But on another note....after diamondtrim (yet again) calls out the "emotional people" on the forum, allyuh ever see such an emotional post from him as this one? Notice, he is clearly incensed by the article. So as much as he trying to discount Liburd and his article(s), it's obvious he's getting under his skin, shown in his overt attempt to try to convince us 'kids' that it's all over.
And then too he tries to convince Lasana to stop writing.....talk mr trim, talk!
I see the pandemic disease of idiocy and a reluctance to accept the basic tenets of comprehension, has not lost its potency on the author of the above quote.
My post was devoid of emotion, in as much as your head is apparently devoid of worthwhile content. In fact, if you did read the post, and furthermore, understood it, you may have noted that it was focussed on highlighting the fact that with the players divided, only the TTFF (and its advisor) would win, and kudos to them for winning. But perhaps that escaped you. No worries there, as I am fairly certain that far greater things have escaped your intellectual grasp.
Mr Bake's response was strangely civil and seemingly well put together....Yours however displays the image of a person steeped in the quagmire of ignorance.
[/quote]
Ah, the standard diamondtrim tactic of resorting to insults of his opposer's level of intelligence.....predictable, and I expected as much, to be honest.
This post of yours was devoid of emotion, your previous post however wasn't, especially coming from you. Your opening statement clearly displayed supreme annoyance with Mr. Liburd and his article(s). Afterwards, although you did highlight the fact that the players' division presents a gigantic obstacle towards any success in their case, you didn't just offer kudos the the TTFF, you celebrated it, with almost maniacal laughter I might add (by your standards).
As for your closing paragraph, while you've discounted Liburd before, this is the first time I can recall you encouraging him to write pertinent articles, taunting him and his "boyfren Jennings" about their jokey journalism and lack of results. Not usually your style.
But then again my head devoid of worthwhile content and u smarter than me and everybody on this board put together right, so what do I know??