April 27, 2024, 08:57:29 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - zuluwarrior

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 102
181
Entertainment & Culture Discussion / pharrell-williams-debuts-24-hou video
« on: November 28, 2013, 10:11:13 PM »
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/earshot/pharrell-williams-debuts-24-hour-659606

Check the beat it make you want to rock to it, why? cause you HAPPY.

184
General Discussion / ANXIOUS’ MARK
« on: November 28, 2013, 07:32:25 AM »
ANXIOUS’ MARK
...House Speaker threatens to sue ‘Express’, University officials explain why House Speaker received EMBA exam concessions

By Denyse Renne denyse.renne@trinidadexpress.com
Story Created: Nov 27, 2013 at 10:56 PM ECT
Story Updated: Nov 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM ECT
House Speaker Wade Mark was allowed to sit in a room by himself to complete his final Executive Masters of Business Administration (EMBA) degree exam because he may have been anxious.
This was the explanation given yesterday by University of the West Indies (UWI) Principal Prof Clement Sankat, executive director of the Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business (GSB) Miguel Carrillo and Dean of the Faculty of Social Science, Errol Sims.
The three officials were interviewed yesterday by the Express at GSB’s Mt Hope offices at their request.
In seeking to clear the air on the circumstances surrounding Mark’s graduation, the trio admitted that Mark was granted two concessions, having failed the Management Accounting course twice in the past. When Mark took the final exam, according to a document obtained by the Express, he topped the class.
The Express asked whether Mark was granted any concessions by the school.
Carrillo responded: “One of the most important parts of being a student-centred institution which we are in the West Indies is that we will help the students, it doesn’t matter who they are, to be successful academically. We will support them and whenever we have a student who is actually taking the last course to graduate, those are in special circumstances where we, as they request, we might consider some concessions and those concessions are nothing special and are things that happen regularly in the UWI system.”
The Express queried exactly what were the concessions afforded to Mark.
Carrillo: “Basically we are talking about a special sitting. It’s that he requested to sit by himself and not with the other cohorts for the final exam. It was requested and approved. The student (Mark) didn’t have to come to class, however. He requested tutoring which is a normal practice in the UWI based on particular circumstances of the student and it was difficult for him to attend class.”
Carrillo added that the final examination administered to Mark was “properly invigilated by UWI and not the Arthur Lok Jack School.
“It was a regular examination. The others (students) were writing the exam at the same time. It wasn’t like we set a special exam for Mr Mark, others were doing the exam at the same time.”
Sankat explained as well that UWI also made such concessions for its students.
“They may have time constraints and they appeal to UWI, we listen and set exams for one person,” he said. Sankat said such concessions are made for students who may attend a funeral or whose “father or mother may have died”.
What was Mark’s reason for wanting to be in a room by himself?” the Express asked.
Carrillo: “There was no particular excuse, he just requested that and we passed that request along. But we have to understand he was sitting down alone with a lot of people he didn’t know and the other part, most important, is the kind of pressure, because it’s his last opportunity to pass and to graduate”.
Sims said: “It could very well have been anxiety. It was his final attempt. If he had failed the exam, he would be gone.
Sankat: “It got to him…anxiety.”
Carrillo: “Anxiety.”
Sims said the heads of departments and boards normally dealt with such requests and in the past there have been lots of cases where special exams have occurred but in Mark’s case, this was not the case.
The Dean explained that the examination consisted of two parts, the more critical being “ownership of the exam and the outcome is the written final exam. This is rated much more heavily than the course work”.
“The final exam is administered by the university in a written form, except in the case with persons with handicaps and so forth. But in written form it is invigilated by the university (UWI),” he said.
On the controversial issue of whether Mark was exempt from course work, Sims said with the course work there is greater flexibility whereby it is essentially the responsibility of the first examiner. He said the course work can take many forms which consist of group, individual or a combination of both.
Mark, however, was excluded from this and given an oral examination instead, according to Carrillo.
“Yes, he was, but it was part of the course work and the written final exam. Oral exams consist of questions that will reflect the general understanding of the concepts of the student,” Carrillo said.
Asked about the framework of such questions, Carrillo said: “We don’t have a framework on what the oral exam should consist of, it depends a lot on the nature of the course and perspective of the examiner so there is not necessary a standard.”
Sims said this was Mark’s third attempt at course work in the Accounting Management course and the oral was administered to him for a reason. He added that in the past, Mark had completed the other course work required.
He said the school had documentary evidence to show where a lecturer as required by university regulations essentially refused to carry out the instructions of the director to set the course work exam.
“The academic programme director who also has overall responsibility for the student also did not carry out his responsibility to see that the student is given the opportunity to do his course work. The regulations require that the gentleman (Mark) should be given his course work before his final exam.
“These two gentlemen..... for whatever reason contrived not to carry out the instructions of giving this man (Mark) his course work assignment,” Sims said.
Asked why they would do this , Carrillo said he did not know.
Carrillo was also asked to explain e-mails sent to Mark requesting that he contact him urgently and also what was the “wrong which needed to be made right” as stated in an e-mail Ghent sent him last Wednesday.
Carrillo said: “I wanted to let him know the programme director was raising questions for his course work and let the student know he complied with all the requirements.”
That e-mail to Mark had stated: “I would like you to contact me urgently on a matter that has arisen at the business school. We would also like to have a private and confidential email address and a physical address that we can use to send you a formal letter.”
The Express observed that the concerns, according to the e-mail exchanges were raised from July to August about Mark’s course work, so why was there need to contact Mark one month later.
Carrillo responded: “Because the programme director only communicated that to me on November 11 in an e-mail which is not published. Three hours after I replied that all course work will be available to him.”
Adding that all senior staff members once authorised have access to course work marks, Carrillo said he could not explain why checks done by Brian Ghent turned up none.
On November 13, programme director Brian Ghent submitted his resignation letter to academic director Ron Sookram.
His letter stated: “In keeping with several discussions we had, I believe it is important that I record here my deepest concern with the circumstances surrounding the award of the EMBA degree to Mr Wade Mark, as well as, the subsequent responses to me since I raised the matter.”
Sources said that Ghent’s resignation came on the heels of e-mails between senior officials at the GSB suggesting that Mark did not fulfill all the requirements for his EMBA degree.
The e-mails suggest that concessions were made by the graduate school to accommodate Mark and in some cases stated that Mark did not complete several core course works which would have enabled him to graduate.
Mark has denied that he did not complete his course work.

186
General Discussion / Re: Bratton: Poor wages open door to bribes
« on: November 18, 2013, 06:40:55 PM »
Bratton how come the Politicians of Trinbago getting big big salary but they still thiefing and taking all kind gifts .

188
Entertainment & Culture Discussion / PAN IS BEAUTIFUL 12
« on: November 16, 2013, 06:51:28 PM »
Any links warriors.

189
General Discussion / Re: IAN ALLEYNE
« on: November 11, 2013, 08:02:48 PM »
Dutty if that was jack with the supposed to be women  menister in his car and you ask him that question
he would say ask yur yur mu mu mu  muder .   

190
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OW7Chs7K0Ac


this is so cool i thought i should share it .

191
General Discussion / 10 Downing Street’s secret plan
« on: August 11, 2013, 09:16:30 AM »
10 Downing Street’s secret plan
By Andre Bagoo Sunday, August 11 2013

click on pic to zoom in
Harold Wilson, UK Prime Minister, from 1964 to 1970, and again from 1974 to 1976...
Harold Wilson, UK Prime Minister, from 1964 to 1970, and again from 1974 to 1976...
« prev photo next photo »
ON THE morning of Tuesday April 21, 1970, as Prime Minister Eric Williams met with advisers in Whitehall to continue efforts to get the Black Power emergency under control, thousands of miles away, in London, the UK’s Prime Minister Harold Wilson convened his cabinet at 10 Downing Street to consider a special request made by Williams.

A secret seven-page cabinet note of that UK meeting discloses what was on the agenda. At number three on the table of contents for the confidential printed note is an item labelled simply, “Oversea Affairs — Trinidad: Black Power Disturbances”.

According to the note, the Cabinet was briefed by George Thompson MP, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Denis Healey MP, the Defence Secretary.

Thompson revealed that apparently hours after the situation arose, Williams asked Britain for help, “to assist him in restoring order”. This assistance was to be in two forms.

Firstly, Britain was asked to use its influence to get two countries — Nigeria and Tanzania — to send military help to Trinidad.

Secondly, Britain was asked to assist in transporting any troops sent by these countries. The details of this request by Williams for foreign assistance were never made known to the public of Trinidad and Tobago.

“The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said that there have been a series of disturbances in Trinidad instigated by the Black Power movement,” the secret Cabinet note record, printed by the UK Cabinet secretariat in 1971, read. “The immediate occasion of these had been the trial of Trinidadian students in Canada on charges of arson; but there had been a long-standing background of economic discontent. On April 21, the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago, Dr Eric Williams, had declared a state of emergency and had ordered the detention of 25 Black Power leaders: but ten of these had so far evaded arrest. The situation was complicated by the fact that at much the same time some 50 members of the Trinidad and Tobago Regiment, who sympathized with the Black Power movement, had mutinied and had established themselves in the former United States base at Chaguaramas, where they were holding 200 members of the Regiment as hostages.”

Thompson gave details of Williams’ request for assistance which — in 1970 - UK spokespersons had kept confidential, according to a contemporaneous news report at the time by Reuters. Defence Secretary Healey also disclosed Williams had requested help from Venezuela, Guyana and Jamaica.

Thompson told those around the large teal-coloured Cabinet room table, “At the outset Dr Williams had asked us to transmit requests to the Head of the Federal Military Government of Nigeria, General Gowon, and to the President of Tanzania, Mr. Nyerere, for the dispatch of troops to assist him in restoring order. He had also sought British assistance in transporting these troops to Trinidad and had asked us to supply light weapons to replace those seized by the mutineers.”

The UK Cabinet minister continued, “Dr Williams had subsequently decided not to pursue his approach to Nigeria and Tanzania: but urgent consideration had been given to our response if he pursued his request for arms.”

Thompson made clear that the UK still had deep economic interests in the island and its investment in the country was at the time a massive £150 million (an even more substantial sum if inflation is factored). The minister told the Cabinet, “Measures were being taken to ensure the safety of the 2,000 United Kingdom subjects in Trinidad. We had major economic interests in the island; and our investment there was estimated at about £150 million.”

According to the note, Thompson minced no words over the need to keep Williams on the UK’s side for the sake of its regional interests. Ironically, although Williams had turned to the UK for help, the UK Cabinet regarded him as a “strong and effective leader” who was key to their interests in the long-run.

The note reads, “Moreover, Dr Williams was a strong and effective leader, who had considerable influence in the African Commonwealth countries; and it was therefore important that we should do what we could to maintain our relationship with him and to avoid giving him any grounds of complaint as regards our response to his appeal.”

While at the time it had been reported that two British warships happened to be in Caribbean, the Secretary of State for Defence, Healey, confirmed this was no coincidence: they were sent specifically to deal with the situation in response to Williams request for help. The warships, two frigates, were mandated to remain, “out of sight”.

The record of the proceedings of April 21, 1970 reads, “The Defence Secretary said that one frigate, HMS Jupiter, had been dispatched to Trinidad, with orders to remain 30 miles offshore, and would be in position that night.”

Further, “A second frigate, HMS Sirius, would reach the island within the next two days and would also remain offshore and out of sight. HMS Jupiter carried a helicopter and could provide a naval landing party of two platoons trained in riot control. The complement of HMS Sirius included a detachment of Royal Marines.”

In the defence secretary’s assessment, the situation created by the mutiny in the Trinidad and Tobago Regiment was serious, since out of a total strength of 700 men 50 were taking an active part in the mutiny and 200 had been neutralised by the mutineers. The mutiny had also left the loyal troops critically short of arms.

In Healey’s view, “The arms which Dr Williams needed could be dispatched by midnight that night if he so requested: but he now seemed more likely to rely on supplies from the United States. He was also reported to have been promised reinforcements of 1,000 men from Venezuela. Guyana was considering supplying some weapons; but the response from Jamaica, to which Dr Williams had also appealed, was not yet known.”

The Cabinet note gives an account of the discussion which then occurred behind the closed white doors of the 10 Downing Street Cabinet Room, led by the UK prime minister. The key dilemma in the situation was balancing the fact that the incidents could potentially upset a region in which the UK still had key interests, with the need to not be seen to be meddling in the affairs of the newly independent Trinidad and Tobago.

“In discussion, it was suggested that, while the disturbances in Trinidad were on a small scale in terms of the forces involved, the political issues involved could be far-reaching,” the note records. “If we were to become involved in the internal security problems of an independent member of the Commonwealth, the consequences might be serious - the more so in that Dr. Williams’ Government had already incurred local criticism on the grounds of their alleged reliance on British and American support.”

The record discloses that the UK planned, if the situation warranted, to parachute a battalion into the country. It indicated the forces which could be provided by their two frigates were too small to be able to exercise any decisive influence on the maintenance of internal security in Trinidad, and stated that if the situation were to deteriorate to a point at which it became necessary to intervene in force to save British lives, a battalion of parachutists could be made available, which could reach Trinidad in two to four days.

Yet, the discussion around the table was ever mindful of political implications. Opinions stated that it was clearly desirable to avoid such a degree of involvement if possible; and British troops should be committed only in the last resort. Some concern was expressed whether Dr Williams’ assessment of the situation was over-optimistic. There had been some doubt whether he would in fact receive from the United States and elsewhere the supplies of arms and the assistance in which he appeared to be counting but the latest indications were that some arms from United States sources could already have reached him.

UK prime minister Harold Wilson, summing up the conversation, said that the Cabinet agreed on the importance of maintaining relations of confidence and sympathy with the Government of Trinidad and Tobago. A serious Black Power revolt would have serious repercussions elsewhere in the Caribbean; and, if these extended to the Associated States, it might prove impossible for Britain to avoid intervention.

Wilson continued, that on the other hand, Britain should clearly refrain from becoming directly involved in an internal security operation in an independent country. The situation, especially as regards the supply of arms to the Trinidad Government, would be closely watched; and, if immediate decisions were required, he himself would need to have discretion, in consultation with the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and the Defence Secretary, to take necessary action.

At the end of the meeting, the UK cabinet -

“(1) Took note, with approval, of the statements by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and the Defence Secretary and of the Prime Minister’s summing up of their discussion.

“(2) Agreed that the Prime Minister, in consultation with the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and the Defence Secretary, should have discretion to take appropriate action, including the supply of arms, if developments in Trinidad made it necessary to do so at short notice.”

193
General Discussion / Race and politics in T&T, Guyana
« on: August 04, 2013, 10:15:51 AM »

Race and politics in T&T, Guyana
Published:
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Vishnu Bisram
 

In this academic masterpiece, the authors carefully probe the processes by which social and ethnic problems (competition between Indians and Africans) impact on politics in Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana, two multi-ethnic societies. Profs Ann Marie Bissessar (Behavioural Sciences) and John Gaffar La Guerre (emeritus, UWI) display their scholarly expertise and skill in examining the mechanics of political power—how the “mechanism of ethnicity” determines “critical outcomes” in the two pluralist societies.
 
 
They discuss similarities and differences between the two societies. The book is thoughtfully written and makes several insightful and salient points on ethnicity. It amply discusses and illustrates some of the problems of governance in multi-ethnic states although it is short on solutions. As the authors stated, the study has as its principal objective an examination of the morphology of the race factor in relation to political alignments and realignments in the two plural societies.
 
 
The authors demonstrate a profound knowledge and understanding of ethnic concepts and they utilise extensive and copious documentary notes to supplement their analysis. The book is a welcoming addition to the academic literature on endemic political problems associated with ethnic conflict between Indians and Africans in both societies.

195
General Discussion / That change from a dollar
« on: July 03, 2013, 04:35:35 PM »
That change from a dollar
Published:
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
 
Text Size:
For some time now I have noted the propsensity of citizens to leave unwanted change behind. I have seen, at the offices of utility companies—TSTT, T&TEC, WASA—that customers who receive change in coins, tend to leave them at the counter. Moreso, if they fell on the ground, no one bothers to pick them up. It seems as though coins are no longer money.   
 
Long ago, in my Hindu upbringing, we were taught to show respect for hard-earned money so that all coins would be collected and put in a jar, to be converted at the bank. Nowadays, school children do not want a 25-cent coin. They prefer to throw it away, literally. Maybe the money is too easy to come by as parents seem to be ever so willing to dole out $100 bills, but this culture must be changed. At a grocery recently, no less than 85 cents spilled from a man who paid for his groceries. He left it there on the floor, even though he was told that his change fell. In fact he swore at the inconvenience of having to pick up the change. He just left it. Well, I should tell you, I picked it up and put it my ashtray as it went towards my daily newspapers.
 
What a careless people we have become. A day will come when we will cry for the money we throw away; if we throw away a little every day, it all adds up. In fact, if you give a vagrant $1 in change, he will tell you, frankoment, he does not want it. I look down on the hypocrites who quarrel for a one-cent change when the truth is they don’t use it.  Now I believe the way forward is for each business to keep a jar in which people can put their change. This can be donated weekly to a charity, a political party or used during midday salaat at the mosque.
 
Lystra Marajh
 
 
Give me my change is mine ah want it ,even a cent or penny as the americans call it .

196
General Discussion / Re: Will Jack create history?
« on: July 03, 2013, 07:24:21 AM »
I do not like jack but i would like him to win, jus to see what would happen next.

198
When i saw it I said the same thing .

199
Eyeball Licking (Oculolinctus) Can Be Dangerous, Doctors Warn

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Eye Health / Blindness
Also Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health;  Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses
Article Date: 16 Jun 2013 - 0:00 PDT

   


Eyeball Licking (Oculolinctus) Can Be Dangerous, Doctors Warn

      





Eyeball-licking fetishism, also known as "oculolinctus" or "worming", has become a popular way of expressing affection or inciting sexual arousal in Japan. Doctors warn that it is linked to a serious risk of virus conjunctivitis, other eye infections, and even blindness

According to the Japanese website Naver Matome, the oculolinctus craze in the country among young lovers has resulted in a significant increase in eye-infection cases.

Naver Matome first reported on eyeball-licking when a Japanese school noticed that children were coming into class wearing eye patches. Apparently, one third of all the twelve-year-old children at the school had engaged in oculolinctus.
Eyeball licking is dangerous


Pink eye - a case of viral conjunctivitis caused by eyeball licking
When the tongue makes contact with the eye, it is exposed to all kinds of infections and eye damage.

In an interview with the Huffington Post, David Granet, M.D., an ophthalmologist said "Nothing good can come of this. There are ridges on the tongue that can cause a corneal abrasion. And if a person hasn't washed out their mouth, they might put acid from citrus products or spices into the eye."

There is a serious risk of passing on viruses. If somebody who does the licking has herpes and a cold sore, there is a risk of human transmission via oculolinctus.

The International Science Times quoted Dr. Phillip Rizzuto, a spokesman for the American Academy of Ophthalmology, who said there is a risk of eventual blindness. "The bacteria in the mouth are nothing like the bacteria in the eyeball, which is why we no longer recommend people lick contact lenses to moisten them.," Rizzuto added.

If the person doing the licking suffers from halitosis (bad breath), they are likely to have a huge number of harmful bacteria. Allow them to lick your eyeball, which has an absorbing membrane, and your risk of infection is considerable.

Animals use their tongues for personal hygiene (watch a cat cleaning itself), to a certain extent humans do the same. However, the tongue and mouth are designed to deal with a much wider variety of pathogens than our eyeballs are. Who knows what would be passed on to somebody's eye when the licker had just licked his/her hands, especially if that hand has not been washed in a while.

Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Toda

200
General Discussion / Re: NY: 25 People Shot In 48 Hours, 6 Dead
« on: June 07, 2013, 07:15:24 PM »
You know what is sad about this my cousin came from Pennsylvania to his daughter mother wake and he got shot right in the yard where the wake was,he died in Kings County Hospital. ,the daughter lost her mother and father in one week.

Weary if you living close by you might of heard the mother bawling last Saturday morning.

201
General Discussion / NY: 25 People Shot In 48 Hours, 6 Dead
« on: June 07, 2013, 06:42:20 PM »
NY: 25 People Shot In 48 Hours, 6 Dead
Monday June 3, 2013 4:59 AM - One Comment
A bloody weekend of gun violence in New York City has left six people dead. In just 48 hours, 25 people across four boroughs were shot, CBS reports.

The violence began Friday night when an 11-year-old Brooklyn girl, Tayloni Mazyck, was shot by a stray bullet in Bed-Stuy. The injury has left her paralyzed. The following night, The New York Daily News reports 15-year-old Sarah Rivera was shot in the leg when gunfire broke out in the Bronx. The bullet struck her as she was pushing a young child in a stroller to safety. 24 year-old Terrance Davis was shot and killed in the Bronx Friday night. Shabbos in Brooklyn, 23-year-old Antonio Wilson was shot and killed in Clinton Hill and 39-year-old Damion Riley was shot twice and killed in East Flatbush. In Crown Heights on Sunday, 25-year-old Damien Powell was shot in the torso and died. According to the News, his grieving mother collapsed at the scene. Also on Sunday, a man opened fire in Prospect Lefferts Gardens, hitting three people. Cops say 30-year-old Kevon Brown, who is wanted in the shootings, also fired his weapon at cops.

This weekend’s shootings account for 5 percent of the year’s total shootings so far.

The surge of violence this weekend brings the number of gun casualties in New York City to around 440 for 2013, still a 23 percent drop from the same time last year

202
General Discussion / Re: Section 34 Thread
« on: May 31, 2013, 08:08:20 PM »
Dr Rowley being harassed
Published:
Saturday, May 25, 2013
 
Text Size:
I put it to you that the Speaker of the House Mr Wade Mark ably abetted by the Prime Minister, in having Dr Rowley sent to the Privilege Committee, has contravened Section 42(a) of the Integrity in Public Life Act which says as below:
—An employee of the State…shall not be dismissed, suspended, demoted, disciplined, harassed, denied benefit or otherwise negatively affected because;
(a) He, acting in good faith on the basis of a reasonable belief, has
(1) Notified the Commission that his employer or any other person has contravened or is about to contravene this Act
(2) Done or stated the intention of doing anything that is required to avoid having any person contravene this Act
(b) His employer or any person believes he will do something in paragraph (a).
 
Dr Rowley, as an employee of the Parliament/State, caused the notification of the Commission of what, in good faith and on the basis of reasonable belief, he considered (via the said e-mails) contravened this Act. Please note that the Act does not require him to provide definitive proof of what the e-mails suggest but simply that he acted in good faith and has a reasonable belief that they are true.
 
Hence the action of the Speaker and the PM can be viewed as harassment of Dr Rowley and an attempt to have him disciplined and even denied a benefit and he is surely negatively affected.
 
Victor Darceuil

203
General Discussion / Re: Section 34 Thread
« on: May 29, 2013, 05:27:19 PM »
DPP Office not bugged
By CLINT CHAN TACK Wednesday, May 29 2013

NATIONAL Security Minister Emmanuel George yesterday said information sent to him from the police is that the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) was never bugged as was claimed in a newspaper report and by the Opposition.

George made this disclosure to Newsday following the adjournment of the Senate. During the sitting, Opposition Senator Faris Al-Rawi charged that nobody in Government was “getting hot and sweaty” to investigate a newspaper report that the DPP’s Office was bugged.

Al-Rawi alleged that a contractor, Super Industrial Services (SIS), was providing private security services to the DPP’s Office.

Checks on SIS’ website show the services it provides are civil engineering; mechanical engineering; plant construction and maintenance and the supply of concrete blocks and aggregates.

Speaking after the Senate’s adjournment, George said he did not know what Al-Rawi was talking about, regarding the SIS. “He has information I don’t have,” George said. Asked whether there was any investigation into alleged bugging of DPP Roger Gaspard’s office, George replied, “All I can say is I have gotten a report from the Acting Commissioner of Police that there is no bug found in the DPP’s Office.”

George said the report he received from Acting Commissioner Stephen Williams indicated that in January, “the police made a sweep of that office and nothing like that (an electronic listening/monitoring device) was found.”

Describing Al-Rawi’s claim as “typical of the PNM”, George said, “What they do is throw a lie out there and truth has to go running after it to see if he (truth) can catch him (lie).” George also said his ministry would be prepared to provide additional funding to the police if they need it to hire a cyber-crime expert to investigate the authenticity of a package of “emails” which Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley mentioned in his no-confidence motion against Persad-Bissessar and the Government last week. During the sitting, Planning Minister Dr Bhoe Tewarie and Al-Rawi crossed swords over Rowley’s email claims.

Tewarie said while Rowley was in his right to bring a no-confidence motion he (Tewarie) knocked Rowley for raising the email issue when its authenticity is suspect.

In response, Al-Rawi said he found it curious that certain Government senators did not understand that “there is privilege in the House.” Explaining this was inherent in Section 55 of the Constitution and Standing Order 26 (5), Al-Rawi said senators have the ability, “to raise a motion of privilege at any moment in time and without notice.”

Click here to send your comments on thi

204
 Abraham  son or brother was recently shot dead somewhere in central the other day, since that he is making the news very regular and is always somebody getting shot.


205
General Discussion / Re: Section 34 Thread
« on: May 27, 2013, 02:53:42 PM »
The opposition leader of the PNM is in the radio station right now listen in .
http://i955fm.com/

206
General Discussion / Re: Section 34 Thread
« on: May 27, 2013, 08:10:57 AM »

The whistle blow-back
Published:
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Maxie Cuffie
 
Text Size:

I once had access to a whistleblower, while at the TnT Mirror, who claimed to be operating in the Prime Minister’s inner circle. I never found out who the person was or what motivated him, before the communication dried up and he disappeared through the Ethernet from whence he came.
 
He contacted me via Facebook, using a fake profile which has since been disabled, and was able to provide regular updates on matters involving the Prime Minister and her cabal which he considered to be of public interest. He once confessed to having access to a series of e-mails between the PM’s national security adviser Gary Griffith; and Cabinet ministers—Attorney General Anand Ramlogan; Foreign Minister, Suruj Rambachan and Housing Minister Dr Roodal Moonilal.
 
His information, over the period we were in contact, proved to be 95 per cent correct—I insisted we would need to verify everything before publication. He even provided cell phone numbers to assist with the verification process. In the 5 per cent (when he was wrong) he provided information as to the whereabouts of the PM’s former engagements adviser Sasha Mohammed, which when we checked, proved not to be accurate and when challenged, he admitted to mistaking her name for someone else’s.
 
He had some minor inconsistencies too, in dates and times, but overall, I was amazed at how accurate his information consistently proved to be. On February 14, 2012, I was told that the PM was trying to have Diana De Souza, who was said to be a friend of hers from Penal, appointed as CEO of TSTT.
 
At the time De Souza was not even considered in the running and there was not even a hint there would need to be a replacement for then chief executive Roberto Peon. By March 21, Peon’s resignation was announced and on July 3, De Souza was announced as acting CEO.
 
I never tried to find out his identity. He had taken the additional precaution, he confided, of communicating with me through various Internet cafés. In any case, as the Mirror began to print his various exposés, there was a frantic attempt at the Office of the Prime Minister to find the identity of the whistleblower. The office was being swept for eavesdropping devices; employees were being vetted and subjected to polygraph tests, all in an effort to find out who was leaking the information. At least, that is what he told me.
 
As we continued to get information, including some on Cabinet deliberations, that he considered to be in the public interest, I urged him to be careful but, he assured me, he had taken every precaution and had no fear of being caught. I realised that the National Security apparatus was also zeroing in on me to ascertain the Mirror’s source/s of information.
 
 
I pretended not to notice. An attorney who is quite close to a senior government official who had been the subject of communication between the whistleblower and me suddenly sought to befriend me on Facebook, which was, I suspect, to gain access to my list of contacts.
 
Through the whistleblower, I first learnt that the Government had an obsession with journalists. There were those whom they had already compromised, others whom they were prepared to intimidate, and they had developed files on not just journalists, but influential media executives.
 
“Every journalist has skeletons in their closets,” the line recorded in one of the e-mails released by Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley last Monday, was a view consistent with what the whistleblower had revealed was the approach to the media adopted by key members of the current administration.
 
Through the whistleblower I also learnt that the Attorney General was the member of Cabinet with whom the PM was closest and that they were in constant communication by SMS and e-mail and that the PM worked best late at night. Just as it had started, the correspondence stopped abruptly, long before September 2012 and the Section 34 fiasco. I have not heard from my whistleblower since.
 
A lot of what I read in the Opposition Leader’s e-mail exposé, however, was consistent with my whistleblower’s information and I think the Government, by denying it as a fabrication, has played right into the whistleblower’s hands. It makes a prosecution under the Interception of Communications Act that much more difficult. The errors, I suspect, may have even been deliberate. If, as they insist, the e-mails are fabricated, it makes a conviction which carries a fine of $500,000 and a seven-year jail term, almost impossible.
 
The Government’s response to the e-mails has been all over the place. It has ranged from denial of ever having such an e-mail address (AG Ramlogan); it’s cut and paste (the PM, after confirming that the e-mail address was in fact hers); to a total fabrication (Roodal Moonilal).
 
In any case, my whistleblower could easily claim justification for his actions in not only the Prime Minister’s pledge (made on January 4, 2011) to bring legislation soon to protect people like him who were leaking information on what they considered government wrongdoing, but also, he alleged, on the fact that the PM was the recipient of similar information when she was Opposition Leader from people who were well placed in the PNM administration.
 
The PM, therefore, owed her election to the very whistleblowers and is now facing what is tantamount to a whistle blow-back. However things work out, one thing is for certain: we have not heard the last of the whistleblowers. Maxie Cuffie runs a media consultancy, Integrated Media Company Ltd, is an economics graduate of the UWI and holds an MPA from the Harvard Kennedy School as a Mason Fellow in Public Policy and Management.

207
General Discussion / Re: ‘UNGRATEFUL’
« on: May 10, 2013, 11:59:57 PM »
Welcome to the land of new lagoon stink mud mangrove politics , it would never get better than this.

Maybe jus maybe it might get better one day soon .

208




Army official sheds more light on new unit Flying Squad was on drug exercise
Published:


Wednesday, May 8, 2013



Anika Gumbs-Sandiford
 

Mervyn Cordner

Former national security minister Jack Warner denied up to the last that he had any knowledge of the existence of the New Flying Squad Investigations Unit (NFSIU) but new information shows members of the unit were part of a joint air-surveillance exercise by the National Security Operations Centre (NSOC) and T&T Air Guard (TTAG)
 
 
 
 
 
Continued T&T Guardian investigations into the secret revival of the NFSIU revealed that NFSIU members were part of the surveillance of marijuana fields in various areas of east Trinidad on October 5, 2012, along with police and members of the T&T Regiment’s first and second battalion (infantry). The exercise was arranged after NFSIU members received a tip-off about the marijuana fields in east Trinidad, worth an estimated $1 million.
 
 
 
The information, T&T Guardian learned, was handed over to retired coast guard lieutenant commander and NSOC director Garvin Heerah by NFSIU head Mervyn Cordner. How members of the NFSIU ended up aboard a helicopter which falls under the auspices of the Ministry of National Security without Warner’s knowledge is unknown but a Defence Force official confirmed to the T&T Guardian that two members of the NFSIU were part of the exercise.
 
 
 
“We had an exercise in the hot-spot area in the east,” said one, who did not want to be named for fear of being reprimanded. “It included joint air support from the NSOC and the TTAG. It was a surveillance exercise. The exercise was on October 5, 2012, involving police and members of the army.” Asked specifically if members of the NFSIU were part of the exercise, the official first replied: “What about the NFSIU you are asking?”
 
 
 
Told the T&T Guardian had obtained a copy of the report that showed NFSIU members were part of the exercise, the official then said: “Yes, but you know I prefer not to comment about that.” NFSIU members were picked up at Camp Cumuto in Wallerfield for the exercise.
 
 
 
Afterwards a report was submitted to Warner and Heerah by retired police inspector Mervyn Cordner, who claimed he was recalled by Warner to head the NFSIU. The report recommended that surveillance equipment should be installed close to the marijuana fields, after their destruction, to keep a watch on the area.
 
 
 
“The NFS team has observed that when these fields are destroyed and the officers move out of the area, the fields are replanted. We can acquire technology to place cameras in the forest to photograph and record the planters,” the report pointed out. Neither NSOC director Heerah, who assisted with the rental of eight vehicles for the NFSIU, nor Warner, who has since resigned as national security minister, responded to text messages about the surveillance exercise.
 
 
 
And while acting Commissioner of Police Stephen Williams has dismissed claims by Cordner that the NFSIU helped police in fighting crime, T&T Guardian investigations continue to reveal otherwise. Commenting briefly on the exercise last week, Cordner only said: “Everything is going to come out bit by bit, no matter how Jack Warner tries to deny the existence of the NFSIU.
 
 
 
“We did not know when the eradication exercise took place. We were not part of that exercise. We were part of the surveillance exercise and assisted in obtaining the information about the high-grade marijuana fields in the east.” He added: “There was much more surveillance work to be done but the police acted quickly. The police were informed of everything we did.”
 
 
 
Cordner also reiterated that the NFSIU was instrumental in helping solve the murder of Chinese couple Yang Jiang Hua and Wu Xia Hua, who were shot dead last July at their family’s home and business place, Tiger’s Chinese Restaurant, Cunupia. Cordner’s claims are corroborated by businessman Richard Koorn, owner of Donrich Security Kennels, Factory Road, Golden Grove, Arouca, where the NFSIU operated for four months last year until being shut down because of lack of funding.
 
 
 
The NFSIU was reportedly secretly revived in July last year, months after Warner signalled his intention to do so. The original Flying Squad was first formed in the 1970s but was disbanded in 1980 after former police commissioner Randolph Burroughs was charged with conspiracy to murder. Warner hinted at the possibility of bringing back a “sanitised version” of the squad last year but did not give a time frame.
 
 
 
The Police Complaints Authority has started investigations into the revival of the NFSIU. Statements have been taken from Cordner and several other NFSIU members. Koorn is expected to meet with PCA officials to relate his involvement with the NFSIU. 


News


Previous Article
MARQUEZ: CHRISTOPHER

209

steups* how long allyuh go keep cummin with new puns?

Dawson did recently when she admitted in an interview that she calls her vagina "the General."

Ask the General

210
Deeks it is very funny that you mention sam because while posting it I thought about sam . ;D ;D

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 102
1]; } ?>