April 20, 2024, 04:15:19 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tempo

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 15
121
Football / Re: why fire otto?
« on: November 12, 2011, 03:12:12 PM »
You fire Otto for the same reasons you fired Maturana and Latapy; he failed to get results. I can't imagine some would even contemplate keeping the guy around after failing to get out of the first round.

122
Football / Re: FIFA opens 10 more Caribbean bribery cases (iz Oli time!!)
« on: October 29, 2011, 08:50:40 AM »
Yeah, right, and the Nazi soldiers at Auswitz were just following orders.
If you know of wrongdoing you can either look the other way or speak out. If you decide to look the other way and keep your paycheck, you have no moral right to say later "I think they were wrong and I never agreed with their actions" That said, we all have to make our own decisions relevent to our personal situations, I understand that, but you cannot at a later date untarnish yourself. Lincoln Phillips, as much as I respect him, could have spoken out long ago, but chose not to. Maybe Phillips and Look Loy could argue that they felt they could change things from the inside, but thats hard to believe when you consider the death grip held over the TTFF by Warner.

FS, the Auschwitz analogy is a wee bit over the top. Also, to place LP in the same category as Jack's fair haired golden child, Look Loy, is a bit misguided as well.

For one, LP had gone record in the press urging the TTFF to settle with the players. Two, his TD reports frequently cited the damaging consequences both on and off the field that would result from the case if it continued to fester. Three, one reason Look Loy will have problems is enough people know that be was willingly used by Jack and Groden to undermine LP's programme. Case in point, the following link from the TTFF website in 2007 that described LP's coaching education directive with the KNVB, the very same program Look Loy and Corneal hijacked with Groden to call their own in 2010. Look Loy will understand and appreciate the axiom "Truth crushed to earth shall rise again". Take a look and you'll see:
http://ttffonline.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=1




123
Football / Re: Camps resigns from TTFF
« on: October 27, 2011, 06:18:23 PM »
One man has been allowed to stifle all of the potential leaders in the game for decades as well as any sense of professionalism. Now that JW is gone from the scene, the leadership vacuum that will occur may pit all of the potential future leaders against each other and, unfortunately, advance policies in order to cultivate and preserve alliances rather than to advance the best interests of the game. Tough times ahead I'm afraid unless forces join together and recognize the common purpose without one person being concerned about getting the credit or having control. 

124
Football / Re: Andre interviews Jamal Shabazz on I95.5fm this evening
« on: October 22, 2011, 11:12:51 AM »
Shabazz and Ethics- Where in the world do you ascribe Ethics to Terrorists/
. Shabazz was the one who gave rifles and other weapons of mass destruction to teenagers under the guise of a Revolution. Father forgive them for they no not what they do? This man is a mercenary plain and simple. Let me tell you the ethical thing to do- After he had accepted the job of Coach of Guyana he should have resigned from Caledonia. Go and live in Guyana and developed the game or scout talent for the Guyana team. No half a loaf for both teams and still want to call themselves Professional.
 You cant have your cake and eat it.
:beermug:

125
Football / Re: Now T&T men hold on to Mexico.
« on: October 22, 2011, 07:37:27 AM »
Nice result fellas. Imagine there was talk of Eve being let go. One of the young coaches to watch.

126
Jack's rant continues to bring global shame to T&T. This is the attention the esteemed minister has brought with his foray into anti-semetism and less than credible attempt to cast himself as protector of the African diaspora within the halls of FIFA.

http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/oct/20/jack-warner-conspiracy-harry-pearson?cat=football&type=article

127
Zionism is dominated by the nationalist movement in Israel, this is why more and more settlements are being built illegally in the West Bank. The ADL asserts that Zionism is the guiding nationalist movement... and this is what nationalism is today.  These settlements are the chief reason why there can't be peace today, because the Likud government of Netanyahu believe Jerusalem should be Jewish and not shared.  They specifically reject co-existence. These positions have been condemned by all of Israel's allies, including the US, the UK... and by the UN. 

Everyone outside of Israel, and many within recognize these acts/stances as radical, extreme, provocative... call it what you will.  Zionism ceased to be about "establishing a Jewish home state" 60 yrs ago when the State of Israel was established.  I could go on arguing and offering all the links I want but in the end it will only lead to more ole talk. At the end of the day no one knows what Jack really meant when he mentioned Zionism in his remarks... but to just dismiss concerns about Zionism as some zany, fringe lunatic talk is plain foolish.  Not surprising then to see Tempo pushing that talk and Mango Chow like ah maccomere man instigating talk on the side.

Moving on...

It would be best for you to move on because you are completely out of your depth on this issue and I can assure you that Jack's use of the term was not an homage to Jewish repatriation or anything associated with politics in the Levant. Even you can recognize that fact.

128
There is nothing in the FIFA statutes that indicate teams participating in FIFA competitions would be disallowed from continuing because their federation has become insolvent. The concern of the '06 players court victory somehow causing the current players and fans hardship is a red-herring.

129
Half-wit, you expect to find "radicalism" or "radical agendas" in the definition?  Does dictionary.com provide a definition that references "mudmen" or "Jewish Cabal"??

Not necessarily your highness but a mention that points  to the movement as being radical or non-mainstream as you claim is not unreasonable. You obviously haven't been able to locate an example yourself and missed the point that aligned "mudmen" and "Jewish Cabal" as terms used by Jewish conspiracy theorists. Jack's reference to Zionism rearing its head in FIFA was not an acknowledgment of the Israeli/Palestine question but rather a loaded claim that lends credence to those crackpots. It's really not that hard to get.


Since you need to be lead by the hand like the simpleton you are...
Jews against Zionism
Revisionist Zionism

Jews Against Zionism is hardly a widespread movement. They are on par with Jews For Jesus as far as their reach and influence is concerned.

Revisionist Zionism is a nationalist faction within the Zionist movement. It is the founding ideology of the non-religious right in Israel, and was the chief ideological competitor to the dominant socialist Labor Zionism. Revisionism is represented primarily by the Likud Party.

Another strike. When a movement is considered a "faction" within a larger movement, chances are that movement is not universal or widespread. The title alone refers to RZ as holding views that are antithetical to the original non-radical meaning of Zionism. In fact, the Likud Party does not represent the interests of the majority of Israelis and they actually won less seats in the Knesset than the more moderate Kadima Party.

Quote from: Bakes link=topic=55222.msg776105#msg776105 date=1318999312
From that noted anti-Semitic group the [url=http://www.adl.org/durban/zionism.asp
Anti-Defamation League[/url]...
"Today, decades after the actual founding of a Jewish state, Zionism continues to be the guiding nationalist movement of the majority of Jews around the world who believe in, support and identify with the State of Israel."

What's your point? Are you equating "nationalism" with "radicalism"? Remember, your point was that Zionism was a universal AND radical movement that embraced the ideal that the two party solution should be rejected. You can't run from what you said.

Secondly, the definition you attribute to that wonderful organization is similar to the one I originally provided. So, thanks you idiot for managing to prove my original point that Zionism in it's origin is not a radical movement while contradicting your laughable claim that Zionism was inherently accepted worldwide as a radical movement. As the ADL holds on to the original meaning, when the term Zionism is used in the manner in which Jack presented it only a fool like yourself would believe the ADL and Jack use of the term have the same meaning.

That ought to get you started... once you finish your search for a definition that includes "mudmen" and "Jewish Cabal" of course.

You should have stuck with your open ended and unsupported statements because the items that you offered as evidence were a joke.



130
If there is precedence of FIFA sanctioning a team in the middle of qualification because its federation is insolvent then this MAY be an issue to be concerned about. I'm not sure if this has happened though. I think the belief may just be a way for the TTFF to manipulate a way to shut down the qualification effort and conveniently blame the '06 players.

If I am reading the current standings correctly, all Guyana has to do is tie one match and they are through to the next round. 
:beermug:

Correction:
All Guyana has to do is WIN one match or tie both matches and they are through to the next round.

Current Group B Standing
# Team GP W D L F A D PTS Last 5 matches

1      Guyana 4   3   1   0   7   2   +5   10   DWWW
2      Trinidad & T*… 4   3   0   1   8   2   +6   9   WLWW
3      Bermuda 4   1   1   2   4   5   -1   4   DWLL
4      Barbados 4   0   0   4   0   10   -10   0   LLLL


:beermug:

131
If there is precedence of FIFA sanctioning a team in the middle of qualification because its federation is insolvent then this MAY be an issue to be concerned about. I'm not sure if this has happened though. I think the belief may just be a way for the TTFF to manipulate a way to shut down the qualification effort and conveniently blame the '06 players.

If I am reading the current standings correctly, all Guyana has to do is tie one match and they are through to the next round. 

132
Football / Jack's Rant
« on: October 18, 2011, 03:46:15 PM »

133
Jackass what yuh want me to do... quote de internet fuh yuh?  just do a casual search any number of hit would confirm the radicalism inherent in zionism.  You and that next ass-sniffer Mango Chow go have to come better than that queen of hearts talk to really upset me.

No but we want you to get ya head out of your backside. Maybe then you would figure how off-based you are. If that doesn't help here is what a "casual search" Google offered as its first selection in the search phrase "Zionism definition"
http://m.dictionary.com/d/?q=Zionism&o=0&l=dir

See anything referring to radicalism or radical agendas? Didn't think so. Thanks for your effort.

134
....de man mention de "...Queen of Hearts..." in de third person...like he eh realise it actually IS de Queen of Hearts he engaging.

Ent? Enough people come here to engage in some good banter and all dat clown could do is kill vibes. If you don't know sumthin', admit it. If ya wrong, dat's alright. If I make a point and you provide evidence to show my point has no merit; touché. Queen of Hearts is indeed an appropriate sobriquet for dat fella. Thanks.

135
You are obviously NOT aware of what you said.

Universal and inherent? Once again, where is your proof? So enamored with your own existence, you cannot understand that your words and claims alone have no merit and only amounts to pablum. You can resort to whatever name calling and dismissive rants that would make the Queen of Hearts proud all you want. The fact is you haven't offered a shred of evidence to support your position. The great bakes speaks all who listen bow down and tremble!

If you can't show proof of your claims, don't bother to respond. Lightweight.

136
I am not the one "aligning the term with radicalism"... any movement which rejects co-existence, and itself advocates the existence of a people at the distinct expense of another people is by definition radical. That's not my definition.  This is the reason why Israelis who are in favor of a two-nation state reject the application of the term to describe all Israelis.  It has nothing to do with your imaginary "Jewish Cabal" or "mudmen" talk. 

Now you want to draw some tenuous association with me and Jack Horner because I stated the obvious... it is clear that you are ascribing some motive to Jack that's not apparent in his words... the logical conclusion is that you presume to know what's in his mind, only a fool would deny that.  You then trumpet this notion that I am unable to disprove your "theory" about Jack... when in fact your 'theory' is of no interest to me. 

You are so twisted up in your own bs that you can't remember that you were the one who offered a definition of Zionism that is aligned with radicalism. Israeli's reject the term Zionism because it has been co-opted by the likes of Ahmadinijad and other Holocaust deniers who ascribe all ills of the world to Jewish "domination" of finance and media. The few right wing Israelis who still embrace the term do so for completely different reasons than what you claim. I can assure you that Warner didn't raise the term to establish his position of the Israeli/Palestinian question. If you don't understand the context of his words, that's your problem.

If you don't care about the theories of folks who believe that Warner's words and actions are righteous-challenged, why are you responding?

137
The truth is you are clueless about the term. Your own silly attempt at a definition shows you are out of your depth by aligning the term with radicalism. The pre- 9/11 version of the term was less pejorative and described a movement that brought about the creation and development of the State of Israel. Since you are too dense to appreciate the recent manner in which the term is used, it is not a surprise you failed to connect the significance of the article. Instead, you continue to show that you a just a more articulate version of Jack Horner by asking if I can read Warner's mind.

Aside from the fact that you are also unable to read his mind and therefore unable to prove or disprove my theory that Warner's "blame the Jews"- like comment were the words of a desperate man grasping at straws and using racial politics to salvage support.  But I suppose in your world, not being a clairvoyant disqualifies one from forming an opinion; even one that calls out an obviously racist sentiment issued by a government minister.

138
"Zionism", as it has been used in recent times is a euphemism for "Jewish Cabal". It is a loaded term that has a completely different meaning today than it did at the beginning of the 20th century. You should know better.

I should know better?  So you's ah mind reader then... you inherently know what context Jack using the term?  I have no idea where you find this "zionism= jewish cabal" talk, but yuh might want to consult yuh dictionary to find the true meaning and see how it relates to what Jack alleging.

So you know the context in which Jack is using the term? Yes, you should know better as none of your posts suggested you were an anti-Semite. Take a look at this article you fool and then you can figure out how the term "Zionism"' is used today.
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/36671/ahmadinejad-zionists-told-911-advance

139
“I will talk about the Zionism, which probably is the most important reason why this acrid attack on Bin Hammam and me was mounted.”

Wow, is he really going to go there? Zionism? What next, talking about mud people and pushing us to read The Protocols of Zion?   

This is nonsense... "Zionism" is very real and I wouldn't be surprised if it rears its head within FIFA as well.  It is hardly the far-fetched conspiracy you're trying to paint it to be.  Now whether there's any merit to Warner's charges, that remains to be seen... after all , all we keep hearing is about this coming tsunami with barely a ripple being made.

"Zionism", as it has been used in recent times is a euphemism for "Jewish Cabal". It is a loaded term that has a completely different meaning today than it did at the beginning of the 20th century. You should know better.

140
“I will talk about the Zionism, which probably is the most important reason why this acrid attack on Bin Hammam and me was mounted.”

Wow, is he really going to go there? Zionism? What next, talking about mud people and pushing us to read The Protocols of Zion?   

142
Football / Re: Pfister goes Bizerk at post match interview
« on: October 12, 2011, 05:47:15 PM »
Not sure why everyone is falling over congratulating Pfister. Yes, the players' contractual circumstances are horrible but the TTFF is as much if not more to blame than the clubs. If the TTFF paid their players and treated them properly, the young men wouldn't be in such a hurry to jump at every bs tryout or contract that is offered abroad. Furthermore, the clubs own the players' rights and the players are grown men who have no business signing contracts in a foreign language. Plus, the TTFF should license and regulate player agents who conduct work in T&T. Have our standards gotten so low that we hailing someone who is stating the obvious?

If the national coach wants full control over the movement of national team players, the TTFF should do what the US did in the 90s, place all the players under contract with the TTFF. Unfortunately, the TTFF in it's present form can never carry out such an arrangement. All the more reason to seek to have the entire federation replaced.
Does the TTFF pay the players on a weekly or monthly basis? These local clubs are the ones to blame. If they have players contracted to them, why don't they have other clubs come look at them play in their own league, if they are that desperate to sell. Otto brought up a good point about teams like Barca or Man.United not sending their contracted players on trials to other clubs lol only in T&T yuh does see this BS!!!  Is the Pro league in season? if so why the hell yuh have players going on trials during the season?

The TTFF are supposed to pay a stipend to the players after every match. For decades, the federation has made a sport out of bobbin and weavin out of paying players their money.

I understand what Otto is saying and he is correct, in part. First, FIFA no longer licenses agents, they have left that task up to the local federation. As for big clubs sending their players on tryouts, you can't compare big clubs like Man U to teams like Superstar Rangers. And yes, some of these clubs do send some of their contracted players on trials. Quite a few from South America come to MLS under such circumstances. Though there may be a great deal of mismanagement at play with the clubs they do have obligations and bills to pay as well. Another thing we should ask is whether T&T is a large enough market to properly sustain a full-fledged professional outfit. I have my doubts. I'm curious to know if there is any country of 1.5 million or less people that has a thriving professional football league?

143
Football / Re: Pfister goes Bizerk at post match interview
« on: October 12, 2011, 04:08:44 PM »
Not sure why everyone is falling over congratulating Pfister. Yes, the players' contractual circumstances are horrible but the TTFF is as much if not more to blame than the clubs. If the TTFF paid their players and treated them properly, the young men wouldn't be in such a hurry to jump at every bs tryout or contract that is offered abroad. Furthermore, the clubs own the players' rights and the players are grown men who have no business signing contracts in a foreign language. Plus, the TTFF should license and regulate player agents who conduct work in T&T. Have our standards gotten so low that we hailing someone who is stating the obvious?

If the national coach wants full control over the movement of national team players, the TTFF should do what the US did in the 90s, place all the players under contract with the TTFF. Unfortunately, the TTFF in it's present form can never carry out such an arrangement. All the more reason to seek to have the entire federation replaced.

144
Football / Re: The TTFF Thread.
« on: September 11, 2011, 08:53:01 PM »
Yes but I know the answer already! 20 years of undermining and carrying news to Jack  trying to stay in his good books but he still got fired  twice and then got the complementary position of technical adviser to bring the coach Jack wanted ! With all the struggle he faced at Howard he showed no support for  the coach who assisted him to get scholarships when he  was summarily dissed ,  by Groden and company ! He didnot learn anything  from  the  struggle he still genuflecting to the colonisers while talented nationals are sidelined!  is he proud of that legacy?
:beermug:

146
Football / Re: FIFA terminates 2014 World Cup TV deal linked to Jack Warner
« on: September 08, 2011, 02:53:23 PM »
The headline should read "FIFA terminates 2014 World Cup TV deal linked to Jack Warner and Sepp Blatter's nephew". FIFA is kix lol.

I still waiting fuh dem to target Sportvertising...

Ain't happenin'
http://changefifa.posterous.com/fifas-response-to-changefifas-complaint-to-fi

147
Football / FIFA terminates 2014 World Cup TV deal linked to Jack Warner
« on: September 08, 2011, 12:30:19 PM »
FIFA terminates 2014 World Cup TV deal linked to Jack Warner
guardian.co.uk


Fifa have terminated a multimillion-pound 2014 World Cup TV deal after discovering the rights had been sub-licensed to a company owned by the controversial Jack Warner.

The agreement with the Caribbean Football Union (CFU) has been brought to an end after Fifa told the organisation they had not approved the sub-licensing deal with JD International (JDI), owned by the former Fifa vice-president Warner.

Warner, who was at that time also the CFU's president, sold the rights to the Jamaica-based cable TV station SportsMax in 2007 for a fee reported to be between $18m and $20m, though that included the 2010 World Cup too.

Fifa were also owed several payments dating back to 2009 for the rights, which covered 29 Caribbean countries.

Warner resigned from all football activities in June, a month after being charged with bribery by Fifa, who then dropped their investigation saying they no longer had jurisdiction over the Trinidadian.

Fifa have sent a letter to the CFU saying they have "only recently become aware" of the sub-licensing agreement, as well as detailing the missed payments, and terminating the contract.

Warner has claimed that Fifa's action is "designed to go after me" and that he was shocked that the CFU had been targeted.

Fifa said in a statement to the Press Association: "The CFU was a media rights licensee for Fifa events in selected territories in the Caribbean.

"However, the CFU is no longer a media rights licensee of Fifa. Fifa has secured good coverage in the region directly, but has still not finalised any announcement."

The Conservative MP Damian Collins, who is campaigning for Fifa reforms, said Warner's involvement pointed to a clear conflict of interest.

The initial contract with the CFU was agreed in 2005 giving the organisation the rights for the 2010 and 2014 World Cups for countries in the Caribbean. The CFU, headed by Warner, sub-licensed the rights to his company JDI. In 2007, JDI sold on those rights to SportsMax.

Fifa have said they had not approved the sub-licensing and had only become aware of it recently, but there was no secrecy about Warner's involvement.

Indeed he held a photo opportunity with SportsMax executives to announce the deal. SportsMax's website said Warner "negotiated the deal on behalf of JDI" and "in his capacity as president of the CFU".

Collins, who sits on the culture, media and sport committee, said the reforms to be announced by the Fifa president, Sepp Blatter, needed to address conflicts of interest.

He said: "There should be a very strict code where members of Fifa's executive committee have to declare all their financial interests. If it look like senior officials are making money on the side as a result of their role in football, that is plainly wrong.

"For someone who has responsibility for the game of football to be making money out of the exploitation of that game cannot be right."

Warner's close connections to the television rights in the Caribbean were also revealed by the former FA chairman Lord Triesman in his claims about improper approaches during England's 2018 World Cup bid – Triesman alleged Warner asked for $500,000 to be channelled through him to buy the television rights to show the 2010 World Cup on big screens in earthquake-hit Haiti.

Warner said Fifa's action against the CFU was a publicity stunt. He told the Press Association: "Such ignoble pursuit has nothing to do with the cleansing of corruption within the Fifa but rather to offer the perception of an aura of cleansing within the Fifa. The matter is designed to go after me … and is now with the CFU's Swiss lawyers."


148
(production manager) who said to call back at one o'clock.  unprofessional to the max but i will call back.
Ah waitin for Bakes and Tempo to start quotin Neitzsche or Voltaire...den yuh go ha someting worthwhile to read while yuh on hold
:beermug:

149
Football / Re: Ronaldinho hopes for Brazil return
« on: September 06, 2011, 07:24:01 AM »
Mano doesn't have it and 'dinho can't do it on that level anymore. Brazil has to go bold and make a play for Guardiola to leave Barca at the end of this season. Tiki-Taka samba.

brazil will never hire a non brazilian to coach their national team.  they need to hire either scolari or muricy ramalho.

Probably not, but it would be a spectacle. Not sure about Scolari. Ramalho would be an interesting choice especially if Neymar is a featured player.

150
Because FIFA has made it abundantly clear that it is investigating individual wrongdoing on the parts of the individuals present at the CFU meeting.

No FIFA has not made any such representation. You show where Valcke or Blatter have said they will limit their investigations to only individuals. The Ethics Committee is one thing but to say FIFA has made anything "abundantly clear" is an entirely different matter.

Your positions are irreconcilable because you cannot concede that FIFA is yet to take action against the CFU while simultaneously arguing that FIFA (by reason of its ethics probe) has nullified CFU contracts.  Such a nullification would be tantamount to action taken directly against the CFU, which you've conceded hasn't occurred.  I'm sure the contradiction will remain lost on you.[/b]

The only one lost in your made up "contradiction" is yourself. You say I refused to concede FIFA is yet to take action against the CFU and in the next sentence claim that in light of my point about contract nullification, I conceded that FIFA has taken no action against the CFU. Which one is it?

If CFU broadcast contracts have been nullified because of JAW, FIFA would NOT have to take direct action against CFU because they have targeted JAW. The CFU and their member associations get damaged in the process. So, while no "official" action has been taken against the CFU, to imply the CFU or its member FAs are not intentionally impacted is disingenuous at best. It's kind of like NATO bombing the Khadafi living compound and saying it was the military installations surrounding him that were the targets not the man or his family knowing full and well, they may get both.     
 
Yes... and your 'basis' has more stretchmarks than a fat woman on de road Carnival Monday.  No one has suggested that the FA's sent the reps there to collect bribes, the theory has been that the individuals went there on FA business and were subsequently offered bribes.  Your "basis" is founded on the theory that collecting a bribe was part of the "official FA business" of all CFU organizations... which by extension would have to include PR, the Bahamas et al.  Highly unlikely=> "a stretch".[/b]

Your circular logic is entertaining and may pass as a legitimate skill to some but I think you are the one making a stretch here. By attending a meeting as a representative of your FA and receiving a package labeled with your FA country name, not your personal name, you are conducting official FA business. If you want to quibble on that then enjoy yourself.

Earlier you claimed Jack "held" (implying ownership) of the CFU assets... now yuh saying he "controlled" them.  Yours is the first allegation that has been made about Jack owning any CFU assets, an allegation which you reinforced by stating that he was forced to give up his "holdings", including (according to you) real estate etc.  Of course Jack Warner never owned or controlled any CFU broadcast rights... your first point of confusion.  Additionally CONCACAF cannot dictate to the CFU what to do with the latter's broadcast rights... the two entities being distinct and separate... your second point of confusion.

Are you seriously trying to draw a distinction between "held" and "controlled"? What a pettifog. Plus, I never said Warner owned CFU assets, he controlled/held them. A distinction that even you could understand. Furthermore, it is an allegation in which I am hardly the first to make. Why can't CONCACAF tell CFU what to do with the broadcast rights? If CONCACAF or FIFA believe those rights were not properly acquired, they have every right to take action against the CFU. 

You're not only being credulous... but ridiculous as well.  First off it's difficult to prove or disprove that any of the CFU teams had their matches televisedby any carrier, I have no idea whether Belize's game against Grenada was televised anymore than you can prove that Antigua and Barbuda's game was not televised.  Secondly even if it can be proved whether a match was televised or not, that hardly adds to the discussion of whether CFU broadcast rights were "nullified" as you claim.  A match not being televised could be due to any number of reasons unrelated to a CFU television rights contract being nullified.
[/b]

It's not really that difficult to see what sporting event has been or will be broadcast, even for you. One of the best broadcast manifests I've seen is www.livesoccertv.com/schedules/. Take note that if a game venue was at a CFU site, FIFA.com is listed as the broadcaster. The best you could do is say there "could be a number of reasons" why the games aren't televised? Yes, there could be a number of reasons why no broadcast from CFU venues have occurred but why dismiss the theory that the CFU broadcast rights from the 11 associations under investigation have been invalidated if you are unable to disprove it?

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 15
1]; } ?>