1
Football / Re: RIP Weary (Joann Charles)
« on: March 25, 2017, 05:50:57 AM »
Wow. Now seeing this purely by chance. RIP Weary. Condolences to her family and loved ones.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
She is cute. DHW back off!
i thought u is/was a chick?
http://nicholashuggins.com/MUTV-Don-t-Miss-a-MinuteNow seeing this... these are really good. The other stuff is quite good as well. Keep it up.
this link is a few United Posters i made, i figure the united supporters might appreciate it.
The Japanese are well organized and controlled. They attack in numbers and overlap well on both sides. Kagawa is a footballer , wow!!
Italy is vulnerable on the break as the can't match Japan for pace at the back. Balotelli is practiaclly their only threat going forward so far. I'm surprised at how many times they gave away possession, Pirlo especially.
Much ado about nothing. There is no evidence that "personal data" is being collected. These programs are supervised by Congress and done pursuant to lawfully applied for and court issued warrants. The email program doesn't even apply to US Citizens or residents and the phone program doesn't collect information on any person, merely numbers and times. Don't buy into the media's vindictive hype over this.
Talkin bout Penal Sports they put out some InterCol Stars like Phil Harris, David and Charlie Williams, Sutherland, I'm not too sure if the DPP Gaspard came from there also but the club was big in cricket and these fellas were also top cricketers..well David Williams represent..
Team fall apart after the goal yes wayyy. Men cah even defend on the proper side of an attackerAs usual...
He lucky it was not a fella like Roy Keane he bite. That would of been World War 3 on that pitch.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/22/boston-marathon-terrorism-aurora-sandy-hook/print
Why is Boston 'terrorism' but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?
Two very disparate commentators, Ali Abunimah and Alan Dershowitz, both raised serious questions over the weekend about a claim that has been made over and over about the bombing of the Boston Marathon: namely, that this was an act of terrorism. Dershowitz was on BBC Radio on Saturday and, citing the lack of knowledge about motive, said (at the 3:15 mark): "It's not even clear under the federal terrorist statutes that it qualifies as an act of terrorism." Abunimah wrote a superb analysis of whether the bombing fits the US government's definition of "terrorism", noting that "absolutely no evidence has emerged that the Boston bombing suspects acted 'in furtherance of political or social objectives'" or that their alleged act was 'intended to influence or instigate a course of action that furthers a political or social goal.'" Even a former CIA Deputy Director, Phillip Mudd, said on Fox News on Sunday that at this point the bombing seems more like a common crime than an act of terrorism.
Over the last two years, the US has witnessed at least three other episodes of mass, indiscriminate violence that killed more people than the Boston bombings did: the Tucson shooting by Jared Loughner in which 19 people (including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords) were shot, six of whom died; the Aurora movie theater shooting by James Holmes in which 70 people were shot, 12 of whom died; and the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting by Adam Lanza in which 26 people (20 of whom were children) were shot and killed. The word "terrorism" was almost never used to describe that indiscriminate slaughter of innocent people, and none of the perpetrators of those attacks was charged with terrorism-related crimes. A decade earlier, two high school seniors in Colorado, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, used guns and bombs to murder 12 students and a teacher, and almost nobody called that "terrorism" either.
More...
the prez call the bombing an act of terrorism in the earlies. a mistake?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/04/15/iraq-bombings-wave-attacks.html
ooops my bad...wrong thread.
Read recently, Samsung has surpassed Apple as the number 1 smartphone maker in the world. The Galaxy S3 is now the world's most sold smartphone surpassing the IPhone 4. In just a few months.
I'm guessing a few people are thinking that Man Utd played their kids....
Average age of Man Utd's first XI - 25
Average age of Chelsea's first XI - 23![]()
Starting XI: Cech (7m), Azpilicueta (6m), Cahill (7m), Luiz (20m), Bertrand (125k), Piazon (10m), Mikel (16m), Romeu (6m), Mata (23m), Moses (9m), Sturridge (6m)
Brought on: Hazard (32m), Oscar (25m), Ramires (18m)
Academy graduates involved: 0
Total cost: £185.125m
United: Lindegaard (2m), Rafael (2m), Wootton (0), Keane (0), Buttner (3m), Fletcher (0), Anderson (20m), Nani (18m), Giggs (0), Hernandez (6m), Welbeck (0)
Brought on: Powell (4m), Tunnicliffe (0), Macheda (0)
Academy graduates involved: 7
Total cost: £55m
Congratulations to Chelsea on a superb victory
I'm guessing a few people are thinking that Man Utd played their kids....
Average age of Man Utd's first XI - 25
Average age of Chelsea's first XI - 23![]()
Doh try dat. What the numbers look like without Giggs in the count?
In any case, I wouldn't call them kids so much as players trying to make the squad.
Without Giggs they would be an average age of 23 too.
A question for yall United fans - Alex Ferguson's production line has produced a grand total of 1 star player in the last 10 years - Darren Fletcher. If I'm being generous, then perhaps Wellbeck. Do yall have any hope in this latest generation (Cleverley, Powell etc)?