As I said before, I doh agree that Andrews should be dropped and I personally like a positive vibe the days before a big match, cuz that is how I made up. But I have to stand up for freedom of speech and expression on the site...cuz we's get too sensitive sometimes
Stating that Andrews is a liability is an opinion, negative though it may be. It is neither obscene, nor overly disrespectful. Feel free to disagree, but that is the type of discourse that should be going on a football forum. Sure, it would be pleasant to make your points without being indecent and yeah, it would be nice if TnT players was as good as some people seem to think they are. But what exactly do you mean by constructive criticism? Not all posts are designed to facilitate that. Opinion pieces do not have to come with both the negative and the positive. I could say, "So-and-So is a great player beacause a, b and c....and I doh have to point out his weak points too. That is also constructive if done properly. So why if i say, So-and-So play tata cuz a,b,and c.....I also have to come with the positive too? I could choose to or I could leave that up for discussion.
And yes, calling a national team player a shittong is straying into the realm of ludicrous. But it is also a METAPHOR describing his relative level of play to his peers. How can you use the argument that if we cannot do better doh say nothing negative? Of course we cah do better..in that case when a player do sh**, we should always say he had a real good game, cause we woulda do even more sh** in the same situation.