Bakes you are still stretching for argument, are things really that slow on your end?
I already said I don't care what you or anyone else does in the privacy of your own home.
All my arguments are based on IF the homosexual act is done or promoted in a public place and in the presence of others who may find it disgusting. Also as I said, I believe it will be in breach of public decency laws in most civilized countries.
I think we need to labor on some other points because you are really stretching here and coming up short.
What I find uncomfortable about the Gay Agenda is that it seems to be pushing a sexual life style that is favoured by a minority onto the unwilling majority and no one is allowed to say hold up here this is going too far least they be labelled as homophobic.
Fella, yuh not making any sense. Yuh saying that yuh would only be offended/feel like yuh right violated IF gays do this and do that. Yuh claim then that yuh have nothing against them... implying that gays are PRESENTLY not doing the things you fear... having sex in public, promoting it in schools (I hope you realize just how much of a mad man yuh sounding like) etc. So if the NOT doing these things... why are you keeping up with this crusade of posting all these anti-gay videos etc? Clearly is paranoia... and irrational fear of these things that yuh claim gays might hypothetically do.
And again... how are gays "pushing" their 'sexual lifestyle' on anybody? I have to put sexual lifestyle in quotes because once more you are fixated on the sexual aspect of homosexuality rather than the same sex romantic/emotional/attraction.
Are you really this slow Bakes or are you just bored and looking for unnecessary argument to past your time?
I don't think they have yet implemented the teaching of Gay sex as normal and natural in ALL schools but I believe that is one of the definite goals of the Gay Rights Agenda movement. If you find that difficult to believe no need to worry as I am confident that we will all see more and more examples of it being put forward on the syllabus of schools in America and elsewhere in the coming months and years.
We can post the many examples as they come up in the news.
PS: Btw I am not on any crusade, just posted a couple of videos that I mostly agreed with and to help stir some discussion on the forum, that is all.
California passes bill mandating pro-gay teaching in schools, no parent opt-out
BY THADDEUS BAKLINSKISACRAMENTO, July 6, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A bill requiring public schools to teach the “historical contributions” of homosexual Americans was approved by the California legislature on Tuesday, July 5. The bill also prohibits any school material or instruction that reflects adversely on homosexuality, bisexuality or transgenderism,
and prohibits parents from removing children from classes over offensive material.
Click link to read more:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/california-passes-bill-mandating-pro-gay-teaching-in-schools-no-parent-opt>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Parents protest bid to teach about sexuality
Published: 09 Jan 2014 12:30 GMT+01:00
More than 65,000 parents and teachers in southern Germany have signed an online petition against plans to teach children about homosexuality in school.The petition, which by Thursday had collected over 65,700 signatures, wants to lobby parliament to sink plans in the state of Baden-Württemberg to make teachers talk to pupils more frankly about homosexuality.
The initiative, by Baden-Württemberg’s ruling regional Green/SPD coalition, wants to include "acceptance of sexual diversity" in the curriculum so that children are told about different lifestyles and relationships at a young age.
But it has met strong resistance from teachers and parents.
Supporters say the curriculum change will promote tolerance of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual and intersexual people. Critics say it would "go beyond the aim of preventing discrimination" to actively promote "the ideology of the rainbow”.
According to the petition, which was launched by a teacher, the plans would see an "educational, moral and ideological re-education of the general school system."
Regional Green Party head Oliver Hildenbrand has accused petition signatories of displaying "a shocking amount of homophobia," the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) reported on Thursday, and added the curriculum change would help create an environment where children learned tolerance.
The Greens coalition partners in the state government, the SPD, have also expressed shock at resistance to the plan. "The current online petition contains a spirit of severe intolerance," SPD regional education expert Stefan Fulst-Blei told the FAZ.
Signatories are hoping the regional parliament will take their petition into account when it comes to a debate on the culture ministry's initiative to include "acceptance of sexual diversity" in the 2015 education plan.
The initiative has been quietly criticized by grassroots Conservative politicians from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), who would prefer sex education in schools to focus on norms and values.
Click link to read more:
http://www.thelocal.de/20140109/petition>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Primary school teachers 'could face sack' for refusing to promote gay marriage
By John Bingham, The Telegraph (UK)
3:39PM GMT 18 Nov 2012Primary school teachers could face the sack for refusing to promote gay marriage once same-sex unions become law, a minister has signalled.
Liz Truss, an education minister, refused to rule out the possibility that teachers, even in faith schools, could face disciplinary action for objecting on grounds of conscience.
Miss Truss said simply that it was impossible to know what the impact of the legislation would be at this stage.
Her admission came in a letter to a fellow Conservative MP, David Burrowes, last month.
Mr Burrowes, a practising Christian, originally wrote to Maria Miller, the equalities minister, raising concerns about the impact on schools of the Coalition’s plans to change the marriage laws.
It followed the publication of a legal opinion by Aidan O’Neill QC, a barrister in the same London chambers as Cherie Blair, commissioned by the Coalition for Marriage, which campaigns against same-sex unions.
Mr O’Neill, an expert on human rights, was asked to advise on the impact redefining marriage to include same-sex couples could have on schools, churches, hospitals, foster carers and public buildings.
Among his conclusions was that schools could be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff who wilfully fail to use stories or textbooks promoting same-sex weddings.
Click link to read more:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9686306/Primary-school-teachers-could-face-sack-for-refusing-to-promote-gay-marriage.html>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And there are many more examples like the above three from around the world.