Well, you saw the wrong documents. And you're conveniently finding time to ask questions instead of admitting that were duped by your friends.
Okay... I was "duped by my friends."
Now answer the question hypocrite: How much of the $9 million appropriation has been spent and how much remains? Should be simple enough.
So ask your friend. Should be easy enough. Deduct what they have received from what was promised.
Why not just tell us FS?
I can't tell you exactly at this point as the amount has decreased again today when a new request came in. But once you take into account the money set aside for the Miami camp and Gold Cup all that's left is enough to cover Harts salary and the other technical staff. Then, every item on the note would have been met.
But I'm getting tired of correcting untruths and then having to justify everything I write. Never before has this forum received direct information from the Ministry, yet when I try to correct the untruths being told I get dragged into these petty arguments.
"How Sancho could say "he lie" when Sancho self hold up the payments wanting to see audits?" " The $9 million dollars was promised by Griffith, then Sancho came in and put conditions on the payments. Sancho didn't say the TTFA get the money, he said almost 90% of it was spent. What he didn't say is who spend it... or that this bullshit WPL 'tournament" that he forced on the TTFA costs $1.7 million dollars, which came out of the $9 nillion already promised to the FA." These statements are untrue. I corrected them: Sancho has not put in any additional conditions that were not in the original cabinet vote. In fact, he's let funding go through even though those conditions still haven't been met. He's trying to work with the TTFA through their problems. No money from TTFA's note will be deducted for WPL or any other project other that stipulated on the note. To do this would require a return to cabinet for their approval.
"The cabinet note did not condition release of the funds on the TTFA providing audits from 2008- present. Put another way, since you apparently can't understand plain English, Rupert Griffith and cabinet didn't say "the only way the TTFA will get any of the $9 million authorized, is if they first present audited financial statements from the year 2008 and onwards. "Untrue. I corrected it: You are correct in that the cabinet note does not say "the only way the TTFA will get any of the $9 million authorized, is if they first present audited financial statements from the year 2008 and onwards." It states that a condition of the funding is that TTFA produce audited accounts for 2013-14. Unfortunately, TTFA's accountants can't produce these until 2008/9/10/11/12 are completed. So after a satisfactory explanation from Tim-Kee and the accountants, funds were released on the understanding that the accounts would be produced in some form.
So you see
a) it was not Sancho that ordered the accounts, however, quite rightly, he insisted that the conditions be met
b) he allowed funds to be dispersed on the basis of a promise of the future production of the accounts
"I was privy to the communications between Anthony Creed, Griffith and the FA... I didn't see anything that placed a condition on the disbursement of funds."Not sure what he was reading because as I already stated, a condition of the funding is that TTFA produce audited accounts for 2013-14.
"So the coaches haven't been paid arrears (dating back to Jan-Feb) from other TTFA funds... they were paid from the $9 million MoS appropriation?"Asked and answered: You would have to check with your source about how/who TTFA pay. I can only advise on allocations from the cabinet note, some of which was specifically to pay arrears for technical staff and players, staff stipends from 2012/13, and staff salaries from WC14 campaign. The period you are referring to is the final tranche of technical staff remuneration, which will be paid once requested.
"My 'understanding' is not at issue here, I stand by what I said. The documents I saw made no reference to conditions being placed on the release of funds to pay the salaries and arrears." So despite me explaining the conditions on the cabinet note, our boy still insists that he knows different. So, why should I waste my time on idiots like that? The bottom line is that anything Sancho or I say, Bakes will pick apart or criticize. Fair enough if you want to argue with opinions, but what is the point of me writing the truth if I then have to defend myself time after time.
Now laughing boy will come back and have a jab because I don't know the exact figure, yet he doesn't know the actual figure on the cabinet note to start with, yet apparently he's seen it. (Let's see how long it takes him to get the true figure...and, hey, get your guy to check the conditions while he's there)