0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Definitely looking forward to seeing how Hart employs this system and what group he puts on the field. With regards to your lineup. I definitely like the backline, not sure about the midfield and I don't know enough about Plaza and Glenn to really comment on the forward line.
Hart has used Winchester on the wing, and I believe Glenn is probably a replacement for Jones. Also I'm not sure that playing Peltier in the midfield provides enough protection for the defence. Cato gets the pick over Peltier based on form, and late arrival. This is how I think we will line up.JanJoevinBateauMarshallCyrusHylandGuerraBoucardWinchesterJonesCato
i think both of you mixed up guerra and boucaud positions :0
4-4-2 ==> 4-3-3 ==>4-5-1
Quote from: maxg on July 04, 2015, 09:08:47 AM4-4-2 ==> 4-3-3 ==>4-5-1I once heard a commentator say "Good Teams play 4-3-3 while bad teams play 4-5-1" with both basically being the same formation. Just a matter how effective and disciplined the team can be
Quote from: Cowen on July 04, 2015, 11:19:38 AMQuote from: maxg on July 04, 2015, 09:08:47 AM4-4-2 ==> 4-3-3 ==>4-5-1I once heard a commentator say "Good Teams play 4-3-3 while bad teams play 4-5-1" with both basically being the same formation. Just a matter how effective and disciplined the team can beI suppose the question that arises is: is there only one way of playing 4-3-3?Also, given the diagrammatic limitations of the lineup graphics ... some contributors (neither of you) seem to be gehhin tied up regarding the width implications of the 4-3-3. The graphic shows the front 3 and the middle 3 lined up symmetrically behind each other. Is that reality? So I ask ... where do contributors expect the width to be reflected?I started this post with the intention of more specifically addressing elements of what maxg and Cowen contributed, but then I decided it might be more helpful to start where I did. Leh we see.