Coops, Warner simply picked up where James left off from the knowledge that I have of this period.
You really think the Duvaliers coulda run Haiti the way they did if they was around now? Aristide come and try a smartman thing and then he get sweep away. Same way, Panday is not Bhadase Maharaj even if they resemble on a lot of points, and Manning is not Eric Williams even if he want to be.
You can't compare the situation back in the 60s-70s and now and assume that if the players have it better is simply because Warner there - people move in their time, and the authoritarian manner in which James used to conduct affairs is just not compatible with this epoch. To be that macchiavellian in this day and age you have to be able to soften the blow with a smile, or in Jack case, a stutter.