OK i was in a class and i presented this to a professor and he said it was stupid and he wanted a copy so i knew i was working with something.
When i first heard of the theory of gravity i said it was bullshyt and i could come up with something better that we could actually use.
first let me explain why i dont believe in gravity: i think it is a force pushing us towards earth rather than a force pulling us down.
NOW ON TO MY THEORY
Now for a theory to have any relevance there must be a need?? right?
Okay the need is there because sometimes racism is being misunderstood with actual facts, like when someone says " Black people love chicken" Is it racist or is it a fact of is it a product of the 80% theory??
the theory goes: If you can prove the statement to be 80% correct then its a fact.
So lets examine "black people love chicken" for this to be a fact then we must prove that 80% of black people actually love it. we all know that there iz vegetarians out there so they would be the bottom 10%, the top ten would be those who got no other meat available to them so chicken would be the only meat they can eat. YUH FOLLOWING MEH???
2nd option
In another thread we was talking about Indians playing football and someone said Indians dont play football.
Lets examine using my theory:
if we go to India and find at least 80% of the population playing football then it could be a fact. we have to put the few actually made it to the premier league and put them in the top 10% and those who dont have access to a ball and was never introduced to the sport in the bottom 10%.
you could use it for anything like "trini's love to party" of course there is trini's who dont party because of religion etc. but now you all can direct anyone to this thread and shut up your co-worker because at least 80% of trini's love ah good lime
Many people hate on my theories but they still could use it to get out of trouble if it was readily available like lets say newton stupid laws, or bournelli's principle, or Einstein's crap.
