FIFA SAYS "THAT IS NOT ALLOWED". LAW-12 Fouls and misconduct!

[Trini Simply Better]

T&T played great football today and deserved the win with not doubts at all.  But apart from that the ref made many poor decisions including that goal which he disallowed.  The ball was out of the keepers hands.  It does not have to hit the ground before it has to be considered in play. 

Even if it was allowed, Bahrain did not desreve to win this one.  Hats off to T&T and hope to see you glowing in Germany 2006

[bill]

T&T played great football today and deserved the win with not doubts at all.  But apart from that the ref made many poor decisions including that goal which he disallowed.  The ball was out of the keepers hands.  It does not have to hit the ground before it has to be considered in play. 

As you seem to be kinna dense... the ball is considered as if it is in the keeper's hands until the keeper kicks it... READ CAREFULLY. Disallowing the goal was correct. You loss fair and square!

As a goalkeeper releases the ball to kick it into play, an opponent
intercepts it before it touches the ground. Is this permitted?
No. It is an offence to prevent a goalkeeper releasing the ball from his
hands. The releasing of the ball from his hands and the kicking of the
ball is considered to be a single action

[CarenageBoy]

Agogo,

I looked at the video. Based on the statement in the FIFA rule "before it touches the ground", that goal cold not be allowed. If nothing else, the referee’s ruling was properly classified as a dangerous play.

[teddy bear]

Leh we en argue nah.We win, we goin Germany and dah is dah. not a time to argue. Jus drink if yuh drinkin.

[CarenageBoy]

I read the rule for myself and will repost here for all to see:

As a goalkeeper releases the ball to kick it into play, an opponent
intercepts it before it touches the ground. Is this permitted?
No. It is an offence to prevent a goalkeeper releasing the ball from his
hands. The releasing of the ball from his hands and the kicking of the
ball is considered to be a single action.  (taken from http://www.fifa.com/en/regulations/regulation/0,3527,3,00.html Questions & Answers link)

Not only was this a dangerous play on the part of the Bahraini, but it was not legal to begin with.

[Rodney]

doh think the repetition matters too much fellas....ah think them Bahraini's go complain about this disallowed goal (no matter how much proof we provide)for at least another 4years and judging by their performance today probably much much longer 

[Babalawo]

thanx Fyzoman, ma father almost cuz out Kelvin Jack for even attempting it in front of de Bahrain man.

[IsMeOui]

just in case any idiots come and try to rain on we parade....

LAW-12 Fouls and misconduct.

19. As the goalkeeper releases the ball to kick it into play, an opponent intercepts it before it touches the  ground. IS THIS PERMITTED???

NO!!!!!! IT is an offence to prevent a goalkeeper releasing the ball from his hands. THE RELEASING OF THE BALL FROM HIS HANDS AND THE KICKING OF THE BALL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A SINGLE ACTION.

NUFF SAID.

Let there be partying in the streets of TnT and anywhere in the world whey yuh have a Trinbagonian livin. Bless!

I go party by mihself...I eh care...Is I alone here in dis part of North Dakota...bless

Well yuh have only yuhself to blame .. who in dey rite mine wuld go to N. Dakota    Jess kiddin' ya. 

Again, congrats to de team!

[Ponnoxx]

http://www.ussoccer.com/referees/fullstory.sps?iNewsid=268240


more proof that the goal should not be allowed

[dcs]

http://www.ussoccer.com/referees/fullstory.sps?iNewsid=268240


more proof that the goal should not be allowed

Good find.  That is the clearest explanation I see and I cah see how anybody could argue it.

[StoreBayLimer]

As a goalkeeper releases the ball to kick it into play, an opponent
intercepts it before it touches the ground. Is this permitted?
No. It is an offence to prevent a goalkeeper releasing the ball from his
hands. The releasing of the ball from his hands and the kicking of the
ball is considered to be a single action.  (taken from http://www.fifa.com/en/regulations/regulation/0,3527,3,00.html Questions & Answers link)

Thanks to all for pointing this out.  I thought that that was the rule, but when I heard t he announcer on FOx sports carrying on, I started to doubt myself.  Thanks again.

[arrow]

i eh go lie but Fifa Rule or no Fifa Rule Kelvin Jack did REAL SHIT by trying to dump out that ball so close to the Bahrain fella in the 90th minute.  Suppose the ref had turn away from the play or misinterpreted the Fifa rule like we saw in Uzbekistan.  All I can say is he real lucky the ref made the correct call in such a hostile environment because that could have been a million times worse than "de sun were in my eyes".  After all we've been through de man real tempt fate there yes.  But he more than made up for it with that brilliant save at the end so alls well that ends well.  BIG UP JACK!

[Peong]

Jack get top billing on FSC's "Saves of the week".

de man do real shit wit dat striker dere fuh true.

[dumpalewie]

T&T played great football today and deserved the win with not doubts at all.  But apart from that the ref made many poor decisions including that goal which he disallowed.  The ball was out of the keepers hands.  It does not have to hit the ground before it has to be considered in play. 

Even if it was allowed, Bahrain did not desreve to win this one.  Hats off to T&T and hope to see you glowing in Germany 2006

Obviously you didn't read anything in this thread before posting. It was the right call by the ref.

Anyways.

Hush yuh ass!

[Clarke]

I done explain to dem Bahrain people dat the keeper is considered to be in posession of the ball even as the ball is in the air.

Yuh doh know yuh rules go to school.

Lata and feteing until de weekend start.
Richard G.

Fete till the weekend start? Hello we fetein till we play we first Game in the world cup.