed Suarez's head away. It was a clear bite, I eh have time for dis convo, you could argue wid yuhself on dis one.
Lol... "irrelevant"? Okay... except that would be the only objective proof of there being a bite, with video being inconclusive. As for you not having "time for dis convo"... den ride tuh f**k out. You eh doing nobody favors by commenting dred :beermug:
They made you a forkin moderator? No wonder this forum goin tru and more and more people stop posting. It just goes to show they value people like you more and more on this forum, than people who actually know how to communicate in a respectful and tasteful way.
I think his intent was to evoke the response he got from Ivanovic..... to win a penalty
He didn't try to go down himself or feign injury after Ivanovic reacted though. I think you being way more generous to him to imply that he was actually thinking at all. I think he just lost his head and let his emotions get the better of him.
The funny thing is nobody talking about the fact that once again he deliberately handled the ball. He shared most of his repertoire on the field today. Only thing missing was him racially abusing someone.Giggsy11 no doubt he mad no ass. The man could not wait for the after game buffet ;D
I will say this in his defense I don't believe he deliberately handled the ball. If you watch the slow mo
he turned his head away thinking he was going to collide with his team mate
The funny thing is nobody talking about the fact that once again he deliberately handled the ball. He shared most of his repertoire on the field today. Only thing missing was him racially abusing someone.Giggsy11 no doubt he mad no ass. The man could not wait for the after game buffet ;D
I will say this in his defense I don't believe he deliberately handled the ball. If you watch the slow mo
he turned his head away thinking he was going to collide with his team mate
Be serious. We are not debating whether Suarez bit him hard enough to leave a mark. That is irrelevant.
Ivanovic was looking at the ball, not Suarez, until Suarez chomped on him. At which point he spun around and pushed Suarez's head away. It was a clear bite, I eh have time for dis convo, you could argue wid yuhself on dis one.
Lol... "irrelevant"? Okay... except that would be the only objective proof of there being a bite, with video being inconclusive. As for you not having "time for dis convo"... den ride tuh f**k out. You eh doing nobody favors by commenting dred :beermug:
Indefensible.(http://l.yimg.com/os/en/blogs/sptussowexperts/WubX7nn.jpg)
Giggsy can i bite u?
If is anybody being "kind" to him, is you wit yuh biased, asshole, liverfool ass! Mario Balotelli was getting hammered from all fronts but for a few people...Mario is now 22 years old (soon to be 23) and to you, people was just defending him because he was "black", according to your f**kin' black, cocksuckin' ass. You couldn't ever WAIT to be postin' on here 'bout how Mario need a "come uppance" and how stupid he was for any offence he commit....it was never that he, at 19, 20 or 21, was ever a "brilliant footballer...immature fella" to you, which he actually is but here it is, that suarez wit he repeat offender, 26 year old ass carryin' on it some dumb shit, yet again, and you wanna talk but he is just a "immature fella". Balotelli's emotions never ever got the best of him, according to you and people like you....but you want to give suarez a backhanded pass. Boy, hul yuh mudda c**t oui!
Be serious. We are not debating whether Suarez bit him hard enough to leave a mark. That is irrelevant.
Ivanovic was looking at the ball, not Suarez, until Suarez chomped on him. At which point he spun around and pushed Suarez's head away. It was a clear bite, I eh have time for dis convo, you could argue wid yuhself on dis one.
Lol... "irrelevant"? Okay... except that would be the only objective proof of there being a bite, with video being inconclusive. As for you not having "time for dis convo"... den ride tuh f**k out. You eh doing nobody favors by commenting dred :beermug:
They made you a forkin moderator?No wonder this forum goin tru and more and more people stop posting. It just goes to show they value people like you more and more on this forum, than people who actually know how to communicate in a respectful and tasteful way.
Bakes you being ah facking asshole here. Better you keep quiet. Suarez have no defence and should have no defenders here. Period
Don't think he had a chance to actually bite him... but the intent was definitely there. That would factor into any penalty that he gets. Very foolish either way, brilliant footballer... immature fella.
Giggsy can i bite u?
Precisely. Fully endorsed! For a brief period, it seemed to have forged a rehabilitation, but alas that notion is dead. Very much tied to my "Arab Spring" on the forum comment recently.
If is anybody being "kind" to him, is you wit yuh biased, asshole, liverfool ass! Mario Balotelli was getting hammered from all fronts but for a few people...Mario is now 22 years old (soon to be 23) and to you, people was just defending him because he was "black", according to your f**kin' black, cocksuckin' ass. You couldn't ever WAIT to be postin' on here 'bout how Mario need a "come uppance" and how stupid he was for any offence he commit....it was never that he, at 19, 20 or 21, was ever a "brilliant footballer...immature fella" to you, which he actually is but here it is, that suarez wit he repeat offender, 26 year old ass carryin' on it some dumb shit, yet again, and you wanna talk but he is just a "immature fella". Balotelli's emotions never ever got the best of him, according to you and people like you....but you want to give suarez a backhanded pass. Boy, hul yuh mudda c**t oui!
You sound upset. Hard to say though.
Giggsy can i bite u?
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
(http://sphotos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/11729_490302561023410_2027423637_n.jpg):rotfl: :rotfl:
I was impressed that Ivanovic actually pushed Suarez instead of punching him. Even in the heat of battle (literally) he kept a cool head.Yep, very professional of him! He would have gotten a punch from a normal mortal like me!
(http://sphotos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/11729_490302561023410_2027423637_n.jpg)
Indefensible.(http://l.yimg.com/os/en/blogs/sptussowexperts/WubX7nn.jpg)
I suspect he was leaving at the end of the season anyway (too good NOT to be playing Champions League football, and sadly, most likely not even Europa League football), but this behaviour only reduces his price and strengthens the negotiating postion of the buying club.
Precisely. Fully endorsed! For a brief period, it seemed to have forged a rehabilitation, but alas that notion is dead. Very much tied to my "Arab Spring" on the forum comment recently.
Lol... was only a matter of time before you weigh in, de way you does master tote feelings.
I dare Luis Suarez to even try and bite me in the derby. Cos he'll get volleyed right into the Kop the horrible f**king sewer rat. Victor Anichebe (@RealBigVic28) April 21, 2013
Liverpool fine forward for biting Branislav Ivanovic
Liverpool have fined Luis Suarez for biting Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic but insist the striker still has a future at the club.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22248105
heat of the momment type actions this type of thing happens.
these men out there battling all this i part of the game.
do you know how much intentional elbow, pull stones and intentional stamp does pass , especially during corners etc
when ref not looking
Bitting is a bit over board, but dont pretend that dirty plays is not part of everyday football.
take your fine and come back and play hard,
media be blowing things out of proportion.
heat of the momment type actions this type of thing happens.
these men out there battling all this i part of the game.
do you know how much intentional elbow, pull stones and intentional stamp does pass , especially during corners etc
when ref not looking
Bitting is a bit over board, but dont pretend that dirty plays is not part of everyday football.
take your fine and come back and play hard,
media be blowing things out of proportion.
KND like yuh bite a man arready lol
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BIc2b8WCcAEowLY.jpg):rotfl:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BIc2b8WCcAEowLY.jpg)
Karma catches up with him too, with RVP passing him for the scoring lead.
I don't know what the f--k wrong with this boy. He does be playing good and then he does get some vaps and do some REAL irrational crap when he battling 50/50 for the ball. Especially in the penalty area.
I don't know what the f--k wrong with this boy. He does be playing good and then he does get some vaps and do some REAL irrational crap when he battling 50/50 for the ball. Especially in the penalty area.
Just ah immature and selfish fella... most adults have learned to curb their impulses by that age. The Liverpool hierarchy have belly, I really doh see it getting any better.
giggsy, to me, yuh really raise a good point hyere, gyul. Why would flex and tallman and dem take this jackass that have such a contentious existence with as many people as he does and make he a "moderator" is beyond me. I woulda never think this site would be in such a desperate situation as to give this c**t that kinda "authority"...but then again....people vote jack warner in office so say wha? This one here isn't the first jackass to get put in a "position". So is either a fren ting or dey 'fraid him jes' like wit jack.
I am in no way, shape or form of the opinion that anyone is picking on me and I will tell you straight that it is a real small-town mentality to think that I am in any way, shape or form, interested in becoming a moderator. Just because I question the wisdom in the ministry appointing some people as teachers, doh mean I want to be one. "Friendly advice", flex, can only be friendly amongst friends. You and I are not friends. Admittedly, you and he are friends. I have NO problem with that. But please do not insult my intelligence in telling me that I receiving a yellow card when your "friend" should have been red-carded and suspended, banned and fined many, many moons ago.....but then again, as yuh say, he is your friend. I KNOW fully well this forum is not run on any funding by me, jed, no need to remind me, it is free. I totally respect and I even laud and appreciate what you are doing. However, you cannot expect, as I pointed out, that you appointing someone as historically contentious and "disrespectful" as you are with this fool and expect that grown men and women are just going to snap to attention like if we in the military. Whatever value and resources he is volunteering to bring to the site, then good for your site and more power to him, but you are lying to yourself if you think you are not being biased.
giggsy, to me, yuh really raise a good point hyere, gyul. Why would flex and tallman and dem take this jackass that have such a contentious existence with as many people as he does and make he a "moderator" is beyond me. I woulda never think this site would be in such a desperate situation as to give this c**t that kinda "authority"...but then again....people vote jack warner in office so say wha? This one here isn't the first jackass to get put in a "position". So is either a fren ting or dey 'fraid him jes' like wit jack.
I think you are out of place here.
Yes, I give him the position because I think he is capable and yes, he is meh pardna. He doing this for free he is not getting paid so comparing him to Jack Warner regimen it wrong. I eh paying him millions of your money.
The man expressing his opinion about the situation and he was not assaulting you in anyway. If you disagree with what Bakes saying, fine, you guys can argue but keep it real and stop with the personal attacks or sacrarium.
We have moderators here and if you feel you being picked on by anyone of them, send myself and Tallman a PM and we will handle the situation but to come in public and disrespect a moderator and then bash myself, Tallman and the SWO is unacceptable.
Please consider this is friendly warning, a yellow card issued.
PS: If you are interested in becoming a future moderator feel free to send us your letter of interest (LOI) and when a position becomes available, we would consider your LOI. The same way Bakes got the job.
I fuh one glad for all de distraction away from de cut ass we geh today ;D
I fuh one glad for all de distraction away from de cut ass we geh today ;D
He got a 10 match banGood!
But wait a minute?!? He get ban 8 games when the FA convicted him of racial abuse but get 10 games when he bite a man?? :-\He got a 10 match banGood!
He got a 10 match ban
He got a 10 match ban
Absolutely ridiculous and over the top decision. What about consistency? ::)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/t/tottenham_hotspur/6076094.stm
He got a 10 match ban
Absolutely ridiculous and over the top decision. What about consistency? ::)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/t/tottenham_hotspur/6076094.stm
He got a 10 match ban
Absolutely ridiculous and over the top decision. What about consistency? ::)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/t/tottenham_hotspur/6076094.stm
He lucky it was not a fella like Roy Keane he bite. That would of been World War 3 on that pitch.
He lucky it was not a fella like Roy Keane he bite. That would of been World War 3 on that pitch.
If was Ballo.....
Liverpool goalkeeper Pepe Reina has told a Spanish radio station that Luis Suarez's 10-match ban for biting Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic is "absurd and unfair" reports the Guardian. (external)
Reina says the Uruguayan striker is being singled out because of his nationality and previous misdemeanours.
"People in England are treating him different because he is Uruguayan; because he has had a previous episode like this," Reina is reported as saying.
"He knows perfectly well that what he did was wrong but a 10-game ban seems to me absurd, out of proportion and unfair. It seems that the people making the decisions have got it in for Luis a little bit."
(Will link in a few)
Unfortunately not in the heat of the moment (http://www.guardiannews.com/football/2013/apr/25/luis-suarez-suspension-pepe-reina)
Liverpool goalkeeper Pepe Reina has told a Spanish radio station that Luis Suarez's 10-match ban for biting Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic is "absurd and unfair" reports the Guardian. (external)
Reina says the Uruguayan striker is being singled out because of his nationality and previous misdemeanours.
"People in England are treating him different because he is Uruguayan; because he has had a previous episode like this," Reina is reported as saying.
"He knows perfectly well that what he did was wrong but a 10-game ban seems to me absurd, out of proportion and unfair. It seems that the people making the decisions have got it in for Luis a little bit."
(Will link in a few)
10 matches is excessive, arbitrary and apparently motivated by bias. I wouldn't be surprised if Liverpool/Suarez appeal, and succeed in having it reduced.
The issue that really at play here is the fact that he has a track record of indiscretions.
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/397939_10151562121149417_1089700392_n.jpg):rotfl:
I saw this on the UK Guardian today:
(http://media1.sulia.com/static/user_images/96/2013-04-23/81d11910-b12b-41a1-ad67-d0dd9f079930)
His ban should include playing for Uruguay as well. This way he will think hard for a minute because obviously he did not learn from his first incident.
The issue that really at play here is the fact that he has a track record of indiscretions.
The problem with the penalty is that if you try to equate it with anything else it seems wrong.
I think he got 7 with Ajax for the bite. 8 for the Evra issue. Now he's gotten 10 because of those past two incidents.
Problem is....some people skewing it now to say that the penalty for biting someone is harsher than alleged racial abuse.
"The Commisson did not take into account that no further action was taken against Jermain Defoe in 2006, and instead used the case of Brighton's Ashley Barnes, banned for a total of seven games for tripping up a referee, to judge the length of Suarez's ban."
...
"But when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez's denial of the standard punishment that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly insufficient, it seemed to us that Mr Suarez has not fully appreciated the gravity and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident.''
I saw this on the UK Guardian today:
(http://media1.sulia.com/static/user_images/96/2013-04-23/81d11910-b12b-41a1-ad67-d0dd9f079930)
FA publishes reasons for Suarez ban... (http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1426635/fa-publishes-reasons-severity-suarez-ban?cc=5901)Quote"The Commisson did not take into account that no further action was taken against Jermain Defoe in 2006, and instead used the case of Brighton's Ashley Barnes, banned for a total of seven games for tripping up a referee, to judge the length of Suarez's ban."
...
"But when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez's denial of the standard punishment that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly insufficient, it seemed to us that Mr Suarez has not fully appreciated the gravity and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident.''
Like I said... arbitrary. You don't use a similar offense by which to gauge punishment, although that is somewhat understandable... you don't use some other incident related to violent conduct, but instead use an incident involving a player and a referee. Makes no sense. The kicker is that they insist that this biting incident is "truly exceptional" completely ignoring the fact that it has happened in the PL before... the irony of them overlooking the DeFoe situation apparently being lost on them.
I wouldn't be surprised if Liverpool/Suarez appeal, and succeed in having it reduced.
FA publishes reasons for Suarez ban... (http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1426635/fa-publishes-reasons-severity-suarez-ban?cc=5901)Quote"The Commisson did not take into account that no further action was taken against Jermain Defoe in 2006, and instead used the case of Brighton's Ashley Barnes, banned for a total of seven games for tripping up a referee, to judge the length of Suarez's ban."
...
"But when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez's denial of the standard punishment that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly insufficient, it seemed to us that Mr Suarez has not fully appreciated the gravity and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident.''
Like I said... arbitrary. You don't use a similar offense by which to gauge punishment, although that is somewhat understandable... you don't use some other incident related to violent conduct, but instead use an incident involving a player and a referee. Makes no sense. The kicker is that they insist that this biting incident is "truly exceptional" completely ignoring the fact that it has happened in the PL before... the irony of them overlooking the DeFoe situation apparently being lost on them.
The Liverpool manager said Suárez's persecution complex stemmed from the inconsistencies in an FA disciplinary process that enabled Jermain Defoe to escape with a yellow card for biting Javier Mascherano in 2006 and saw the Chester City defender Sean Hessey receive a five-match ban for biting Stockport's Liam Dickinson in the same year.
http://www.espnfc.us/
3 game ban -- WC over for Suarez, and I not sure that Liverpool should keep this fella!
"dis is not a fete in here ... dis is madness!!"
http://www.espnfc.us/
3 game ban -- WC over for Suarez, and I not sure that Liverpool should keep this fella!
"dis is not a fete in here ... dis is madness!!"
Come and get him, Madrid and Barca
FIFA have banned Luis Suarez from playing International & domestic football for 24 games & have fined the Uruguay forward €150,000
FIFA have banned Luis Suarez from playing International & domestic football for 24 games & have fined the Uruguay forward €150,000
FIFA, Uruguay and Liverpool have to realize Vampire Suarez needs more than ban and fine. He needs help
Tony Barrett
@TonyBarretTimes
FIFA have banned Luis Suarez from playing International & domestic football for 24 games & have fined the Uruguay forward €150,000
167 people cashed in on bet that Luis Suarez would bite someone at World Cup
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/06/luis-suarez-biting-prop-bet-norway
Tony Barrett
@TonyBarretTimes
FIFA have banned Luis Suarez from playing International & domestic football for 24 games & have fined the Uruguay forward €150,000
That punishment soft.
LOL... I'm not even mad.
http://bitemangame.com/
@FIFAWorldCup
BREAKING: #URU's Luis Suarez suspended for nine matches and banned for four months from any football-related activity. MORE TO FOLLOW
@FIFAWorldCup
BREAKING: #URU's Luis Suarez suspended for nine matches and banned for four months from any football-related activity. MORE TO FOLLOW
wonder if that will solve his problem ?
Suarez has gotten a slap on the wrist.
http://www.espnfc.us/fifa-world-cup/story/1913701/luis-suarez-banned-for-four-months
All talk aside, the world cup won't be as good without him there.Agreed. He's a very good player. But the ban is well deserved.
Suarez has gotten a slap on the wrist.
http://www.espnfc.us/fifa-world-cup/story/1913701/luis-suarez-banned-for-four-months
Finally he speaks out on the matter.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10154259892985652&set=vb.219735380651&type=2&theater
Ah know we have a visceral reaction to biting because we see it as animal ting. But I watching de France game yesterday where man throwing elbows at man temple and ting. Ting to kill people. Dat ain't worse than biting? Dem red card fouls to mash up man leg and career and ting. Dat eh worse dan biting? Scraping studs down a man shin. Yellow card. Ain't no lengthy ban for dat. Why we treating biting worse?
Ah asking myself that question too, by the way.
I ain't saying biting cool. I'm saying how come we doh have the same degree of outrage over other acts that are equally or more dangerous. They'll show two replays of an elbow to the head, say 'he's been a bit naughty' and story done. When in reality that more likely to be dangerous than a bite.Ah know we have a visceral reaction to biting because we see it as animal ting. But I watching de France game yesterday where man throwing elbows at man temple and ting. Ting to kill people. Dat ain't worse than biting? Dem red card fouls to mash up man leg and career and ting. Dat eh worse dan biting? Scraping studs down a man shin. Yellow card. Ain't no lengthy ban for dat. Why we treating biting worse?
Ah asking myself that question too, by the way.
dread yuh could spread disease with bites, infections if yuh break skin...any manner of shit could happen to make d victim end up d worst for dat bite.........bitin people ent nothing to make lite of.
I ain't saying biting cool. I'm saying how come we doh have the same degree of outrage over other acts that are equally or more dangerous. They'll show two replays of an elbow to the head, say 'he's been a bit naughty' and story done. When in reality that more likely to be dangerous than a bite.Ah know we have a visceral reaction to biting because we see it as animal ting. But I watching de France game yesterday where man throwing elbows at man temple and ting. Ting to kill people. Dat ain't worse than biting? Dem red card fouls to mash up man leg and career and ting. Dat eh worse dan biting? Scraping studs down a man shin. Yellow card. Ain't no lengthy ban for dat. Why we treating biting worse?
Ah asking myself that question too, by the way.
dread yuh could spread disease with bites, infections if yuh break skin...any manner of shit could happen to make d victim end up d worst for dat bite.........bitin people ent nothing to make lite of.
9 international games and no football related activity for four months doesn't sound like a slap on the wrist for me. That means he's missing the rest of the World Cup and the first 2 -3 months of his club season. That is no joke. Especially if "no football related activity" means he can't even train with his club side.
Ah know we have a visceral reaction to biting because we see it as animal ting. But I watching de France game yesterday where man throwing elbows at man temple and ting. Ting to kill people. Dat ain't worse than biting? Dem red card fouls to mash up man leg and career and ting. Dat eh worse dan biting? Scraping studs down a man shin. Yellow card. Ain't no lengthy ban for dat. Why we treating biting worse?
Ah asking myself that question too, by the way.
I ain't saying biting cool. I'm saying how come we doh have the same degree of outrage over other acts that are equally or more dangerous. They'll show two replays of an elbow to the head, say 'he's been a bit naughty' and story done. When in reality that more likely to be dangerous than a bite.Ah know we have a visceral reaction to biting because we see it as animal ting. But I watching de France game yesterday where man throwing elbows at man temple and ting. Ting to kill people. Dat ain't worse than biting? Dem red card fouls to mash up man leg and career and ting. Dat eh worse dan biting? Scraping studs down a man shin. Yellow card. Ain't no lengthy ban for dat. Why we treating biting worse?
Ah asking myself that question too, by the way.
dread yuh could spread disease with bites, infections if yuh break skin...any manner of shit could happen to make d victim end up d worst for dat bite.........bitin people ent nothing to make lite of.
Because it is normal to use you arms and legs in football - using your teeth is taking it to another level. It is savage behaviour.
Joey Barton – 12 matches
After being shown a red card for elbowing Carlos Tevez, Barton was found guilty of trying to knee Sergio Aguero and head-butt Vincent Kompany. These additional two charges of violent conduct, added to the dismissal, have resulted in a 12-match ban for the former Newcastle man, and put his career at the London club at risk.
Eric Cantona – 9 months
The mercurial French attacker was given a nine-month worldwide ban from the game in 1995 after his famed kung-fu kick on Crystal Palace fan Matthew Simmons at Selhurst Park. The Manchester United forward was also ordered to complete 120 hours of community service after the shocking act.
Paolo Di Canio – 11 matches
Fiery Sheffield Wednesday forward Paolo Di Canio was on the sidelines for 11 matches after pushing referee Paul Alcock to the ground in September 1998. After being dismissed in a league fixture against Arsenal, the Italian pushed the official to the deck, and was also handed a £10,000 fine for the act of petulance.
Kevin Keegan and Billy Bremner – 10 matches
Keegan and Bremner were both on the sidelines for 10 matches after coming to blows in the 1974 Charity Shield between Liverpool and Leeds. The pair were involved in a fight on the hour mark of the game, and both dismissed.
David Prutton – 10 matches
Southampton man David Prutton was given a ten-match ban for shoving referee Alan Wiley after his dismissal against Arsenal in the Premier League in 2005. The Saints midfielder was also handed out a £6,000 fine.
Paul Davis – 9 matches
The Arsenal midfielder was given a nine-match ban for punching Glenn Cockerill in October 1998, breaking the Southampton man’s jaw. Davis was sent off and ordered to pay a £3,000 fine by the FA.
@FIFAWorldCup
BREAKING: #URU's Luis Suarez suspended for nine matches and banned for four months from any football-related activity. MORE TO FOLLOW
wonder if that will solve his problem ?
No it won't. Psychological help might. A ban, in and of itself, won't "solve" his problem.
While biting is more common among delinquent toddlers, psychologists say that adult biters involved in that kind of primitive attack behaviour likely have childhood impulse-control deficiencies.
"When we talk about biting, it's a very bizarre thing," said Adam Naylor, a sports psychologist with Boston University.
"I would argue the more bizarre the action, the more it might be a sign of someone actually trying to control their emotions. And if you don’t have any emotional management compass and you try and control it, it’s going to end up looking really weird when you don’t."
All talk aside, the world cup won't be as good without him there.
Barca sign the biter. I suspect he will be less stressed now that he will be speaking in his native tougue so he will be less likely to bite.
:beermug:Barca sign the biter. I suspect he will be less stressed now that he will be speaking in his native tougue so he will be less likely to bite.
I heard he moved because Spaniards taste better :p