i was listening to a radio show the other day when some UNC leader was going on and on about how Mr Panday is destroying the party and what the membership should do about it.
I'm not going to argue the merits or deficiencies of the parties, but the UNC is the house that Panday built. What are these guys fighting over? Is it that they want to make a real change, or is it that they perceive that the UNC is the best place to start on a quest for power?
Dookeran et al tried to make a change in the UNC, decided it wasn't possible to work in that environment and left.
I think that is the more honorable path, perhaps not the best political move, but certainly the infighting over the soul of the UNC can't be good. Panday, if he cared about his legacy should have faded back, allowed the party to decide and collected his kudos, now, instead of Mandela, he's Mugabe.