Nah, I feel we keep to what going for us.
We playing 4:5:1, yes. but in reality like Observer say, we have nuff attackers.
Between John, Latapy, Yorke, Carlos, Seaton and even Birchal bussing shot, we have lots of offensive ammunition.
And we aint talk bout Air Dog and his runs and headers.
We have to keep the team solid.
Remember Spann will be coming back, and does overlap and attack nice with Edwards on the right, even more dimension than the Mexico game.
Attack wise, we good.
Its is, and always has been a question of structure and organisation and defense for T&T teams.
5 in the middle good.
If we not getting goals, or they score, yes, bring on Jones for a more attack oriented configuration.
If we getting the goals and we want to close up, bring in Theobald.
Offense is not our problem.
Also, dont be too nieve in only wanting a 3-0 at home.
Yes, we would love that and it will be very good.
But 2-0 and 1-0 are good results too. The key is the advantage we will have, and they will be forced to attack in the return, thus we can adjust strategy to cope and make advantage of it.
Even a 0-0 draw at home, although not what we want, I still confident we will prevail, cause I know we will always be capable of scoring. Then it become a case of just avoiding a loss in Bahrain, once we draw with them with goals scored.
We have to attack yes, but more importantly, we cannot by any means allow them to score in Trinidad.
That could break our back in the long run, just like the 5-1 we get in Guatemala almost come back to haunt us in the end for goal difference.
If we play our normal game, between the fans and the will of the team, and the quality of our players, we can impose our tempo on the home game and get the result.
A 2-0 for me is the most realistic and safe result I can see.
I prefer 2-0 rather than 3-1, just because of the away goal, and the confidence I have in my team of scoring in Bahrain.
