There are plenty examples of PNM policing itself...you just chose not to remember or are ignorant of the facts.
As a general statement:
I voted for the PP and I have been disappointed. That is something completely different from saying that I think I made the wrong decision.
To answer your statement:
I made a claim that the current administration has been noticeably superior to the last. I was explicitly asked for clarification.
I used an example of a situation that I thought was egregious that I don't think has been paralleled as yet by the current administration. If there has been a negative situation thus far in this administration that is without parallel in the previous administration then there's a flaw in my argument.
As a baseline scenario, one would expect most governments to go about most things properly. If there's a situation in which the PNM acted responsibly you can't just conjecture a counterfactual scenario for the PP and bring it into a comparison of actual performance. If there is something concrete where the PP have stumbled in a manner that the PNM didn't then I am in error as that puts us in the situation described in the previous paragraph.
edit: I realise that you were addressing a specific aspect of the argument that I made but, seeing that I probably won't reply in here further, I'll add this here as an attempt to give a slightly more comprehensive reply to the original request for clarification by elan.
Of the big ticket issues/items/policies/ideas of the last govt the two that I particularly liked were GATE and the rapid rail. GATE was an enhancement of dollar for dollar which itself was a great idea in its time. Maybe, as someone else on this forum has suggested, the rapid rail as proposed was too extravagant but I think it was a good idea. In any case it doesn't seem like any govt is going to get it done soon.
As far as the more mundane operations of the government I can't say that I've found much to distinguish one administration from the other thus far.