Bakes, the part in bold should clear up whether or not she has a degree.......now shouldn't Rambachan and Sandy be referred to the privileges committee?? They both clearly sought to mislead the house and the public. Not that I expect that to happen but isn't it something Rowley should consider??
Yeah... we still doh know how current that resume/CV is though. So I'm not sure if they could be charged with deliberately misleading Parliament. Even if she doh really have a degree, she may have misrepresented such to them and they relied on that. Lack of due diligence on their part not to check, but not proof of intent to mislead.
And again, I disappointed in the media, Ria Taitt here in particular for giving credence to the spying talk w/o the government actually substantiating the charges with proof.
Bakes, I was reading something on Facebook just before I posted this and ah kinda confuse the article with what ah was reading on fb (information overload). The discussion was that if we use the old CV being circulated, which is said to have been furnished to media houses in 2007 and she working full time for 4 years now, when she had time to complete a degree??
And if I'm not mistaken didn't Rambachan and/or Sandy say she already had a degree and was pursuing another one?? You catch where I'm coming from? When did she have the time between 2007 and 2011 to do this degree??
The thing is she eh no UWI grad, she do a damn Microsoft Certificate something
AT UWI. Dais must be what they were referring to, they try ah Gary Hunt on we when he said the flag cost $18,000 but what he meant was the CLOTH to make the flag was $18,000.
In any event, I am deeply troubled by the PM's behaviour in all this. I listened to her interview with a reporter on Friday or Saturday and the manner in which this woman sought to defend this indefensible bull shit is very troubling. Ah mean is the nation's security we talking bout not a f&*&%#@ng dolly house!!!!!