yeah Mexico sell out........
that's why the keeper save the PK...which bribed keeper gonna save a penalty ??...
that's why the man lobbed Jack from the top of the box, when he coulda just blast it wide.......(steups)
people should just stick to what they know about....I heard rumors of Jack payin' off Mexico & CR before the game so that no matter what, we would get through to the play-off......I guess that is why CR went down to Guatemala and played the game of their lives right ?? (steups)....
Just because someone workin' for the press on the "inside" says it, doh make it the gospel...
that's over-simplified thinking....First off, you can bribe a referee, sure (and there's no guarantee in that)....but you can't pay "MEXICO"...who is Mexico ? the coach ? the players ? the football association ? the gov't ??...who ?? who yuh pay and how much ?? and how much did Guatemala pay Mexico ?? how long the negotiation took ? so Mexico just sat there and accepted cash offers from both sides and then decided.......hmmmm let's see who to let win ??..... and who is to say that they would accept it ?? who is to say that someone won't blow the whistle ?? People have huge reputations on the line if news like that gets out........ who is to say that the players won't just walk out and say f- that ?? who is to say that the players wouldn't still go out and still play to win ??
I believe that Mexico not having as much at stake, did not come out blazing as they could, and they didn't bring their best players....had Mexico needed to win, the game may have been different....that is a no-brainer...and it's inconsequential, because that is the nature of W.C. qualifiers... and I eh sayin' that pay-offs don't happen, sure...but to say that "Jack pay Mexico" and believe that jusso jusso is just over-simplified thinking. There is alot to take into consideration before you come out and say some shit like that.......(I get real vex when I hear men eatin' up rumors like that)