I have no problem with the woman's coach receiving a high salary but why isn't that afforded to the men's coach in a qualifying year?
The dictator chose SANTHIEF at supposedly a bargain basement price, bawling no money which I know is a lie because he hasn't revealed how much allocation he has received from the govt for 2017. He did that because he is making his bribe and match fixing money to throw/sabotage games...
If he really didn't sell out he would have allocated more money to our men's team to retain Hart or would have replaced him with a top notch coach who they can more than afford.
This should tell you that he has ulterior motives to sabotage our chances. It's the logical explanation when examining the differences in salary and timing of his decisions.. if they are smart enough to select morace, they know what is good for our football, they are doing things deliberately to sabotage our chances.
As I said it is a culmination of factors involved here... morace is getting paid twice the amount and our men's team is in a qualifying year, the dictator refuses to spend the money he has and opts to not get the best available option, all translates to sabotage by him and his minions..
But why sabotage the team when greater money can be made? Well it's easy, he has sold out and a part of his deal is to sabotage the team and match fixing is a part of that... it's the only logical explanation to their behaviour..