At 145/4 Ramdin stumped Yousuf off a ball from Mohammed. West Indies appealed and the square leg umpire did not refer it to the third umpire, he just gave it not out with his naked eye. Replays show that Yousuf's back foot was still on the line when the bails were broken, so it should have been given out. Pakistan would have then been 145/5. I have watched the hi-lights but for those of you that have not seen it, Cricinfo's commentary says
50.4 Mohammed to Mohammad Yousuf, no run, a googly, beats the bat of Yousuf, drags his foot out slightly, Ramdin collects the ball and whips off the bails, loud appeal for a stumping, not referred to the third umpire.
Replays show Yousuf's leg was on the crease, surprising it was not referred
The West Indies have been cheated, and that decision could have cost the us the test match.
There are no excuses for decisions like that. All the square leg umpire had to do was refer it to the third umpire who has the benefit of television replays. Instead the square led umpire, Asoka de Silva, has tried to be a smart arse and has decided what was an even test match at that point.
I can understand bad decisions when umpires have to make split second decisions for lbws, caught behinds, etc, but for run outs and stumpings they are not acceptable because all they have to do it refer it to the third umpire.
Having said all that, Pakistan have still played the better cricket, and we will really have to step up our game to come out at the end of the series with a positive result.