Yes, but the "what" is what is in question. Perception gap. Overblown situation in terms of perception.
I interpret your comments to mean that you are in agreement with Cruyff. I guess that you both are in a better position to judge having surely seen the young GG play. I have not, so until I do, I have to take your word that his is an "overblown situation in terms of perception". Thank you.
The crux of the matter is that a quid pro quo is not absent.
To correlate the non-existence/existence of a quid pro quo with the quality of the player is a distractor. Yuh could have a quid pro quo involving a decent player and have one for a mediocre player and have one for an average player. That's not my focus.
I've been on the ground in Coleraine. I don't have a blinkered view about this. Nor am I interested in having the wool pulled over my eyes or the footballing public's.
In this narrative, Fenwick himself has embellished reality and not for the first time.
I'm more interested in the process than the substantive outcome.
In other words, I am neither hating nor favoring. But we have to keep it real.
And I'm speaking for me, not Cruyff. Don't conflate our posts.
The crux of the matter is that a quid pro quo is not absent.
To correlate the non-existence/existence of a quid pro quo with the quality of the player is a distractor. Yuh could have a quid pro quo involving a decent player and have one for a mediocre player and have one for an average player. That's not my focus.
I've been on the ground in Coleraine. I don't have a blinkered view about this. Nor am I interested in having the wool pulled over my eyes or the footballing public's.
In this narrative, Fenwick himself has embellished reality and not for the first time.
I'm more interested in the process than the substantive outcome.
In other words, I am neither hating nor favoring. But we have to keep it real.
And I'm speaking for me, not Cruyff. Don't conflate our posts.
[/quote]
Mind expanding on this one Asylum?
stuff on you seeing
The crux of the matter is that a quid pro quo is not absent.
To correlate the non-existence/existence of a quid pro quo with the quality of the player is a distractor. Yuh could have a quid pro quo involving a decent player and have one for a mediocre player and have one for an average player. That's not my focus.
I've been on the ground in Coleraine. I don't have a blinkered view about this. Nor am I interested in having the wool pulled over my eyes or the footballing public's.
In this narrative, Fenwick himself has embellished reality and not for the first time.
I'm more interested in the process than the substantive outcome.
In other words, I am neither hating nor favoring. But we have to keep it real.
And I'm speaking for me, not Cruyff. Don't conflate our posts.
[/quote]
Curious on this one
You been at Corelaine and said TF embellishing
Cause eveybody wondering bout his statements how they're teh youngest to make a CL squad but a lil quick research and you can't find them youths on any game squads or team roster?
Thought it was just an academy and not the pro setup
Baffled how media havent really asked for more in-depth explanation on this from TF himself.