.
There is merit in what you state ... however, Ince aside ...
Frankly, the goal was constructed once the penetrating pass beat the 3 defenders immediately behind the clueless Daniel. How difficult is it to unbalance an already unbalanced defensive posture?
Yuh mean the pass from out in mid field??....ah think ah see what yuh saying.....
It feels almost comical to write this, but freeze it at 0:01
... the pass I'm referencing is at 0:04.
Daniel should have relayed the runner (#16) at once, and focused on the player who ultimately delivered the crucial pass.
When the play has developed, at about 0:06, you'll note there was actually a 4th defending player also caught out by that incisive pass, and that this player lost his (shared) Honduran attacker. The end result is that #16 had TWO viable options to provide the finish to just to the right of the PK spot ... the one whose attempt Abu Bakr snuffed out ... and the trailing player to his right.
In sum, 8 of our 9 defending players were unbalanced by that ONE ball. (notably, Radanfah Abu Bakr was not!).
It can be argued Ince's motion was premature, but he moved in anticipation of #16 finishing on goal. Keepers have split seconds to make decisions. Based on his movement, at best he would have the hope of a reaction save b/c he never got 'set'. In retrospect, perhaps he would have been better off holding his starting position, and making the adjustment from there to deal with the shot that eventually came ... but again these are split second decisions that have to be framed to include what Ince thought was going on.
This is a play that was 9 v 5, numbers-up us!!!
You see Carlos remonstrating with Ince ... I see that too, but I also see Ince doing the reverse seconds later ... Carlos on Pavon? Maybe no goal. But same way, Abu Bakr on Pavon (he left him) ... the first attempt goes in. Bakr's movement gave us an opportunity to correct the initial error (I'll attribute that to Daniel) ... more was expected of Carlos there.
Poor defensive posture collectively.
