I will still say that Wim still didnt truly get a chance to succeed or fail on any front. We were perfectly positioned, we had continuity after the last world cup, nucleus of the squad would be ready for 2010, we lost Leo but his assistant was ready to take over the reigns. TTFF mash up d whole ting. Man expecting Wim to work miracles when he handcuffed, it looked as even if he had a gag order from talking about the impasse to the media and on all fronts and whist he was no diplomat, he called a spade a spade and i could respect that when talking about the standard of the Pro League. The problem with Wim is that he shouldnt have said anything period like Leo so he couldnt be rubbing folks all kinda wrong ways, Simoes used to write articles in the papers and probably took more interest in local development but did that translate into winning games on the field? what was his record? Did he have an impasse to deal with? or maybe he had other internal issues with the TTFF that we didnt know about? I was here for the digicel tourney, we played well with the players we had, none of them plying trades in the UK but they maintained shape and played to instruction, the faults of the same pro league is what really brought our demise and it was clear for those who were present, fitness, and technique. Dem is things a national coach supposed to inherit not teach. I find some of the comments unfair, but that is just my opinion.
Is like trying to saw a piece ah wood with a rusty old hacksaw blade and it have fresh new ones lock away in a safe and you cyah get it cause d boss say so and when time to judge yuh work, men saying yuh work looking shitty. I still say give d man a chance with a full squad and den judge him on the results.