So let me get this straight, Kompany was suppose to take out Nani with the break foot tackle in order to get a red card? I have to disagree, that was a shit tackle, regardless if he got the ball or not, Nani did well to hurdle over the tackle, so it did not look as bad, but what if he did connect with both ball and the man's ankle? The ref made that decision based on the rules of the game when it comes to tackling, I saw no favoritism there.
Surprise surprise lol
Did I say something wrong? I'm not trying to start an argument, I asked a logical question. I understand alot of you don't like Man.United, but for all of you to defend that tackle is just ridiculous. I saw Evans make a tackle like that some time back, and I cursed that ass, he even got a red card for it. So I'm not siding with Man.United cause I support them, I'm doing it because it was not a proper tackle and it deserved either a yellow or red card, in this case, the ref gave a red, which it suppose to be, cause it was a dangerous tackle.