Really... I am? Where did I say such a thing? I said the fan base consists of those who are fans of the Soca Warriors... or did you miss that the first five times I said it? I made no qualification of the fan base... and in fact I said it includes many who can't make it to all the games, people like myself who can't make a mid-week trip to Nashville.
I didn't miss anything. we both accept that there are examples of local and foreign based fans who go to great lengths to see the team. you said that the argument becomes moot when you consider what the foreign based are willing to do to see a game. Implicit in you saying that is that, all else equal, that behaviour is more likely to be exhibited by foreign based.
Whether you want to admit it or not, you have already made a speculation of your own to get to that conclusion if only because all else isn't equal.
but moving on, if you're not putting that restriction on the fan base then your argument just develops another hole: how on earth does someone who prefers not to speculate make a determination about how much of the fan base is sitting at home watching on tv instead of going to Nashville/Boston/Chicago/Hartford?
That's strange... I could have sworn you said "plenty" of that fan base... now you're saying you spoke specifically of your family and people you overheard making random comments in the parking lot. Either "plenty" of your relatives were in attendance or there were "plenty" in the parking lot displaying their ignorance as to who's wearing what. Not that that proves they were there just for the lime... but we'll leave it where it is.
I did say plenty and I haven't changed that position yet. I used people I know as examples. just as I used an example of someone I didn't know. How you could twist that into a supposed change of stance on my part is beyond me. I recognize this is not scientific proof but I feel very secure in my claim that plenty of the trinis in attendance don't "follow" the team.
The nature of this topic precludes a scientifically acceptable level of proof. Regardless of which side you're arguing. So that raises the question: why would you even get into it if you have such an aversion to speculation?