Ramesh: No need for Rowley to resign
Originally printed at
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Ramesh__No_need_for_Rowley_to_resign-140821193.htmlBy Ria Taitt Political Editor
February 29, 2012
Nonsense.
That's how former attorney general and former chief whip Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj has described the assertion by several Government spokesmen that Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley must resign if the no-confidence motion he filed against Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar is defeated in the House of Representatives on Friday.
"A no-confidence motion is an important weapon which an Opposition has in order to make the Government account," he said.
Maharaj said the United National Congress (UNC) while in Opposition filed several no-confidence motions from 1991.
"And we knew when we filed those motions that they were not going to succeed because the government always has the majority. But it (the filing of such a motion) is a means of making the government account in respect of every matter which an opposition believes that the government has lost confidence because of the actions or inaction of the prime minister," he said.
Maharaj said in the last Parliament (2007-2010) when he filed a no-confidence motion against former prime minister Patrick Manning on the issue of UDeCOTT, it was agreed at the caucus "at which the current Prime Minister and Roodal Moonilal and others in the current government were present, that the motion would not succeed. Nobody had to resign because the purpose of filing it was ... to put pressure on the government to account and justify its actions and for the population to assess the government."
Various Government ministers such as Suruj Rambachan, Fuad Khan and Stephen Cadiz have stated that if the motion is defeated by a majority of votes, the mover of the motion should resign.
Since 1991, there have been 12 motions of no confidence, though most of them were not voted on and some were not even debated.
In 1992, there was a no-confidence motion against the then minister of health over the salmonella poisoning incident in which a number of St Ann's patients died. It was never debated. In the same year, Panday filed a motion against then House speaker Occah Seapaul. That too was not debated.
In 1994, Panday filed a motion against Manning. The motion was defeated.
In 1995 the then leader of government business, Ken Valley, filed a motion against Seapaul. After two days, the debate was aborted when Seapaul was put under house arrest and a bill passed to removed her from office.
In 1996, Rowley filed a motion against then agriculture minister Reeza Mohammed. The motion was defeated.
In 2001, Valley filed a motion against Panday. It was not debated and was removed from the Order Paper.
In 2002, then Pointe-a-Pierre MP Gillian Lucky filed a motion against national security minister, Howard Chin Lee, and in the Senate in the same year, former senator Robin Montano filed a motion against then Senate president Dr Linda Baboolal. Neither went to a vote.
In 2008, Maharaj filed a motion against Manning. It was during that debate that Manning announced the Commission of Enquiry into UDeCOTT.
In 2009, Persad-Bissessar filed a motion against then finance minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira and in the same year, the Siparia MP filed a motion against then attorney general John Jeremie.
In 2010, Persad-Bissessar, then opposition leader, filed a motion against Manning. The Parliament was dissolved midnight Thursday, April, 2010, hours before the debate was due to start.