358
« on: May 25, 2005, 05:52:38 PM »
55 years later, US victory still resonates
By NANCY ARMOUR, AP National Writer
May 25, 2005
CHICAGO (AP) -- The English played on with the trademark cool and intensity that had made them one of the world's best soccer teams, not even flinching when the upstart Americans took the lead.
It wasn't until the closing minutes of that 1950 World Cup game that panic set in: What was supposed to be an easy victory over the Americans was about to become an unthinkable catastrophe.
``They could see it slipping from them,'' U.S. defender Harry Keough recalled. ``They didn't ever dream we could beat them. Neither did we, for that matter.''
ADVERTISEMENT
It's been 55 years since the United States stunned England 1-0 in the World Cup in Brazil. Many of the men who played in that game are dead, and the United States has come so far on the field that England coach Sven-Goran Eriksson predicts it's only a matter of time before the Americans win a World Cup.
But as the United States prepares to meet England on Saturday in an exhibition game, the impact of that upset carries on.
The victory is still considered the greatest in U.S. soccer history, and is the subject of a new movie, ``The Game of Their Lives.'' To this day, the English won't wear dark blue shirts like the ones they wore in Brazil, and a generation cringes at the mere mention of 1950.
``As a kid growing up there, we were all told that England was well nigh invincible. ... For me, it was a terrible shock because I expected England to win, as did everybody else,'' said Soccer Hall of Fame historian Colin Jose, who was 13 in 1950.
``Friends of mine are still horrified,'' he added. ``And it's the same for some of the players who are still alive, kind of a nightmare that's lasted for the rest of their lives.''
After skipping the first three World Cups because of political squabbles, England went to Brazil as one of the favorites to win. The English were, after all, the ones who invented the sport, and few played it better. They had a roster of stars, too, including Billy Wright, Tom Finney and Stanley Mortensen.
The Americans, on the other hand, weren't even considered afterthoughts. They had good players, sure. Walter Bahr played professionally for 25 years, and John ``Clarkie'' Souza made a World Cup all-star team selected by Brazil's top sports newspaper. Several players were on the 1948 Olympic team.
But they didn't have much experience playing together as a team. Though five of the starters were from St. Louis, the Americans didn't have regular, extended training camps like the national squad does today. There weren't a series of warmups, either.
Before they left for Brazil, the Americans played a Turkish team and an English ``B'' team that had just finished a tour of Canada.
They lost both games.
``I think our team was probably a little better than people gave us credit for,'' Bahr said. ``I think a lot of us felt if we could go down there and keep the game close, we could hold our heads up.''
The United States played well in its first game in Brazil, leading Spain until the last 10 minutes before falling 3-1. Next up was mighty England, which had beaten Chile in its opener.
``We knew we weren't in the same class as the English team,'' Bahr said. ``But anybody worth their salt when they go out onto the field, they always think there's some possibility that something can happen, that they could steal a victory.''
Keough wasn't as certain.
``England, in my own thoughts, was way up high and we were down a little lower,'' he said. ``Anybody if they beat me, they had to really work hard to beat me. But I didn't entertain any thoughts that we were going to beat them.''
The game was played in Belo Horizonte, a mining town about 350 miles north of Rio de Janeiro, and England was in control much of the day.
But in the 37th minute, Bahr collected a throw-in from Ed McIlvenny and took a shot from about 25 yards out. The ball was heading for the far post and England goalkeeper Bert Williams was already moving to his right when Joe Gaetjens deflected it with a diving header, sending the ball into the opposite side of the goal.
United States 1, England 0.
``I thought, `These guys are sleeping until now.' And they weren't sleeping. They were outplaying us. We were chasing them most of the time,'' Keough said. ``My thought was ..., `They're really going to come down on us hard.'
``For us to be ahead at the half was one thing,'' he added. ``For us to hold it was another.''
Hold it, though, they did. U.S. goalie Frank Borghi made some spectacular saves, and the Americans pulled off the upset.
``As much as we were very thrilled and pleased to win the game, most of us felt the same way: `How's that English club going to go back home and face their fans?''' Bahr said. ``It was a lot easier for us to explain the victory than for them to go back and explain that defeat.''
And there really was no way to explain it, Bahr added. While England would win the 1966 World Cup at home, the Americans wouldn't return until 1990. When the teams met in 1953 in New York for an exhibition, England won 6-3.
England is 5-2 overall against the United States, losing 2-0 at Foxboro, Mass., in 1993, and winning by the same score the next year at Wembley.
Still, the exhibitions don't have the impact of that meeting in the World Cup.
``We were lucky and won the game,'' Bahr said. ``The best team doesn't always win. I don't know how to explain the game any other way than the best team doesn't always win.''