Of all the positions on the field no coach can compromise having too many inexperience in midfield; Latas having mostly inexperience players in midfield is either into wishful thinking or doesn't the difference between the two. This is the engine room, can‘t compromise there. [/color] This statement also indicates the inexperience of the coach. Remember what he said after the second Jamaica game? " We had trouble adjusting defensively in the midfield...Jamacia played in a 3-5-2 and we usually play against teams who play in a 4-4-2..." Experienced coaches know that whenever you have a 4-4-2 vs 3-5-2 you will always have problems in the midfield because you are outnumbered. There is also an indication that the team was not prepared to deal with any other tactical approach by the opponent, which seems to be the case in every game where we are playing against teams with competent players and coaches. If the coach cannot present a clear tactical plan with defined responsibilities for each of the players and their units and without a decisive approach to attacking and defending scenarios as a team...you asking your players to just play football and that's not good enough.
Further, when I hear that players performance attitude is lackluster I have to think about their motivation...I really wonder how motivated these players are for the following reasons...
1. Have they been paid for their services from the previous set of games...if players did not get paid after playing in a World Cup...what is the likelyhood of me getting paid for Caribbean qulifying games?
2. If the coach is trying to use predominantly inexperienced players for this stage of qualifying...where do I stand once we qualify?
3. If the coach is not presenting us with a clear tactical plan and has not provided a long therm strategy towards building a competitive team...how much confidnce do the players have in the coach?
I heard someone said on another thread "that rebuilding shouldn't be about starting from scratch, but about building from what was." dat eh true word.
We all know Latas is inexperience, but that shouldn't mean lacking football sense; his approach could be considered lacking football sense, or competence.
Fine, he choose a local base squad in prelims, by the end of the prelims he should have figure out that the local base will not cut it at a higher level if they struggled at a lesser level.
I don't know what Latas is thinking, but if his motivation was to build a inexperience side into a commanding one in short order then he's attempting something that has never being done in the Caribbean or the CONCACAF.
Fools Gold indeed; Either he's full of himself having a strange confidence in his unproven coaching ability, or he doesn't really understand football from a coaching standpoint.
All the great coaches will tell you; a team have to have the best players to compete and win; that they can't take mediocrity and make them great in short order.