December 04, 2023, 12:54:08 PM

Author Topic: Manning found GUILTY of Unfair Conduct  (Read 2934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dcs

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 5032
  • T&T 4 COP
    • View Profile
    • Warrior Nation
Manning found GUILTY of Unfair Conduct
« on: May 04, 2007, 10:09:44 AM »

‘PM acted unfairly’
Trinidad & Tobago Newsday
Friday, May 4 2007
By NEWSDAY REPORTER



A HIGH COURT judge yesterday concluded that Prime Minister Patrick Manning “acted unfairly and contrary to the principles of natural justice” when he blocked the appointment of Permanent Secretary Feroza Ramjohn to a top post at this country’s High Commission in London. Madame Justice Amrika Tiwary-Reddy, presiding in the San Fernando High court yesterday, further said that the Prime Minister’s decision to revoke Ramjohn’s position and the accusation that she was involved in a conspiracy was, “an abuse of process, misuse of power and a great injustice to individual rights.” The judge also added that the Prime Minister’s decision was unreasonable and unfounded.

Ramjohn, a former Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, won her civil case against Manning yesterday over her removal from office and revocation of her appointment to a prestigious foreign post in London.

The action against Ramjohn came after reports that she was somehow involved in the disappearance of 200 blank TT passports. But Tiwary-Reddy deemed the reports unreliable, stating, “The reports were unsigned reports, containing information from an unknown source and a bold statement that was never substantiated with documentation as evidence.” The judge further added, “There was no reason for the Prime Minister to declare Mrs Ramjohn a threat to national security because she has an unblemished record and has never been the subject of any disciplinary charges during her 36 years of public service.”

Ramjohn is now expected to file another law suit, this time for damages as a result of yesterday’s judgment. Attorney Anand Ramlogan who represented Ramjohn, that the judicial review ruling allows Ramjohn “to assume her appointed position with retroactive effect and that she will be entitled to all the benefits of the post.”

Ramjohn explained that she had considered taking early retirement but has decided to take the appointment in London instead. She further lamented, “It is sad that people of such a high calibre can cast such judgment without any proof.” This is not the first time the Government has lost a case of judicial review. High Court.

In 2004 CEO of San Fernando City Corporation Marlene Coudray (wife of the former Minister of Labour Larry Achong) won her case against the PSC which was seeking to transfer her to the Point Fortin City Corporation.

Offline noname

  • Sr. Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
Re: Manning found GUILTY of Unfair Conduct
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2007, 10:25:57 PM »
Judge Tewarie-Reddy a politician—Valley
From Trinidad Guardian, May 6th 2007

PNM Leader of Government Business Ken Valley on Friday described High Court Judge Amrika Tewarie-Reddy as a “UNC functionary” and said the PNM saw her as a politician.

Valley’s comments came as UNC MP for Oropouche Dr Roodal Moonilal praised Tewarie-Reddy for her judgment in the Feroza Ramjohn judicial review case at Friday’s sitting of the Lower House.

In the judgment Tewarie-Reddy slammed Prime Minister Patrick Manning for preventing Ramjohn from taking up a London appointment at T&T High Commission. Moonilal said Tewarie-Reddy’s judgment had exposed “PNM discrimination” for all to see.

Ramjohn, a senior Foreign Affairs accounting executive, had filed in 2004 for judicial review against the Prime Minister’s decision to veto her posting because she was considered a national security threat.

Justice Tewarie-Reddy’s judgment, delivered on Thursday, condemned Manning for thwarting Ramjohn’s appointment, rejecting Manning’s “national security threat” defence as well as the contention that Ramjohn was part of a conspiracy to steal 500 blank T&T passports.

The judge had shown up Manning, Moonilal said in the House on Friday.

At this point, Valley half rose from his seat, blurting out that Tewarie-Reddy had been a NAR senator and that she was a “UNC functionary.”

A surprised Moonilal wondered whether Valley was criticising the judge and her decision in the Ramjohn case.

Valley responded that the UNC might regard her, Tewarie-Reddy as a judge, but that the PNM saw her as a politician.

Law under threat

UNC Couva South MP Kelvin Ramnath butted in to warn Valley that he was “talking nonsense.”

“She’s a judge, have some respect. You worse than Umbala,” he said, referring to controversial radio talk show host, George “Umbala” Joseph.

Ramnath then wondered whether Chief Magistrate Sherman Mc Nicolls had also been “political.” Mc Nicolls was the central figure in the State’s collapsed case against CJ Sharma of seeking to pervert the course of justice in the Basdeo Panday integrity trial.

Asked for a comment on the issue yesterday, Chief Justice Satnarine Sharma said it appeared that the rule of law was under threat in T&T.

Sharma said while he had not yet read Tewarie-Reddy’s judgment on the case, it was wrong for politicians to use the cover of Parliament to impugn the integrity of a judge.

CJ Sharma noted “fair and objective criticism” of Justice Tewarie-Reddy’s judgment was to be expected, and said that if the Government felt wronged, it had access to the Appeal Court, and higher, to contest its findings.

Attacks on judges and impugning their integrity seemed to be a new development in the political arena in T&T, he added.

“This is a very serious matter for the future. If politicians take matters into their own hands, the rule of law will be under threat.

“If this is true, what next?” he asked.

Offline noname

  • Sr. Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
Re: Manning found GUILTY of Unfair Conduct
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2007, 10:27:04 PM »
Valley: My remarks should not have been reported
Trinidad Express
Juhel Browne
Monday, May 7th 2007
 
 
 Leader of Government Business Kenneth Valley says that his remarks concerning High Court Judge Amrika Tewarie-Reddy, during Friday's sitting of the House of Representatives, should not have been reported by the media.

"It was across the floor banter. I was not on my legs. It was not a matter that the Speaker was supposed to hear, far less strangers," Valley said yesterday.

"It should not have been reported. Strangers have no right to take that into consideration."

Sounding upset about the media reports, Valley was referring to the fact that the media is regarded, under Parliamentary procedure, as "strangers to the House" and that the cross talk was not part of the officially recorded part of Friday's proceedings.

"The Speaker did not intervene. Strangers, regardless of their rank, have no right interfering in the business of the House," he said.

During Friday's sitting, Valley was heard making remarks concerning Tewarie-Reddy's decision in favour of Foreign Affairs Ministry accounting executive Feroza Ramjohn, in a judicial review against Prime Minister Patrick Manning's decision to block her from taking up a posting at the nation's High Commission in London.

Asked for further comment on the issue yesterday, Valley said, "Whatever I say I will be saying in the Parliament."

Valley's comments have sparked strong responses from Chief Justice Satnarine Sharma, who said they should have been considered as a breach of Parliamentary privilege.

In the official record of all sittings of the Lower House and the Senate, the Hansard, cross talk is literally recorded as the words "cross talk".

Any remarks made during cross talk, therefore, are not recorded in the Hansard and is, therefore, not regarded as official statements made during the Parliament sittings and would not be covered by Parliamentary privilege.

Under the Lower House Standing Orders, strangers, who are anyone who is not an MP, Senator, presiding officer or member of the Parliament staff, may be present in the Chamber of the House in places set apart for them, such as the public gallery, "under such rules as the Speaker may make from time to time for that purpose".

Standing Order 88 stipulates the Speaker may grant "a general permission to the representative of any journal or newspaper or other medium of public information to attend the sittings of the House under such rules as he may make from time to time for that purpose".

The Standing Order also says, "If such rules are contravened, such permission may be revoked."
 

Offline dcs

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 5032
  • T&T 4 COP
    • View Profile
    • Warrior Nation
Re: Manning found GUILTY of Unfair Conduct
« Reply #3 on: May 07, 2007, 01:13:25 PM »

Valley is a mad man?

Parliament is be live on TV so what nonsense he talking!!

Offline Phensic

  • Full Warrior
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
    • View Profile
Re: Manning found GUILTY of Unfair Conduct
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2007, 11:55:11 AM »
Thats right brodder! They have they own channel - like a CSPAN Trinistyle.  Stuppes, some ah dem politicians need a good purge yes!


Valley is a mad man?

Parliament is be live on TV so what nonsense he talking!!

 

1]; } ?>