Victor, Pekerman ... is good and fine where he is ... Mexico. He is not the solution.
I would be among the last to reject an Argentinian-trained practitioner, but it is at this stage that we need to move beyond labels: German, Dutch, Brazilian, Argentinian etc. and really understand and come to terms with both the coaching philosophy and application of specific personalities rather than generalised notions of what someone from nation group A or B brings to the table.
Our analysis for selection has to be more sophisticated.
Thinking about some of your other observations ... meanwhile ah go address this one for now...
IF ALLYUH DONE WITH DEM DUTCH PEOPLE GO TO ARGENTINA, GET A GOOD COACH(S) AND BUILD WE PROGRAM FROM THE GROUND UP.
No contention as such ... my views may be radical on this ... to really have a major shift in where we are as a nation we need the injection of not just one [foreign] coach but many experienced [youth] coaches bringing common goods, spread across the nation building the game from ground zero. Have these coaches working in tandem with local coaches, synchronised in whatever our consensus plan is.
So instead of investing excessive millions of dollars in one head coach, spread the wealth across a universe of coaches and move to reap the rewards in improvement in under a decade. This is not a novel model.
Let local coaches check their egos at the gate ... have a symbiotic system where there is mutual learning and adaptation ... foreign and local.