April 29, 2024, 04:57:24 AM

Author Topic: Sancho vs Tim Kee the Thread.  (Read 31489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18066
  • A Trini 4 Real.
    • View Profile
    • Soca Warriors Online
Re: Sancho says no more funding for TTFA...unless.
« Reply #120 on: July 14, 2015, 03:32:42 PM »
I know for a fact that the TTFA has given the ministry reports from 2008-2011.

The ramifications coming from the FIFA arrests in May and KPMG being the auditors of FIFA has been halted. However, I know that the TTFA correspondence has been sent to KPMG on several occasions and they remain in contact with the local KPMG auditor.

I mean, what would you like them to do?

The real measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.

Offline Controversial

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6878
    • View Profile
    • Gino McKoy
Re: Sancho says no more funding for TTFA...unless.
« Reply #121 on: July 14, 2015, 03:41:45 PM »
Instead of the he said-he said, I would appreciate if a journalist would really do the research and provide a more impartial view of what's happening between these two gentlemen.

Was TimKee even involved with the TTFF during the2007-09  period when Jack was taking money from the TTFF and putting it into his account? Besides what does being the PNM Treasurer have to do with this? At the least I find it laughable that theMinister would try to invoke Jack Warner when his very party and leader was bosom buddies with Jack and his main beneficiaries during the last election.

Lasana how bout an article that separates the politics and obvious personal animosity and focuses on what the TTFF has received, spent, requested, provided and not provided.

Read it again!!

Mr Tim Kee was an important part of the TTFF administration which was controlled by Jack Warner, the master puppeteer. As a vice-president and, at one point, chairman of TTFF’s finance committee, it is impossible to believe that Mr Tim Kee’s curiosity would not have been aroused by huge transactions entering and departing TTFF accounts under the orders of Mr Warner.
In one such instance in 2008, Mr Tim Kee was copied into an email conversation concerning the distribution of a US$500,000 cheque. This cheque was converted to TT dollars and distributed into three accounts, including two TTFF accounts.
Within 24 hours of these transactions, Mr Warner advised his secretary, “do take note of the amounts which went into the LOC Account as well as the T&TFF’s account both of which must be repaid.” Mr Tim Kee was copied into this conversation.
Such a large transaction should have caused concern, not only because it was originally in US dollars, not only that it was layered into three different accounts, but that Warner was instructing that the money must be repaid.
For what innocent reason would such a transaction occur?
Mr Tim Kee, even as recently as yesterday at an extraordinary general meeting of  TTFA, stated that he had no knowledge of any suspect transactions made by Warner.

Look, Sancho still searching for TTFF money and feel Tim Kee thief some.

Tell de 06 Warriors, they getting not a penny more.

Tell Sancho go and fight Jack for they money, he eh go go they though.

Jack will mash up all of them.

Sancho since he was a player was always a trouble maker, thats why his career got over years before his playing days was over, even they club in England didn't like he and Kelvin Jack.

I eh have a problem with them wanting to fight Jack Warner, allyuh go ahead nah.



I think you're mad Sancho hasn't done an interview with Flex. The only reason TK did it was to mamguy Flex and the board... playing the victim, making it seem like he's so transparent, when in fact he was just spouting hot air and nothing in depth..

I also agree Sancho's gripe is with JW, but currently, TK is the man in charge and pulling the strings... he is not performing...

Offline Controversial

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6878
    • View Profile
    • Gino McKoy
Re: Sancho says no more funding for TTFA...unless.
« Reply #122 on: July 14, 2015, 03:45:53 PM »
I know for a fact that the TTFA has given the ministry reports from 2008-2011.

The ramifications coming from the FIFA arrests in May and KPMG being the auditors of FIFA has been halted. However, I know that the TTFA correspondence has been sent to KPMG on several occasions and they remain in contact with the local KPMG auditor.

I mean, what would you like them to do?



what were the reports specifically Flex??

Offline Flex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18066
  • A Trini 4 Real.
    • View Profile
    • Soca Warriors Online
Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #123 on: July 14, 2015, 05:48:43 PM »
Raymond Tim Kee (PNM) vs Brent Sancho (PP).

Ok, without picking sides.... A neutral observation.

We have two politicians that is using our football as a battle field. Imagine, we are all caught up in a political battle because of two men. Players are heated, unpaid, coaches to, fans fighting each other, you name it, its a fight that should not involve us. If they want to go at each other, then take it off the field.

Politicians all over the world are causing havoc on their respected countries and T&T is no different. In-fact, its the worst I've seen in a while.

Tim Kee (TTFA) is basically saying that KPMG is the problem because they have halted on the audit and they have no control over that.

My question, can they get another auditing company? I know the TTFA did send audit (The 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011) to the MOS.

Brent Sancho wants the TTFA to be more transparent and is saying that he will strangle the TTFA until an audit is completed.

In the meantime, our football teams and staff members are the ones suffering the most. Now these teams have NOTHING TO DO WITH NEITHER OF THEM or the current situation.

Who are the winners here?

Why not call in Tim Kee and you guys sit down like respectable adults and find a solution to move forward instead of this back and forth battle that will affect EVERYONE and without any gain?

Find a solution, not a problem?

1. New auditing company, maybe Sancho could recommend one?

2. Sancho terms as far as money is concern.

3. How much will be allowed per-year.

4. Tim Kee assurance to cooperate and find other outlets to help source the TTFA.

5. Leave the politics out of our football.

6. The TTFA need to stop last minute planning and then expecting last minute funds.

7. The MOS need to be on time with disbursement of funds.

8. The TTFA must be open and better run in terms of players handling, games, visas, etc etc.

9. ?

10?

11?

12?

I mean, these are some topics they can work on.

Tim Kee is here already and will be until next election don't matter the outcome of this battle and Sancho will be here until next election don't matter whats the outcome?

I believe someone in a higher position needs to step in and do something. This is ridiculous from two grown men.

I don't see how not giving funds to the TTFA will affect Tim Kee? the worst can happen is he step down but then what? Does Sancho has a suitable replacement? Will he give unlimited funds to the new president? Is his riff with Tim Kee personal? what caused this?

As for the new constitution, a president can only serve two terms and the TTFA election is suppose to be in November. And the voting panel has opened up where many others can vote unlike before where is was set up for the ruling party was assured victory.

Why can't these two gentlemen take the battle to the voting polls?

And lets just get behind the teams, at least for now. November is only a few months away?

« Last Edit: July 15, 2015, 06:33:01 AM by Flex »
The real measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.

Offline socalion

  • Sr. Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #124 on: July 14, 2015, 06:39:01 PM »
Flex  yuh spot on ...!!!!  Another troubling aspect is ..... these  are supposedly  2 intelligent , albeit rational  adult men  behaving like  .??     like they on steroids or had some serious bay rum to drink .. if they are both serious and solution  oriented ...  there can be no doubt  that they ought to sit down as intelligent / rational men , . to find ways to resolve these outstanding issues  as it relates to  funding and  all other concerns  !!  It is my hope good reason prevail  between all the parties involved..

Offline Controversial

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6878
    • View Profile
    • Gino McKoy
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #125 on: July 14, 2015, 07:51:50 PM »
Raymond Tim Kee (PNM) vs Brent Sancho (PP).

Ok, without picking sides.... A neutral observation.

We have two politicians that is using our football as a battle field. Imagine, we are all caught up in a political battle because of two men. Players are heated, unpaid, coaches to, fans fighting each other, you name it, its a fight that should not involve us. If they want to go at each other, then take it off the field.

Politicians all over the world are causing havoc on their respected countries and T&T is no different. In-fact, its the worst I've seen in a while.

Tim Kee (TTFA) is saying basically saying that KPMG is the problem because they have halted on the audit and they have no control over that.

My question, can they get another auditing company? I know the TTFA did send audit (The 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011) to the MOS.

Brent Sancho wants the TTFA to be more transparent and is saying that he will strangle the TTFA until an audit is completed.

In the meantime, our football teams and staff members are the ones suffering the most. Now these teams have NOTHING TO DO WITH NEITHER OF THEM or the current situation.

Who are the winners here?

Why not call in Tim Kee and you guys sit down like respectable adults and find a solution to move forward instead of this back and forth battle that will affect EVERYONE and without any gain?

Find a solution, not a problem?

1. New auditing company, maybe Sancho could recommend one?

2. Sancho terms as far as money is concern.

3. How much will be allowed per-year.

4. Tim Kee assurance to cooperate and find other outlets to help source the TTFA.

5. Leave the politics out of our football.

6. The TTFA need to stop last minute planning and then expecting last minute funds.

7. The MOS need to be on time with disbursement of funds.

8. The TTFA must be open and better run in terms of players handling, games, visas, etc etc.

9. ?

10?

11?

12?

I mean, these are some topics they can work on.

Tim Kee is here already and will be until next election don't matter the outcome of this battle and Sancho will be here until next election don't matter whats the outcome?

I believe someone in a higher position needs to step in and do something. This is ridiculous from two grown men.

I don't see how not giving funds to the TTFA will affect Tim Kee? the worst can happen is he step down but then what? Does Sancho has a suitable replacement? Will he give unlimited funds to the new president? Is his riff with Tim Kee personal? what caused this?

As for the new constitution, a president can only serve two terms and the TTFA election is suppose to be in November. And the voting panel has opened up where many others can vote unlike before where is was set up for the ruling party was assured victory.

Why can't these two gentlemen take the battle to the voting polls?

And lets just get behind the teams, at least for now. November is only a few months away?



I don't understand, if the MOS received the audits for those years, why are you suggesting another auditing firm?

One minute I'm hearing TTFA didn't produce any audit documents and now I'm hearing they gave the audited documents... Is there proof of this?

Where is the proof of this by the TTFA? FS can you verify that Sancho and the MOS have received the necessary documents and if they did, why are we still bickering about this?
« Last Edit: July 14, 2015, 08:01:47 PM by Controversial »

Offline Controversial

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6878
    • View Profile
    • Gino McKoy
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #126 on: July 14, 2015, 08:08:50 PM »
Okay just read FS and Sams exchange.. So Sancho wants 2008 and 2012 documents... Which is reasonable.. 5 years of docs normally give you a good financial picture about the organization..

The halting of the audit can create problems.. Maybe they can seek another firm to audit the books, the question is will TTFA do this?





Offline dcs

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 5032
  • T&T 4 COP
    • View Profile
    • Warrior Nation
Re: Sancho says no more funding for TTFA...unless.
« Reply #127 on: July 14, 2015, 10:52:10 PM »

Make those reports public.  I haven't seen anything confirming complete reports were received.

Offline Tiresais

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2818
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #128 on: July 15, 2015, 03:46:34 AM »
This has escalated steadily and now they've put themselves into positions they can't back out of - either of them will willingly back down now - there's too much that's been said. The election might or might not solve this, and the TTFA elections might also. KPMG are a very respectable company when it comes to auditing so I'm not sure changing them will help.

The only way to keep politics out is to bar any executive member of the TTFA from holding public office, past or present and have a formalised relationship with the Ministry with mutual commitments clearly defined contractually

Offline Tiresais

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2818
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho says no more funding for TTFA...unless.
« Reply #129 on: July 15, 2015, 04:05:08 AM »
I know for a fact that the TTFA has given the ministry reports from 2008-2011.

The ramifications coming from the FIFA arrests in May and KPMG being the auditors of FIFA has been halted. However, I know that the TTFA correspondence has been sent to KPMG on several occasions and they remain in contact with the local KPMG auditor.

I mean, what would you like them to do?

This is important to know and talk about - you know for a fact meaning outside of the TTFA? So the implication is that Sancho is lying? Or that he's unhappy with them?

Were these reports done by KPMG or internally?

Offline FF

  • Moderator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 7513
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #130 on: July 15, 2015, 05:36:04 AM »
In a mature society, why should any qualified individual be barred from partaking in national politics and serving his or her country? It is ones constitutional right and some may say even duty to serve.

If these are the measures we have to go through, then making this restriction will not solve anything in T&T. please put some thought into this.
THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES

Offline asylumseeker

  • Moderator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18076
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #131 on: July 15, 2015, 06:44:05 AM »
In a mature society, why should any qualified individual be barred from partaking in national politics and serving his or her country? It is ones constitutional right and some may say even duty to serve.

If these are the measures we have to go through, then making this restriction will not solve anything in T&T. please put some thought into this.


It could be that not holding political office concurrently with holding office at an NSO is reasonable public policy. But, having held political office (and being therefore identified with one party or another) should not preclude subsequent holding of office at an NSO.

In addition, we should consider that in the public interest, it is also desirable to have a broad swathe of representation rather than concentrated representation featuring a familiar parade of recurring personalities. This impacts public discourse and more likely encourages diffused and dispersed viewpoints in the governance matrix.

Offline AB.Trini

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 5624
  • yuh cyar take meh ancestry from meh
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho says no more funding for TTFA...unless.
« Reply #132 on: July 15, 2015, 06:56:16 AM »
One question - Does the MoS have any intention of paying back the government the money received  for the2006 WC? Does the Mos intent to abide by the agreement which was made public that this money was intended to be paid back  on the contingency that the said players received money owing to them form the Special Advior to the TTFF at the time?

Offline AB.Trini

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 5624
  • yuh cyar take meh ancestry from meh
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #133 on: July 15, 2015, 06:59:11 AM »
Okay just read FS and Sams exchange.. So Sancho wants 2008 and 2012 documents... Which is reasonable.. 5 years of docs normally give you a good financial picture about the organization..

The halting of the audit can create problems.. Maybe they can seek another firm to audit the books, the question is will TTFA do this?




This also reasonable?
One question - Does the MoS have any intention of paying back the government the money received  for the2006 WC? Does the Mos intent to abide by the agreement which was made public that this money was intended to be paid back  on the contingency that the said players received money owing to them form the Special Advior to the TTFF at the time?

There are no winners at this time- the losers - our football programs and the players.
All this smells of another deflection to steer awayfromthe i competence and lack of directives of this present governance.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2015, 07:02:04 AM by AB.Trini »

Offline Jumbie

  • ~~~ JUMBIE ~~~
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 4269
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #134 on: July 15, 2015, 07:31:50 AM »
Flex, I think the majority of what you ask/suggest falls on part of the Federation.. planning, accountability, being self sufficient, etc  - If we are to believe the ministry, that is what they expect and as a tax paying public, shouldn't we too?

'best case scenario' (for many here) and a new gov't is installed in the fall.. I don't see anything new happening in terms of the federation. There are areas they could be working on improving now and they are not (forget funding). yes $$ may be available, but a PNM govt will require even stricter protocol (PNM will satisfy to the nation that they are accountable)  to get said funding and the federation will not be ready to live by such rules.


I personally have no faith in this federation and it's leader/s. They are too quick to pass the blame and NEVER man the f**k up.

Offline Sando

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2994
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #135 on: July 15, 2015, 07:42:26 AM »
This is an excellent post Flex.

However, I can't see a truce, both men are stubborn old men.

My question is.

1. How much should be the government contribute to football in T&T.

2. And what is the TTFA contributions to football in T&T.

3. What are the TTFA plans to be a little self sufficient? how can they beg for money everyday?

It has been 3 years since Tim Kee came onboard and the TTFA can't get one single sponsor as far as money is concern.

And now the ministry know they need the support and is using it against them.

Politics at its best.


Offline Controversial

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6878
    • View Profile
    • Gino McKoy
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #136 on: July 15, 2015, 08:11:09 AM »
This is an excellent post Flex.

However, I can't see a truce, both men are stubborn old men.

My question is.

1. How much should be the government contribute to football in T&T.

2. And what is the TTFA contributions to football in T&T.

3. What are the TTFA plans to be a little self sufficient? how can they beg for money everyday?

It has been 3 years since Tim Kee came onboard and the TTFA can't get one single sponsor as far as money is concern.

And now the ministry know they need the support and is using it against them.

Politics at its best.



The TTFA are doing themselves no favours by hiding and lying to the MOS. Before they answered to no one, now they have to answer in terms of where the money is spent.

If they can't handle responsibility and don't want to be accountable leave the post and let someone who is willing to work with the government run our football that is neutral.

Offline Controversial

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6878
    • View Profile
    • Gino McKoy
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #137 on: July 15, 2015, 08:12:11 AM »
In a mature society, why should any qualified individual be barred from partaking in national politics and serving his or her country? It is ones constitutional right and some may say even duty to serve.

If these are the measures we have to go through, then making this restriction will not solve anything in T&T. please put some thought into this.


It could be that not holding political office concurrently with holding office at an NSO is reasonable public policy. But, having held political office (and being therefore identified with one party or another) should not preclude subsequent holding of office at an NSO.

In addition, we should consider that in the public interest, it is also desirable to have a broad swathe of representation rather than concentrated representation featuring a familiar parade of recurring personalities. This impacts public discourse and more likely encourages diffused and dispersed viewpoints in the governance matrix.

 :beermug:

Offline Tiresais

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2818
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #138 on: July 15, 2015, 08:23:29 AM »
In a mature society, why should any qualified individual be barred from partaking in national politics and serving his or her country? It is ones constitutional right and some may say even duty to serve.

If these are the measures we have to go through, then making this restriction will not solve anything in T&T. please put some thought into this.

They're not - they may happily vote, but it's not an unreasonable request of a body who regularly deal with ever-changing governments and whose governing body requires political neutrality to require its executives to be politically neutral. In fact, this requirement is fairly common in some industries (esp. charities) in the UK - you can't be mixing politics with entities who rely extensively on a democratically elected government's funding.

Offline Controversial

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6878
    • View Profile
    • Gino McKoy
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #139 on: July 15, 2015, 09:01:03 AM »
In a mature society, why should any qualified individual be barred from partaking in national politics and serving his or her country? It is ones constitutional right and some may say even duty to serve.

If these are the measures we have to go through, then making this restriction will not solve anything in T&T. please put some thought into this.

They're not - they may happily vote, but it's not an unreasonable request of a body who regularly deal with ever-changing governments and whose governing body requires political neutrality to require its executives to be politically neutral. In fact, this requirement is fairly common in some industries (esp. charities) in the UK - you can't be mixing politics with entities who rely extensively on a democratically elected government's funding.

 :beermug:

Offline AB.Trini

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 5624
  • yuh cyar take meh ancestry from meh
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #140 on: July 15, 2015, 06:22:52 PM »
In a mature society, why should any qualified individual be barred from partaking in national politics and serving his or her country? It is ones constitutional right and some may say even duty to serve.

If these are the measures we have to go through, then making this restriction will not solve anything in T&T. please put some thought into this.


True- each and every individual has that democratic right to partake in politics of his/ her choice.  Does a mature intelligent individual who is guided my ethical and moral principles join in with politics which appear to be composed of incompetent ministers , ministers involved in unethical and immoral actions, a government masked with allegations of corruption and ministries in disarray?
In my opinion I dontthonk that the condemnation is one of the individual but rather of the individual's choice of political affinity given the climate surrounding that governance- but at the end of the day the individual still has the pregorative to chose as he/ she wish.

Offline royal

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 3493
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #141 on: July 15, 2015, 10:00:20 PM »
it got to be extremely difficult to audit books that Jack cook.Yuh need some forensics

Offline Deeks

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18649
    • View Profile
Re: Sancho vs Tim Kee, who is really the winners and losers here?
« Reply #142 on: July 15, 2015, 10:20:24 PM »
it got to be extremely difficult to audit books that Jack cook.Yuh need some forensics

forensics?!! you mean phensics!!

Offline Flex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18066
  • A Trini 4 Real.
    • View Profile
    • Soca Warriors Online
Re: Sancho says no more funding for TTFA...unless.
« Reply #143 on: July 17, 2015, 06:00:34 PM »
I know for a fact that the TTFA has given the ministry reports from 2008-2011.

The ramifications coming from the FIFA arrests in May and KPMG being the auditors of FIFA has been halted. However, I know that the TTFA correspondence has been sent to KPMG on several occasions and they remain in contact with the local KPMG auditor.

I mean, what would you like them to do?

This is important to know and talk about - you know for a fact meaning outside of the TTFA? So the implication is that Sancho is lying? Or that he's unhappy with them?

Were these reports done by KPMG or internally?

I think FS is checking on the matter. But yes, the TTFA did send them reports from such dates.

« Last Edit: July 17, 2015, 06:05:21 PM by Flex »
The real measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.

Offline Flex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18066
  • A Trini 4 Real.
    • View Profile
    • Soca Warriors Online
Captain Jones calls for unity between TTFA and Sport Minister.
« Reply #144 on: July 21, 2015, 01:56:26 AM »
Captain Jones calls for unity between TTFA and Sport Minister.
By Ian Prescott (Express).


Get serious

SOCA WARRIORS captain Kenwyne Jones is urging the Trinidad and Tobago Football Association (TTFA) and current Sport Minister Brent Sancho to end hostilities in the interest of football.

Both parties have made accusations, while the TTFA has claimed victimisation. Minister Sancho has periodically withheld payment and team funding for various reasons. A week ago, Sancho declared the Sport Ministry would not entertain any further football funding requests unless the TTFA is transparent, and accounts for previous funds.

Prior to becoming Sport Minister recently, Sancho had a long-running fight with the football body, as a prominent member of the 2006 World Cup team which took the governing body to court over playing bonuses.

Jones hinted that once again the team is affected, with the players reported not to have been paid tournament match fees, while the TTFA awaits funding from the Ministry.

“Hopefully things will be sorted out,” Jones said. “It hasn't been sorted yet, but we will see what happens. We can't go forward like this into an entire World Cup campaign basically scraping the barrel.

We have to be well-prepared.”

Following Trinidad and Tobago's run to the quarter-finals of this year's CONCACAF Gold Cup, where they went out 6-5 on spot-kicks to Panama on Sunday, Jones said continued development required both parties to cooperate.

In four Gold Cup matches, T&T were bested by none of their opponents in open play. They beat Guatemala (3-1), Cuba (2-0) and drew with Mexico (4-4) and Panama (1-1). These are some of the same opponents the Soca Warriors will face when they enter the fourth (semi-final) round of CONCACAF qualifying for the 2018 World Cup in November.

Already through to the fourth round of World Cup qualifying are five 2015 Gold Cup quarter-finalists: Costa Rica, Mexico, United States, Panama and Trinidad and Tobago, along with Honduras. Caribbean champions Jamaica and other teams are still trying to make it to the 12-team semi-final round.

The draw for the fourth round will be held on July, 25, at the Konstantinovsky Palace in Strelna, St Petersburg, Russia. Teams will be drawn into three four-team, home-and-away round-robin groups with games taking place between November 2015 and September 2016.

“The prospect for this team can be good depending on which of the relative bodies decide to sort themselves out and help us with a good preparation,” Jones said. “Once the funding is right we will do okay.

“If that doesn't happen, we will just be trying to make miracles happen with the two loaves and the five fishes,” he added.

Captain defends players.

“These players, they didn't rob anybody, they just missed a penalty kick,” declared Trinidad and Tobago captain Kenwyne Jones, following Trinidad and Tobago's 6-5 penalty kicks defeat to Panama at the quarter-final stage of the 2015 CONCACAFGold Cup.

A hundred and twenty minutes earlier, the teams were deadlocked at 1-1 before Daneil Cyrus, Sheldon Bateau and Joevin Jones—all of whom will still only be just 24 years old in two weeks—missed from the spot. It took the Soca Warriors almost an hour after the Panamanians, to emerge from the dressing room following the defeat. Defender Sheldon Bateau had a particularly pained look on his face, long after his unfortunate miss.

“These are young players,” Jones continued, explaining that the country should not beat them up for their mistakes. “It's a lot of new players, so hopefully it will make them stronger in the future,” he said.

Jones, who scored from open play and spot kicks against Panama, also missed a penalty when the Soca Warriors lost the 2014 Caribbean Cup final 4-3 on spot kicks to Jamaica.

“It's ironic,” Jones added. “We lost the Caribbean Cup on penalties, and we also went out here on penalties.”

The real measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.

Offline Flex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18066
  • A Trini 4 Real.
    • View Profile
    • Soca Warriors Online
Re: Captain Jones calls for unity between TTFA and Sport Minister.
« Reply #145 on: July 21, 2015, 02:07:41 AM »
Sancho replaces Griffith

Persad-Bissessar also last night announced that Sport Minister Brent Sancho had been given the nod for the Toco/Sangre Grande seat, replacing Dr Rupert Griffith.

Apart from Sancho, she said Dr David Lee had also got the screening committee’s nod to replace Errol McLeod in Pointe-a-Pierre while Fuad Khan (Barataria/San Juan), Dr Suruj Rambachan (Tabaquite), Vasant Bharath (St Joseph) will get the chance to recontest their seat.

The real measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.

Offline Flex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18066
  • A Trini 4 Real.
    • View Profile
    • Soca Warriors Online
Re: Captain Jones calls for unity between TTFA and Sport Minister.
« Reply #146 on: July 21, 2015, 02:10:44 AM »
Sancho hails coach Hart, Soca Warriors effort
By JOEL BAILEY (Newsday).


BRENT SANCHO, ex-Trinidad and Tobago football team defender and current Minister of Sport, is pleased with the efforts shown by the current national squad at the CONCACAF Gold Cup in the United States.

The Stephen Hart-coached team lost 6-5, via kicks from the penalty spot, against Panama on Sunday evening, in their quarter-final match at New Jersey, United States. The scoreline was 1-1 at the end of regulation and extra times, but the Panama team held their nerves in the shootout.

“It’s a heartbreaking loss for us,” said Sancho, during a telephone interview yesterday. “Once you get to that stage of the game, when you go to penalty kicks, it was a lottery.

“All in all, I think coach Hart and the players will be very proud of their performances. They’ve done extremely well in terms of the performances that they put forward.”

Commenting on the on-field display against Panama, as a former national player, the 37-year-old Sancho stated, “going into the game, I read comments that coach Hart was willing to possess the ball a little more, and we fell short in that department.

“Although we played very well in the early games, for some reason against Panama, we didn’t seem to possess the ball as well as we had before,” he continued. “I don’t think the midfielders played as well as they had during the tournament. Because of that, we found ourselves in a position where we were chasing the Panamanians around the pitch.

“Once it got to extra time, we looked a (less fitter) team. But, then again, we’ve put in so many remarkable performances during the course of the tournament, to have us slip up at that point was a bit unfortunate. It’s nothing for them to drop their heads for.”

Sancho added, “We’ve done exceedingly well and I think going forward, I’d love to see coach Hart have a discussion with the (Trinidad and Tobago) Football Association, where they do give him the type of practice games and the type of backing that he deserves, so he can prepare the team for the World Cup.”

The national team, known as the Soca Warriors, were blighted by funding issues before the Gold Cup, particularly payment to the members of the technical staff.

Sancho pointed out, “the undertaking that the Government has taken in terms of making sure that the staff was and has been paid, and also the players, has absolutely nothing to do with the Ministry at all. In fact, we’ve paid everything that we’ve supposed to pay.

“Whatever we haven’t paid is in the process of being paid,” he added. “So they were, up until November of last year, basically guaranteed a salary. So I believe we made them very comfortable, in terms of the monies used for making sure that their preparations for the Gold Cup were there. In terms of the actual preparations, I think that’s a matter for the Football Association to answer.”

The Sports Minister went on to say, “taking my Ministerial hat off for a second, I did think it was not necessarily a good idea spending a lot of the budgeted money, or the ‘sent money’ from Cabinet to go all the way to Jordan to play a game. I think it could have been better used. I’m not the one who decides who we play or who we don’t play.”

The national team will now turn their attention towards the start of the CONCACAF qualification stage, for the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia.

But Sancho emphasised that the TTFA will have to be more serious in their dealings with the Ministry, in terms of accountability.

“I’ll make it abundantly clear whatever (issue) between myself and the president of the Football Association is between myself and him. It has nothing to do with the players,” he stressed. “We continue to pay the players’ salary. We still continue to pay directly to the players and directly to the coaching staff.

“What we’re asking for is transparency and accountability with the Football Association. I find it a bit confusing and even disrespectful to know that they can make a statement as such, knowing fully well that this Government and this Ministry has fully supported, financially, all of their endeavours.”

The real measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.

Offline Deeks

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18649
    • View Profile
Re: Captain Jones calls for unity between TTFA and Sport Minister.
« Reply #147 on: July 21, 2015, 02:34:19 AM »
Unfortunately KJ, this unity thing is not going to happen. So it is up to the players to decide to either walk, play for your clubs only,  or accept the status quo until after the elections.

Offline Sando prince

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 9192
    • View Profile
Re: Captain Jones calls for unity between TTFA and Sport Minister.
« Reply #148 on: July 21, 2015, 05:45:08 AM »

KJ should understand Sancho will not be Sports Minister after Sep 7th

Offline Socapro

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *
  • Posts: 14531
  • Ras Shorty-I, Father of Soca, Chutney-Soca & Jamoo
    • View Profile
Re: Captain Jones calls for unity between TTFA and Sport Minister.
« Reply #149 on: July 21, 2015, 05:56:40 AM »

KJ should understand Sancho will not be Sports Minister after Sep 7th

Don't be so sure!
With the amount of folks from India, Guyana and elsewhere that the PP government have been regularising for the past year and giving housing to in the marginals seats, I won't be surprised if the PP government is able to steal the elections despite their massive unpopularity with real Trinbagonians who genuinely care about the country's future.
Trinidadians who want to get rid of the corrupt PP government need to ensure that they are all registered to vote and that all is in order with their names being on the EBC electorial list by this Thursday 23rd July latest.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2015, 06:00:21 AM by Socapro »
De higher a monkey climbs is de less his ass is on de line, if he works for FIFA that is! ;-)

 

1]; } ?>