April 28, 2024, 11:53:45 AM

Author Topic: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.  (Read 5051 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 18066
  • A Trini 4 Real.
    • View Profile
    • Soca Warriors Online
Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« on: November 18, 2005, 05:58:36 AM »
Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
By: Jim Allen, National Instructor Staff.


This article is designed to help make referees and players aware of what constitutes goalkeeper possession and what opponents may and may not do when the goalkeeper has possession.

What Does "Possession” Mean?
While the ball is in the possession of the goalkeeper, it cannot be played by an opponent. Any attempt to do so may be punished by a direct free kick.  "In the possession of the goalkeeper" is defined as the goalkeeper having the ball trapped between one hand and a surface (which may include the other hand, the ground, a goalpost, or the keeper's own body).  International Board Decision Two of Law 12 emphasizes that the hand includes any part of the hand or arm.  However, as stated in the Advice to Referees on the Laws of the Game (Advice 12.16 and 12.17), the goalkeeper is also considered to be in possession of the ball while bouncing it on the ground or while throwing it into the air.  Possession is given up if, while throwing the ball into the air, it is allowed to strike the ground.

Once the goalkeeper has gained possession (also known as "control") of the ball, an opponent may not interfere with or block the goalkeeper's distribution of the ball.  For example, players have a right to maintain a position achieved during the normal course of play, but they may not try to block the goalkeeper's movement while he or she is holding the ball and trying to distribute it.  Nor may opposing players do anything to hinder, interfere with, or block a goalkeeper who is throwing or punting the ball back into play.  The goalkeeper has already gained possession and is granted up to six seconds to release the ball back into play by other players.  A goalkeeper in the act of distributing the ball may not be challenged under these circumstances.  (This includes trying to head a ball out of the goalkeeper's open hand or playing a ball being bounced or tossed into the air by the goalkeeper.)  An opponent does not violate the Law, however, if that player takes advantage of a ball clearly released by the goalkeeper directly to him or her, in his or her direction, or deflecting off him or her nonviolently.

When is Possession Lost?
The critical question is when the goalkeeper has released the ball into play and thus has allowed the ball to be played by an opponent.  Based on traditional interpretations of this issue and the International Board's Questions and Answers, the referee should consider the ball as having been released into play after leaving the goalkeeper's hands only if the goalkeeper has completed a throw or kick (punt) and the goalkeeper is not able directly to possess the ball again in his or her hands.  Thus, the ball is not playable by an opponent during the entire time it is being held by the goalkeeper (including when the ball is being bounced on the ground) or during the entire process of being released into play (including the action of throwing or kicking/punting the ball).  In short, opponents may play the ball only if the goalkeeper has clearly distributed the ball by kicking or throwing it.

"Parrying" Versus "Saving"
The concept of "parrying" is still in the Law; however, parrying is no longer seen at the higher levels of play, because it is no longer an effective tool for the goalkeeper, who has only six seconds to distribute the ball after achieving possession.  "Parrying" should not be confused with making a "save."  "Parrying" occurs when the goalkeeper controls the ball with the hands by pushing it to an area where it can be played later. By parrying the ball, the goalkeeper has done two things simultaneously:  (1) established control and (2) given up possession.  The ball is now free for all to play and the goalkeeper may not play it again with the hands. Referees must watch carefully to see that the goalkeeper does not use a parry (disguised as a “save”) in an attempt to hide the fact that he or she has established possession.

When the Goalkeeper Releases the Ball
Since the overhaul of the Laws in 1997, other players may not attempt to play the ball while the goalkeeper has possession of the ball or is attempting to release the ball so that others may play it.  Attempting to do so with the foot is punished as either kicking or attempting to kick.  The goalkeeper gives up possession if, while throwing the ball into the air, he allows it to strike the ground. The goalkeeper also gives up possession by clearly releasing it for general play.  It is playable in such a case as soon as it hits the ground.  (NOTE:  The released ball must hit the ground to be playable. If the goalkeeper is punting the ball, the opponent may not interfere or attempt to play the ball.) Any attempt to kick the ball while it is in the possession of the 'keeper may be punished by a direct free kick (and may be subject to caution or send-off, depending on the circumstances).

If the goalkeeper has control—but not full possession—by means other than the hands (e.g., dribbling with the feet or holding the ball against the ground with his body or feet), an opponent may challenge the goalkeeper in any permissible way.  As there are very few permissible ways to play a ball trapped by the goalkeeper's body or legs, the goalkeeper must either release the ball immediately or rise and play the ball immediately.  Failure to do so could result in the awarding of an indirect free kick against the goalkeeper for playing dangerously, and, if this illegal control persists, possibly a caution and yellow card for unsporting behavior.

Why Are These Provisions Important?
These provisions are important because the IFAB wants the ball to be playable as much and for as long as possible.  Anything that reduces legal challenges for the ball must be strictly limited.  That is why there are rules against the goalkeeper establishing second possession (also known as second touch) or handling a ball that has been deliberately kicked to him or her by a teammate, handling on a throw-in from a teammate, and even the basic limitation of six seconds. They are all designed to keep to a minimum the time an opponent may not challenge for the ball.

What the Referee Looks For
The referee's perception of goalkeeper possession should be tempered by the players’ skill level.  At very young ages, possession of the ball should be defined broadly to include having a hand on the ball, other than purely incidental contact.  Once the goalkeeper is in possession of the ball, opponents must stop challenging or attempting to play the ball. Any attempt to kick, head, knee, or otherwise play the ball in the goalkeeper's possession must be considered as an action directed at the goalkeeper and therefore should be considered as a direct free kick offense.  If contact is made, the referee might consider that the kicking player committed serious foul play and might then send off the player and show the red card.

Source.
www.ussoccer.com
« Last Edit: November 18, 2005, 06:02:32 AM by Flex »
The real measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.

Offline bill

  • Full Warrior
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • View Profile
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2005, 06:13:41 AM »

Offline Sando

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2994
    • View Profile
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2005, 06:39:18 AM »
Uummm.... Interesting.....

Offline kaliman2006

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2367
    • View Profile
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2005, 06:59:05 AM »
Thanks for the info. The example with Henry and Best (thanks Bill, great research!) should also put to rest all doubts. The only way FIFA can rule in Bahrain's favor would be to totally disregard their own law and I am sure this would not happen. In fact, I'm sure the law book was the first document they consulted upon review of the disputed goal.

Offline arrow

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 3040
    • View Profile
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2005, 02:20:13 AM »
Since the Fifa rules on this seems to be so clear here's a hypothetical question to think about:

Suppose the referee had somehow missed the play or got confused with the rule and decided to let the goal stand instead of blowing for the foul.  Then suppose we had ended up losing the match in extra time or penalties.

What would have been Fifa's response to our appeal?  Would they have ordered a replay based on what seems to be a clear violation of the rules (contrary to what the Bahrain people believe)?  And would we have had to replay the entire match over or starting from the 90th minute leading 1-0.  Would the replay be on a neutral ground or back in Bahrain?
Stranger things have happened with referee decisions (e.g. Uzbekistan, Haiti 1974 etc.) so maximum respect to the Columbian referee for making the correct call in a pressure environment.

Offline Redbelt

  • SHIFT_Redline
  • Full Warrior
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
    • PiracyUnlimited.com, Anime & Manga
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2005, 04:54:30 AM »

What would have been Fifa's response to our appeal?  Would they have ordered a replay based on what seems to be a clear violation of the rules (contrary to what the Bahrain people believe)?  And would we have had to replay the entire match over or starting from the 90th minute leading 1-0.  Would the replay be on a neutral ground or back in Bahrain?

no
that would be an error in judgement not error in enforcing rules

example:
a player is tackled in the box:

error in judgment: either a pemelty kick or not

error in enforcing the rules: the ref awards the tackeling team a throw in.

see what I mean?

so had the ref said that was a goal, the best thing a complaint will do is penalties against the ref. thats all.

Offline jr sams

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 707
  • Every time....all de time....true to form
    • View Profile
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2005, 07:00:58 AM »

What would have been Fifa's response to our appeal?  Would they have ordered a replay based on what seems to be a clear violation of the rules (contrary to what the Bahrain people believe)?  And would we have had to replay the entire match over or starting from the 90th minute leading 1-0.  Would the replay be on a neutral ground or back in Bahrain?

no
that would be an error in judgement not error in enforcing rules

example:
a player is tackled in the box:

error in judgment: either a pemelty kick or not

error in enforcing the rules: the ref awards the tackeling team a throw in.

see what I mean?

so had the ref said that was a goal, the best thing a complaint will do is penalties against the ref. thats all.

How is that any different to the nonesense that happened in the game you guys played in Uzbek...you were losing that game 1-0...the ref made a 'technical error' according to FIFA and because of it the entire game had to be replayed, which makes no sense by the way, causing Uzbek to lose out in the end. Bahrain should be the last team to complain because realistically, you should not have made it past Uzbek.
well yes

Offline Redbelt

  • SHIFT_Redline
  • Full Warrior
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
    • PiracyUnlimited.com, Anime & Manga
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2005, 07:24:57 AM »
no one from our side complained about uzbek. they did.
it was replayed because as uzb was shooting a penelty, one of thier players got in the box.
what happens in this case is this:

1-if it was a goal, you shoot again
2- if it was outside, you give a freekick to the defending team.

So japanese ref gave us a  freekick when he should have given them another shot.

thats all.

Offline capodetutticapi

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 10942
  • veni vidi vici
    • View Profile
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2005, 11:52:55 AM »
BAHRAIN LOSE TNT GOIN WORLD CUP..............................................CASE CLOSE.redbelt stop yuh bitchin.be ah man.one day you will stop cryin yuhself to sleep.
soon ah go b ah lean mean bulling machine.

Offline Redbelt

  • SHIFT_Redline
  • Full Warrior
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
    • PiracyUnlimited.com, Anime & Manga
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2005, 10:24:32 AM »
BAHRAIN LOSE TNT GOIN WORLD CUP..............................................CASE CLOSE.redbelt stop yuh bitchin.be ah man.one day you will stop cryin yuhself to sleep.

Do you understand English boy?

Offline skins

  • Barca4ever
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 1666
  • orginally from san do
    • View Profile
Re: Playing the Ball in the Goalkeeper's Possession.
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2005, 10:35:48 AM »
Just to let you all know the game against Bahrain and Uzbek which resulted in a 1-0 victoty for Uzbeks, it was Uzbeks that complained first. They said they should be given a 3-0 victory for the referre techinical error which i find was stupid. Bahrain appealed after Uzbeks appealed and since Fifa can't give a 3-0 victory to a team when they scored one, they decided to play over the match. Uzbeks felt they were shrewed because the ref made a mistake but Uzbeks accpeted the replay because they figured they could beah Bahrain by more than one goal if the match was replayed. They screwed themselves because they took Bahrain for granted and the game ended 1-1 in the replay match

Offline vb

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *
  • Posts: 8281
    • View Profile
    • http://www.caribsport01.homestead.com/caribsport.html
why de goal get disallowed again??
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2005, 02:11:53 PM »
I hear the Commentators say the keeper had he leg up.

But from what I saw the ball was released and I eh see no leg up.

Pardon my ignorance and just tell me. :(

VB
VITAMIN V...KEEPS THE LADIES HEALTHY...:-)

Offline morvant

  • warrior nation member
  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 5429
  • malick till i die
    • View Profile
Re: why de goal get disallowed again??
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2005, 02:12:52 PM »
yuh talkin bout de bahrain goal??
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"

Offline Disgruntled_Trini

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 4053
    • View Profile
Re: why de goal get disallowed again??
« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2005, 02:16:42 PM »
it have ah lil search button on top the page

yuh could do one and get the answer easy easy without starting ah new thread


Ms que un club.

Offline vb

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Warrior
  • *
  • Posts: 8281
    • View Profile
    • http://www.caribsport01.homestead.com/caribsport.html
Re: why de goal get disallowed again??
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2005, 02:24:32 PM »
de amount shit that was spoken about the Bah. game..it would be much easier to just answer here.

The effort u spent giving me that advice cold just as easilly have been used to answer me.

VB
VITAMIN V...KEEPS THE LADIES HEALTHY...:-)

Offline futbolfan

  • Hero Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 1703
    • View Profile
Re: why de goal get disallowed again??
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2005, 02:30:08 PM »
de amount shit that was spoken about the Bah. game..it would be much easier to just answer here.

The effort u spent giving me that advice cold just as easilly have been used to answer me.

VB
VB as ah long time poster ah go give yuh ah bligh... :beermug: :beermug: :beermug: :beermug:
laterzzzz


LAW-12 Fouls and misconduct.

19. As the goalkeeper releases the ball to kick it into play, an opponent intercepts it before it touches the  ground. IS THIS PERMITTED?Huh??

NO!!!!!! IT is an offence to prevent a goalkeeper releasing the ball from his hands. THE RELEASING OF THE BALL FROM HIS HANDS AND THE KICKING OF THE BALL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A SINGLE ACTION.


The darkest hour is just before the dawn.

 

1]; } ?>